Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Vivek Goel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Vivek Goel.


Social Science & Medicine | 2004

Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation.

Mark J Dobrow; Vivek Goel; Ross Upshur

Evidence-based decision-making is centred on the justification of decisions. In the shift from an individual-clinical to a population-policy level, the decision-making context becomes more uncertain, variable and complex. To address this we have developed a conceptual framework for evidence-based decision-making, focusing on how context impacts on what constitutes evidence and how that evidence is utilised. We present two distinct orientations towards what constitutes evidence, representing different relationships between evidence and context. We also categorise the decision-making context based on the ways in which context impacts on evidence-based decision-making. Furthermore, we invoke the concept of axes of evidence-based decision-making to describe the relationship between evidence and context as we move from evidence-based medicine to evidence-based health policy. From this, we suggest that it may be more important how evidence is utilised than how it is defined. Based on the research and knowledge utilisation literature, we present a process model of evidence utilisation, which forms the basis for the conceptual framework for context-based evidence-based decision-making. The conceptual framework attempts to capture the role that context plays in the introduction, interpretation and application of evidence. We illustrate this framework with examples from policy development for colorectal cancer screening.


Medical Decision Making | 2001

Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Vivek Goel; Carol Sawka; Elaine C. Thiel; Elaine H. Gort; Annette M. O’Connor

A decision aid for the surgical treatment of early breast cancer was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. The decision aid, a tape and workbook, includes explicit presentation of probabilities, photographs and graphics, and a values clarification exercise. Community surgeons were randomized to use the decision aid or a control pamphlet. Patients completed a questionnaire prior to using the decision aid, after reviewing it but prior to surgery, and 6 months after enrollment. There was no difference in anxiety, knowledge, or decisional regret across the 2 groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower decisional conflict in the decision aid group. A subgroup of women who were initially leaning toward mastectomy or were unsure had lower decisional conflict. Although the decision aid had minimal impact on the main study outcomes, a subgroup may have benefited. Such subgroups should be identified, and appropriate decision support interventions should be developed and evaluated.


Urology | 2003

Use of complementary/alternative medicine by men diagnosed with prostate cancer: prevalence and characteristics☆

Heather Boon; Kathleen P. Westlake; Moira Stewart; Robert Gray; Neil Fleshner; Alan Gavin; Judith Belle Brown; Vivek Goel

OBJECTIVES To ascertain the prevalence of the use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) among a random sample of Ontario (Canadian) men diagnosed with prostate cancer and to explore in what way users of CAM differ from nonusers. METHODS A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 696 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. RESULTS The final response rate was 78.8%. Almost one third (29.8%) reported using CAM for their prostate cancer care. Natural health products (most commonly vitamin E, saw palmetto, and selenium) were used by 26.5% of the respondents. CAM therapies were used by 17.0% of the men (most commonly dietary changes), and only 9.1% visited CAM practitioners. Three characteristics appear to differentiate CAM users from nonusers. Men who had attended support groups were much more likely to use CAM. Men who had more advanced disease, and those who believed in the efficacy of CAM, but were not concerned about potential adverse effects of CAM, were also more likely to use CAM. CAM use was not related to education, income, or geographic location. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that CAM use is no longer a phenomenon restricted to a unique segment of the population that is highly educated and enjoys a high family income. CAM use appears to be more related to other factors such as support group attendance, disease characteristics, and beliefs about CAM. Our findings highlight the need for urologists to ask all their patients about their use of CAM.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 1996

Classification systems of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb: Do they satisfy methodological guidelines?

Rachelle Buchbinder; Vivek Goel; Claire Bombardier; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson

A critical appraisal of existing classifications of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb was performed utilizing methodological criteria including appropriateness for purpose, validity, reliability, feasibility, and generalizability. Five classifications were assessed independently by three raters using standardized forms. For those criteria that can be assessed by inspection of the classification itself, none of the classification systems appeared acceptable for reasons such as failure to be comprehensive, overlap of categories, and lack of demonstration that the criteria for inclusion into the categories are valid and reliable. No judgement could be passed about those criteria that require formal testing, such as reliability and construct validity, because of the absence of data. The overall interrater reliability of the critical appraisal was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82. The validity of studies that have relied upon existing classifications of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb to group the entities under study is questioned in light of the findings of this study. Future work should be directed toward improving existing classification systems and/or developing new ones that fulfil basic measurement criteria.


Spine | 1994

Group education interventions for people with low back pain: An overview of the literature

Joanna E. Cohen; Vivek Goel; John Frank; Claire Bombardier; Paul M. Peloso; Francis Guillemin

Study Design. This study systematically reviewed the literature on group education for people with low back pain. Findings are considered in relation to parameters such as the characteristics of the study participants, the intervention, and the setting. Objective. To make a recommendation regarding the effectiveness of group education as an intervention for people with low back pain. Results. Based on a systematic search of the literature, 13 primary studies are cited; 6 of these were sufficiently well designed and executed for their findings to be considered. Of the four quality studies with chronic back pain subjects, only one found a positive shortterm effect on one of the outcome measures considered (pain intensity). In the two studies with acute cases, group education was found by one of the studies to reduce pain duration and initial sick leave duration in the short term, but the intervention also included work‐site visits. At 1 year of follow‐up, there was no evidence in the six studies of clinically important benefits on any of the outcome measures. Conclusions. There is insufficient evidence to recommend group education for people with low back pain. [Key words: back school, back pain, review, education] Spine 1994;19:1214–1222


Journal of Health Services Research & Policy | 2001

Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review.

Carole A. Estabrooks; Vivek Goel; Elaine C. Thiel; Patricia Pinfold; Carol Sawka; Ivan Williams

Objectives: The field of consumer decision support interventions has grown rapidly in the last 20 years, particularly since the increased formalization of evidence-based decision-making in health care. However, little is known as yet about the effect these decision aids have on relevant outcomes. To identify outcomes influenced by consumer decision aids (CDAs) and the particular effects of CDAs on those outcomes. Method: Published reports of randomized controlled trials and other designs in English identified from searches of Medline, Cancerlit, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Science Abstracts, the Cochrane Library and Current Contents, and from ancestry searches, hand searches and consultation with key informants. Studies were included if consumers were the decision-makers, decisions were real and not hypothetical, the intervention met a strict definition of a CDA and decisions involved treatment or screening. Data on setting, subjects, decision types, decision aid features and outcomes were extracted. The validity of each study included was evaluated by two team members. Summative ratings were calculated and categorized as high, medium and low. Results: Over 500 titles were initially assessed; 96 study reports were obtained and screened for inclusion. Twenty-two reports representing 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies with a low rating were excluded. Results were synthesized from the remaining 12 studies. Published studies of CDAs are increasing although still few in number. Outcomes such as knowledge and decision-making processes are influenced by CDAs but effects on treatment preferences, the actual decision or other outcomes have yet to be clearly established. Conclusions: Improved outcomes result from the use of CDA in some categories of outcome but insufficient evidence exists yet to support improved outcomes in all categories or to evaluate whether, given the considerable costs of many CDAs, funding for extensive ongoing development and testing can be sustained.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1997

Compliance with practice guidelines for node-negative breast cancer.

A Olivotto; Andrew J. Coldman; T G Hislop; C H Trevisan; J Kula; Vivek Goel; C Sawka

PURPOSE Practice guidelines for cancer management have been in use in the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, since the mid 1970s. To evaluate practice guideline compliance, treatment received was compared with treatment recommended in a population-based cohort of women with breast cancer. METHODS All incident cases (n = 939) of invasive, pathologically node-negative breast cancer diagnosed in 1991 were identified from the BC Cancer Registry. Treatment details were abstracted from cancer clinic records for cases referred to the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) (n = 661) and original source documents for nonreferred cases. Management decisions were considered compliant if the patient received the recommended treatment or was entered onto a randomized trial of the modality being assessed. RESULTS Overall compliance with adjuvant therapy guidelines was 97% for radiotherapy, 96% for chemotherapy, and 89% for tamoxifen. An oncology specialist was consulted by 94% of patients with an indication for adjuvant treatment and by 58% of those without an indication (odds ratio [OR] = 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 7.0 to 16.4). Compliance with a guideline to deliver radiotherapy was 95%; with chemotherapy, 77%; and with tamoxifen, 68%. Compliance with a guideline that stated no adjuvant treatment was indicated was 99% for radiotherapy, 98% for chemotherapy, and 92% for tamoxifen. Noncompliance among patients with an indication for treatment was related to nonreferral to an oncology specialist and less complete implementation of guideline changes in the community as compared with cancer center practices. CONCLUSION Compliance was high, but scheduled updating and more effective community implementation could further improve consistency of care.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2003

Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Factors associated with screening behavior

Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Steven Gallinger; John R. McLaughlin; Vivek Goel

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify whether decisions regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by relatives of CRC patients are influenced by social interactions with family members, friends, and physicians or by public awareness campaigns. METHODS Screened (n=236) and nonscreened (n=132) relatives of CRC patients were interviewed in 2001. A socioecologic model was used as the framework for the interview variables, which included interactions with relatives, medical professionals, and social groups, as well as perceived benefits and barriers to screening and perceived susceptibility. RESULTS Physician encouragement, fewer barriers to screening, strong CRC family history, encouragement from relatives, advice from a surgeon, and discussion of CRC screening with social groups were all associated with ever having been screened. Having been encouraged by a physician was the strongest correlate of screening behavior. Perceived susceptibility to CRC, advice from family members, and exposure to public awareness information were not associated with screening. CONCLUSIONS The socioecologic framework is a good explanatory model of CRC screening in increased-risk relatives, as variables from each level were associated with screening. These findings can guide interventions aimed at increasing screening uptake, particularly those involving physicians.


Health Expectations | 1998

Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer

Carol Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort

Purpose A patient decision aid for the surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer was developed and evaluated. The rationale for its development was the knowledge that breast conserving therapy (lumpectomy followed by breast radiation) and mastectomy produce equivalent outcomes, and the current general agreement that the decision for the type of surgery should rest with the patient.


Journal of Health Services Research & Policy | 1997

Socio-Economic Status and Visits to Physicians by Adults in Ontario, Canada

Warren McLsaac; Vivek Goel; David Naylor

Objectives: To examine the association between socio-economic status, need for medical care and visits to physicians in a universal health insurance system. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of the 1990 Ontario Health Survey, a population-based survey utilizing a multistage, randomized cluster sample. The analysis considered only those respondents who were 16 years of age or older from the province of Ontario, Canada: 21 272 males and 24 738 females. Results: There was no difference by education or income in persons having made at least one visit to a general practitioner in the previous year. High income persons were less likely to have made six or more visits to a general practitioner — odds ratio (OR) = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52, 0.87 for men; OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.58, 0.75 for women — but more likely to have made at least one visit to a specialist — OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.76 for men; OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.07, 1.45 for women. A persons need for medical care was the most important determinant of a physician visit. Conclusions: Self-reported visits to general practitioners in Canada are strongly influenced by a persons need for medical care and are appropriately related to socio-economic status. However, there is a residual association between higher socio-economic levels and greater use of specialist services.

Collaboration


Dive into the Vivek Goel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl van Walraven

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellen Warner

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Madlensky

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Frank

University of Edinburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Summers

North York General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge