Vinay Maheshwari

Use and outcomes of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute care hospitals in Massachusetts.

BACKGROUND This study determined actual utilization rates and outcomes of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) at selected hospitals that had participated in a prior survey on NIV use. METHODS This observational cohort study, based at eight acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, focused on all adult patients requiring ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure during predetermined time intervals. RESULTS Of 548 ventilator starts, 337 (61.5%) were for invasive mechanical ventilation and 211 (38.5%) were for NIV, with an overall NIV success rate of 73.9% (ie, avoidance of intubation or death while on NIV or within 48 h of discontinuation). Causal diagnoses for respiratory failure were classified as (I) acute-on-chronic lung disease (23.5%), (II) acute de novo respiratory failure (17.9%), (III) neurologic disorders (19%), (IV) cardiogenic pulmonary edema (16.8%), (V) cardiopulmonary arrest (12.2%), and (VI) others (10.6%). NIV use and success rates for each of the causal diagnoses were, respectively, (I) 76.7% and 75.8%, (II) 37.8% and 62.2%, (III) 1.9% and 100%, (IV) 68.5% and 79.4%, (V) none, and (VI) 17.2% and 60%. Hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation than in patients with NIV (30.3% vs 16.6%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS NIV occupies an important role in the management of acute respiratory failure in acute care hospitals in selected US hospitals and is being used for a large majority of patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. NIV use appears to have increased substantially in selected US hospitals over the past decade. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00458926; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Use and Outcomes of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in Different Age Groups.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic disease and do-not-intubate status increases with age. Thus, we aimed to determine characteristics and outcomes associated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in different age groups. METHODS: A database comprising prospective data collected on site on all adult patients with ARF requiring ventilatory support from 8 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts was used. RESULTS: From a total of 1,225 ventilator starts, overall NIV utilization, success, and in-hospital mortality rates were 22, 54, and 18% in younger (18–44 y); 34, 65, and 13% in middle-aged (45–64 y); 49, 68, and 17% in elderly (65–79 y); and 47, 76, and 24% in aged (≥80 y) groups, respectively (P < .001, P = .08, and P = .11, respectively). NIV use for cardiogenic pulmonary edema and subjects with a do-not-intubate order increased significantly with advancing age (25, 57, 57, and 74% and 7, 12, 18, and 31%, respectively, in the 4 age groups [P < .001 and P = .046, respectively]). For subjects receiving NIV with a do-not-intubate order, success and in-hospital mortality rates were similar in different age groups (P = .27 and P = .98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NIV use and a do-not-intubate status are more frequent in subjects with ARF ≥65 y than in those <65 y, especially for subjects with cardiogenic pulmonary edema. However, NIV success and mortality rates were similar between age groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00458926.)