Vincent M. de Jong

Aftercare Following Syndesmotic Screw Placement: A Systematic Review

For ankle fractures, in general, several studies have been published on immobilization (e.g., cast or boot) versus early motion after surgical treatment. However, no studies have been performed to determine the best aftercare strategy for surgically treated patients with ankle fractures with concomitant acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. The aim of the present review was to compare the functional outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury treated with a cast or boot versus early motion. We performed a systematic review using the electronic databases from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2012 of the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE(®), EMbase, and Google Scholar. The included studies were those in which ankle fractures with acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries had been treated with 1 or more syndesmotic screws, with a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months and at least 25 patients included. The functional outcomes, measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society Hindfoot scale, Olerud-Molander Ankle Scale, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, were compared. A total of 9 studies were identified with a total of 531 patients. The number of included patients ranged from 28 to 93. The mean follow-up period was 12 to 101 months. Of the 9 studies, 3 used an early motion protocol (195 patients) and 6 (336 patients) a protocol of immobilization for at least 6 weeks. For the American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society Hindfoot scale, the mean scores for immobilization were 86 to 91 points and for early motion, 84 to 89. For the Olerud-Molander Ankle Scale, the scores for immobilization were 47 to 90 and for early motion, 46 to 82 points. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score for immobilization was 11 and for early motion ranged from 12 to 27 points. No apparent differences could be detected in the published data considering the functional outcomes between immobilization versus an early motion protocol in ankle fractures with acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries treated with a syndesmotic screw. However, level 1 and 2 studies on this subject are lacking.

Predictors of Nonunion and Infectious Complications in Patients With Posttraumatic Subtalar Arthrodesis

Objective: The objective of the present study was (1) to identify predictors of both nonunion and postoperative wound infections (POWI) and (2) to assess the union and complication rate following posttraumatic subtalar arthrodesis (STA). Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients: All consecutive adult patients with STA following traumatic injuries between 2000 and May 2015. Intervention: STA for posttraumatic deformities. Main Outcome Measurements: Union (described as a combination of radiographic signs of osseous bridging and a clinically fused joint) and POWI as classified by the Centers for Disease and Control. Results: A total number of 93 (96 feet) patients met the inclusion criteria. Union was achieved in 89% of patients. For primary, secondary in situ, and secondary correction arthrodesis, these percentages were 94%, 84,% and 90%, respectively (NS). The union rate significantly increased over time (P = 0.02). In 17 patients (18%), a POWI occurred, of which 2 were classified as superficial and 15 as deep POWIs. The POWI rate did not differ between the groups. Alcohol, nicotine, and drug abuse were not significantly associated with the occurrence of POWIs. Patients with an open fracture or an infection following open reduction internal fixation had a greater risk of a POWI following STA (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: We could not identify predictors for nonunion. In 18% of the patients, an infectious complication following surgery occurred. Patients with an open fracture or an infection after primary surgical treatment (ie, open reduction internal fixation) have a higher chance of POWIs following STA. The union rate following posttraumatic STA is 89%. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures: A Case Series and Systematic Review

&NA; The current reference standard for unstable ankle fractures is open reduction and internal fixation using a plate and lag screws. This approach requires extensive dissection and wound complications are not uncommon. The use of intramedullary screw fixation might overcome these issues. The aim of our study was to provide an overview of the published data regarding intramedullary screw fixation of fibula fractures combined with a small consecutive case series. We performed a search of published studies to identify the studies in which fibula fractures were treated with percutaneous intramedullary screw fixation. Additionally, all consecutive patients treated for an unstable ankle fracture in a level 1 trauma center using an intramedullary screw were retrospectively included. The literature search identified 6 studies with a total of 180 patients. Wound infection was seen in 1 patient (0.6%), anatomic reduction was achieved in 168 patients (93.3%), and a loss of reduction was seen in 2 patients (1.1%). Implant removal was deemed necessary in 3 patients (1.7%) and nonunion was seen is 2 patients (1.1%). A total of 11 patients, in whom no wound complications occurred, were included in our study. The follow‐up duration was a minimum of 12 months. A secondary dislocation was seen in 1 patient, and delayed union was observed after 7.5 months in 1 other patient. In conclusion, intramedullary screw fixation is a safe and adequate method to use for fibula fractures, with a low risk of wound complications. Additional research regarding functional outcome is warranted. &NA; Level of Clinical Evidence: 2

Complications of Kirschner Wire Use in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures

The most important goal of surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is anatomic correction. This reduction is usually stabilized using plate and screw osteosynthesis. In addition, Kirschner wires (K-wires) can be used to maintain the surgical reduction or stability of the construct. In the present study, we evaluated the frequency and type of use of additional K-wires and subsequent migration in the surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The data from 279 patients treated surgically from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 in a level 1 trauma center using an extended lateral approach were analyzed after 1 year of follow-up. All postoperative radiographic images were reviewed to identify the cases in which K-wires were used. Data on the number and type of K-wires used, K-wire location, and K-wire migration found on follow-up imaging studies were collected. Of the 279 patients, 69 K-wires had been used in 49 (18%) patients. A total of 25 (36%) lost (buried), 38 (55%) bent, and 6 (9%) unmodified straight K-wires had been placed. Overall, in 4 (5.8%) of 69 K-wires, secondary dislocation was seen. One (4%) of the lost, 3 (50%) of the unmodified, and none of the bent K-wires showed secondary dislocation. K-wire migration was seen in 5.8% of the cases. None of the bent K-wires and only 1 of the lost K-wires had migrated in the present study. These 2 techniques are preferred when using K-wire fixation in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The use of unmodified straight K-wires should be discouraged.

Fixation Methods for Calcaneus Fractures: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical Studies Using Cadaver Specimens

ABSTRACT Calcaneal fractures are notoriously difficult to treat and wound complications occur often. However, owing to the rare nature of these fractures, clinical trials on this subject are lacking. Thus, biomechanical studies form a viable source of information on this subject. With our systematic review of biomechanical studies, we aimed to provide an overview of all the techniques available and guide clinicians in their choice of method of fracture fixation. A literature search was conducted using 3 online databases to find biomechanical studies investigating methods of fixation for calcaneal fractures. A total of 14 studies investigating 237 specimens were identified. Large diversity was found in the tested fixation methods and in the test setups used. None of the studies found a significant difference in favor of any of the fixation methods. All tested methods provided a biomechanically stable fixation. All the investigated methods of fixation for calcaneal fractures seem to be biomechanically sufficient. No clear benefit was found for locking plates in the fixation of calcaneal fractures; however, a subtle mechanical superiority might exist compared with nonlocking plates in the case of fractures in osteoporotic bone. Several of the techniques tested would be suitable for a minimal invasive approach. These should be investigated further in clinical trials. Level of Clinical Evidence: 3

Traumatic Epidermal Inclusion Cyst After Minimally Invasive Surgery of a Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture: A Case Report

Epidermal inclusion cysts are common epithelial cysts of the skin. The latter classically originate from progressive cystic ectasia of the infundibular portion of hair follicle. Therefore, these cysts are usually found in hairy regions and rarely in glabrous skin such as the palms and soles. The etiology of glabrous epidermal inclusion cysts appear to be different from that of those located in hairy regions. It has been suggested that implantation of epithelial cells into subcutaneous tissue, such as during trauma, is most likely the pathophysiologic basis. Epidermal inclusion cysts on the palms and soles are often misdiagnosed, leading to improper treatment. Therefore, we report a rare case of an epidermal inclusion cyst of the heel after minimally invasive surgery of a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture.

Correction to: Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study

The published online version contain mistake in the author list for the name of the author “J. Carel Goslings” was incorrectly presented in the HTML version.

Outcome following osteosynthesis or primary arthrodesis of calcaneal fractures: A cross-sectional cohort study

BACKGROUND Calcaneal fractures are uncommon and have a substantial impact on hindfoot function and quality of life. Several surgical treatment options are available; both in surgical approach and type of operation. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcome and quality of life following ORIF and primary arthrodesis. Furthermore, predictors of worse functional outcome were explored. METHODS A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was performed in patients with surgical fixation of a calcaneal fracture with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Patients received ORIF through the 1) Extended Lateral Approach (ELA), 2) Sinus Tarsi Approach (STA) or 3) primary arthrodesis via STA. Participants were presented a questionnaire containing demographics, the AOFAS hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index, SF-36, EQ-5D and patient satisfaction. RESULTS In total 95 patients participated in this study. The three groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics. A median score of 74.5 points on the AOFAS hindfoot scale and 11.9 on the FFI was found for the entire group. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with ORIF of primary arthrodesis. Patients scored a median of 49.0 on the Physical Component Scale of the SF-36 and 55.4 on the Mental Component Scale. On the EQ-5D patients scored a median of 0.8 points. Again no statistically significant differences were observed between the three subgroups. Socio-economic status was the only statistically significant predictor of worse functional outcome (β: 4.06, 95% CI: 0.50-7.62) after multivariable analysis. INTERPRETATION Good midterm outcomes following in terms of functional outcome and in quality of life are observed. We observed no statistical significant difference in functional outcome between patients with ORIF and patients with primary arthrodesis. The only predictor of worse functional outcome is a lower socio-economic status.