Vijay Kudithipudi
Allegheny General Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vijay Kudithipudi.
Hpb | 2016
Alexander Kirichenko; O Gayou; D Parda; Vijay Kudithipudi; Kusum B. Tom; Akhtar Khan; Peter Abrams; Molly Szramowski; Jose Oliva; Dulabh Monga; Moses Raj; N. Thai
OBJECTIVES We report single center experience on the outcome and toxicity of SBRT alone or in combination with surgery for inoperable primary and metastatic liver tumors between 2007 and 2014. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with 1-4 hepatic lesions and tumor diameter ≤9 cm received SBRT at 46.8Gy ± 3.7 in 4-6 fractions. The primary end point was local control with at least 6 months of radiographic followup, and secondary end points were toxicity and survival. RESULTS Eighty-seven assessable patients (114 lesions) completed liver SBRT for hepatoma (39) or isolated metastases (48) with a median followup of 20.3 months (range 1.9-64.1). Fourteen patients underwent liver transplant with SBRT as a bridging treatment or for tumor downsizing. Eight patients completed hepatic resections in combination with planned SBRT for unresectable tumors. Two-year local control was 96% for hepatoma and 93.8% for metastases; it was 100% for lesions ≤4 cm. Two-year overall survival was 82.3% (hepatoma) and 64.3% (metastases). No incidence of grade >2 treatment toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION In this retrospective analysis we demonstrate that liver SBRT alone or in combination with surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of isolated inoperable hepatic malignancies and provides excellent local control rates.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2017
Shaakir Hasan; Ngoc Thai; Tadahiro Uemura; Vijay Kudithipudi; Paul Renz; Stephen Abel; Alexander V. Kirichenko
AIM To evaluate the control, survival, and hepatic function for Child Pugh (CP)-A patients after Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS From 2009 to 2016, 40 patients with Barcelona Liver Clinic (BCLC) stages 0-B HCC and CP-A cirrhosis completed liver SBRT. The mean prescription dose was 45 Gy (40 to 50 Gy in 4-5 fractions). Local relapse, defined as recurrence within the planning target volume was assessed with intravenous multiphase contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 4-6 mo after completion of SBRT. Progression of cirrhosis was evaluated by CP and Model for End Stage Liver Disease scores every 3-4 mo. Toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03). Median follow-up was 24 mo. RESULTS Forty-nine HCC lesions among 40 patients were analyzed in this IRB approved retrospective study. Median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (1.5-8.9 cm). Six patients with tumors ≥ 5 cm completed planned selected transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with SBRT. Eight patients underwent orthotropic live transplant (OLT) with SBRT as a bridging treatment (median time to transplant was 12 mo, range 5 to 23 mo). The Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in this group was 62.5%. The 2-year in-field local control was 98% (1 failure). Intrahepatic control was 82% and 62% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 92% and 60% at 1 and 2 years, with a median survival of 41 mo per Kaplan Meier analysis. At 1 and 2 years, 71% and 61% of patients retained CPA status. Of the patients with intrahepatic failures, 58% developed progressive cirrhosis, compared to 27% with controlled disease (P = 0.06). Survival specific to hepatic failure was 92%, 81%, and 69% at 12, 18, and 24 mo. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity. On univariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV) < 23 cc was associated with freedom from CP progression (P = 0.05), hepatic failure-specific survival (P = 0.02), and trended with OS (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION SBRT is safe and effective in HCC with early cirrhosis and may extend waiting time for transplant in patients who may not otherwise be immediate candidates.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2016
Vijay Kudithipudi; O Gayou; A. Colonias
To analyse the clinical impact of megavoltage conebeam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) cine on internal target volume (ITV) coverage in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
Journal of Radiation Oncology | 2017
Vijay Kudithipudi; Ellen Day; N. Thai; Alexander Kirichenko
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Shaakir Hasan; Alexander V. Kirichenko; Paul Renz; Vijay Kudithipudi; Molly Vincent; Lorenzo Machado; Tadahiro Uemura; Ngoc Thai
Hpb | 2018
S. Hasan; A.V. Kirichenko; P. Renz; Vijay Kudithipudi; L. Machado; T. Uemura; N. Thai
Hpb | 2018
A.V. Kirichenko; S. Hasan; I. Jan; P. Renz; Vijay Kudithipudi; L. Machado; T. Uemura; N. Thai
Hpb | 2017
P. Renz; S. Abel; Vijay Kudithipudi; T. Uemura; L. Machado; N. Thai; Alexander Kirichenko
Hpb | 2017
S. Hasan; Vijay Kudithipudi; S. Abel; N. Thai; L. Machado; T. Uemura; M. Bunker; Alexander Kirichenko
Journal of Solid Tumors | 2015
Mark Trombetta; Kathleen M. Erb; Vijay Kudithipudi; Judith Small