Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Vishal R. Aggarwal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Vishal R. Aggarwal.


Pain | 2010

Risk factors for onset of chronic oro-facial pain – Results of the North Cheshire oro-facial pain prospective population study

Vishal R. Aggarwal; Gary J. Macfarlane; Tracey Farragher; John McBeth

&NA; Due to the cross‐sectional nature of previous studies, whether mechanical factors predict the onset of Chronic oro‐facial pain remains unclear. Aims of the current study were to test the hypotheses that self‐reported mechanical factors would predict onset of Chronic oro‐facial pain and that any observed relationship would be independent of the confounding effects of psychosocial factors and reporting of other unexplained symptoms. About 1735 subjects who had completed a baseline questionnaire were assessed at 2 year follow‐up for the presence of Chronic oro‐facial pain, psychosocial factors (anxiety and depression, illness behaviour, life stressors and reporting of somatic symptoms), mechanical dysfunction (facial trauma, grinding, phantom bite and missing teeth) and reporting of other unexplained symptoms (chronic widespread pain, irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue). About 1329 subjects returned completed questionnaires (adjusted response rate 87%). About 56 (5%) reported new episodes of Chronic oro‐facial pain at follow‐up. Univariate analyses showed that age, gender, reporting of other unexplained symptoms, psychosocial factors and two self‐report mechanical factors predicted the onset of Chronic oro‐facial pain. However multivariate analysis showed that mechanical factors did not independently predict onset. The strongest predictors were health anxiety (Relative Risk (RR) 2.8, 95% CI 1.3–6.2), chronic widespread pain (RR 4.0 95% C.I. 2.2–7.4) and age (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.7). The findings from this prospective study support the hypothesis that psychosocial factors are markers for onset of Chronic oro‐facial pain. The efficacy of early psychological management of Chronic oro‐facial pain to address these factors should be a priority for future investigations.


Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology | 2011

Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behaviour changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992–2009

Martin Tickle; Ruth McDonald; Jarrod Franklin; Vishal R. Aggarwal; K. M. Milsom; David Reeves

BACKGROUND There is a tension between financial incentives and professional codes and norms, both of which are believed to influence the behaviour of health care professionals. This study examined the impact of changes to financial incentive structures on the behaviour of dentists working in the English National Health Service (NHS) as a result of a new national contract. METHODS Comparison of six reference treatments delivered by all NHS dentists in England for the period 1992-2009. RESULTS Large and abrupt changes in the provision of the reference treatments coincided with the introduction of changes in the incentive structure in 2006. Treatments which can be provided in the least amount of time (and therefore costs to dentists) such as extractions increased and treatments which are time consuming or have significant additional materials costs such as bridgework, crowns, root fillings and radiographs reduced substantially. CONCLUSIONS Changes to financial incentive structures can produce large and abrupt changes in professional behaviours. In the context of multiple and conflicting goals, greater thought needs to be given to policies to change incentive structures to mitigate their unintended consequences.


Pain | 2004

Can one predict the likely specific orofacial pain syndrome from a self-completed questionnaire?

Tatiana V. Macfarlane; Anthony Blinkhorn; Rebecca Craven; Joanna M. Zakrzewska; Philip Atkin; Michael Escudier; C. Amy Rooney; Vishal R. Aggarwal; Gary J. Macfarlane

Abstract To estimate the prevalence of orofacial pain (OFP) by specific diagnostic subgroups in the general population. Cross‐sectional population study. General medical practice in South East Cheshire, UK. Participants of baseline investigation who completed the full postal questionnaire (1510, adjusted study participation rate 81%). Clinical examination was attended by 126 (43%) of all the participants who reported OFP in the questionnaire. These individuals were classified as musculoligamentous/soft tissue type, dentoalveolar or neurological/vascular. OFP duration, location, descriptors and statements on OFP were predictors of classification group. The estimated prevalence in the general population of musculoligamentous/soft tissue type of OFP was 7%, dentoalveolar 7% and neurological/vascular 6%. This study has derived a statistical model to classify participants with OFP into three broad groups (musculoligamentous/soft tissue, dentoalveolar and neurological/vascular) based on questionnaire information about OFP (OFP chronicity, location and verbal descriptors of pain). It is potentially useful in large population studies of OFP, where a clinical examination is not possible, however, further validation of its performance in large populations are necessary.


British Dental Journal | 2008

The failure rate of NHS funded molar endodontic treatment delivered in general dental practice

Martin Tickle; K. M. Milsom; Alison Qualtrough; F A Blinkhorn; Vishal R. Aggarwal

Objective To describe the quality and record the outcomes of root canal therapy on mandibular, first permanent molar teeth provided by GDPs working according to NHS contracts.Design Descriptive, retrospective cohort study.Setting Twelve general dental practices in Salford, North West England.Subjects and method All patients aged 20-60 years attending the practices who had received a NHS-funded root filling in a mandibular first permanent molar between January 1998 and December 2003. The radiographic quality of root fillings in the teeth was assessed by an endodontic specialist and categorised into optimal, suboptimal and teeth which had no radiograph, or an unreadable radiograph. Teeth were also dichotomised into those restored with a crown and those restored with an intracoronal restoration. Failure as an outcome was defined as if a tooth was extracted, the root filling was replaced or periradicular surgery was performed on the tooth. Crude failure rates per 100 years were calculated for optimally, sub-optimally root filled teeth and for those with no or an unreadable radiograph, and according to how the tooth was coronally restored. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards were used to determine factors linked with increased failures.Results One hundred and seventy-four teeth were included in the study, of which 16 failed. The crude failure rates per 100 years with a root filled tooth were very low and differed little (p = 0.9699) for optimally (2.6), sub-optimally (2.5) root filled teeth and for those with no or an unreadable radiograph (2.9), with approximately one in 37 root filled mandibular first molar teeth failing each year. The majority of root fillings fail within the first two years (N = 10, 62.5%). Some 67 teeth (38.5%) were restored with a crown, none of which failed during the follow up period compared to those with a plastic restoration (p = 0.0004).Conclusions The very low failure rates have significant implications for the design of research studies investigating outcomes of endodontic therapy. The similar failure rates for teeth that had optimal and suboptimal root fillings suggest that endodontic treatment is not as technique sensitive as previously thought. The results also support the notion that the coronal restoration is more important than radiographic appearance of the root filling.


Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners | 2011

Dentists' and specialists' knowledge of chronic orofacial pain: results from a continuing professional development survey.

Vishal R. Aggarwal; Amy Joughin; Joanna M. Zakrzewska; Fiona J Crawford; Martin Tickle

Aim To explore the knowledge of chronic orofacial pain within general dental practitioners (GDPs) and dental specialists. Methods Following a recent national survey of GDPs and specialists on the diagnosis of facial pain, all those who responded were asked to answer four multiple-choice questions on chronic orofacial pain as part of a continuing professional development exercise. The questions were formulated using a review of the literature and consultation with a facial pain expert and were administered by post. Results Of the 380 subjects who completed the original survey, 212 (56%) returned completed multiple-choice questionnaires. Specialists correctly answered significantly more questions than GDPs (P<0.001). The majority of specialists—49/83 (59%)—obtained a score of three or more, compared to 39/129 (30%) GDPs. This was due to variation in answering one question. Significantly more specialists—50 (60%)—correctly selected trigeminal neuralgia (TN) as a condition that is not associated with COFP, whereas only 41 (32%) GDPs chose this answer. Both specialists and GDPs grossly underestimated the prevalence of COFP in secondary care clinics. Conclusions The results suggest that specialists and GDPs may have sufficient knowledge to make an appropriate diagnosis of COFP, but they also highlight the knowledge gaps and perhaps the need for more extensive inclusion of COFP in the dental undergraduate curriculum.


British Dental Journal | 2008

Unexplained orofacial pain - is an early diagnosis possible?

Vishal R. Aggarwal; John McBeth; Joanna M. Zakrzewska; Gary J. Macfarlane

Aim To identify distinct characteristics of unexplained orofacial pain that could be used by dental practitioners in making an early diagnosis.Methods Subjects reporting orofacial pain in a postal questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey were invited for clinical examination. The interviewer was blinded to the questionnaire responses of the subjects. A diagnosis was made following the examination and subjects were assigned into two groups: unexplained pain and dental pain. The questionnaire responses of subjects who had consulted a healthcare professional within these two groups were then compared with particular attention to demographics, orofacial pain characteristics, consultation behaviour and relationship with other unexplained syndromes.Results Subjects who had consulted for their pain and were assigned to the unexplained orofacial pain group were significantly (p <0.05) more likely to report the following characteristics: pain descriptors (nagging, aching, tingling), pain pattern (worse with stress), site (poorly localised), duration (persistent/chronic), high disability, multiple consultations and co-morbidities (teeth grinding, reporting of other unexplained syndromes).Conclusion This study has shown that unexplained orofacial pain has distinct characteristics that differentiate it from other common dental conditions. This provides a good evidence base which can reduce uncertainty among dental practitioners, allowing them to make an early diagnosis.


European Journal of Pain | 2008

Are reports of mechanical dysfunction in chronic oro-facial pain related to somatisation? A population based study

Vishal R. Aggarwal; John McBeth; Joanna M. Zakrzewska; Mark Lunt; Gary J. Macfarlane

Objectives:


Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology | 2012

Predictors of pain associated with routine procedures performed in general dental practice.

Martin Tickle; K. M. Milsom; Fiona J Crawford; Vishal R. Aggarwal

OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to investigate factors that influence pain intensities associated with routine dental procedures. METHOD Four hundred and fifty-one dental patients self-reported pain experienced during the procedure immediately after undergoing a variety of common dental interventions and 1 day after the completion of the procedure. Pain character was measured using the McGill short-form pain questionnaire and intensity using a numerical rating (NRS) scale. Information was collected on a number of factors that could influence pain: dental anxiety was measured using the Corah Dental Anxiety Scale to categorize patients into four domains (fearless, some unease, nervous and very anxious). Dentists provided information regarding the type(s) of procedure and use of local anaesthetic (LA). RESULTS Seventy-five percent of patients (339/451) reported no pain during their procedure when the data were collected immediately postoperatively (NRS score = 0). Univariate analyses showed that dental anxiety, LA use and type of procedure (extractions) were significant (P < 0.05) predictors of reported intra-operative pain. However, when these factors were combined in a multivariate model, the strongest predictor of pain was dental anxiety [odds ratio (OR) = 4.98 (95% CI 1.42-17.44)] and LA use [OR = 2.79 (95% CI 1.39-5.61)]. Although the strongest predictor of postoperative pain on the next day was pain reported during the procedure [OR = 5.85 (95% CI 2.71-12.64)], LA remained a significant predictor of pain the day after the procedure [OR = 3.16 (95% CI 1.02-9.81)]. CONCLUSIONS Dentists need to assess their patients both preoperatively for dental anxiety and intra-operatively for signs of suboptimal local anaesthesia so as to effectively align patient management and clinical techniques to control dental anxiety and produce adequate anaesthesia.


Health Education Journal | 2012

Dentists' Preferences for Diagnosis, Management and Referral of Chronic Oro-Facial Pain: Results from a National Survey.

Vishal R. Aggarwal; Amy Joughin; Joanna M. Zakrzewska; Priscilla Appelbe; Martin Tickle

Aim: To explore the diagnosis, treatment and referral patterns of chronic oro-facial pain patients by generalist primary care dentists (GDPs) in the UK. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a non-stratified random sample of 500 GDPs who were selected from the General Dental Council register. A self-complete postal questionnaire with four hypothetical clinical case scenarios describing sub-types of chronic oro-facial pain (COFP) was used to investigate diagnosis, treatment and referral options of GDPs. Results: Two hundred and twenty (44%) GDPs responded. The majority correctly diagnosed temporomandibular disorder (TMD; 88%) and burning mouth syndrome (BMS; 92%). There was more variation in the diagnosis of the other cases related to persistent oro-facial pain. For TMD there was a clear preference for treatment with occlusal splint therapy, and referral to a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) specialist. The BMS scenario showed drug therapy and referral to an oral medicine specialist to be most popular. The chronic oro-facial pain cases had greater variation in management and choice of psychotherapy was related to duration of pain symptoms. Conclusions: The greater variation in responses to scenarios based on patients with chronic oro-facial pain may reflect the difficulty clinicians face in diagnosing and treating this condition. Management appears to follow a biomedical model and most clinicians chose to refer patients for treatment. There are few specialist services to cater for such referrals, indicating a need to train primary care practitioners in management of chronic COFP, along with the establishment of evidence-based guidelines.


European Journal of Pain | 2014

Functioning of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and growth hormone axes in frequently unexplained disorders: Results of a population study

Vishal R. Aggarwal; Gary J. Macfarlane; Abdelouahid Tajar; Matthew R. Mulvey; A Power; David Ray; John McBeth

The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that associations with specific stress systems [hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) and growth hormone (GH) axes] would increase as the number of unexplained disorders increased while accounting for the possible confounding effects of psychosocial factors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Vishal R. Aggarwal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Tickle

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John McBeth

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Peters

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy Joughin

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karina Lovell

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Lunt

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hanieh Javidi

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge