Victoria Aguilera

Clinical Benefits of Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Hepatitis C Following Liver Transplantation

Pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin eradicates hepatitis C virus (HCV) in one third of liver recipients with recurrent disease. Side effects are frequent and potentially life threatening. Our aim was to define the long‐term benefits of antiviral therapy in recurrent HCV. Eighty‐nine (89) recipients (genotype 1: 86.5%) were treated with IFN (n = 31) or pegIFN (n = 58) plus ribavirin and 75 untreated contemporaneous disease‐matched controls. The major end point was survival from transplantation. Survival, progression to cirrhosis and clinical decompensation since start of therapy were compared between sustained virologic responders (SVRs) and nonresponders (NRs). Results revealed 44 patients died during the follow‐up (20% treated vs. 35% controls; p = 0.05). Patient survival was higher in treated compared to controls (7 years: 74% vs. 62%; p = 0.04). Among treated patients, an SVR was achieved in 37% (IFN 16% vs. peg‐IFN 48%; p = 0.03). About 2/33 SVRs and 16/56 NRs died (p = 0.01) due to HCV‐disease (56%), IFN‐induced rejection (11%), both causes (11%) or others (22%). Five‐year survival was greater in SVRs than in NRs (93% vs. 69%, p = 0.032). In patients without baseline cirrhosis, progression to cirrhosis occurred more frequently in NRs (27/42 vs. 6/16; p = 0.06). The 5‐year risk of graft decompensation was higher in NRs (33% vs. 16%; p = 0.04). Antiviral therapy is associated with improved long‐term outcome in recurrent HCV.

Efficacy, predictors of response, and potential risks associated with antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C†

There are unresolved issues regarding sustained virological response (SVR), tolerance and risk of rejection following antiviral therapy in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of our study was to determine efficacy, rejection risk and factors associated with SVR. HCV‐infected LT patients with at least 6 months of follow‐up following end‐of‐therapy (EOT) received combination therapy of ribavirin (Rbvr) + standard (n=31)/pegIFN (n=36) between 1999 and 2004 (95% genotype 1). An EOT and SVR was obtained in 46% and 33%, respectively. Type of antiviral therapy, use of erythropoietin, compliance, and early virologic response (EVR) were predictive of SVR, but only the latter remained in the multivariate analysis. Premature discontinuation, not impacted by the use of erythropoietin or GCSF, occurred in 40% patients. None of the variables predicted rejection (acute n=2, chronic n=4). A SVR occurred in 3/4 patients with chronic rejection. In conclusion, the efficacy of pegIFN‐Rbvr is similar to the non‐transplant population. An EVR at 3 months is useful to predict lack of response. The type of calcineurin inhibitor and history of prior non‐response to IFN before LT do not influence the outcome of therapy. Severe rejection may lead to graft loss, a complication difficult to predict. Liver Transpl 12:1067–1076, 2006.

Effect of calcineurin inhibitors on survival and histologic disease severity in HCV‐infected liver transplant recipients

The severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is likely related to several factors. Controversial results have been reported regarding the effect of specific calcineurin‐inhibitors. The aim of this research was to determine whether there are differences on posttransplantation outcome in HCV‐infected patients based on initial immunosuppression. Prospective randomized trial comparing tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression in a cohort of patients undergoing primary orthotopic liver transplantation between 2001 and 2003 was used. Yearly biopsies were performed. Patients with at least 1 protocol biopsy and those with very severe recurrence despite a follow‐up of less than 1 yr (cholestatic hepatitis, progression to bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis) were included. Baseline characteristics (demographics, liver function at transplantation, genotype distribution, donor, surgery, immunosuppression except for the type of calcineurin inhibitor) did not differ between the 2 groups. Severe disease (defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, cholestatic hepatitis, and/or death due to recurrent disease in the first year) was present in 27 in 90 (30%), and was equally distributed in the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (15/46 vs. 12/44, respectively). A total of 33 in 90 (37%) patients had no fibrosis in the first year biopsy with no difference between the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups (36.5 vs. 37%). The percentage of patients developing recurrent acute hepatitis was also similar (32% vs 35%); time to acute hepatitis though was shorter in the tacrolimus group (59 days [35‐185] vs. 92 days [39‐343] in the cyclosporin group; P = 0.02). Cholestatic hepatitis was observed in 4 of 44 and 5 of 46 patients under cyclosporine and tacrolimus, respectively (P = not significant). In conclusions, the short‐term posttransplantation course of hepatitis C is not related to the calcineurin inhibitor used. Liver Transpl 12:762–767, 2006.

Worse recent efficacy of antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: Impact of donor age and baseline cirrhosis

We hypothesized that antiviral efficacy [sustained virologic response (SVR)] has improved in recent years in the transplant setting. Our aim was to assess whether the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PegIFN)–ribavirin (Rbv) has improved over time. One hundred seven liver transplant patients [74% men, 55.5 years old (range: 37.5–69.5), 86% genotype 1a or 1b] were treated with PegIFN‐Rbv for 355 (16–623) days at 20.1 (1.7–132.6) months after transplantation. Tacrolimus was used in 61%. Sixty‐seven percent had baseline F3–F4 (cirrhosis: 20.5%). Donor age was 49 (12–78) years. SVR was achieved in 39 (36.5%) patients, with worse results achieved in recent years (2001–2003: n = 27, 46.5%; 2004: n = 23, 43.5%; 2005: n = 21, 35%; 2006 to January 2007: n = 36, 24%; P = 0.043). Variables associated with SVR in the univariate analysis included donor age, baseline viremia and cirrhosis, bilirubin levels, rapid virologic response and early virologic response (EVR), premature discontinuation of PegIFN or Rbv, and accumulated Rbv dose. In the multivariate analysis, the variables in the model were EVR [odds ratio (OR): 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.016–0.414, P = 0.002] and donor age (OR: 1.039, 95% CI: 1.008–1.071, P = 0.01). Variables that had changed over time included donor age, baseline viremia, disease severity (cirrhosis, baseline bilirubin, and leukocyte and platelet counts), interval between transplantation and therapy, and use of growth factors. In the multivariate analysis, variables independently changing were donor age (OR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.013–1.071, P = 0.004), duration from transplantation to antiviral therapy (OR: 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000–1.001, P = 0.013), and baseline leukocyte count (OR: 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000–1.000, P = 0.034). In conclusion, the efficacy of antiviral therapy with PegIFN‐Rbv has worsened over time, at least in our center. The increase in donor age and greater proportion of patients treated at advanced stages of disease are potential causes. Liver Transpl 15:738–746, 2009.

Expanded criteria for liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) selection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a matter of debate. The Milan criteria (MC) have been largely adopted by the international community. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rates and recurrence probabilities of a new proposal for criteria (up to 3 tumors, each no larger than 5 cm, and a cumulative tumor burden ≤ 10 cm). Patients with cirrhosis and HCC included on the waiting list (WL) from 1991 to 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes in patients who had tumors within and beyond the MC were compared. The survival analysis was done (1) with the intention‐to‐treat principle and (2) among transplanted patients. A total of 281 patients were included in WL. Twenty‐four cases did not undergo OLT (a dropout rate of 8.5%); all but 1 case had tumors within the MC. Of the 257 transplanted patients, 26 had tumors beyond the MC in the pre‐OLT evaluation. Based on the intention‐to‐treat analysis, the 5‐year survival was 56% versus 66% in patients who had tumors within and beyond the MC, respectively (P = 0.487). Among transplanted patients, the 5‐year survival was 62% versus 69%, respectively (P = 0.734). Through multivariate analysis, microvascular invasion was an independent prognostic factor of poor survival (P = 0.004). The recurrence probabilities at 1 and 5 years were 7% versus 12% and 14% versus 28% in patients with tumors within and beyond the MC, respectively (P = 0.063). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that both poorly differentiated tumors (P < 0.001) and microvascular invasion (P < 0.001) increased the risk of recurrence. The expansion to up to 3 nodules, each up to 5 cm, and a cumulative tumor burden ≤ 10 cm did not result in a reduction of survival in comparison with patients who had tumors within the MC. Liver Transpl 14:1449–1460, 2008.

Prediction of fibrosis in HCV‐infected liver transplant recipients with a simple noninvasive index

Recurrent hepatitis C is a frequent event in liver transplantation (LT). Serial liver biopsies remain the best way of monitoring disease progression. Due to the limitations of a liver biopsy, there is an interest in developing noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. While several models for predicting fibrosis have been constructed in patients who have not undergone transplantation, these are lacking in the transplant population. The aim of this study was to construct one simple model based on routine laboratory data to predict fibrosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected LT patients. A total of 510 yearly protocol liver biopsies performed in 188 LT patients (67% male; median age 54 years) were divided into 2 groups: training set (n = 414) and validation set (n = 96). Laboratory variables at time of biopsies were recorded. Multivariate analysis identified 4 variables as independent predictors of fibrosis: prothrombin time (PT), albumin/total protein ratio, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and time since LT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) were 0.80 and 0.84 for the training and the validation set, respectively. In the training set, using a cutoff of 0.2, the model had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 74%, 69%, 42%, and 90%, respectively, to differentiate significant (bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis) from mild fibrosis (none or portal). In the validation cohort, these values increased to 87%, 71%, 49%, and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, in the LT setting, a simple fibrosis index is useful to select HCV‐infected patients with a very low risk of significant fibrosis in whom protocol liver biopsies may be avoided. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:456–462.)

Effect of Calcineurin Inhibitors in the Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Recipients

Background. There is a paucity of good studies evaluating the impact of calcineurin inhibitors on posttransplantation outcome in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant (LT) recipients. Methods. We sought to determine whether there are differences on posttransplantation survival and histologic recurrence in HCV-LT recipients based on initial immunosuppression (IS) by conducting a prospective study comparing tacrolimus (Tac) versus cyclosporine-based IS in patients undergoing LT between 2001 and 2007. Protocol liver biopsies were performed. Results. Baseline characteristics (demographics, liver function at LT, genotype distribution, donor, surgery, and IS except for the type of calcineurin inhibitor) did not differ between groups. Severe disease (defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, cholestatic hepatitis, or allograft loss or death because of recurrent disease in the first year) was present in 67 of 253 (26.5%) and was equally distributed in the CsA and Tac groups (27% vs. 26%; P=0.68). Two thirds of protocol biopsies performed at 1 year showed some fibrosis without differences between CsA and Tac groups (75% vs. 70%). Advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis) was diagnosed in 30% CsA and 24.5% Tac patients (P=NS). No differences in survival at 1 and 7 years were observed (83% and 67% vs. 78% and 64%, respectively, P=0.4). In summary, in patients undergoing LT for HCV-related liver disease, posttransplantation outcome is not related to the calcineurin inhibitor used.

Comparison of two non-contemporaneous HCV-liver transplant cohorts: Strategies to improve the efficacy of antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS In a previous study, advanced fibrosis was associated with worsening efficacy of antiviral therapy in HCV-transplant patients. We aimed at assessing whether changes in treatment policy, that is starting therapy at lesser stages of fibrosis, have resulted in improved efficacy. METHODS Efficacy (rapid, early, end-of-treatment, and sustained viral response (SVR)) and tolerability (peginterferon (pIFN)/ribavirin (RBV) doses, premature discontinuation, dose reductions, anemia, growth factors, transfusions) were compared between two non-contemporaneous cohorts of post-LT naïve patients treated with pIFN-RBV: Group 1 (n=44), a historical cohort of patients treated during the period 2005-2007 and Group 2 (n=70), patients treated more recently (2007-2010), where treatment was started once there was evidence of fibrosis. RESULTS SVR increased from 25% to 54% (p=0.002) due to a reduction in relapse rate. Comparing both cohorts, a decrease in the number of cirrhotic patients together with an increase in platelet count was observed in recent years. Additional non-intentional changes included: (i) an increase of patients treated under cyclosporine immunosuppression, (ii) treatment-related factors with an increase in patients treated with initial full pIFN and RBV doses, who developed anemia and hence required dose modifications and erythropoietin. Baseline factors associated with SVR were younger donor age, lack of cirrhosis or severe necroinflammation and the use of RBV at full doses at initiation while on-treatment variables were adherence and viral kinetics. CONCLUSIONS Treatment in the absence of cirrhosis is associated with higher SVR warranting strict disease progression monitoring. A more aggressive approach, particularly regarding RBV dosage, is also associated with improved efficacy. Further studies are required to assess whether switching to cyclosporine will result in improved SVR.

Cirrhosis of mixed etiology (hepatitis C virus and alcohol): Posttransplantation outcome—Comparison with hepatitis C virus–related cirrhosis and alcoholic‐related cirrhosis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related liver disease is enhanced by alcohol consumption. Of HCV‐related liver transplantation (LT) recipients, 25% have a history of alcohol intake. The purpose of this research was to determine whether LT outcome differs between patients with cirrhosis of mixed etiology compared to HCV or alcohol alone. Of 494 LT (1997‐2001), recipient/donor features, post‐LT histological, metabolic complications [hypertension, diabetes–diabetes mellitus (DM)], and de novo tumors were compared in 3 groups [HCV‐related cirrhosis = 170 (HCV group), alcohol‐related cirrhosis (alcohol group) = 107, and cirrhosis of mixed etiology (mixed group) = 60]. Protocol biopsies were done in HCV patients. Severe recurrent HCV disease was defined as: 1‐year fibrosis >1, cholestatic hepatitis, recurrent cirrhosis, or HCV‐related liver retransplantation (reLT) within 5 years. Patients in the mixed group were younger (mean age: HCV group = 59 years; mixed group = 49 years; alcohol group = 53 years; P < 0.05) and mainly men (% men: HCV group = 51%; mixed group = 97%; alcohol group = 87%). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was more frequent in HCV patients (HCV group = 44%; mixed group = 35%; alcohol group = 18%; P = 0.05). Five‐year survival was lowest in the HCV group (HCV group = 49% versus mixed group = 73% versus alcohol group = 76%; and P < 0.01 for the HCV group versus the alcohol group or the HCV group versus the mixed group; P = 0.74 for the alcohol group versus the mixed group). Metabolic complications and de novo tumors were more frequent in the alcohol groups. Severe HCV disease was similar in the HCV+ groups (HCV group = 45%; mixed group = 45%; P = 0.66). Patients with in the mixed group were more frequently treated with antivirals (32% versus HCV group = 18%; P = 0.03). In HCV patients, factors independently associated with lower survival were older donor age, LT indication (HCV alone), and increased body mass index (BMI). Antiviral therapy was a protective factor. Post‐LT survival was lower in the isolated HCV group compared to the alcohol or mixed groups despite a similar recurrence of HCV disease. A greater use of antiviral therapy in the mixed group may explain these differences. The incidence of metabolic complications and de novo tumors was greater in the alcohol groups. Liver Transpl 15:79–87, 2009.

Prospective validation of a noninvasive index for predicting liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus–infected liver transplant recipients

We previously developed a mathematical model, the Hospital Universitario La Fe (HULF) index, as an alternative to protocol liver biopsy (PLB) to estimate significant fibrosis (SF) in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for liver damage caused by chronic HCV infection. In the present study, we sought to validate this noninvasive index. The commonly derived clinical and laboratory data for calculating the HULF index were prospectively collected over 2.7 years from patients undergoing LT and PLB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic capacity were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Biopsy was performed 93 times in 86 LT patients. The prevalence of SF (F3‐F4 on the Knodell scoring system) was 32%. The intraobserver and interobserver concordance was high (κ = 0.94 and κ = 0.75, respectively) in identifying SF in PLB. For low scores, the HULF index discarded an SF diagnosis with a sensitivity of 90% and a negative predictive value of 89%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68. The precision of the HULF index did not improve with the incorporation of donor age and body mass index into the multivariate analysis. Applying the index would have prevented 24% of the biopsy procedures performed. In conclusion, the HULF index was prospectively validated with data commonly obtained in standard clinical practice. Because the index distinguishes a subgroup of HCV LT patients with a low probability of having SF, PLB would be avoided in those patients. Liver Transpl 15:1798–1807, 2009.