Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Vijay K. Gombar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Vijay K. Gombar.


Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences | 1996

Assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient: when is the assessment reliable?

Vijay K. Gombar; Kurt Enslein

A model, VLOGP, has been developed for assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, of chemicals from their structures. Unlike group contribution methods, VLOGP is based on linear free energy relationship (LFER) approach and employs information-rich electrotopological structure quantifiers derived solely from molecular topology. VLOGP, a robust and cross-validated model derived from accurately measured experimental log P values of 6675 diverse chemicals, has a coefficient of determination, R2, of 0.986 and a standard error of estimate of 0.20. When applied to the training set, the largest deviation observed between experimental and calculated log P was 0.42. VLOGP is different from other log P predictors in that its application domain, called Optimum Prediction Space (OPS), has been quantitatively defined, i.e., structures to which the model should not be applied for predicting log P can be identified. A computer-assisted implementation of this model within HDis toxicity assessment software package, TOPKAT 3.0, automatically checks whether the submitted structure is inside the OPS or not. VLOGP was applied to a set of 113 chemicals not included in the training set. It was observed that for the structures inside the OPS the average deviation between experimental and model-calculated log P values is 0.27, whereas the corresponding deviation for structures outside the OPS is 1.35. This demonstrates the necessity of identifying the structures to which a model is not applicable before accepting a model-based predicted log P value. For a set of 47 nucleosides, the performance of VLOGP was compared with that of four published log P predictors; a standard deviation of 0.33 was obtained with VLOGP, whereas the standard deviation from other log P predictors ranged between 0.46 and 1.20.


Archive | 1991

A Structure-Biodegradability Relationship Model by Discriminant Analysis

Vijay K. Gombar; Kurt Enslein

Multivariate analysis, in the strictest sense, is the study of systems of correlated random variables or random samples from such systems (Gifi 1990). However, practically,multivariate methods deal with the problem of linear representation of relationships among a set of measurements on a number of objects. When objects are chemical structures and measurements are molecular descriptors and rate of aerobic biodegradation, for instance, the techniques of multivariate analysis are well suited for studying structure-biodegradability relationships.


Mutation Research\/genetic Toxicology | 1990

Salmonella mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity: quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Benjamin W. Blake; Kurt Enslein; Vijay K. Gombar; Harold H. Borgstedt

Based on a compilation of 222 reports of rodent nominal lifetime carcinogenicity bioassays by the NCI/NTP on the one hand, and corresponding Salmonella mutagenicity bioassays (Ames tests) on the other, Ashby and Tennant (1988) have divided the carcinogens and non-carcinogens into genotoxic (Ames test positive) and non-genotoxic (Ames test negative) groups and discussed structural characteristics common to each of these groups. The Ames test alone was deemed to be adequate for the identification of genotoxicity because other short-term bioassays, and even combinations, or batteries, appeared to offer no significant advantages. From the results of this study it is possible to achieve (1) a division of the carcinogens into the same genotoxic and non-genotoxic groups, and (2) a division of the non-genotoxic compounds into the same carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic groups, solely on the basis of structure-activity relationships, with a classification accuracy of approx. 95%. (1) An equation comprising 8 sigma molecular charge descriptors, 2 molecular connectivity indices (MCIs), 2 kappa molecular shape descriptors and one MOLSTAC substructure descriptor achieved discrimination between genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens with an accuracy of 94.5%. (2) Another equation comprising 8 sigma molecular charge descriptors, 3 MCIs, one kappa shape descriptor and 12 substructural descriptors achieved discrimination between non-genotoxic carcinogens and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens with an accuracy of 95.2%. These SAR models are suitable for the distinction between (1) genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens and (2) carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic non-genotoxins, both in the absence of animal bioassay data.


Mutation Research | 1994

Use of SAR in computer-assited prediction of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals by the TOPKAT program

Kurt Enslein; Vijay K. Gombar; Benjamin W. Blake


Archive | 1996

Method and apparatus for validation of model-based predictions

Vijay K. Gombar


Mutation Research | 1994

International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Use of SAR in computer-assisted prediction of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals by the TOPKAT program.

Kurt Enslein; Vijay K. Gombar; Benjamin W. Blake


Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships | 1990

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Studies Using Electronic Descriptors Calculated from Topological and Molecular Orbital (MO) Methods

Vijay K. Gombar; Kurt Enslein


Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships | 1991

A QSAR Model of Teratogenesis

Vijay K. Gombar; Harold H. Borgstedt; Kurt Enslein; Jeffrey B. Hart; Benjamin W. Blake


Archive | 1995

Use of Predictive Toxicology in the Design of New Chemicals

Vijay K. Gombar; Kurt Enslein


Mutation Research Letters | 1993

Carcinogenicity of azathioprine: An S-AR investigation

Vijay K. Gombar; Kurt Einstein; Benjamin W. Blake

Collaboration


Dive into the Vijay K. Gombar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kurt Enslein

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge