Victor J. Zannis

Three-year analysis of treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)

This report presents 3 years of data on treatment efficacy, cosmetic results, and toxicities for patients enrolled on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite (Cytyc, Bedford, Mass) Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial.

Initial outcomes for patients treated on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Clinical Trial for ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast

BackgroundThe MammoSite device was designed as a breast brachytherapy applicator and is currently used to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). We hypothesized that APBI delivered with the MammoSite device would be well tolerated and be associated with a good cosmetic outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS).MethodsFrom 2002 to 2004, 191 patients with DCIS were enrolled in a registry trial to assess the MammoSite applicator. Fifteen patients were excluded from analysis because of device- or patient-related factors; 7 patients were excluded after receiving a radiotherapy boost, thus leaving 169 patients available for study. Follow-up information was available for 158 patients. The average length of follow-up was 7.35 months. Forty-three patients had at least 1 year of follow-up.ResultsSkin spacing for the MammoSite applicator was as follows: < 5 mm, 3 patients (1.78%); 5 to 7 mm, 18 patients (10.65%); and ≥7 mm, 148 patients (87.57%). Patients with a device-to-skin distance of ≥7 mm had the best cosmetic result. Patients with a device-to-skin distance of ≥7 mm also had a lower incidence of radiation dermatitis. Data on 43 patients who were followed up for at least 1 year confirmed these findings. Additional adverse events were primarily related to skin changes, with breast infections occurring in five patients (3.16%). No patient in the study has experienced a recurrence.ConclusionsAPBI delivered via MammoSite is well tolerated in patients with DCIS, and the lowest toxicity was obtained in patients with the greatest device-to-skin distance. Long-term follow-up data regarding patient satisfaction, cosmesis, and efficacy are needed and will be determined from a recently opened large randomized study.

Four-year clinical update from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite brachytherapy trial

BACKGROUND We present a 4-year update on the efficacy, cosmetic results, and complications of MammoSite breast brachytherapy in patients enrolled in the American Society of Breast Surgeons registry trial. METHODS A total of 1,449 breasts in 1,440 patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving therapy were treated with adjuvant, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) (34 Gy in 3.4-Gy fractions) delivered with the MammoSite device. The median follow-up period for the entire group was 36.1 months. RESULTS The 3-year actuarial rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 2.15%. The 3-year actuarial rate of axillary recurrence was .36%. Complication rates were as follows: infection, 9.5%; seroma, 26.8% (symptomatic seroma, 12.7%); and fat necrosis, 2.0%. The percentages of breasts with good or excellent cosmetic results were as follows: 12 months, 95%; 24 months, 94%; 36 months, 94%; and 48 months, 91%. CONCLUSIONS Locoregional control, complications, and cosmetic outcomes from MammoSite APBI at the 4-year update are acceptable and similar to results seen with other forms of APBI.

Timing of Chemotherapy After MammoSite Radiation Therapy System Breast Brachytherapy: Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial

PURPOSE To evaluate cosmetic outcome and radiation recall in the American Society of Breast Surgeons registry trial, as a function of the interval between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and initiation of chemotherapy (CTX). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 1440 patients at 97 institutions participated in this trial. After lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer, patients received APBI (34 Gy in 10 fractions) with MammoSite RTS brachytherapy. A total of 148 patients received CTX within 90 days of APBI. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at each follow-up visit and dichotomized as excellent/good or fair/poor. RESULTS Chemotherapy was initiated at a mean of 3.9 weeks after the final MammoSite procedure and was administered </=3 weeks after APBI in 54 patients (36%) and >3 weeks after APBI in 94 patients (64%). The early and delayed groups were well balanced with respect to multiple factors that may impact on cosmetic outcome. There was a superior cosmetic outcome in those receiving chemotherapy >3 weeks after APBI (excellent/good in 72.2% at </=3 weeks vs. excellent/good in 93.8% at >3 weeks; p = 0.01). Radiation recall in those receiving CTX at </=3 weeks was 9 of 50 (18%), compared with 6 of 81(7.4%) in those receiving chemotherapy at >3 weeks (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION The majority of patients receiving CTX after APBI have excellent/good cosmetic outcomes, with a low rate of radiation recall. Chemotherapy initiated >3 weeks after the final MammoSite procedure seems to be associated with a better cosmetic outcome and lower rate of radiation recall. An excellent/good cosmetic outcome in patients receiving CTX after 3 weeks was similar to the cosmetic outcome of the overall patient population who did not receive CTX.

American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Radiation Therapy System Registry Trial: ductal carcinoma-in-situ subset analysis—4-year data in 194 treated lesions

BACKGROUND A subset analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) Registry Trial of patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) was performed to compare results to patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for invasive tumors and to results in patients with DCIS receiving whole breast irradiation. METHODS One hundred ninety-four cases of DCIS were identified from a total of 1,449 cancers treated on the ASBS Registry Trial. Details of the trial are previously published. Analysis of the entire group of cases was performed in regards to toxicity and local control. RESULTS Median age was 62.1 years with 40.1% and 10.9% younger than 60 years and 50 years, respectively. Nuclear grade distribution was 35.6%, 31.4%, 17%, and 16% high, intermediate, low grade, and unknown, respectively. Necrosis was known to be present 42.3% of cases. Comedo/solid architecture was known to be present in 68% of cases. Median tumor size was 8.0 mm (range .1-45 mm, 15.5% unknown). Median margin was 2 mm; 2 cases had positive margins and 56 cases had less than 1-mm margins. The median follow-up time was 46.7 months. Five isolated ipsilateral breast failures occurred. The actuarial isolated ipsilateral breast failure rate was 2.45% at 4 years. The total in-breast 4-year actuarial failure rate was 3.0%. Three of the patients had a failure elsewhere (1.69% 4-year actuarial rate). Three of the failures were true recurrences (1.33% 4-year actuarial rate). Infection occurred in 16 patients for an 8.2% rate. Seroma formation was reported in 31%, with 13% and 12% symptomatic and requiring intervention, respectively. Seroma formation was statistically higher in open versus closed cases for all seromas. Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 90.3% of patients with evaluation at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS The ASBS Registry Trial includes the largest published collection of DCIS treated with APBI. Four-year follow-up shows result similar to those with invasive cancer treated with APBI, as well as DCIS treated with whole breast irradiation.

Local control, toxicity, and cosmesis in women >70 years enrolled in the American Society of Breast Surgeons accelerated partial breast irradiation registry trial

PURPOSE The American Society of Breast Surgeons enrolled women in a registry trial to prospectively study patients treated with the MammoSite Radiation Therapy System breast brachytherapy device. The present report examined the outcomes in women aged >70 years enrolled in the trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 1,449 primary early stage breast cancers were treated in 1,440 women. Of these, 537 occurred in women >70 years old. Fishers exact test was performed to correlate age (≤ 70 vs. >70 years) with toxicity and with cosmesis. The association of age with local recurrence (LR) failure times was investigated by fitting a parametric model. RESULTS Older women were less likely to develop telangiectasias than younger women (7.9% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0083). The incidence of other toxicities was similar. Cosmesis was good or excellent in 92% of the women >70 years old. No significant difference was found in LR as a function of age. The 5-year actuarial LR rate with invasive disease for the older vs. younger population was 2.79% and 2.92%, respectively (p = 0.5780). In women >70 years with hormone-sensitive tumors ≤ 2 cm who received hormonal therapy (n = 195), the 5-year actuarial rate of LR, overall survival, disease-free survival, and cause-specific survival was 2.06%, 89.3%, 87%, and 97.5%, respectively. These outcomes were similar in women who did not receive hormonal therapy. Women with small, estrogen receptor-negative disease had worse LR, overall survival, and disease-free survival compared with receptor-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated partial breast irradiation with the MammoSite radiation therapy system resulted in low toxicity and produced similar cosmesis and local control at 5 years in women >70 years compared with younger women. This treatment should be considered as an alternative to omitting adjuvant radiotherapy for older women with small-volume, early-stage breast cancer.

The Surgeon’s Role in Breast Brachytherapy

Abstract:  Although two‐thirds of invasive breast cancers and half of non‐invasive breast cancers are amenable to lumpectomy, only about 70% of such patients choose breast conservation. Of that group, up to one‐third do not follow‐up with radiation therapy despite it being clinically indicated. The reasons include the patient’s and surgeon’s attitude toward breast conservation as well as the inconvenience and distance of a suitable radiation facility. The advent of shorter courses of radiation therapy may encourage more patients to seek adjuvant therapy. An increasingly popular and more convenient alternative to traditional whole‐breast radiation therapy in patients with early‐stage breast cancer is accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), for which the American Society of Breast Surgeons and the American Brachytherapy Society have promulgated guidelines for candidate selection. Although several methods are emerging, the most widely used brachytherapy technique utilizes the MammoSite single‐catheter balloon brachytherapy device. In a best practices symposium convened in 2006, breast surgeons from academic and community practices with extensive experience in balloon brachytherapy developed general guidelines for integrating APBI into a breast surgical practice. Important considerations include patient age, histology, tumor location and size, and breast size. Thoughtful lumpectomy planning is essential to optimize balloon placement. Real‐time sonographic guidance is essential as the surgeon should attend closely to volume excised and cavity shape. A cavity evaluation device can act as a place holder while patient suitability for APBI is considered. Many breast surgeons expert in this procedure insert the balloon catheter in the office either through a de novo skin entrance site removed from the lumpectomy incision or through the original incision. Optimally, insertion occurs within 2–3 weeks after lumpectomy. Close and continual communication with the radiation oncologist is essential to assure optimal outcomes. In this review, several key aspects of a successful APBI program from a surgeon’s perspective as well as a consensus panel from a best practices symposium on the topic herein are highlighted.

Spacer Balloons prior to Partial Breast Irradiation: Helpful or Hurtful?

Spacer balloons, otherwise known as ‘‘cavity evaluation devices’’ (CEDs), are frequently placed intraoperatively at the time of lumpectomy to facilitate accelerated partial breast irradiation (PBI). CEDs provide a pathway to the excision cavity, preserve cavity shape/volume, and simplify delayed insertion of a single-entry brachytherapy device such as MammoSite, Contura or SAVI. Despite these intentions, significant issues have become apparent with widespread utilization of CEDs:Spacer balloons, otherwise known as ‘‘cavity evaluation devices’’ (CEDs), are frequently placed intraoperatively at the time of lumpectomy to facilitate accelerated partial breast irradiation (PBI). CEDs provide a pathway to the excision cavity, preserve cavity shape/volume, and simplify delayed insertion of a single-entry brachytherapy device such as MammoSite, Contura or SAVI. Despite these intentions, significant issues have become apparent with widespread utilization of CEDs:

Presidential Address: 2010. The American Society of Breast Surgeons. There’s no “Boring” in Breast Surgery!!

Just over 10 years ago, after 18 years of general surgery practice, I had a change of heart—an epiphany, maybe. After 18 years of passion for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies, inguinal herniorraphies, laparoscopic Nissen’s, mastectomies, splenectomies, adrenalectomies, and thyroid and parathyroidectomies, my passion changed for reasons that, I admit, are still not clear to me. All I knew was that the practice of breast surgery was becoming a bigger and bigger part of my professional life, both in my heart and in my head. What were suddenly very interesting to me were things like: