Ville Väisänen

Time-resolved fluorescence imaging for quantitative histochemistry using lanthanide chelates in nanoparticles and conjugated to monoclonal antibodies

Tissue and cell examinations have a potential to produce extremely valuable information about antigen quantities in samples. Using currently available methods, a truly quantitative analysis is nearly impossible. We have previously shown that immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of prostate-specific antigen and human glandular kallikrein from prostatic tissue, together with time-resolved fluorescence imaging (TRFI), is a suitable method for obtaining quantitative data from biological samples and that the signal response is linear. In this paper we show that Eu-chelate containing particles in the nanometer range are suitable labels for quantitative IHC. Even single nanoparticle molecules can be detected by TRFI and the signals measured can be readily quantitated. The signal intensity correlates very well with the amount of bound label, and the use of nanoparticles could markedly improve the sensitivity of quantitative IHC methods. TRFI provides a powerful tool for providing quantitative data about antigens or transcripts in tissue sections or cultured cells. It is also of major importance in standardization and optimization of protocols for fixation and tissue preparation, including antigen retrieval methods.

Standardization of Two Immunoassays for Human Glandular Kallikrein 2

BACKGROUND Measurement of human kallikrein 2 (hK2) has improved early detection and staging of prostate cancer. However, reported concentrations of hK2 among currently used assays have not been standardized in any way. We compared two hK2 assays and five different recombinant hK2 variants (rhK2) and suggest a common calibrator as an important step and putative reference substance in hK2 assay standardization. METHODS We measured 146 sera by two hK2 assays, using assay-specific calibrators to assess the difference between the two assays. Serial dilutions of five rhK2 preparations were measured repeatedly, with one preparation assigned as calibrator and the others as unknowns to define which variant provided the closest match between the two assays. This rhK2 variant was used to recalibrate both assays. We measured hK2 concentrations in the same 146 patients to evaluate the change in the difference. RESULTS Use of assay-specific calibrators for comparison of the two assays yielded a Deming regression equation of: y = 0.789 (95% confidence interval, 0.674-0.922)x + 0.014 (0.004-0.025) micro g/L; R(2) = 0.667. Analysis of five rhK2 variants revealed that the enterokinase (ek)-rhK2 form provided the best match between both assays. Using the ek-rhK2 as a common calibrator, we observed a change in the slope of the regression curve to: y = 1.106 (0.872-1.340)x + 0.006 (-0.002 to 0.016) micro g/L; R(2) = 0.648, suggesting an increase in the mean estimate of agreement between the two assays. CONCLUSION Calibration with a common calibrator substantially increased agreement between the assays. The ek-rhK2 variant provided the best performance of all tested rhK2 variants and should undergo mass spectrometry and amino acid analysis for exact mass determination and value assignment to evaluate its potential as a reference material for immunoassays for hK2.

Intact and Internally Cleaved Free Prostate-Specific Antigen in Patients With Prostate Cancer With Different Pathologic Stages and Grades

OBJECTIVES To measure the concentration levels of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms in patients with prostate cancer selected for curative treatment using radical prostatectomy and to study the association between the isoforms and the pathologic cancer stage and grade. METHODS Preoperative plasma samples were obtained from 309 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy at Turku University Hospital. The pathologic TNM stage, Gleason score, and World Health Organization grade of the tumors were recorded. The total, free, and intact PSA (tPSA, fPSA, and fPSA-I, respectively) concentrations of the archived samples were measured with in-house immunoassays, and the nicked PSA (fPSA-N) concentrations (fPSA minus fPSA-I) and ratios of different PSA forms were calculated. These were compared with the prostate cancer stage, Gleason score, and World Health Organization grade. RESULTS The median fPSA-I and fPSA-N concentrations in the patients with prostate cancer was 0.42 and 0.28 ng/mL, constituting an average of 60% and 40% of fPSA, respectively. The nicked/total PSA and free/total PSA ratios had the strongest negative correlations with a higher pathologic stage, Gleason score, and World Health Organization grade (Spearman rho -0.205 to -0.262, P < .05). Within a patient subgroup with tPSA <10 ng/mL, fPSA-N as a single marker had a negative correlation with a higher Gleason score (rho -0.160, P = .021). CONCLUSIONS Lower proportions of fPSA-I and fPSA-N to total PSA were associated with a more advanced cancer stage and grade. A long-term follow-up study and a comparison with currently used clinical methods are needed to evaluate the usefulness of the analytes as prognostic markers for cancer aggressiveness in individual patients.

Comparison of Two Assays for Human Kallikrein 2

BACKGROUND We compared two recently developed research assays for the measurement of human kallikrein 2 (hK2) in serum: one fully automated assay (Beckman Coulter Access immunoanalyzer) and one manual assay based on the DELFIA technology. METHODS We used two subsets of clinical specimens consisting of 48 samples from prostate cancer patients and 210 samples from participants in an ongoing screening study (ERSPC). Both subsets were measured in the Rotterdam laboratory, and the prostate cancer samples were used for analytical comparison with the originating sites for the assays: Beckman Coulter Research Department (San Diego, CA) and Turku University (Turku, Finland). RESULTS Both the Beckman Coulter and the Turku assays performed very similarly between the Rotterdam laboratory and the originating sites: the R(2) value for both comparisons was 0.99, and the slope difference between sites was <20%. Deming regression analysis of the DELFIA (y) and Access (x) assays yielded the following: for the prostate cancer group, y = 1.17x - 0.01 (R(2) = 0.88; n = 48); and for the ERSPC group, y = 0.62x - 0.01 (R(2) = 0.77). Breakdown of the latter group into subgroups (nondiseased, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer samples) gave only minor differences. The Access calibrators were underrecovered by 13% in the DELFIA assay, whereas the DELFIA calibrators were overrecovered by 45% in the Access assay. CONCLUSION The DELFIA and Access assays for hK2, which have similar analytical features, show differences that cannot be explained by calibration.