Vignetta Charles

The development and implementation of the national evaluation strategy of Access to Care, a multi-site linkage to care initiative in the United States.

The Access to Care (A2C) is a multi-site initiative that seeks to increase the access to and retention in effective HIV healthcare and support services by people living with HIV across the United States. As the initiative implemented evidence-based programs in new settings with diverse populations, it was important to document these innovative efforts to contribute to the evidence base for best practices. In a partnership between Johns Hopkins University, AIDS United, and the A2C sites, a national evaluation strategy was developed and implemented to build knowledge about how linkage to care interventions could be most effectively implemented within the context of local, real-world settings. This article provides an overview of the efforts to develop and implement a national monitoring and evaluation strategy for a multi-site initiative. The findings may be of utility for other HIV interventions that are seeking to incorporate a monitoring and evaluation component into their efforts.

2015–2020 National HIV/AIDS Strategy Goals for HIV Linkage and Retention in Care: Recommendations From Program Implementers

The authors discusses various recommendations regarding the U.S. Office of National AIDS Policys 2015-2020 National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States and goals involving HIV linkage and retention in care, and it mentions the efforts to reduce HIV infections, increase access to medical care, and lower the number of HIV-related health disparities. The U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the nations Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 are assessed.

Cost and cost threshold analyses for 12 innovative US HIV linkage and retention in care programs

ABSTRACT Out of >1,000,000 people living with HIV in the USA, an estimated 60% were not adequately engaged in medical care in 2011. In response, AIDS United spearheaded 12 HIV linkage and retention in care programs. These programs were supported by the Social Innovation Fund, a White House initiative. Each program reflected the needs of its local population living with HIV. Economic analyses of such programs, such as cost and cost threshold analyses, provide important information for policy-makers and others allocating resources or planning programs. Implementation costs were examined from societal and payer perspectives. This paper presents the results of cost threshold analyses, which provide an estimated number of HIV transmissions that would have to be averted for each program to be considered cost-saving and cost-effective. The methods were adapted from the US Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Per client program costs ranged from

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Access to HIV Care Interventions: A Qualitative Analysis of the Positive Charge Initiative.

1109.45 to

Romantic relationships: an important context for HIV/STI and pregnancy prevention programmes with young people

7602.54 from a societal perspective. The cost-saving thresholds ranged from 0.32 to 1.19 infections averted, and the cost-effectiveness thresholds ranged from 0.11 to 0.43 infections averted by the programs. These results suggest that such programs are a sound and efficient investment towards supporting goals set by US HIV policy-makers. Cost-utility data are pending.

Unpacking Linkage and Reengagement in HIV Care: A Day in the Life of a Positive Charge Care Coordinator

Research indicates that less than half of people living with HIV (PLWH) have undetectable levels of virus, despite recent findings that viral load suppression dramatically reduces the transmissibility of HIV. Linkage to HIV care is a crucial initial step, yet we know relatively little about how to effectively implement linkage interventions to reach PLWH who are not in care. AIDS Uniteds initiative, Positive Charge (PC), funded five U.S. sites to develop and implement comprehensive linkage interventions. Evaluation of the initiative included qualitative interviews with management and service staff from each intervention site. Sites experienced barriers and facilitators to implementation on multiple environmental, organization, and personnel levels. Successful strategies included developing early relationships with collaborating partners, finding ways to share key information among agencies, and using evaluation data to build support among leadership staff. Lessons learned will be useful for organizations that develop and implement future interventions targeting hard-to-reach, out-of-care PLWH.

Exploring Changes in Interagency Collaboration Following AIDS United’s Positive Charge: A Five-Site HIV Linkage and Retention in Care Program

Romantic relationships are central in the lives of young people. This paper uses data on romantic relationships from urban youth in the USA to illustrate how using a relationships perspective in HIV/STI and pregnancy prevention programmes broadens the skills and content covered, and contextualises the learning to enhance relevance and use. Self-report survey data were collected using electronic handheld devices for a school-based randomised trial. The survey sample includes 911 young people (mean age = 12.4 years) representative of their schools. Logistic regressions explored associations between selected sexual behaviours and relationship characteristics. For all participants, having more boy/girlfriends, dating alone, ever touching and ever having had oral sex were associated with an increased likelihood of having vaginal sex. Among young people with current partners, having a partner three or more years older, length of relationship and ever having oral sex were associated with an increased likelihood of having vaginal sex. The study data confirm the importance of accounting for relationships in sexual risk reduction programmes, and provide avenues for enhancing the relevancy of typical school-based prevention programmes.

Positive Charge: Filling the Gaps in the U.S. HIV Continuum of Care

UNLABELLED AIDS Uniteds Positive Charge (PC) was a multiorganizational HIV linkage to care program implemented in five U.S. LOCATIONS To better understand the process of linkage and reengagement in care, we conducted interviews with care coordinators and program supervisors at 20 PC implementing agencies. Though linkage to care is often considered a single column in the HIV continuum of care, we found that it contains several underlying and often complex steps. The steps described are: identifying individuals in need of services; contacting those individuals through a variety of means; assessing and addressing needs and barriers to care; initial engagement (or reengagement) in HIV primary care; and provision of ongoing support to promote retention. We highlight strategies used to complete these steps. These findings will be of utility to other HIV interventions that aim to improve linkage and engagement in HIV care.

Cost and Threshold Analysis of Positive Charge, a Multi-site Linkage to HIV Care Program in the United States

Background. Many out-of-care people living with HIV have unmet basic needs and are served by loosely connected agencies. Prior research suggests that increasing agencies’ coordination may lead to higher quality and better coordinated care. This study examines four U.S. interagency networks in AIDS United’s HIV linkage and retention in care program. This study explores changes in the networks of implementing agencies. Methods. Each network included a lead agency and collaborators. One administrator and service provider per agency completed an online survey about collaboration prior to and during Positive Charge. We measured how many organizations were connected to one another through density, or the proportion of reported connections out of all possible connections between organizations. Network centralization was measured to investigate whether this network connectivity was due to one or more highly connected organizations or not. To compare collaboration by type, density and centralization were calculated for any collaboration and specific collaboration types: technical assistance, shared resources, information exchange, and boosting access. To characterize the frequency of collaboration, we examined how often organizations interacted by “monthly or greater” versus “less than monthly.” Results. Density increased in all networks. Density was highest for information exchange and referring clients. When results were restricted to “monthly or greater,” the densities of all networks were lower. Conclusions. This study suggests that a targeted linkage to care initiative may increase some collaboration types among organizations serving people living with HIV. It also provides insights to policy makers about how such networks may evolve.