Virginia D. Steen

Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States

OBJECTIVE To provide a single source for the best available estimates of the national prevalence of arthritis in general and of selected musculoskeletal disorders (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, the spondylarthropathies, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis, gout, fibromyalgia, and low back pain). METHODS The National Arthritis Data Workgroup reviewed data from available surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey series. For overall national estimates, we used surveys based on representative samples. Because data based on national population samples are unavailable for most specific musculoskeletal conditions, we derived data from various smaller survey samples from defined populations. Prevalence estimates from these surveys were linked to 1990 US Bureau of the Census population data to calculate national estimates. We also estimated the expected frequency of arthritis in the year 2020. RESULTS Current national estimates are provided, with important caveats regarding their interpretation, for self-reported arthritis and selected conditions. An estimated 15% (40 million) of Americans had some form of arthritis in 1995. By the year 2020, an estimated 18.2% (59.4 million) will be affected. CONCLUSION Given the limitations of the data on which they are based, this report provides the best available prevalence estimates for arthritis and other rheumatic conditions overall, and for selected musculoskeletal disorders, in the US population.

2013 Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative

OBJECTIVE The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. METHODS Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by 1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and 2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. RESULTS It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, 7 additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynauds phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. CONCLUSION The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.

Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002

Background: Survival of scleroderma has changed since the renal crisis treatment has become possible. Aims: To document the changes in survival and organ system causes of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc) over the past 25 years in patients from a single medical centre. Methods: Consecutive patients evaluated at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA between 1 January 1972 and 31 December 1996 were studied. Survival was determined in five 5-year time periods between 1972 and 1997. Causes of death included scleroderma-related (scleroderma renal crisis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis (PF), gastrointestinal (GI), heart and multiorgan failure) and non-scleroderma-related (cancer, atherosclerotic cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, infection, sudden death, other and unknown) causes. Results: The 10-year survival improved steadily from 54% to 66% during each of the time intervals. There was a significant improvement in survival for patients during 1982–91 compared with those during 1972–81 (p<0.001), even when patients with renal crisis were excluded (p<0.005). The frequency of deaths due to renal crisis significantly decreased over the 30-year time period, from 42% to 6% of scleroderma-related deaths (p<0.001), whereas the proportion of patients with scleroderma who died of PF increased from 6% to 33% (p<0.001). The frequency of pulmonary hypertension, independent of PF, also significantly increased during this time period (p<0.05). There were no changes in scleroderma GI- and heart-related deaths, nor in any of the non-scleroderma-related causes, although patients with scleroderma were less likely to die from scleroderma-related problems in the past 15 years. Conclusion: The change in the pattern of scleroderma-related deaths over the past 30 years demonstrates that the lung (both pulmonary hypertension and PF) is the primary cause of scleroderma-related deaths today. It is important that aggressive searches continue to develop better therapies for these severe pulmonary complications of SSc.

2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative

Objective The 1980 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) lack sensitivity for early SSc and limited cutaneous SSc. The present work, by a joint committee of the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), was undertaken for the purpose of developing new classification criteria for SSc. Methods Using consensus methods, 23 candidate items were arranged in a multicriteria additive point system with a threshold to classify cases as SSc. The classification system was reduced by clustering items and simplifying weights. The system was tested by (1) determining specificity and sensitivity in SSc cases and controls with scleroderma-like disorders, and (2) validating against the combined view of a group of experts on a set of cases with or without SSc. Results It was determined that skin thickening of the fingers extending proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints is sufficient for the patient to be classified as having SSc; if that is not present, seven additive items apply, with varying weights for each: skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, interstitial lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, Raynauds phenomenon, and SSc-related autoantibodies. Sensitivity and specificity in the validation sample were, respectively, 0.91 and 0.92 for the new classification criteria and 0.75 and 0.72 for the 1980 ACR classification criteria. All selected cases were classified in accordance with consensus-based expert opinion. All cases classified as SSc according to the 1980 ACR criteria were classified as SSc with the new criteria, and several additional cases were now considered to be SSc. Conclusions The ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc performed better than the 1980 ACR criteria for SSc and should allow for more patients to be classified correctly as having the disease.

Outcome of Renal Crisis in Systemic Sclerosis: Relation to Availability of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE To determine the outcome of scleroderma renal crisis before and after the availability of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. DESIGN Evaluation of a large cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis and renal crisis who were followed prospectively. SETTING University scleroderma center. PATIENTS One hundred and eight patients who had scleroderma renal crisis between 1972 and 1987. INTERVENTION ACE inhibitors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Therapy with ACE inhibitors has dramatically improved the survival of patients with scleroderma renal crisis (1-year survival, 15% without and 76% with ACE inhibitors; P less than 0.001). However, 24 (44%) of 55 patients with scleroderma renal crisis who were treated with ACE inhibitors died early or required permanent dialysis. Older age, male sex, an initial serum creatinine level of more than 270 mumol/L, inadequately controlled blood pressure, and congestive heart failure were associated with these poor outcomes, but only older age and congestive heart failure were significant in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Eleven of twenty patients (55%) who survived dialysis more than 3 months and continued to receive therapy with ACE inhibitors were able to discontinue dialysis after 3 to 15 months compared with 0 of 15 dialysis patients who did not receive ACE-inhibitor therapy (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Patients with systemic sclerosis who develop hypertension should be treated with an ACE inhibitor. Improved survival and successful discontinuation of dialysis are possible when ACE inhibitors are used to treat scleroderma renal crisis.

Case-control study of corticosteroids and other drugs that either precipitate or protect from the development of scleroderma renal crisis

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the initiation of corticosteroids or other types of therapy affects the development of scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). METHODS Using a case-control study, 110 patients with systemic sclerosis who developed SRC between 1981 and 1993 were closely matched with controls on sex, race, age, disease duration, skin score, levels of creatine phosphokinase, and presence of tendon friction rubs. Corticosteroid use was determined prior to the onset of SRC in cases or prior to the first visit in controls. Cases were compared with matched controls using McNemars matched-pair analysis and conditional logistic regression analysis. The effects of other drugs, including D-penicillamine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, were also evaluated. RESULTS In the 6 months prior to SRC onset or to the first visit, high-dose corticosteroids (> or =15 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) were administered significantly more frequently in SRC patients (36%) than in the controls (12%) (McNemars odds ratio 4.37, 95% confidence interval 2.03-9.43, P < 0.0001). New use of low-dose steroids, continuous use of any steroid dose, NSAIDs, calcium channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of SRC. Antecedent D-penicillamine therapy may have been protective against the development of SRC in controls. CONCLUSION This retrospective case-control study has shown a significant association between antecedent high-dose corticosteroid therapy and the development of SRC. These results should discourage the use of high-dose corticosteroids in patients with early diffuse scleroderma who are at increased risk of developing SRC.

High-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: Analysis of a two-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients taking high-dose D-penicillamine (D-Pen) would have greater softening of skin, lower frequency of renal crisis, and better survival than patients taking low-dose D-Pen. METHODS Seventeen centers enrolled 134 SSc patients with early (< or =18 months) diffuse cutaneous scleroderma into a 2-year, double-blind, randomized comparison of high-dose D-Pen (750-1,000 mg/day) versus low-dose D-Pen (125 mg every other day). All 134 patients were followed up for a mean+/-SD of 4.0+/-1.1 years to assess the frequencies of new-onset scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) and mortality. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients completed 24 months of drug treatment. The course of the modified Rodnan skin thickness score in the 32 high-dose and the 36 low-dose D-Pen completers was not different at 24 months: the skin score dropped 4.8+/-10.3 (mean+/-SD) units in the high-dose group and 6.9+/-8.4 units in the low-dose group (P = 0.384 by t-test; favoring low-dose D-Pen) from 20.4+/-10.3 in the high-dose and 19.9+/-6.6 in the low-dose D-Pen group at study entry. The incidences of SRC and mortality were not different (P > 0.38 by Cox proportional hazards and by chi-square test) in the 66 high-dose patients (8 developed SRC and 8 died) compared with the 68 low-dose patients (10 developed SRC and 12 died). Of the 20 adverse event-related withdrawals, 80% occurred in the high-dose D-Pen group. CONCLUSION The course of the skin score and the frequencies of SRC and mortality in the high-dose D-Pen group were not different from those in the low-dose D-Pen group. Eighty percent of the adverse event-related withdrawals occurred in the high-dose D-Pen patients. Although this study cannot answer the question of whether low-dose D-Pen is effective, it does suggest that there is no advantage to using D-Pen in doses higher than 125 every other day.

Scleroderma Renal Crisis

Renal crisis occurs in patients who have systemic sclerosis with rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous thickening early in their disease. SRC is characterized by malignant hypertension, hyperreninemia, azotemia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and renal failure. SRC was almost uniformly fatal, but in most cases it can now be successfully treated with ACE inhibitors. This therapy has improved survival, reduced the requirement for dialysis, and often allowed for the discontinuation of dialysis 6 to 18 months later. Prompt diagnosis and early, aggressive initiation of therapy with ACE inhibitors will result in the most optimal outcome.

D-Penicillamine Therapy in Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma): A Retrospective Analysis

In a retrospective study on progressive systemic sclerosis, we compared 73 patients who had received D-penicillamine therapy for a minimum of 6 consecutive months with 45 patients who had not received this drug. All patients had diffuse sclerodermatous skin changes and early disease (less than 3-years duration). D-Penicillamine was prescribed for an average of 24 months (range, 6 to 68 months) with a maximum daily dose of 500 to 1500 mg (median, 750 mg). During a mean follow-up interval of 38 months, the degree and extent of skin thickness, determined on physical examination, decreased considerably more in the patients treated with D-penicillamine than in patients in the comparison group (p = 0.07). The rate of new visceral organ involvement was reduced in patients treated with D-penicillamine, especially for the kidney (p = 0.01). Patients treated with D-penicillamine had a greater 5-year cumulative survival rate (88% versus 66%, p less than 0.05). Therapy with colchicine (23 patients) or immunosuppressive agents (26 patients) was not associated with these improvements.

Recombinant human relaxin in the treatment of scleroderma. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Relaxin, a heterodimer protein with a molecular weight of 6000, is secreted by the corpus luteum and placenta during pregnancy (1, 2). It is structurally related to insulin and insulin-like growth factor I, and its principal physiologic role seems to be fostering the growth and remodeling of the uterus. Relaxin also loosens the pelvic ligaments and ripens the uterine cervix in preparation for parturition (3). The availability of recombinant human relaxin has permitted focused investigations of its effects on connective tissue. Recombinant human relaxin alone reduces synthesis of dermal fibroblast collagen and enhances the effects of interferon- (4). Relaxin attenuates the actions of profibrotic cytokines, including transforming growth factor- and interleukin-1 (5), and increases secretion of dermal fibroblast collagenase while reducing levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (5). Of interest, the effect of relaxin on reduced secretion of collagen and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase is dose-dependent, whereas its effect on collagenase is optimal in a narrow range of concentrations (5). Finally, recombinant human relaxin prevents the development of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rodents (6), as well as dermal fibrosis in rodent irritant models (7). In vitro and animal studies suggest that recombinant human relaxin might be therapeutically useful for diseases characterized by fibrosis. Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is the prototypical fibrosing disease in humans. Although the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis is not completely understood, tissue fibrosis dominates the clinical features of the disease and largely determines its morbidity and mortality (8). Scleroderma-related fibrosis includes both the fibrotic intimal hyperplasia of small arteries and arterioles (the Raynaud phenomenon, renal crisis, and pulmonary hypertension), as well as extravascular tissue fibrosis (skin, interstitial lung disease, and tendon involvement) (8). The long-term clinical benefit of preventing or reversing fibrosis in systemic sclerosis has not been tested, and no therapies to date have demonstrated such effects (9). Before porcine relaxin was withdrawn from the market in the early 1960s in response to reformed policies of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), open case studies showed that it improved scleroderma-related skin change and healed cutaneous ulcers (10). Phase I studies of recombinant human relaxin in patients with diffuse scleroderma have demonstrated that steady-state serum concentrations of relaxin up to 60 times higher than those seen in normal pregnancy could be safely achieved with continuous subcutaneous infusion (11, 12). The most common drug-related adverse events associated with relaxin treatment have been menometrorrhagia and moderate reversible reductions in hemoglobin. In phase I studies, extent and severity of skin thickening as well as patient global assessment and functional status improved over periods of up to 1 year. However, interpretation of these findings has been hampered by short duration of treatment (11) or inadequacies of open-label design (12). We report the results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing placebo with recombinant human relaxin, 25 g/kg of body weight per day and 100 g/kg per day, given for 24 weeks in patients with stable, diffuse, moderate to severe scleroderma. Methods Patients Before screening, all patients gave informed consent according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with FDA requirements. Patients were recruited through 13-member institutions of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium. Men and women 18 to 70 years of age were included if they had a history of systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma (defined as skin involvement proximal to the elbows or knees, excluding the face and neck) and less than 5 years had elapsed since onset of the first non-Raynaud sign or symptom. A baseline modified Rodnan skin score of at least 20, or of at least 16 in the case of truncal involvement, was required for inclusion in the treatment phase of the study. Patients were excluded from this phase if their skin score varied by more than 5 points from screening to the first treatment day. We excluded patients who had systemic sclerosis with limited scleroderma (skin involvement restricted to face and neck and sites distal to elbows and knees); eosinophilic fasciitis; eosinophilia myalgia syndrome; or scleroderma in conjunction with any other definable connective tissue disease, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyositis, or dermatomyositis. We also excluded patients with a substantial history of environmental exposure to tainted rapeseed oil, vinyl chloride, trichloroethylene, or silica. In addition, patients with renal crisis in the previous 6 months; chronic renal failure; or severe cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, or pulmonary disease were excluded. Patients were required to discontinue putative disease-modifying treatments for scleroderma (including d-penicillamine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate, potassium aminobenzoate, photopheresis, colchicine, or any other experimental treatment) at least 4 weeks before beginning treatment with the study drug. Patients were excluded if they were receiving more than 10 mg of prednisone per day or an equivalent dose of another glucocorticoid. Intervention We administered recombinant human relaxin, 25 g/kg per day or 100 g/kg per day, or placebo for 24 weeks by continuous subcutaneous infusion, using microinfusion pumps (Panomat T-Series 5 mL, Disetronic Medical Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). Recombinant human relaxin was produced by Connetics Corp. (Palo Alto, California) in Escherichia coli (13). The placebo was a sterile acetate buffer solution that was identical in composition to the buffer used for relaxin. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or recombinant human relaxin (25 g/kg per day or 100 g/kg per day). Randomization was performed at a centralized data management organization (Pacific Research Associates, Los Altos, California). Biased coin randomization (14, 15) was used to stratify patients on the basis of disease duration ( 2.5 years or>2.5 to 5 years) and use of d-penicillamine in the previous 6 months (16). The same randomization procedure was used to replace patients who withdrew before completing 4 weeks of treatment. Patient prescriptions for the study medication were forwarded to a centralized pharmacy (Coram Healthcare of Northern California, Hayward, California) for preparation of blinded supplies of the study drug. Each patients dose was based on screening body weight. The dose was adjusted only if body weight changed by 10% or more during the study. Treatment was administered over 24 hours for 24 weeks. The infusion site and needle were changed at least every 72 hours. The dosage of 25 g/kg per day was selected on the basis of pharmacokinetic results from earlier studies. We anticipated that it would be safe and well tolerated and would produce steady-state serum concentrations of relaxin that were approximately three- to fivefold greater than those found in human pregnancy (11). On the basis of preclinical and earlier clinical studies, we hypothesized that this serum concentration would have antifibrotic effects. To measure the potential for a doseresponse effect, we selected the dosage of 100 g/kg per day on the basis of safety and tolerability data from earlier clinical studies (11, 12). Continuous subcutaneous infusion was chosen as the mode of administration to eliminate the need for six daily subcutaneous injections, to conserve drug supply, and to mimic the constancy of relaxin concentrations that are usually seen in pregnancy (11). Study Design The objectives of the study were to assess the efficacy, safety, and doseresponse effect of recombinant human relaxin in patients with diffuse scleroderma. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment clinical trial. Assessments The primary measure of efficacy was the modified Rodnan skin score, a clinical evaluation by palpation of skin thickness in 17 body areas (face, chest, abdomen, right and left fingers, hands, forearms, upper arms, thighs, legs, and feet). Each area receives a score of 0 to 3 for degree of thickness (0=normal, 1=mild thickening, 2=moderate thickening, and 3=severe thickening). The total score ranges from 0 to 51. The modified Rodnan skin score has been the standard measure of outcome in recent clinical trials involving scleroderma (16-18). Many recent studies have confirmed that total skin scoring is both accurate (with an interobserver variability of 4.6 units) and reproducible (with an intraobserver variability of 3.1 units) (19, 20). Skin scoring is in many ways an ideal outcome measure for scleroderma because it is accessible, cost-effective, sensitive to change, and, as a measure of fibrosis, directly relevant to the biological process of disease (21). Before the study began, investigators were trained according to the standards of one experienced observer. All skin scoring for each individual patient was performed by a single investigator. Secondary measures of efficacy were the following: maximal oral aperture; maximal hand extension (18); tenderness and swelling of metacarpophalangeal joints (as a unit), wrists, and knees; enumeration of cutaneous ulcers; functional status according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (22); global disease assessments by patients and investigators; and pulmonary function tests, including lung diffusion capacity and forced vital capacity. Serum relaxin levels were determined by using enzyme immunoassay (6). The presence of antirelaxin antibody was measured in an enzyme immunoassay that used purified recombinant relaxin and affinity-purified antihuman immunoglobulin as the