Victor S. Blanchette

Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group

Diagnosis and management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) remain largely dependent on clinical expertise and observations more than on evidence derived from clinical trials of high scientific quality. One major obstacle to the implementation of such studies and in producing reliable meta-analyses of existing data is a lack of consensus on standardized critical definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology. Moreover, the demand for comparative clinical trials has dramatically increased since the introduction of new classes of therapeutic agents, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and innovative treatment modalities, such as anti-CD 20 antibodies. To overcome the present heterogeneity, an International Working Group of recognized expert clinicians convened a 2-day structured meeting (the Vicenza Consensus Conference) to define standard terminology and definitions for primary ITP and its different phases and criteria for the grading of severity, and clinically meaningful outcomes and response. These consensus criteria and definitions could be used by investigational clinical trials or cohort studies. Adoption of these recommendations would serve to improve communication among investigators, to enhance comparability among clinical trials, to facilitate meta-analyses and development of therapeutic guidelines, and to provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies.

International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia

Previously published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) require updating largely due to the introduction of new classes of therapeutic agents, and a greater understanding of the disease pathophysiology. However, treatment-related decisions still remain principally dependent on clinical expertise or patient preference rather than high-quality clinical trial evidence. This consensus document aims to report on new data and provide consensus-based recommendations relating to diagnosis and treatment of ITP in adults, in children, and during pregnancy. The inclusion of summary tables within this document, supported by information tables in the online appendices, is intended to aid in clinical decision making.

Randomised trial of intravenous immunoglobulin G, intravenous anti-D, and oral prednisone in childhood acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura

The most serious complication of childhood acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), intracranial haemorrhage, occurs in about 1% of children with platelet counts below 20 x 10(9)/L. We conducted a randomised study to explore three treatment options in this high-risk group. 146 children (> 6 months and < 18 years old) with typical acute ITP and platelet counts of 20 x 10(9)/L or lower were randomised to receive high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIgG) 1 g/kg on 2 consecutive days (n = 34), 0.8 g/kg once (n = 35), intravenous anti-D 25 micrograms/kg on 2 consecutive days (n = 38), or oral prednisone 4 mg/kg per day with tapering and discontinuation of prednisone by day 21 (n = 39). The rate of response as reflected by the number of days with platelet counts at 20 x 10(9)/L or lower and the time taken to achieve a platelet count 50 x 10(9)/L or more was significantly faster for both IVIgG groups than for the anti-D group (p < 0.05); the difference between prednisone and IVIgG was significant (p < 0.05) only for the IVIgG 0.8 g/kg group, and responses to the two IgG groups were similar. These differences in response rates were reflected in the percentages of children with platelet counts of 20 x 10(9)/L or lower at 72 hours following the start of treatment: 3% (IVIgG 0.8 g/kg x 1), 6% (IVIgG 1 g/kg x 2), 18% (anti-D), and 21% (oral prednisone 4 mg/kg/day). Treatment-associated toxicities included a fall in haemoglobin with anti-D (to less than 100 g/L in 24% of cases); weight gain with oral prednisone; and fever, nausea, vomiting, and headache with IVIgG. On the basis of these results, intravenous anti-D cannot be recommended as initial therapy for children with acute ITP and platelet counts of 20 x 10(9)/L or lower. A single dose of 0.8 g/kg IVIgG offers the fastest recovery for the least treatment; additional IgG or oral prednisone can be reserved for the one-third of children who continue to have platelet counts of 20 x 10(9)/L or less at 48-72 hours after the start of treatment.

Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement

Summary.  Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long‐term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality‐of‐life assessment instruments, and cost‐benefit analyses.

A prospective, randomized trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin G therapy, oral prednisone therapy, and no therapy in childhood acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Fifty-three children, aged 7 months to 14.4 years and with typical acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura and platelet counts < or = 20 10(9)/L, were randomly assigned to receive intravenously administered immune globulin G (IVIG), 1 gm/kg per day for 2 consecutive days (n = 19); orally administered prednisone, starting at a dose of 4 mg/kg per day, with tapering and discontinuation of corticosteroids by day 21 (n = 18); or no therapy (n = 16). Both IVIG and prednisone resulted in significantly fewer days with platelet counts < or = 20 x 10(9)/L in comparison with no therapy (median, 1 and 2 days vs 4 days; corresponding ranges, 1 to 20 and 1 to 11 days vs 1 to 132 days; p < 0.01). Reversal of clinically important thrombocytopenia assessed by the number of days taken to achieve a platelet count of > or = 50 x 10(9)/L was significantly faster in children randomly assigned to receive IVIG (median, 2 days; range, 1 to 34 days) than in those receiving prednisone (median, 4 days; range, 2 to 13 days; p < 0.001) or no therapy (median, 16 days; range, 2 to 132 days; p < 0.001). Because the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in children with acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura is highest in the group with severe thrombocytopenia, and appears to be restricted to children with platelet counts < or = 20 x 10(9)/L, these results support the use of IVIG or high doses of prednisone as initial therapy in children with acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts < or = 20 x 10(9)/L).

Newly diagnosed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in childhood: an observational study

BACKGROUND Diagnosis and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) have been based primarily on expert opinion and practice guidelines rather than on evidence. We have used a registry to prospectively survey the presenting features and the diagnostic evaluation and management practices used for children with ITP worldwide. METHODS We used the Intercontinental Childhood ITP Registry which had been widely advertised. 209 physicians from 136 institutions in 38 countries participated by submitting data for each of their newly diagnosed patients. Data from 2031 children with ITP was registered between June, 1997, and May, 2000, and we analysed 6-month follow-up data from 1496 children. FINDINGS There was a peak in occurrence of childhood ITP during spring and a nadir in the autumn. Mean initial platelet count was 15.4x10(9)/L (SD 19.7). 1447 (73%) of 1976 children were admitted to hospital. Initial management consisted of no drug treatment in 612 (31%), intravenous immunoglobulin in 576 (29%), corticosteroids in 651 (33%), or both in 137 (7%) patients. Intracranial haemorrhage was reported in two patients. INTERPRETATION The variable approaches to management of childhood ITP demonstrate the need for prospective clinical trials, which should be feasible within such a study group.

Tailored prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A: interim results from the first 5 years of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

Summary.  Background: Prophylactic treatment for severe hemophilia A is likely to be more effective than treatment when bleeding occurs, however, prophylaxis is costly. We studied an inception cohort of 25 boys using a tailored prophylaxis approach to see if clotting factor use could be reduced with acceptable outcomes. Methods: Ten Canadian centers enrolled subjects in this 5‐year study. Children were followed every 3 months at a comprehensive care hemophilia clinic. They were initially treated with once‐weekly clotting factor; the frequency was escalated in a stepwise fashion if unacceptable bleeding occurred. Bleeding frequency, target joint development, physiotherapy and radiographic outcomes, as well as resource utilization, were determined prospectively. Results: The median follow‐up time was 4.1 years (total 96.9 person‐years). The median time to escalate to twice‐weekly therapy was 3.42 years (lower 95% confidence limit 2.05 years). Nine subjects developed target joints at a rate of 0.09 per person‐year. There was an average of 1.2 joint bleeds per person‐year. The cohort consumed on average 3656 IU kg−1year−1 of factor (F) VIII. Ten subjects required central venous catheters (three while on study); no complications of these devices were seen. One subject developed a transient FVIII inhibitor. End‐of‐study joint examination scores – both clinically and radiographically – were normal or near‐normal. Conclusions: Most boys with severe hemophilia A will probably have little bleeding and good joint function with tailored prophylaxis, while infusing less FVIII than usually required for traditional prophylaxis.

Break-through bleeding in relation to predicted factor VIII levels in patients receiving prophylactic treatment for severe hemophilia A

Summary.  Background: The role of prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) to decrease hemophilic bleeding and arthropathy is well established. The rationale for this strategy is to convert patients with severe hemophilia A to a moderate clinical phenotype by reducing time spent with a FVIII level <1 IU dL−1. Studies to date, however, have not demonstrated a strong link between FVIII level and the bleeding rate. Objectives: To assess the effect of FVIII level on break‐through bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A on prophylaxis. Patients/methods: This study analysed data from 44 patients aged 1–6 and 99 patients aged 10–65 years with severe hemophilia A (FVIII <1 IU dL−1) who were treated with prophylactic FVIII as part of clinical studies assessing pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a recombinant FVIII (Advate®). Each patient had pharmacokinetic measurements and FVIII infusions recorded, and these were used to calculate time spent with a FVIII below 1, 2 and 5 IU dL−1. Results: The data demonstrate that increasing time with a FVIII below 1 IU dL−1 is associated with increased total bleeds and hemarthroses. Lack of adherence to the intended frequency of FVIII infusion was the most important determinant of low FVIII and increased bleeding. In children aged 1–6 years, the rate of bleeding was also influenced by FVIII half‐life and clearance. Conclusions: These data have important implications for the management of patients with severe hemophilia.

Heparin Therapy in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT: Current guidelines for heparin therapy in pediatric patients have been extrapolated from trials in adult patients without rigorous evaluation of efficacy and safety. We prospectively monitored consecutive pediatric patients receiving systemic doses of heparin over 10 mo at one institution using a predetermined nomogram to monitor maintenance therapy. Sixty-five consecutive children; 38 males and 27 females, received systemic doses of heparin. Thirty children had deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism; 11 had arterial thrombi, most frequently after diagnostic angiography; and the remaining 24 received heparin prophylactically, for congenital heart disease. Twenty-nine (45%) of the 65 patients were less than 1 y of age and 22 (34%) were 10 y or older. Congenital heart disease was the predominant diagnosis under 1 y and deep venous thrombosis in older children. After a bolus dose of 50 U/kg, 39% of children (n = 30) achieved a minimal level activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Sixty-eight percent of children achieved a minimal level APTT by 24 h and 81% by 48 h. For all 65 children, APTT values were within the therapeutic range 43% of the time. APTT values outside the therapeutic range were twice as likely to be low as high. The average amount of heparin required to maintain therapeutic APTT values for children was 22 U/kg/h: 28 U/kg/h for infants <1 y and 20 U/kg/h for the rest. Bleeding was rare (2%) and mild. Documented recurrent thrombotic disease was more common (7%) with associated morbidity. In summary, a commonly used protocol for administration of heparin to children was rigorously evaluated and shown to provide insufficient amounts of heparin in the first days of treatment. Average requirements of heparin per kilogram per hour were determined and will form the bases of future studies.

Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

V. S . BLANCHETTE ,* N . S . KEY ,† L . R . L JUNG,‡ M. J . MANCOJOHNSON,§ H. M. VAN DEN BERG ¶ and A . SR IVASTAVA,** FOR THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON FACTOR VI I I , FACTOR IX AND RARE COAGULAT ION DISORDERS *Pediatric Thrombosis and Hemostasis Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; †Departments of Medicine and Pathology, UNC Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center Chapel Hill, Hill, NC, USA; ‡Department of Paediatrics and Malmo Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Lund University, Skanes Universitetssjukhus, Malmo, Sweden; §Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; ¶Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and **Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India