Vinicius M. Fava

Genetic and immunological evidence implicates interleukin 6 as a susceptibility gene for leprosy type 2 reaction.

In leprosy, type 1 reaction (T1R) and type 2 reaction (T2R) are major causes of nerve injury and permanent disabilities. A previous study on plasma levels of 27 cytokines in patients with T1R or T2R and controls with nonreactional leprosy identified the gene for interleukin 6 (IL-6) as a candidate for genetic analysis. Two nested case-control studies were built from a cohort of 409 patients with leprosy from central Brazil, monitored for T1R and T2R. There was evidence for association between T2R and IL-6 tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs2069832 (P = .002), rs2069840 (P = .03), and rs2069845 (P = .04), with information on the entire IL-6 locus, as well as functional IL-6 variant rs1800795 (P = .005). Moreover, IL-6 plasma levels in patients with T2R correlated with IL-6 genotypes (P = .04). No association was found between IL-6 variants and T1R. Identifying genetic predictive factors for leprosy reactions may have a major impact on preventive strategies.

A Missense LRRK2 Variant Is a Risk Factor for Excessive Inflammatory Responses in Leprosy

Background Depending on the epidemiological setting, a variable proportion of leprosy patients will suffer from excessive pro-inflammatory responses, termed type-1 reactions (T1R). The LRRK2 gene encodes a multi-functional protein that has been shown to modulate pro-inflammatory responses. Variants near the LRRK2 gene have been associated with leprosy in some but not in other studies. We hypothesized that LRRK2 was a T1R susceptibility gene and that inconsistent association results might reflect different proportions of patients with T1R in the different sample settings. Hence, we evaluated the association of LRRK2 variants with T1R susceptibility. Methodology An association scan of the LRRK2 locus was performed using 156 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Evidence of association was evaluated in two family-based samples: A set of T1R-affected and a second set of T1R-free families. Only SNPs significant for T1R-affected families with significant evidence of heterogeneity relative to T1R-free families were considered T1R-specific. An expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of T1R-specific SNPs on LRRK2 gene transcriptional levels. Principal Findings A total of 18 T1R-specific variants organized in four bins were detected. The core SNP capturing the T1R association was the LRRK2 missense variant M2397T (rs3761863) that affects LRRK2 protein turnover. Additionally, a bin of nine SNPs associated with T1R were eQTLs for LRRK2 in unstimulated whole blood cells but not after exposure to Mycobacterium leprae antigen. Significance The results support a preferential association of LRRK2 variants with T1R. LRRK2 involvement in T1R is likely due to a pathological pro-inflammatory loop modulated by LRRK2 availability. Interestingly, the M2397T variant was reported in association with Crohn’s disease with the same risk allele as in T1R suggesting common inflammatory mechanism in these two distinct diseases.

Association of TNFSF8 Regulatory Variants With Excessive Inflammatory Responses but not Leprosy Per Se

BACKGROUND Type 1 reactions (T1R) affect a considerable proportion of patients with leprosy. In those with T1R, the host immune response pathologically overcompensates for the actual infectious threat, resulting in nerve damage and permanent disability. Based on the results of a genome-wide association study of leprosy per se, we investigated the TNFSF15 chromosomal region for a possible contribution to susceptibility to T1R. METHODS We performed a high-resolution association scan of the TNFSF15 locus to evaluate the association with T1R in 2 geographically and ethnically distinct populations: a family-based sample from Vietnam and a case-control sample from Brazil, comprising a total of 1768 subjects. RESULTS In the Vietnamese sample, 47 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) overlapping TNFSF15 and the adjacent TNFSF8 gene were associated with T1R but not with leprosy. Of the 47 SNPs, 39 were cis-expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) for TNFSF8 including SNPs located within the TNFSF15 gene. In the Brazilian sample, 18 of these cis-eQTL SNPs overlapping the TNFSF8 gene were validated for association with T1R. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, these results indicate TNFSF8 and not TNFSF15 as an important T1R susceptibility gene. Our data support the need for infection genetics to go beyond genes for pathogen control to explore genes involved in a commensurate host response.

A genome wide association study identifies a lncRna as risk factor for pathological inflammatory responses in leprosy

Leprosy Type-1 Reactions (T1Rs) are pathological inflammatory responses that afflict a sub-group of leprosy patients and result in peripheral nerve damage. Here, we employed a family-based GWAS in 221 families with 229 T1R-affect offspring with stepwise replication to identify risk factors for T1R. We discovered, replicated and validated T1R-specific associations with SNPs located in chromosome region 10p21.2. Combined analysis across the three independent samples resulted in strong evidence of association of rs1875147 with T1R (p = 4.5x10-8; OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.32–1.80). The T1R-risk locus was restricted to a lncRNA-encoding genomic interval with rs1875147 being an eQTL for the lncRNA. Since a genetic overlap between leprosy and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been detected, we evaluated if the shared genetic control could be traced to the T1R endophenotype. Employing the results of a recent IBD GWAS meta-analysis we found that 10.6% of IBD SNPs available in our dataset shared a common risk-allele with T1R (p = 2.4x10-4). This finding points to a substantial overlap in the genetic control of clinically diverse inflammatory disorders.

Influence of KIR genes and their HLA ligands in the pathogenesis of leprosy in a hyperendemic population of Rondonópolis, Southern Brazil

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the association between KIR genes and the immunopathogenesis of leprosy.MethodsThe types of KIR and HLA genes were evaluated by PCR-SSOP-Luminex in 408 patients with leprosy and 413 healthy individuals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and stepwise multivariate analysis.ResultsThere was a higher frequency of activating KIR genes (KIR2DS1, 2DS2 and 3DS1) together with their HLA ligands in the tuberculoid (TT) group as compared to the lepromatous leprosy (LL) group. KIR2DL2/2DL2-C1 was more frequent in the patient, TT and LL groups than in the control group. Borderline patients presented a higher frequency of inhibitory pairs when compared to the control group, and a higher frequency of activating pairs as compared to the LL group. Multivariate analysis confirmed the associations and demonstrated that being a female is a protective factor against the development of the disease per se and the more severe clinical form.ConclusionsThis study showed that activating and inhibitory KIR genes may influence the development of leprosy – in particular, activating genes may protect against the more aggressive form of the disease – thereby demonstrating the role of NK cells in the immunopathology of the disease.

Age-Dependent Association of TNFSF15/TNFSF8 Variants and Leprosy Type 1 Reaction

A current major challenge in leprosy control is the prevention of permanent disabilities. Host pathological inflammatory responses termed type 1 reaction (T1R) are a leading cause of nerve damage for leprosy patients. The environmental or inherited factors that predispose leprosy cases to undergo T1R are not known. However, studies have shown an important contribution of host genetics for susceptibility to T1R. We have previously identified variants encompassing the TNFSF15/TNFSF8 genes as T1R risk factors in a Vietnamese sample and replicated this association in a Brazilian sample. However, we failed to validate in Brazilian patients the strong association of TNFSF15/TNFSF8 markers rs6478108 and rs7863183 with T1R that we had observed in Vietnamese patients. Here, we investigated if the lack of validation of these variants was due to age-dependent effects on association using four independent population samples, two from Brazil and two from Vietnam. In the combined analysis across the four samples, we observed a strong association of the TNFSF15/TNFSF8 variants rs6478108, rs7863183, and rs3181348 with T1R (pcombined = 1.5E−05, pcombined = 1.8E−05, and pcombined = 6.5E−06, respectively). However, the association of rs6478108 with T1R was more pronounced in leprosy cases under 30 years of age compared to the global sample [odds ratio (OR) = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54–2.46, pcombined = 2.5E−08 versus OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.23–1.73, pcombined = 1.5E−05]. A multivariable analysis indicated that the association of rs6478108 with T1R was independent of either rs7863183 or rs3181348. These three variants are known regulators of the TNFSF8 gene transcription level in multiple tissues. The age dependency of association of rs6478108 and T1R suggests that the genetic control of gene expression varies across the human life span.

Association Analysis Suggests SOD2 as a Newly Identified Candidate Gene Associated With Leprosy Susceptibility

Genetic studies have identified several genes and genomic regions contributing to the control of host susceptibility to leprosy. Here, we test variants of the positional and functional candidate gene SOD2 for association with leprosy in 2 independent population samples. Family-based analysis revealed an association between leprosy and allele G of marker rs295340 (P = .042) and borderline evidence of an association between leprosy and alleles C and A of markers rs4880 (P = .077) and rs5746136 (P = .071), respectively. Findings were validated in an independent case-control sample for markers rs295340 (P = .049) and rs4880 (P = .038). These results suggest SOD2 as a newly identified gene conferring susceptibility to leprosy.

Genetic risk factors for human susceptibility to infections of relevance in dermatology

BACKGROUND In the pre-microbiological era, it was widely accepted that diseases, today known to be infectious, were hereditary. With the discovery of microorganisms and their role in the pathogenesis of several diseases, it was suggested that exposure to the pathogen was enough to explain infection. Nowadays, it is clear that infection is the result of a complex interplay between pathogen and host, therefore dependant on the genetic make-up of the two organisms. Dermatology offers several examples of infectious diseases in different stages of understanding of their molecular basis. In this review, we summarize the main advances towards dissecting the genetic component controlling human susceptibility to infectious diseases of interest in dermatology. Widely investigated diseases such as leprosy and leishmaniasis are discussed from the genetic perspective of both host and pathogen. Others, such as rare mycobacterioses, fungal infections and syphilis, are presented as good opportunities for research in the field of genetics of infection.

Evaluating the Impact of LTA4H Genotype and Immune Status on Survival From Tuberculous Meningitis

Emerging evidence suggests that early events in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis set the stage for the clinical outcome of the disease [1]. An early critical measure of antituberculosis host responsiveness is the balance between proinflammatory and antiinflammatory pathways that are triggered by prostaglandin E2 and lipoxin A4 (LX4), respectively [2, 3]. Mutations in the gene encoding leukotriene A4 hydrolase (LTA4H) can lead to preferential LX4 accumulation and increased susceptibility to mycobacterial disease in zebra fish and humans [4]. Unexpectedly, heterozygosity at several LTA4H single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provided increased protection for pulmonary and meningeal tuberculosis (TBM) [4]. This observation led to the concept that excess LTA4H activity would result in a host-detrimental hyperinflammatory phenotype, whereas lack of LTA4H activity would result in host-detrimental hypoinflammation [4]. Subsequently, the LTA4H promoter region SNP rs17525495, occurring in 3 genotypes—TT, CT, and CC—was identified as a likely molecular cause of the genetic susceptibility [5]. Expression levels of LTA4H in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) correlated with SNP genotype, with CC being lowest (hypoinflammation) and TT being the highest (hyperinflammation). In a study of 182 Vietnamese patients with TBM, of whom a subset had received adjunctive dexamethasone treatment, 3 important results emerged. The genotype of the rs17525495 SNP correlated with pretreatment cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leukocyte counts; in the absence of dexamethasone, heterozygotes at rs17525495 displayed a significant survival advantage; and the main beneficiaries of adjunctive steroid therapy were carriers of the hyperinflammatory TT genotype [5]. Given the suggested clinical relevance of the LTA4H polymorphism, additional studies of the role of this genetic variant in TBM are of great interest. Two studies reported in this issue of The Journal of Infectious Diseases investigated the impact of rs17525495 genotypes and inflammatory biomarkers on survival from TBM in the presence of corticosteroid adjunctive therapy. The first study, by Thuong et al, used a cohort of 764 adult Vietnamese patients with TBM, of whom 352 were infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Using a 9-month serial interval, the authors observed HIV infection as a strong risk factor for decreased survival. British Medical Research Council (BMRC)–defined disease severity grade was a strong risk factor for reduced survival for both HIV-infected and HIV-free patients with TBM. Moreover, the authors studied genotypes of the rs17525495 LTA4H polymorphism and markers of CSF inflammation as additional risk factors for death. Owing to pronounced differences in clinical presentation and prognosis of HIV-infected patients with TBM, we will focus only on the HIV-uninfected patients. Compared to patients who were homozygous for the TT genotype, which is associated with hyperinflammation, HIV-negative carriers of the rs17525495 CC genotype, which is associated with hypoinflammation, had a higher risk of early death, with borderline significance (P = .03). Because of large confidence intervals around the risk estimate, the true impact of homozygosity at this SNP on survival is difficult to evaluate. The LTA4H promoter SNP was not associated with CSF leukocyte counts but was associated with 3 pretreatment CSF cytokine levels. However, both low leukocyte counts and global low cytokine levels were strongly associated with reduced survival. Whether the SNP effect on survival is mediated through cytokine levels remains unknown. Disease severity, which was strongly associated with survival, was not associated with leukocyte count, cytokine levels, or LTA4H genotype. A second study, by van Laarhoven et al, enrolled 608 patients with TBM, of whom 93 were HIV infected. Over a 12-month follow-up period, the authors studied clinical and immune characteristics and the LTA4H promoter polymorphism as risk factors for reduced survival. As in the Vietnamese cohort, HIV infection and disease severity were strong risk factors for reduced survival. E D I T O R I A L C O M M E N T A R Y

Deciphering the genetic control of gene expression following Mycobacterium leprae antigen stimulation

Leprosy is a human infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. A strong host genetic contribution to leprosy susceptibility is well established. However, the modulation of the transcriptional response to infection and the mechanism(s) of disease control are poorly understood. To address this gap in knowledge of leprosy pathogenicity, we conducted a genome-wide search for expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) that are associated with transcript variation before and after stimulation with M. leprae sonicate in whole blood cells. We show that M. leprae antigen stimulation mainly triggered the upregulation of immune related genes and that a substantial proportion of the differential gene expression is genetically controlled. Indeed, using stringent criteria, we identified 318 genes displaying cis-eQTL at an FDR of 0.01, including 66 genes displaying response-eQTL (reQTL), i.e. cis-eQTL that showed significant evidence for interaction with the M. leprae stimulus. Such reQTL correspond to regulatory variations that affect the interaction between human whole blood cells and M. leprae sonicate and, thus, likely between the human host and M. leprae bacilli. We found that reQTL were significantly enriched among binding sites of transcription factors that are activated in response to infection, and that they were enriched among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with susceptibility to leprosy per se and Type-I Reaction, and seven of them have been targeted by recent positive selection. Our study suggested that natural selection shaped our genomic diversity to face pathogen exposure including M. leprae infection.