Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Victor J. Pizzitola is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Victor J. Pizzitola.


American Journal of Surgery | 2014

Validation study of a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge.

Awais Ashfaq; Derek Senior; Barbara A. Pockaj; Nabil Wasif; Victor J. Pizzitola; Marina E. Giurescu; Richard J. Gray

BACKGROUND Nipple discharge occurs in 2% to 5% of women. We evaluated the effectiveness of a previously proposed treatment algorithm for these patients. METHODS Patients with pathologic nipple discharge and a negative mammogram and subareolar ultrasound were offered follow-up from 2005 to 2011 according to the algorithm. RESULTS A total of 192 patients, mean age 56 years, were studied. Risk of carcinoma among the entire cohort was 5%. Breast surgeon was consulted for 142 (74%) patients: 48 (34%) underwent initial subareolar excision and 94 (66%) were clinically followed. The rate of carcinoma was 17% (8/48) after initial subareolar excision, 0% (0/13) for those without imaging abnormalities, 23% (8/35) with imaging abnormalities, and 1% (1/94) with clinical follow-up. Of patients who underwent follow-up, 21% (n = 20) underwent subareolar excision because of imaging abnormality (n = 1, 1%) or persistent discharge (n = 19, 20%). Most patients had ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5, 56%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with nipple discharge can be prospectively identified based on radiographic findings and clinical examination for safe clinical follow-up. Most will have resolution avoiding a surgical procedure.


Breast Journal | 2017

Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography: A Single-Institution Experience of the First 208 Cases.

Tiffany C. Lewis; Victor J. Pizzitola; Marina E. Giurescu; William G. Eversman; Roxanne Lorans; Kristin A. Robinson; Bhavika K. Patel

Contrast‐enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is the only imaging modality that provides both (a) a high‐resolution, low‐energy image comparable to that of digital mammography and (b) a contrast‐enhanced image similar to that of magnetic resonance imaging. We report the initial 208 CEDM examinations performed for various clinical indications and provide illustrative case examples. Given its success in recent studies and our experience of CEDM primarily as a diagnostic adjunct, CEDM can potentially improve breast cancer detection by combining the low‐cost conclusions of screening mammography with the high sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging.


Clinical Imaging | 2017

Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion

Bhavika K. Patel; Michelle E. Naylor; Heidi E. Kosiorek; Yania M. Lopez-Alvarez; Adrian M. Miller; Victor J. Pizzitola; Barbara A. Pockaj

OBJECTIVE Supplement tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortions (AD) with CESM to better characterize malignant vs benign lesions. METHODS Retrospective review CESM prior to biopsied AD. Pathology: benign, radial scar, or malignant. RESULTS 49 lesions (45 patients). 29 invasive cancers, 1 DCIS (range, 0.4-4.7cm); 9 radial scars; 10 benign. 37 (75.5%) ADs had associated enhancement. PPV 78.4% (29/37), sensitivity 96.7% (29/30); specificity, 57.9% (11/19); NPV, 91.7% (11/12). False-positive rate 21.6% (8/37); false-negative rate, 8.3% (1/12). Accuracy 81.6% (40/49). CONCLUSIONS High sensitivity and NPV of CESM in patients with AD is promising as an adjunct tool in diagnosing malignancy and avoiding unnecessary biopsy, respectively.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2017

The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

Matthew F. Covington; Victor J. Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Barbara A. Pockaj; Donald W. Northfelt; Catherine M. Appleton; Bhavika K. Patel

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to discuss facilitators of and barriers to future implementation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the United States. CONCLUSION CEM provides low-energy 2D mammographic images analogous to digital mammography and contrast-enhanced recombined images that allow assessment of neovascularity similar to that offered by MRI. The utilization of CEM in the United States is currently low but could increase rapidly given the many potential indications for its clinical use.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2018

Initial Experience of Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies of Tomosynthesis-Detected (2D Mammography and Ultrasound Occult) Architectural Distortions

Bhavika K. Patel; Matthew F. Covington; Victor J. Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Marina E. Giurescu; William G. Eversman; John M. Lewin

OBJECTIVE As experience and aptitude in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) have increased, radiologists are seeing more areas of architectural distortion (AD) on DBT images compared with standard 2D mammograms. The purpose of this study is to report our experience using tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABs) for ADs that were occult at 2D mammography and ultrasound and to analyze the positive predictive value for malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 34 DBT-detected ADs that were occult at mammography and ultrasound. RESULTS We found a positive predictive value of 26% (nine malignancies in 34 lesions). Eight of the malignancies were invasive and one was ductal carcinoma in situ. The invasive cancers were grade 1 (4/8; 50%), grade 2 (2/8; 25%), or grade 3 (1/8; 13%); information about one invasive cancer was not available. The mean size of the invasive cancers at pathologic examination was 7.5 mm (range, 6-30 mm). CONCLUSION Tomosynthesis-guided VAB is a feasible method to sample ADs that are occult at 2D mammography and ultrasound. Tomosynthesis-guided VAB is a minimally invasive method that detected a significant number of carcinomas, most of which were grade 1 cancers. Further studies are needed.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2010

Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasive Lobular Cancer: Good, Better, but Maybe not the Best?

Lee J. McGhan; Nabil Wasif; Richard J. Gray; Marina E. Giurescu; Victor J. Pizzitola; Roxanne Lorans; Idris T. Ocal; Chee Chee H Stucky; Barbara A. Pockaj


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2012

Clinical and Self Breast Examination Remain Important in the Era of Modern Screening

Irene Ma; Amylou C. Dueck; Richard J. Gray; Nabil Wasif; Marina E. Giurescu; Roxanne Lorans; Victor J. Pizzitola; Barbara A. Pockaj


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2015

Utilization of Multiple I-125 Radioactive Seeds in the Same Breast is Safe and Feasible: A Multi-institutional Experience.

Zahraa Al-Hilli; Katrina N. Glazebrook; Sarah A. McLaughlin; Danielle M. Chan; Kyle T. Robinson; Jamie G. Giesbrandt; Evelyn L. Slomka; Victor J. Pizzitola; Richard J. Gray; James W. Jakub


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2016

Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Mariam Ali-Mucheru; Barbara A. Pockaj; Bhavika K. Patel; Victor J. Pizzitola; Nabil Wasif; Chee Chee H Stucky; Richard J. Gray


Applied Radiology | 2017

Navigating contrast-enhanced digital mammography

Tiffany C. Lewis; Bhavika K. Patel; Victor J. Pizzitola

Collaboration


Dive into the Victor J. Pizzitola's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge