Vincenzo Fragola

ISSQoL: A new questionnaire for evaluating the quality of life of people living with HIV in the HAART era*

Objective: To design a Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) instrument for HIV-infected people in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Methods: The self-administered questionnaire was developed by an Italian network including researchers, physicians, people living with HIV, national institutions and community-based organizations (CBO) through several steps: (1) review of existing HRQoL literature and questionnaires for HIV-infected people; (2) selection of relevant domains measuring HRQoL in HIV-infected people, and identification of new domains related to new aspects of HRQoL concerning HAART-treated individuals; (3) conduction of two pre-test analyses in independent groups of Italian HIV-positive people (n≌100) distributed throughout the country. The objectives of the first pre-test were to verify the usefulness of the questionnaire, to construct a form easily understandable by everyone, to define the domains and their significance; the second pre-test aimed at evaluating and reshaping the questionnaire based on a statistical analysis of the outcomes of first pre-test; (4) validation analysis. A large cohort of people with HIV infection was recruited for the last step.Results: The internal consistence reliability (Cronbach’s α) was ≥0.70 for all domains. Most domains had Cronbach’s coefficient >0.80. All domains demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. The final version of ISSQoL includes two sections: HRQoL Core Evaluation Form (9 domains) and Additional Important Areas for HRQoL (6 domains). The ISSQoL was administered together with two additional forms: a Daily Impact of Symptoms Form and a Demographic Information Form. The Additional Important Areas for HRQoL include social support, interaction with medical staff, treatment impact, body changes, life planning, and motherhood/fatherhood.Conclusion: The data reported in the present paper provide preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the ISSQoL questionnaire for the measurement of HRQoL in HIV-infected people. The direct involvement of HIV-positive people in all the phases of the project was a key aspect of our work.

Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine- didanosine-nevirapine and zidovudine-didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial). DesignA 48-week randomized, double-blind trial. MethodsSixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health. ResultsAlthough the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P < 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score. ConclusionAlthough a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

Plasma HIV-1 copy number and in vitro infectivity of plasma prior to and during combination antiretroviral treatment.

Some studies on untreated patients have shown a general correlation between plasma HIV copy number and plasma infectivity in in vitro models. Recent observations also indicate that HIV-RNA level is an important predictor of perinatal transmission and may also have a role in heterosexual transmission. To further analyse the correlation between HIV viral load and plasma infectivity, we studied the relationship between HIV-1 plasma copy number and plasma infectivity prior to and during treatment with antiretroviral combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adults. Plasma infectivity was assessed in vitro by coculture of plasma from HIV-positive patients with PHA-stimulated fresh PBMC from uninfected donors. A positive plasma isolation, in almost all cases (43/45) and irrespective of treatment status, was associated with an HIV viral load higher than 100000 copies per ml, with higher plasma HIV-1 RNA values in isolation-positive samples compared with isolation-negative samples (median values, 710000 vs. 37500 copies per ml, respectively). SI and NSI strains had similarly high viral load values (470000 vs. 790000 copies per ml), but CD4 counts were lower in the SI phenotype group. Our data indicate that low levels of viral load are only exceptionally associated with isolation from plasma in the in vitro model we used. This observation confirms indirectly the presence of an association between viral load and infectivity. The requisite of a high plasma viral load in order to obtain infectivity (i.e. positivity of HIV isolation from plasma) also seems maintained under antiretroviral treatment, adding confidence in the conclusion that reductions in viral load translate into reduction of plasma infectivity. Due to the extreme complexity of factors determining transmission, a very prudent interpretation of the results is essential when information from experimental studies has to be transferred to clinical situations requiring assessment of risks or clinical decisions.

Evolution of proviral DNA HIV-1 tropism under selective pressure of maraviroc-based therapy

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor tropism in proviral DNA of patients during maraviroc-based therapy. METHODS Fourteen heavily high active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated patients with a CCR5 Trofile profile were monitored over a 24 month period from the start of maraviroc therapy. Whole-blood samples were obtained at different timepoints, and coreceptor tropism was determined for proviral DNA from the V3-loop region sequence using the Geno2Pheno algorithm [false positive rate (FPR): 20%]. RESULTS At the start of maraviroc treatment, 13/14 patients were viraemic (median: 4.33 log copies/mL). Concordance in R5 tropism (R5/R5) was observed between circulating HIV-RNA (Trofile) and HIV-DNA provirus in 10/14 patients (median FPR = 54.0%), while 4 patients showed a CXCR4-tropic R5/X4 variant in their provirus (FPR: 5.8%, 5.7%, 16.6% and 1.1%, respectively). All R5/R5 patients showed a stable HIV-1 DNA coreceptor usage. Two out of four R5/X4 patients showed a tropism shift in their archived provirus and, after 6 months a prevalence of R5-tropic virus was detected in DNA. The other two R5/X4 patients harboured the 11/25 genotype, and maintained X4 tropism in provirus during the study. Virological response did not reveal differences in RNA decay and CD4+ cell recovery in patients with discordant tropism. CONCLUSIONS A relatively good correlation between RNA and DNA tropism was observed at baseline. Proviral DNA tropism remained stable over 24 months of maraviroc-based therapy, indicating that determination of proviral DNA V3 sequence could be used in tropism prediction in clinical practice. The data also confirm the importance of the 11/25 rule in predicting viral tropism.

Hospitalizations and Costs of Treatment for Protease Inhibitor-Based Regimens in Patients with Very Advanced HIV-Infection (CD4 < 50/mm3)

Abstract Purpose: To describe the cost of hospitalization and treatment in patients with very advanced disease who tart different regimens based on a protease inhibitor (PI). Method: An observational retrospective analysis was performed on data from a 48-week randomized, multicenter study. Analysis was based on a subgroup of centers that were geographically defined. Costs of ordinary hospital admissions and of antiretroviral treatment were considered. Incidence of hospitalization and number of days free from hospitalization during the period of observation were calculated. Cost and hospitalization measures were compared among patients receiving three different therapeutic regimens: only PI, PI plus one nucleoside, or PI plus two nucleosides. A multivariate analysis was used to assess cost differences, controlling for variables potentially able to influence outcome. Results: Overall, among 166 patients starting PI (PI plus two nucleosides, 71; PI plus one nucleoside, 65; only PI, 30), 162 ordinary hospital admissions were observed during about 1 year of follow-up. Monthly rates of admission per person and incidence of first hospitalization on 100 person-months showed a clear inverse relationship with the number of drugs comprising the baseline treatment regimen, with the lower rates for the triple therapy group (0.06 and 3.9, respectively), intermediate values for the dual therapy group (0.10 and 8.1, respectively), and higher rates for the PI monotherapy group (0.15 and 13.7, respectively). The average number of days free from hospitalization per month was 29.5 in the triple therapy group, 28.6 in the dual therapy group, and 27.9 in the monotherapy group. The results of cost analysis showed, despite higher cost of antiretroviral treatment, that global costs were progressively lower using regimens of increasing potency: Compared to PI monotherapy, global cost (costs of antiretroviral treatment and of hospitalizations combined) per month per patient was 31.9% lower for the triple therapy group and 19.3% lower for the dual therapy. Global cost for the triple therapy was 15.7% lower compared to global cost for dual therapy. After adjustment for CD4 count, AIDS status, and Karnofsky score, both hospitalization costs and global costs were significantly lower for triple therapy compared to monotherapy (p = .002 and .039, respectively). Conclusion: In advanced and nucleoside-experienced patients, PI-containing regimens have a differential impact according to the overall strength of the regimen, with the best effects on both hospitalizations and treatment costs obtained using PI within potent combination regimens.

Retention in Care of Adult HIV Patients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Tigray, Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Introduction Although Ethiopia has been scaling up the antiretroviral therapy (ART) services, low retention in care of patients remains one of the main obstacles to treatment success. We report data on retention in care and its associated determinants in Tigray, Ethiopia. Methods We used data from the CASA project, a prospective observational and multi-site study of a cohort of HIV-infected patients who initiated ART for the first time in Tigray. Four participating health facilities (HFs) located in the South of Tigray were considered for this study. Patients were followed for one year after ART initiation. The main outcome measure was represented by the current retention in care, defined as the proportion of patients who were alive and receiving ART at the same HF one year after ART initiation. Patients who started ART between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 were included in this analysis. Patients were followed for one year after ART initiation. The determinants of retention were analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards model with robust sandwich estimates to account for within HF correlation. Results The four participating HFs in Tigray were able to retain overall 85.1% of their patients after one year from starting ART. Loss to follow-up (5.5%) and transfers to other HF (6.6) were the main determinant of attrition. A multivariate analysis shows that the factors significantly associated with retention were the type of HF, gender and active TB. Alamata health center was the HF with the highest attrition rate (HR 2.99, 95% CI: 2.77–3.23). Active TB (HR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.23–2.41) and gender (HR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.10–2.56) were also significantly associated with attrition. Conclusions Although Ethiopia has significantly improved access to the ART program, achieving and maintaining a satisfactory long-term retention rate is a future goal. This is difficult because of different retention rates among HFs. Moreover specific interventions should be directed to people of different sex to improve retention in care in male population.

Relationship Between Health-Related Quality of Life Measures and High HIV Viral Load in HIV-Infected Triple-Class-Experienced Patients

Abstract Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been recognized as a central measure of the overall health status in HIV patients. With the availability of different highly effective drug combinations, maximizing quality-adjusted survival has become a major target of HIV treatment. Although the association of HIV RNA and CD4 cell count with clinical HIV progression has been well established, the relation between these markers and HRQoL measures is still unclear. Method: This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship linking HIV RNA and CD4 to HRQoL measures in 181 triple-class-experienced patients with advanced HIV disease. The instrument used was the ISSQoL, a self-administered and HIV-specific HRQoL questionnaire. Results: Data showed no correlation between HRQoL measures and CD4 counts. Higher HIV RNA levels were, however, associated with poor HRQoL scores in 3 out of 9 scales of social functioning, depression and anxiety, and satisfaction with quality of life. In multivariable analyses, only the satisfaction with quality of life mean score remained significantly lower for the HIV RNA >100,000 copies/mL group compared to the HIV RNA 50 to 10,000 copies/mL group. Conclusions: Although other determinants of HRQoL in people with HIV should also be considered, this finding suggests a negative impact of high viral load on perceived HRQoL that adds to other described determinants of lower quality of life in people with HIV, such as lower social support and self-reported symptoms.

The mutational archive in proviral DNA does not change during 24 months of continuous or intermittent highly active antiretroviral therapy

Objectives The aim of the study was to determine the modifications of the mutational archive in proviral HIV‐1 DNA occurring during 24 months of intermittent or continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

Virological failure at one year in triple-class experienced patients switching to raltegravir-based regimens is not predicted by baseline factors

We evaluated rates and determinants of virological failure in triple-class experienced patients receiving raltegravir-based regimens from a national observational study over 48 weeks, defined by any one of the following: (1) no HIV-RNA suppression to undetectable levels (<50 copies/mL) during follow-up; (2) detectable viral load after obtaining undetectable levels; and (3) leaving the study before 48 weeks. Among 101 eligible patients, 26 (25.7%; 95% CI 17.2–34.2) had virological failure. No significant differences between patients with and without virological failure were observed for gender, age, route of transmission, baseline CD4/HIV-RNA, CDC group, hepatitis B or C co-infections, resistance (based on the last genotype available), type and number of concomitant drug classes, concomitant use of darunavir, atazanavir, etravirine, enfuvirtide or maraviroc, and health-related quality-of-life measures. A high rate of treatment response was observed. The analyses did not identify any baseline factor associated with failure, including resistance status. Even if we cannot exclude the presence of pre-existing minority resistant variants not captured by genotypic tests, the lack of baseline predictors of failure suggests the need to monitor patients closely during follow up for other factors, such as potential drug interactions and reduced levels of adherence, which may favour virological failure.

Response to raltegravir-based salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus coinfection

OBJECTIVES To define the impact of coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) on viroimmunological response to raltegravir-based salvage regimens that also include new HIV inhibitors such as maraviroc, darunavir and etravirine. METHODS We used data from a national observational study of patients starting raltegravir-based regimens to compare virological suppression and CD4 cell change from baseline in patients with and without concomitant HBV or HCV infection. RESULTS Overall, 275 patients (107 coinfected and 168 non-coinfected) were evaluated. Coinfected patients were more commonly former intravenous drug users and had a longer history of HIV infection and higher baseline aminotransferase levels. Both HIV-RNA and CD4 response were similar in the two groups. Mean time to first HIV-RNA copy number <50 copies/mL was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.5-4.6) in non-coinfected patients and 3.9 months (95% CI 3.3-4.5) in coinfected patients (hazard ratio 1.039, 95% CI 0.761-1.418, P = 0.766, log-rank test). The risk of developing new grade 3-4 hepatic adverse events was significantly higher in coinfected patients (hazard ratio 1.779, 95% CI 1.123-2.817, P = 0.009). The two groups of coinfected and non-coinfected patients had similar rates of interruption of any baseline drug (hazard ratio 1.075, 95% CI 0.649-1.781, P = 0.776) and of raltegravir (hazard ratio 1.520, 95% CI 0.671-3.447, P = 0.311). Few AIDS-defining events and deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Viroimmunological response to regimens based on raltegravir and other recent anti-HIV inhibitors is not negatively affected by coinfection with HBV or HCV. Liver toxicity, either pre-existing or new, is more common in coinfected patients, but with no increased risk of treatment interruption.