Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Viren Jain is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Viren Jain.


Nature | 2013

Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina

Moritz Helmstaedter; Kevin L. Briggman; Srinivas C. Turaga; Viren Jain; H. Sebastian Seung; Winfried Denk

Comprehensive high-resolution structural maps are central to functional exploration and understanding in biology. For the nervous system, in which high resolution and large spatial extent are both needed, such maps are scarce as they challenge data acquisition and analysis capabilities. Here we present for the mouse inner plexiform layer—the main computational neuropil region in the mammalian retina—the dense reconstruction of 950 neurons and their mutual contacts. This was achieved by applying a combination of crowd-sourced manual annotation and machine-learning-based volume segmentation to serial block-face electron microscopy data. We characterize a new type of retinal bipolar interneuron and show that we can subdivide a known type based on connectivity. Circuit motifs that emerge from our data indicate a functional mechanism for a known cellular response in a ganglion cell that detects localized motion, and predict that another ganglion cell is motion sensitive.


Neural Computation | 2010

Convolutional networks can learn to generate affinity graphs for image segmentation

Srinivas C. Turaga; Joseph F. Murray; Viren Jain; Fabian Roth; Moritz Helmstaedter; Kevin L. Briggman; Winfried Denk; H. Sebastian Seung

Many image segmentation algorithms first generate an affinity graph and then partition it. We present a machine learning approach to computing an affinity graph using a convolutional network (CN) trained using ground truth provided by human experts. The CN affinity graph can be paired with any standard partitioning algorithm and improves segmentation accuracy significantly compared to standard hand-designed affinity functions. We apply our algorithm to the challenging 3D segmentation problem of reconstructing neuronal processes from volumetric electron microscopy (EM) and show that we are able to learn a good affinity graph directly from the raw EM images. Further, we show that our affinity graph improves the segmentation accuracy of both simple and sophisticated graph partitioning algorithms. In contrast to previous work, we do not rely on prior knowledge in the form of hand-designed image features or image preprocessing. Thus, we expect our algorithm to generalize effectively to arbitrary image types.


international conference on computer vision | 2007

Supervised Learning of Image Restoration with Convolutional Networks

Viren Jain; Joseph F. Murray; Fabian Roth; Srinivas C. Turaga; V. Zhigulin; Kevin L. Briggman; Moritz Helmstaedter; Winfried Denk; H.S. Seung

Convolutional networks have achieved a great deal of success in high-level vision problems such as object recognition. Here we show that they can also be used as a general method for low-level image processing. As an example of our approach, convolutional networks are trained using gradient learning to solve the problem of restoring noisy or degraded images. For our training data, we have used electron microscopic images of neural circuitry with ground truth restorations provided by human experts. On this dataset, Markov random field (MRF), conditional random field (CRF), and anisotropic diffusion algorithms perform about the same as simple thresholding, but superior performance is obtained with a convolutional network containing over 34,000 adjustable parameters. When restored by this convolutional network, the images are clean enough to be used for segmentation, whereas the other approaches fail in this respect. We do not believe that convolutional networks are fundamentally superior to MRFs as a representation for image processing algorithms. On the contrary, the two approaches are closely related. But in practice, it is possible to train complex convolutional networks, while even simple MRF models are hindered by problems with Bayesian learning and inference procedures. Our results suggest that high model complexity is the single most important factor for good performance, and this is possible with convolutional networks.


computer vision and pattern recognition | 2010

Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints

Viren Jain; Benjamin Bollmann; Mark Richardson; Daniel R. Berger; Moritz Helmstaedter; Kevin L. Briggman; Winfried Denk; Jared B. Bowden; John M. Mendenhall; Wickliffe C. Abraham; Kristen M. Harris; Narayanan Kasthuri; Kenneth J. Hayworth; Richard Schalek; Juan Carlos Tapia; Jeff W. Lichtman; H. Sebastian Seung

Recent studies have shown that machine learning can improve the accuracy of detecting object boundaries in images. In the standard approach, a boundary detector is trained by minimizing its pixel-level disagreement with human boundary tracings. This naive metric is problematic because it is overly sensitive to boundary locations. This problem is solved by metrics provided with the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset, but these can be insensitive to topo-logical differences, such as gaps in boundaries. Furthermore, the Berkeley metrics have not been useful as cost functions for supervised learning. Using concepts from digital topology, we propose a new metric called the warping error that tolerates disagreements over boundary location, penalizes topological disagreements, and can be used directly as a cost function for learning boundary detection, in a method that we call Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints (BLOTC). We trained boundary detectors on electron microscopic images of neurons, using both BLOTC and standard training. BLOTC produced substantially better performance on a 1.2 million pixel test set, as measured by both the warping error and the Rand index evaluated on segmentations generated from the boundary labelings. We also find our approach yields significantly better segmentation performance than either gPb-OWT-UCM or multiscale normalized cut, as well as Boosted Edge Learning trained directly on our data.


neural information processing systems | 2008

Natural Image Denoising with Convolutional Networks

Viren Jain; H. Sebastian Seung


Current Opinion in Neurobiology | 2010

Machines that learn to segment images: a crucial technology for connectomics

Viren Jain; H. Sebastian Seung; Srinivas C. Turaga


neural information processing systems | 2011

Learning to Agglomerate Superpixel Hierarchies

Viren Jain; Srinivas C. Turaga; Kevin L. Briggman; Moritz Helmstaedter; Winfried Denk; H. S. Seung


international conference on learning representations | 2014

Deep and Wide Multiscale Recursive Networks for Robust Image Labeling

Gary B. Huang; Viren Jain


arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition | 2016

Flood-Filling Networks.

Michał Januszewski; Jeremy Maitin-Shepard; Peter Li; Jörgen Kornfeld; Winfried Denk; Viren Jain


Archive | 2010

Image and data segmentation

H. Sebastian Seung; Srinivas C. Turaga; Viren Jain

Collaboration


Dive into the Viren Jain's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Srinivas C. Turaga

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin Bollmann

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel R. Berger

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fabian Roth

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge