Victoria Higgins

Impact of night-time symptoms in COPD: a real-world study in five European countries

Background Sleep quality is often poor in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A cross-sectional European survey investigated the prevalence of night-time symptoms in COPD to evaluate the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the presence of night-time symptoms, and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without night-time symptoms. Methods A total of 251 primary care physicians and 251 respiratory specialists completed record forms on 2,807 patients with COPD. The forms captured information on patient demographics, lung function, COPD severity, and symptoms. Patients completed questionnaires on the time of day when their COPD symptoms bothered them, and the impact of COPD on their ability to get up in the morning and on sleep. Data were compared between groups (those with and without night-time symptoms) using t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests. The kappa statistic was used to assess the level of disconnect between physician and patient perceptions of the impact of night-time symptoms. Results Most patients (78%) reported night-time disturbance. Patients with night-time symptoms experienced more daytime breathlessness (mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score 2.4 versus 1.1) and exacerbations in the previous 12 months (mean 1.7 versus 0.4), and received more maintenance therapy (mean of 2.8 versus 2.3 products) than those without. Concordance between the frequency of physician-reported (67.9% of patients) and patient-reported (68.5% of patients) night-time symptoms was good. Physicians significantly underestimated the impact of COPD on the patient’s ability to get up in the morning and on sleep (fair–moderate agreement). Physician-reported night-time symptoms were present for 41.2% of patients who could be categorized by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (n=937), increasing from 20.9% of those in the low-risk group to 77.4% of those in the high-riskgroup. Conclusion Patients with COPD experience night-time symptoms regardless of GOLD group, that impact on their ability to get up in the morning and on their sleep quality.

Understanding the GOLD 2011 Strategy as applied to a real-world COPD population

STUDY OBJECTIVES The aim of this analysis was to understand the implications of the GOLD 2011 multidimensional system for the assessment and management of COPD, using data from a real-world observational study. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of consulting patients in five European countries and in the U.S. undertaken between June and September 2011. Patients were classified using both the GOLD 2010 and revised GOLD 2011 criteria, and profiled with regards to demographics, disease characteristics and treatment patterns. RESULTS Information on 3813 COPD patients was collected. Disease characteristics showed a general tendency to worsen in parallel with worsening of symptoms. When comparing dual versus single risk criteria, the inclusion of exacerbation history resulted in an increase in the number of patients in high risk groups. The highest proportions of patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were in group D. However, a considerable proportion of patients in low risk groups were receiving ICS/long-acting β2 agonists. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis confirmed the relationship between higher symptomatic burden, increased airflow limitation and exacerbation, and further illustrated the importance of including exacerbation history in the assessment of COPD to identify patients at high risk. As based on data from current clinical practice, this study also highlighted the frequent and potentially inappropriate use of ICS and bronchodilators in patients at low risk of experiencing exacerbations.

Real World COPD: Association of Morning Symptoms with Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes

Abstract This research examined the prevalence of morning symptoms and their relationship with health status, exacerbations and daily activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Data on 1489 patients were analysed from a European and USA sample. Results were tested for significance (p < 0.05) using Mann-Whitney and regression modelling accounting for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, symptom severity, smoking status and medication adherence. Morning symptoms were experienced by 39.8% of patients. Controlling for potential confounders, morning symptoms were significantly associated with higher COPD assessment test scores (p < 0.001) and exacerbation frequency (p < 0.001), more frequent worsening of symptoms without consulting a Health Care Professional (p = 0.008), and increased impact on normal daily activities (p = 0.007); and in the working population, a significantly greater impact on getting up and ready for the day (p < 0.001) and significantly more days off work per year (p < 0.001). Our research concluded that in patients with COPD, morning symptoms are associated with poorer health status, impaired daily activities and increased risk of exacerbation in affected patients compared with those patients without morning symptoms. Improved control of patients’ morning symptoms may lead to substantial reduction in COPD impact and frequency of exacerbations, and enable patients to increase daily activities, particularly early morning activities. This could, in turn, enable working patients with COPD to be more productive in the workplace.

Real-world characterization and differentiation of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy classification

Background This study aimed to characterize and differentiate the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy 2011 cut points through the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT). Methods Analysis of COPD patient data from the 2012 Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific Program was conducted in Europe and US. Matched data from physicians and patients included CAT and mMRC scores. Receiver operating characteristic curves and kappa analysis determined a cut point for CAT and mMRC alignment and thus defined patient movement (“movers”) within GOLD groups A–D, depending on the tool used. Logistic regression analysis, with a number of physician- and patient-reported covariates, characterized those movers. Results Comparing GOLD-defined high-symptom patients using mMRC and CAT cut points (≥2 and ≥10, respectively), there were 890 (53.65%) movers; 887 of them (99.66%) moved from less symptomatic GOLD groups A and C (using mMRC) to more symptomatic groups B and D (using CAT). For receiver operating characteristic (area under the curve: 0.82, P<0.001) and kappa (maximized: 0.45) recommended CAT cut points of ≥24 and ≥26, movers reduced to 429 and 403 patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed variables significantly associated with movers were related to impact on normal life, age, cough, and sleep (all P<0.05). Within movers, direction of movement was significantly associated with the same variables (all P<0.05). Conclusion Use of current mMRC or CAT cut points leads to inconsistencies for COPD assessment classification. It is recommended that cut points are aligned and both tools administered simultaneously for optimal patient care and to allow for closer management of movers. Our research may suggest an opportunity to investigate a combined score approach to patient management based on the worst result of mMRC and CAT. The reduced number of remaining movers may then identify patients who have greater impact of disease and may require a more personalized treatment plan.

Establishing the relationship of inhaler satisfaction, treatment adherence, and patient outcomes: a prospective, real-world, cross-sectional survey of US adult asthma patients and physicians

BackgroundInhaled asthma medications are the mainstay of treatment for chronic asthma. However, nonadherence rates for long-term inhaler therapy among adults are estimated to exceed 50 %. Nonadherence is associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes and diminished quality of life. Research suggests that adherence is associated with patients’ satisfaction with their treatment regimen and other factors, such as concomitant allergic rhinitis and tobacco use.MethodsThis prospective, cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients evaluated the relationship between patient satisfaction with attributes of inhaler devices, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. Primary care and specialist physicians completed a physician-reported patient record form for patients with a confirmed asthma diagnosis. Patients for whom a physician-reported form was completed were invited to complete a patient-reported form. Both surveys collected information about demographics, symptoms, exacerbation history, treatment, smoking status, comorbidities, type of inhaler device, and treatment adherence. Patients also indicated the degree to which they were satisfied with attributes of their currently prescribed inhaler device(s). Partial least squares path modeling quantified relationships between latent variables and clinical outcomes.ResultsA total of 243 patients were included in our analysis and 41 % had poorly controlled asthma. More favorable clinical outcomes were significantly associated with greater patient satisfaction with drug delivery (P = 0.002), higher medication adherence (P = 0.049), no history of tobacco use (P < 0.001), and absence of comorbid allergic rhinitis (P = 0.005). Attributes associated with device satisfaction included patient perceptions of consistency in the amount of drug delivery to the lungs, ease of use, and feedback about the number of remaining doses.ConclusionsHigher patient satisfaction with their asthma drug delivery inhaler device is a significant predictor of more favorable clinical outcomes while allergic rhinitis and smoking history were negatively associated with optimal control of asthma. These findings provide clinicians with opportunities to improve patients’ clinical outcomes by tailoring choice of inhaler device therapy and providing education about the correct way to use the device to ensure optimal outcomes. Patients will likely benefit from medical therapy to manage comorbid allergic rhinitis and smoking cessation interventions. Patients unable to stop smoking may require alternative medical therapies to improve their clinical outcomes.

P185 Quantification and Treatment Patterns of Real-World Patients Classified by the GOLD 2011 Strategy

Objectives The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 Strategy classifies COPD patients into 4 categories (A: low risk, less symptoms; B: low risk, more symptoms; C: high risk, less symptoms; D: high risk, more symptoms) based on risk (FEV1 ≥ or <50% predicted and/or exacerbation history < or ≥2 per year) and symptoms (COPD Assessment test [CAT] score < or ≥10 or modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] dyspnoea scale < or ≥2). We examined the proportion of patients in each category when evaluated by CAT or mMRC, and corresponding pharmacological treatment (CAT classification). Methods GOLD 2011 criteria were applied to a real-world international COPD population sampled from the Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific. Programme undertaken between June 2011 and September 2011. Physicians and patients completed matched questionnaires. Results 2392 patients completed a questionnaire, of which 1508 with all 4 GOLD classification parameters were analyzed. The proportion of patients in categories A, B, C and D, respectively, when evaluated by CAT was 10, 49, 1 and 40%, and when evaluated by mMRC was 39, 20, 13 and 28%. By CAT evaluation in categories A, B, C, and D, patients were using a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) alone (8, 6, 0 and 1%), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) alone (37, 25, 8 and 5%), inhaled corticosteroid plus LABA (ICS/LABA) alone (22, 18, 8 and 8%), and ICS/LABA plus LAMA only (11, 20, 46, 43%). Conclusion CAT assessment increased the number of patients in the more symptomatic categories (B and D), compared with mMRC. Contrary to the GOLD 2011 recommendations, by CAT assessment, a high proportion of low-risk patients (A and B) were using ICS/LABA.

Trends in medication use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a long-term view of real-world treatment between 2000 and 2015

Background Despite the availability of a variety of treatments, many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are not achieving glucose control. We analyzed successive waves of the Adelphi Real World Diabetes Disease Specific Programmes (DSPs) to assess treatment patterns reported by primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists and the effect of treatment on levels of glucose control. Methods Data were collected between 2000 and 2015 in the US and EU5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK). Physicians completed patient record forms for the next 10 patients consulting with T2DM. Key aspects captured were change over time in therapy usage, time to insulin introduction, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Results Over 12 DSP waves, 3,555 specialists and 5,109 PCPs completed questionnaires for 70,657 patients. Treatment patterns changed considerably over time as new agents were introduced. The number of agents prescribed per patient increased over time, as did HbA1c levels at which physicians stated they would introduce insulin. The greatest improvements in HbA1c levels occurred during 2000–2008, with little improvement since 2008. Conclusion In this real-world setting, the proportion of patients with T2DM achieving good glucose control has not increased greatly since 2008. A better understanding of how to individualize treatment pathways may be required to improve control in these patients.

Reasons for discontinuation of GLP1 receptor agonists: data from a real-world cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes

Aim Nonadherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RAs) is relatively common among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study sought to identify reasons why patients discontinue GLP1 RAs. Materials and methods Retrospective data from the Adelphi Diabetes Disease Specific Programme were used. Physicians managing patients with T2DM were surveyed via face-to-face interviews, and patients treated for T2DM were surveyed via self-completed questionnaires. Patient data were stratified by current versus prior GLP1 RA use. Results Physicians (n=443) most frequently reported inadequate blood glucose control (45.6%), nausea/vomiting (43.8%), and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects (36.8%) as reasons for GLP1 RA discontinuation. Patients (n=194) reported the GI-related issues “Made me feel sick” (64.4%) and “Made me throw up” (45.4%) as their top reasons for discontinuation. The most common problems reported (excluding cost) for those currently using GLP1 RAs were “Prefer oral medication over injections” (patients 56%, physicians 32.6%), “Made me feel sick” (patients 38.1%, physicians 16.3%), and “Did not help lose weight” (patients 25.4%, physicians 18%). The most bothersome problems for patients globally (frequency reporting very/extremely bothersome) (excluding cost) were “Difficult to plan meals around” (55.6%), “Made me throw up” (51.6%), and “Caused weight gain” (50%). Conclusion Both patients and physicians reported GI-related issues as a prominent factor, but disparities between patient experiences and physician perceptions were revealed, suggesting gaps in physician–patient communication. Understanding patients’ expectations of GLP1 RAs and physicians’ patient-management practices may help increase GLP1 RA adherence and thereby potentially enhance diabetes care.

Physician-Patient Concordance in Pharmacological Management of Patients with COPD

Abstract A retrospective analysis of a cross-sectional, multicenter survey was conducted in United States (US) medical practices to evaluate the concordance between patients with COPD and their physicians on disease-specific characteristics. Associations between patient and disease-related characteristics with monotherapy, dual therapy, or triple therapy prescribed as COPD maintenance regimens were also examined. Eligible physicians completed patient record forms (PRFs) for up to 6 consecutive patients with COPD. Patients for whom a PRF was completed were invited to complete a patient self-completion (PSC) survey consisting of questions similar to those on the PRF, as well as several validated measures to assess the impact of COPD on patients’ lives. A total of 469 patients completed a PSC that was matched with the PRF completed by their physician, forming the sample for the concordance analysis. Moderate agreement (kappa (κ) = 0.41–0.60) was observed for 79% of measures, with the lowest concordance rating corresponding to hemoptysis (κ = 0.22). There were few differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between patients prescribed monotherapy and dual therapy. Triple therapy rather than monotherapy or dual therapy was more often prescribed for patients with greater frequency of symptoms, negative impact of COPD on daily life and interpersonal relationships, and respiratory impairment based on the most recent FEV1. Diverse factors influence US physicians’ perceptions of disease and treatment choices, including patient symptoms, quality of life, and disease impact. Our results highlight that concordance between physicians and patients regarding symptoms and physical function may contribute to optimal management of COPD.

Health Status of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Symptom Level

Background: Despite receiving treatment, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often continue to experience symptoms that impact their health status. We determined the relationship between overall symptom burden and health status, and assessed the treatments patients were receiving. Methods: Data from 3 cross-sectional surveys of U.S. patients with COPD (2011-2013) were analyzed. Patients receiving inhaled COPD treatment for ≥3 months completed the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) symptom burden and respiratory health status measure, EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D-3L) general health status questionnaire, and Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ). CAT scores were used to identify high- (CAT ≥24) and low-symptom patients (CAT <24), who were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching with replacement. Match balance was assessed with standardized mean differences. EQ-5D-3L and JSEQ scores, and current treatment were compared between groups post-matching. Sensitivity was assessed with Rosenbaum bounds. Results: A total of 638 patients were included. Compared with low-symptom patients, high-symptom patients had worse health status and greater sleep disturbance by EQ-5D utility index (0.85 versus 0.71, respectively; p<0.0001) and JSEQ scores (3.73 versus 7.35, respectively; p<0.0001). High-symptom patients were prescribed single-maintenance bronchodilators ± inhaled corticosteroids (46.0%), triple therapy (40.5%), and short-acting therapy only (8.2%). Results were robust and insensitive to unobserved confounders. Conclusions: Increased COPD symptom burden is associated with worse general health status in patients receiving COPD treatment. High-symptom patients frequently received single inhaled medication. The results suggest that health care providers should monitor and tailor therapy, based on level of symptom burden to improve symptom control and health status.