Vincent J. Kramer
Dow AgroSciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vincent J. Kramer.
Aquatic Toxicology | 1999
Stephanie R. Miles-Richardson; Vincent J. Kramer; Scott D. Fitzgerald; James A. Render; Behzad Yamini; Steven J. Barbee; John P. Giesy
Abstract Environmental contaminants with estrogenic activity have recently received attention because of their potential effects on the reproductive efficiency of humans and wildlife. This study was conducted with the endogenous estrogen, 17 β-estradiol (E2), to establish the histologic response of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) as a model organism. Sexually mature fathead minnows were exposed for 14 days to waterborne concentrations of 1000, 100, 10, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.1 or 0.0625 nM E2. Exposure to E2 caused a reduction in size of the prominent male secondary sex characteristics, the fatpads and nuptial breeding tubercles. Histological lesions observed in the testes included proliferation of Sertoli cells and degenerative changes. Electron microscopy of seminiferous tubules and their Sertoli cells revealed large phagolysosomes filled with degenerating spermatozoa and other cellular debris. Females had ovaries in which most of the follicles were in the primary stage of development. There were also more atretic follicles and fewer secondary and Graafian follicles than in unexposed females. These findings demonstrate components of sexually mature fish which may be altered by compounds that mimic E2. To determine if lesions observed in males were permanent, 50 sexually mature males and females were exposed to a single concentration of 10 nM E2 for 10 days. Samples were collected from males on the final day of E2 exposure and over a period of 16 weeks after the exposure was stopped. No E2-induced lesions were observed beyond 16 weeks post E2 exposure. Results of these studies suggest that histological lesions could occur at ecologically-relevant exposures to ‘estrogenic’ compounds. However, certain lesions caused by exposure of adult fathead minnows are not permanent.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2011
Vincent J. Kramer; Matthew A. Etterson; Markus Hecker; Cheryl A. Murphy; Guritno Roesijadi; Daniel J. Spade; Julann A. Spromberg; Magnus Wang; Gerald T. Ankley
Maintaining the viability of populations of plants and animals is a key focus for environmental regulation. Population-level responses integrate the cumulative effects of chemical stressors on individuals as those individuals interact with and are affected by their conspecifics, competitors, predators, prey, habitat, and other biotic and abiotic factors. Models of population-level effects of contaminants can integrate information from lower levels of biological organization and feed that information into higher-level community and ecosystem models. As individual-level endpoints are used to predict population responses, this requires that biological responses at lower levels of organization be translated into a form that is usable by the population modeler. In the current study, we describe how mechanistic data, as captured in adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), can be translated into modeling focused on population-level risk assessments. First, we describe the regulatory context surrounding population modeling, risk assessment and the emerging role of AOPs. Then we present a succinct overview of different approaches to population modeling and discuss the types of data needed for these models. We describe how different key biological processes measured at the level of the individual serve as the linkage, or bridge, between AOPs and predictions of population status, including consideration of community-level interactions and genetic adaptation. Several case examples illustrate the potential for use of AOPs in population modeling and predictive ecotoxicology. Finally, we make recommendations for focusing toxicity studies to produce the quantitative data needed to define AOPs and to facilitate their incorporation into population modeling.
Pest Management Science | 2017
W. John Owen; Chenglin Yao; Kyung Myung; Greg Kemmitt; Andrew Leader; Kevin G. Meyer; Andrew J. Bowling; Thomas Slanec; Vincent J. Kramer
Abstract BACKGROUND The development of novel highly efficacious fungicides that lack cross‐resistance is extremely desirable. Fenpicoxamid (Inatreq™ active) possesses these characteristics and is a member of a novel picolinamide class of fungicides derived from the antifungal natural product UK‐2A. RESULTS Fenpicoxamid strongly inhibited in vitro growth of several ascomycete fungi, including Zymoseptoria tritici (EC50, 0.051 mg L−1). Fenpicoxamid is converted by Z. tritici to UK‐2A, a 15‐fold stronger inhibitor of Z. tritici growth (EC50, 0.0033 mg L−1). Strong fungicidal activity of fenpicoxamid against driver cereal diseases was confirmed in greenhouse tests, where activity on Z. tritici and Puccinia triticina matched that of fluxapyroxad. Due to its novel target site (Qi site of the respiratory cyt bc1 complex) for the cereals market, fenpicoxamid is not cross‐resistant to Z. tritici isolates resistant to strobilurin and/or azole fungicides. Across multiple European field trials Z. tritici was strongly controlled (mean, 82%) by 100 g as ha−1 applications of fenpicoxamid, which demonstrated excellent residual activity. CONCLUSIONS The novel chemistry and biochemical target site of fenpicoxamid as well as its lack of cross‐resistance and strong efficacy against Z. tritici and other pathogens highlight the importance of fenpicoxamid as a new tool for controlling plant pathogenic fungi.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 1998
Gerald T. Ankley; Ellen Mihaich; Ralph G. Stahl; Donald E. Tillitt; Theo Colborn; Suzzanne McMaster; Ron Miller; John A. Bantle; Pamela M. Campbell; Nancy D. Denslow; Richard L. Dickerson; Leroy C. Folmar; Michael Fry; John P. Giesy; L. Earl Gray; Patrick D. Guiney; Thomas H. Hutchinson; Sean W. Kennedy; Vincent J. Kramer; Gerald A. LeBlanc; M. A. Mayes; Alison Nimrod; Reynaldo Patiño; Richard E. Peterson; Richard Purdy; Robert K. Ringer; Peter C. Thomas; Les Touart; Glen Van Der Kraak; Timothy R. Zacharewski
Aquatic Toxicology | 1998
Vincent J. Kramer; Stephanie R. Miles-Richardson; Susan L. Pierens; John P. Giesy
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | 2000
John P. Giesy; Susan L. Pierens; Erin M. Snyder; Stephanie R. Miles-Richardson; Vincent J. Kramer; Shane A. Snyder; Krista M. Nichols; Daniel A. Villeneuve
Environmental Research | 1999
S.R. Miles-Richardson; Susan L. Pierens; Krista M. Nichols; Vincent J. Kramer; Erin M. Snyder; Shane A. Snyder; James A. Render; Scott D. Fitzgerald; John P. Giesy
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology | 1997
Vincent J. Kramer; William G. Helferich; Åke Bergman; Eva Klasson-Wehler; John P. Giesy
Science of The Total Environment | 1999
Vincent J. Kramer; John P. Giesy
Archive | 2008
Vincent J. Kramer; David G. Ouse; Norman R. Pearson; Holger Tank; Mark W. Zettler