Victoria Blinder
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Victoria Blinder.
Cancer | 2009
Heather Taffet Gold; Michael J. Hall; Victoria Blinder; Bruce R. Schackman
The objective of this study was to examine the cost effectiveness of using a pharmacogenetic test for uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferase 1A1*28 (UGT1A1*28) variant homozygosity before administering irinotecan to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cancer Prevention Research | 2012
Robert W. Haile; Esther M. John; A. Joan Levine; Victoria K. Cortessis; Jennifer B. Unger; Melissa Gonzales; Elad Ziv; Patricia A. Thompson; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Katherine L. Tucker; Jonine L. Bernstein; Thomas E. Rohan; Gloria Y.F. Ho; Melissa L. Bondy; Maria Elena Martinez; Linda S. Cook; Mariana C. Stern; Marcia Cruz–Correa; Jonelle E. Wright; Seth J. Schwartz; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Victoria Blinder; Patricia Y. Miranda; Richard B. Hayes; George Friedman-Jiménez; Kristine R. Monroe; Christopher A. Haiman; Brian E. Henderson; Duncan C. Thomas; Paolo Boffetta
There are compelling reasons to conduct studies of cancer in Hispanics, the fastest growing major demographic group in the United States (from 15% to 30% of the U.S. population by 2050). The genetically admixed Hispanic population coupled with secular trends in environmental exposures and lifestyle/behavioral practices that are associated with immigration and acculturation offer opportunities for elucidating the effects of genetics, environment, and lifestyle on cancer risk and identifying novel risk factors. For example, traditional breast cancer risk factors explain less of the breast cancer risk in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites (NHW), and there is a substantially greater proportion of never-smokers with lung cancer in Hispanics than in NHW. Hispanics have higher incidence rates for cancers of the cervix, stomach, liver, and gall bladder than NHW. With respect to these cancers, there are intriguing patterns that warrant study (e.g., depending on country of origin, the five-fold difference in gastric cancer rates for Hispanic men but not Hispanic women). Also, despite a substantially higher incidence rate and increasing secular trend for liver cancer in Hispanics, there have been no studies of Hispanics reported to date. We review the literature and discuss study design options and features that should be considered in future studies. Cancer Prev Res; 5(2); 150–63. ©2012 AACR.
Cancer | 2012
Victoria Blinder; Sujata Patil; Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Clifford A. Hudis; Ethan Basch; Rose C. Maly
Previous research has found an 80% return‐to‐work rate in mid‐income white breast cancer survivors, but little is known about the employment trajectory of low‐income minorities or whites. We set out to compare the trajectories of low‐income Latina and non‐Latina white survivors and to identify correlates of employment status.
Journal of Community Health | 2012
Victoria Blinder; Linda T. Vahdat; H. T. Gold; I. de Melo-Martin; Mary Katherine Hayes; Ronald J. Scheff; Ellen Chuang; Anne Moore; Madhu Mazumdar
Employment status is related to treatment recovery and quality of life in breast cancer survivors, yet little is known about return to work in immigrant and minority survivors. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using ethnically cohesive focus groups of urban breast cancer survivors who were African-American, African-Caribbean, Chinese, Filipina, Latina, or non-Latina white. We audio- and video-recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded the focus group discussions and we analyzed the coded transcripts within and across ethnic groups. Seven major themes emerged related to the participants’ work experiences after diagnosis: normalcy, acceptance, identity, appearance, privacy, lack of flexibility at work, and employer support. Maintaining a sense of normalcy was cited as a benefit of working by survivors in each group. Acceptance of the cancer diagnosis was most common in the Chinese group and in participants who had a family history of breast cancer; those who described this attitude were likely to continue working throughout the treatment period. Appearance was important among all but the Chinese group and was related to privacy, which many thought was necessary to derive the benefit of normalcy at work. Employer support included schedule flexibility, medical confidentiality, and help maintaining a normal work environment, which was particularly important to our study sample. Overall, we found few differences between the different ethnic groups in our study. These results have important implications for the provision of support services to and clinical management of employed women with breast cancer, as well as for further large-scale research in disparities and employment outcomes.
Cancer | 2013
Victoria Blinder; Virginia W. Norris; Nancy W. Peacock; Jennifer J. Griggs; David P. Harrington; Anne Moore; Richard L. Theriault; Ann H. Partridge
Although the routine use of treatment plans and summaries (TPSs) has been recommended to improve the quality of cancer care, limited data exist about their impact on quality, including patient satisfaction and coordination of care.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Kouta Ito; Victoria Blinder; Elena B. Elkin
PURPOSE Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures in postmenopausal women who receive adjuvant AIs for hormone receptor (HR) -positive early breast cancer (EBC). We compared the cost effectiveness of alternative screening and treatment strategies for fracture prevention. METHODS We developed a Markov state transition model to simulate clinical practice and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of women age 60 years with HR-positive EBC starting a 5-year course of AI therapy after primary surgery for breast cancer. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We compared the following strategies: no intervention; one-time bone mineral density (BMD) screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; annual BMD screening and selective bisphosphonate therapy in women with osteoporosis or osteopenia; and universal bisphosphonate therapy. RESULTS ICERs for annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis, annual BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteopenia, and universal treatment with oral bisphosphonates were
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Jennifer J. Griggs; Shail Maingi; Victoria Blinder; Neelima Denduluri; Alok A. Khorana; Larry Norton; Michael Francisco; Dana S. Wollins; Julia H. Rowland
87,300,
Journal of Oncology Practice | 2014
Talya Salz; Shrujal S. Baxi; Victoria Blinder; Elena B. Elkin; M. Margaret Kemeny; Mary S. McCabe; Chaya S. Moskowitz; Erin E. Onstad; Leonard Saltz; Larissa K. Temple; Kevin C. Oeffinger
129,300, and
Cancer | 2013
Kouta Ito; Elena B. Elkin; Victoria Blinder; Nancy L. Keating; Niteesh K. Choudhry
283,600 per QALY gained, respectively. One-time BMD screening followed by oral bisphosphonates for those with osteoporosis or osteopenia was dominated. Our results were sensitive to age at the initiation of AI therapy, type of bisphosphonates, post-treatment residual effect of bisphosphonates, and a potential adjuvant benefit of intravenous bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION In postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant AIs for HR-positive EBC, a policy of baseline and annual BMD screening followed by selective treatment with oral bisphosphonates for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of societal resources.
Seminars in Oncology | 2013
Victoria Blinder; Jennifer J. Griggs
ASCO is committed to addressing the needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations as a diverse group at risk for receiving disparate care and having suboptimal experiences, including discrimination, throughout the cancer care continuum. This position statement outlines five areas of recommendations to address the needs of both SGM populations affected by cancer and members of the oncology workforce who identify as SGM: (1) patient education and support; (2) workforce development and diversity; (3) quality improvement strategies; (4) policy solutions; and (5) research strategies. In making these recommendations, the Society calls for increased outreach and educational support for SGM patients; increased SGM cultural competency training for providers; improvement of quality-of-care metrics that include sexual orientation and gender information variables; and increased data collection to inform future work addressing the needs of SGM communities.