Vivek S. Yellore

Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy is associated with TCF8 gene mutations and abdominal hernia.

Mutations in the two‐handed zinc‐finger homeodomain transcription factor gene (TCF8) have been associated with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) and extraocular developmental abnormalities. We performed screening of TCF8 in 32 affected, unrelated probands, affected and unaffected family members of probands identified with a TCF8 mutation, and in 100 control individuals. Eight different pathogenic mutations were identified in eight probands: four frameshift (c.953_954insA, c.1506dupA, c.1592delA, and c.3012_3013delAG); three nonsense (Gln12X, Gln214X, Arg325X); and one missense (Met1Arg). Screening of TCF8 in affected and unaffected family members in six families demonstrated that each identified mutation segregated with the disease phenotype in each family; two probands did not have additional family members available for analysis. None of the eight TCF8 mutations was identified in 200 control chromosomes. The prevalence of hernias of the abdominal region in affected individuals with PPCD associated with TCF8 mutations was significantly higher than the prevalence in both individuals with PPCD not associated with a TCF8 mutation and in unaffected individuals. Therefore, PPCD is associated with TCF8 mutations in one quarter of affected families in this study, or about one third of all PPCD families that have been screened thus far. In these families, the presence of apparently causative TCF8 mutations is associated with abdominal and inguinal hernias.

Autosomal recessive CHED associated with novel compound heterozygous mutations in SLC4A11.

Purpose: To determine the genetic basis of autosomal recessive congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED2) in an American patient of Chinese ancestry. Methods: Slit-lamp examination of the proband and his parents, as well as histopathologic examination of excised corneal specimens from the proband, were performed to confirm the diagnosis of autosomal recessive CHED. DNA was collected from the proband and his parents, and all 19 exons of the SLC4A11 gene were amplified and screened. Results: The proband showed diffuse bilateral corneal edema, which was not present in either of his parents. After the performance of bilateral penetrating keratoplasties, histopathologic examination of the excised corneal specimens showed marked corneal stromal edema and an absence of corneal endothelial cells. Screening of SLC4A11 showed 2 heterozygous mutations: c.743G>A (Ser232Asn) and c.1033A>T (Arg329X). The probands mother was found to be heterozygous for the Ser232Asn missense mutation, and his father was heterozygous for the Arg329X nonsense mutation. No other coding region sequence variants were identified in the proband or his parents, and neither of the identified mutations was identified in 100 control individuals. Conclusions: CHED2 is associated with mutations in SLC4A11, a member of the SLC4 family of base transporters. Although the majority of affected individuals reported to date have shown homozygous mutations, associated with consanguinity in the Burmese, Indian, and Pakistani populations, we report 2 novel, independently sorting SLC4A11 mutations in an affected individual of Chinese ancestry.

Candidate gene screening for posterior polymorphous dystrophy.

Purpose: To perform candidate gene screening for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD). The initial 3 genes chosen, ID1, BCL2L1, and VSX1, lie within the region on chromosome 20 to which the PPCD gene has been linked, and mutations in VSX1 have previously been identified in patients with PPCD. Methods: DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and direct sequencing of the VSX1, BCL2L1, and ID1 genes were performed in 14 affected patients (12 families) as well as in unaffected family members and healthy control subjects. Results: No coding region mutations in the BCL2L1 or ID1 genes were identified in affected patients. In the VSX1 gene, the previously identified Gly160Asp missense change was not present in any of our 12 probands, and the Asp144Glu mutation was identified in 1 affected patient as well as 1 unaffected control individual. Additionally, 2 synonymous substitutions were identified, Ala182Ala (8 affected patients from 8 families) and Gly239Gly (1 affected patient and 1 unaffected patient from the same family). In the ID1 gene, the synonymous substitution Gly216Gly was observed in 2 affected patients (2 families) who also demonstrated a single nucleotide change in both the 5′UTR (2129T>C) and 3′UTR (3267A>G). Another 5′UTR change, 2177T>C, was identified in 1 affected patient and his unaffected parent, both of whom also demonstrated the 2129T>C and 3267A>G changes. Conclusions: None of the 12 probands with PPCD demonstrated the previously described Gly160Asp mutation within the VSX1 gene. The Asp144Glu missense change, present in an affected patient as well as an unaffected control individual, appears to be a rare polymorphism, not a disease-causing mutation. No coding region changes were identified in the ID1 or BCL2L1 genes. Therefore, although we report a number of novel polymorphisms in the VSX1 and ID1 genes, the failure to identify any sequence variants that sort with the disease phenotype suggests that other genetic factors are involved in PPCD.

Replication and refinement of linkage of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy to the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 locus on chromosome 20.

Purpose: The study purpose was to identify the genetic basis of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy, an autosomal dominant disorder of the corneal endothelium that is associated with the development of corneal edema, necessitating corneal transplantation for visual rehabilitation. Glaucoma also develops in up to 40% of patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy.Methods: Linkage analysis, using microsatellite markers previously used to demonstrate linkage of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy to the chromosome 20 candidate region known as posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1, was performed in 29 members of a family with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Thirty-four microsatellite markers were used to refine the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 interval. TCF8, located on chromosome 10, was screened in an affected family member to exclude posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3.Results: Significant evidence of linkage to the posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 interval was obtained with both single-point and multipoint analyses. The largest single-point log odds ratio score obtained was 4.38 (θ = 0) at marker D20S471; within 4.7 Mbp (7.2 cM) of D20S471 eight markers provided single-point log odds ratio scores of greater than 3.00 and three markers provided single-point log odds ratio scores greater than 4.00. The largest multipoint log odds ratio score obtained was 4.83, found across the adjacent markers D20S844, D20S191, D20S484, and D20S111. The support interval for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 in the family we report is approximately 13.5 Mbp (10 cM) long and lies between the markers D20S182 and D20S195. Eleven markers have multipoint log odds ratio scores greater than 4.0 within this region. No coding region mutations were identified in TCF8 in an affected member of the family, effectively excluding posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3.Conclusions: The originally described 19.8 cM posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 candidate disease interval has been refined to a 10 cM interval between markers D20S182 and D20S195. A portion of this refined interval overlaps a more recently reported posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 interval, with only 20 known and predicted genes mapped to the 2.4 cM common interval.

Keratoconus is not associated with mutations in COL8A1 and COL8A2.

Purpose: To evaluate the suggested role of the COL8A1 and COL8A2 genes in the pathogenesis of the corneal ectatic disorders keratoconus and keratoglobus through mutation screening in affected patients. Methods: DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, and sequencing of COL8A1 and COL8A2 were performed in 50 unrelated keratoconus and 2 unrelated keratoglobus patients. Results: No sequence variations were identified in COL8A1 and COL8A2 in the 2 patients with keratoglobus. Screening of COL8A1 in keratoconus patients revealed a previously identified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; c.1850C>T; Pro535Pro), in 1 patient. Screening of COL8A2 in keratoconus patients revealed 7 previously described SNPs: c.14G>A (Gly3Arg); c.112G>A (Ala35Ala); c.1012C>G (Leu335Leu); c.1308G>A (Arg434His); c.1492G>A (Gly495Gly); c.1512C>T (Thr502Met); and c.1765C>T (Pro586Pro). Four novel sequence variants were also identified, each in 1 affected patient: c.38_40dupCTG (Leu11dup), also identified in an unaffected relative of the affected proband, c.667G>A (Gly220Gly), c.1588G>A (Pro527Pro), and c.2026C>T (Val673Val). None of the 3 novel synonymous substitutions identified in COL8A2 was predicted to produce a splice acceptor site. Conclusions: The absence of pathogenic mutations in COL8A1 and COL8A2 in patients with keratoconus indicates that other genetic factors are involved in the pathogenesis of this corneal ectatic disorder.

TGFB1-Induced Extracellular Expression of TGFBIp and Inhibition of TGFBIp Expression by RNA Interference in a Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Line

PURPOSE To report the increased production of extracellular transforming growth factor β-induced protein (TGFBIp) by human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs) after induction by TGFB1 and the inhibition of TGFBIp production in induced and noninduced HCECs by RNA interference (RNAi). METHODS HCECs were cultured in serum-free medium and treated with 0 or 10 ng/mL TGFB1 over a period of 72 hours. Commercially available siRNAs targeting TGFBI mRNA were mixed with a transfection reagent and used to reverse transfect TGFB1-induced and noninduced HCECs. Extracellular and intracellular concentrations of TGFBIp were measured by ELISA and Western blot analysis, respectively, and TGFBI RNA was assayed using semiquantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS HCECs constitutively express TGFBIp, and treatment with TGFB1 results in up to a fourfold increase in the amount of extracellular TGFBIp. Four commercially available siRNAs targeting TGFBI mRNA produced a >70% decrease in extracellular TGFBIp within 48 hours after transfection of noninduced HCECs but a <25% decrease in extracellular TGFBIp by 48 hours after transfection of TGFB1-induced HCECs. The suppression of extracellular TGFBIp production correlated with a decrease in intracellular TGFBIp production and TGFBI mRNA expression after transfection. CONCLUSIONS Extracellular TGFBIp expression by HCECs is increased several fold after exposure to TGFB1. Both HCEC-constitutive and HCEC-induced TGFBIp production can be inhibited with RNA interference, though the effect was greater and lasted longer for constitutive than induced TGFBIp production. Given that the corneal deposits in the TGFBI dystrophies consist of TGFBIp derived from HCECs, RNAi represents a potential means to inhibit primary dystrophic deposit formation and recurrence after surgical intervention.

Linkage of Posterior Amorphous Corneal Dystrophy to Chromosome 12q21.33 and Exclusion of Coding Region Mutations in KERA, LUM, DCN, and EPYC

PURPOSE To identify the genetic basis of posterior amorphous corneal dystrophy (PACD) segregating in a large pedigree. METHODS The authors performed clinical evaluation of a previously unreported pedigree with PACD, light and electron microscopic examination of an excised corneal button, genomewide linkage analysis, fine mapping linkage and haplotype analysis, and screening of four candidate genes (KERA, LUM, DCN, and EPYC). RESULTS Twenty-one participants were determined to be affected based on the presence of characteristic clinical features of PACD; 15 affected and 39 unaffected individuals from a single pedigree enrolled in the study and provided DNA for analysis. Histopathologic examination of an excised corneal specimen from an affected individual demonstrated disorganized stromal lamellae and stromal staining with colloidal iron. Genomewide analysis demonstrated significant evidence of linkage to chromosome region 12q21.33 and evidence suggestive of linkage to chromosome region 8q22.3. Fine mapping of the chromosome 12 locus confirmed significant linkage; the largest multipoint log odds ratio score was 5.6 at D12S351. The linkage support interval was approximately 3.5 Mb (3.5 cM) in length between flanking markers D12S1812 and D12S95, roughly the entire chromosome band 12q21.33. No coding region mutations were identified in four candidate genes-KERA, LUM, DCN, EPYC-located in the chromosome 12 linkage support interval. CONCLUSIONS Linkage and haplotype analyses identified 12q21.33 as a locus for PACD. However, no mutations were identified in the candidate genes (KERA, LUM, DCN, EPYC) within this region.

Exclusion of positional candidate gene coding region mutations in the common posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 1 candidate gene interval.

Purpose: Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) is an autosomal-dominant disorder of the corneal endothelium associated with visually significant corneal edema and glaucoma. Statistical genetic analysis of 4 families with PPCD has demonstrated linkage to a 2.4 cM common support interval on chromosome 20 bordered by the markers D20S182 and D20S139. We sought to identify the genetic basis of PPCD linked to chromosome 20 (PPCD1) by screening the 26 positional candidate genes between these markers in a family previously mapped to the PPCD1 region. Methods: The coding regions of the 26 positional candidate genes mapped to the common PPCD1 support interval were amplified and sequenced in affected and unaffected individuals from a family previously linked to the PPCD1 locus. Nine other genes positioned just outside of the common PPCD1 support interval but within the autosomal-dominant congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy interval were also screened. Results: Four DNA sequence variants in 3 of the positional candidate genes demonstrated complete segregation with the affected phenotype: p.Thr109Thr (rs6111803) in OVOL2, p.Arg56Gln (novel variant-RPSnovel) in RPS19P1, and p.Thr85Thr (rs1053834) and p.Pro99Ser (rs1053839) in C20orf79. Each of these 4 sequence variants demonstrated significant linkage with the affected phenotype in this family (P = 2.5 × 10-7 for RPSnovel, rs1053834 and rs1053839; P = 8.6 × 10-7 for rs6111803). However, we also identified each of these 4 sequence variants in ≥9% unaffected control individuals. The haplotype on which the disease-causing mutation is segregating was found to have a population frequency of 4.2% in the CEPH HapMap trios. Although a number of other previously described and novel single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified in the 35 positional candidate genes located within the PPCD1 and congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy intervals, none segregated with the affected phenotype. Conclusions: We report the absence of a presumed pathogenic coding region mutation in the common PPCD1 support interval. Although minor alleles of 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified that segregated with the affected phenotype, the relatively high frequency of each minor allele in the general population indicates that none is a candidate for the causal variant for PPCD. Instead, the causal variant is most likely a coding region deletion or a variant in a noncoding region of the PPCD1 common support interval.

Analysis of the Role of ZEB1 in the Pathogenesis of Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE To determine how nonsense mutations in the transcription factor ZEB1 lead to the development of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy type 3 (PPCD3). METHODS Whole-cell extracts were obtained from cultured human corneal epithelial cells (HCEpCs) as a source of ZEB1 protein. DNA-binding assays were performed using the whole-cell extract and oligonucleotide probes consisting of the two conserved E2-box motifs and surrounding nucleotides upstream of COL4A3. ZEB1 and COL4A3 mRNA expression in primary human corneal endothelial cells (HCEnCs) was assayed in both PPCD3 and control corneas by RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry was used to localize ZEB1 and COL4A3 expression in normal human cornea. RESULTS Electromobility shift assays (EMSAs) and competition EMSAs demonstrated binding of protein(s) in the cultured HCEpCs to the E2-box motifs in the probes. The supershift EMSA confirmed that ZEB1, demonstrated to be present in the whole-cell extracts, binds to both the proximal and distal E2-box motifs in the COL4A3 promoter region. Both COL4A3 and ZEB1 are expressed in normal HCEnCs, although in PPCD3, ZEB1 expression is decreased and COL4A3 expression is increased compared with levels of both genes in healthy control corneas. CONCLUSIONS Inversely related HCEnC expression levels of ZEB1 and COL4A3 in PPCD3 indicate that ZEB1-mediated alterations in COL4A3 expression are most likely associated with the pathogenesis of this corneal endothelial dystrophy. However, the demonstration of COL4A3 expression in healthy adult primary HCEnCs suggests that PPCD3 is more likely to involve an alteration in the timing and/or degree of COL4A3 expression than to result from the dichotomous change implied by the previously proposed ectopic expression model.

No pathogenic mutations identified in the TGFBI gene in polymorphic corneal amyloid deposition.

Purpose: To determine whether primary, polymorphic, corneal amyloid deposition is associated with a mutation of the TGFBI gene. Methods: Interventional case series of 8 patients. Slit lamp examination of all patients and photodocumentation of 5 patients were performed. Genomic DNA was isolated from buccal mucosal swabs obtained from all patients and all 17 exons of the TGFBI gene were amplified and sequenced. Results: Multiple polymorphic, refractile deposits were noted throughout the central corneal stroma in all patients. The deposits appeared gray-white on direct illumination and translucent on retroillumination, characteristic of amyloid. In 2 patients, linear, branching opacities, reminiscent of lattice corneal dystrophy, were identified. Histopathologic examination confirmed the presence of stromal amyloid in the cornea of 1 patient who required corneal transplantation for pseudophakic corneal edema. Screening of the entire coding region of the TGFBI gene revealed 4 previously described synonymous substitutions, Leu217Leu, Val327Val, Leu472Leu, and Phe540Phe. A previously unreported missense change, Asp299Asn, was identified in one affected patient but not in her affected sister. No pathogenic mutations, including the Ala546Asp missense mutation previously associated with polymorphic corneal amyloidosis, were identified in any of the patients. Conclusions: TGFBI gene mutations were not identified in a series of patients with polymorphic corneal amyloid deposition. As bilateral, discrete stromal amyloid deposits may be dystrophic or degenerative, differentiation between these phenotypically similar conditions is facilitated with the use of molecular genetic analysis.