Volker Musahl

Varying Femoral Tunnels Between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee

Background Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. Hypothesis A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N·m valgus and 5-N·m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied. Results At 30° of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 ± 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 ± 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 ± 3.7 mm; P <. 05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 ± 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 ± 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 ± 5.2 mm; P <. 05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions. Conclusion Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. Clinical Relevance Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the anatomic and biomechanical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel. METHODS Ten human cadaveric knees (5 matched pairs) without ligament injury or pre-existing arthritis underwent ACL reconstruction by either a transtibial or anteromedial portal technique. A medial arthrotomy was created in all cases before reconstruction to determine the center of the native ACL tibial and femoral footprints. A 10-mm tibial tunnel directed toward the center of the tibial footprint was prepared in an identical fashion, starting at the anterior border of the medial collateral ligament in all cases. For transtibial femoral socket preparation (n = 5), a guidewire was placed as close to the center of the femoral footprint as possible. With anteromedial portal reconstruction (n = 5), the guidewire was positioned centrally in the femoral footprint and the tunnel drilled through the medial portal in hyperflexion. An identical graft was fixed and tensioned, and knee stability was assessed with the following standardized examinations: (1) anterior drawer, (2) Lachman, (3) maximal internal rotation at 30°, (4) manual pivot shift, and (5) instrumented pivot shift. Distance from the femoral guidewire to the center of the femoral footprint and dimensions of the tibial tunnel intra-articular aperture were measured for all specimens. Statistical analysis was completed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons test with P ≤ .05 defined as significant. RESULTS The anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction controlled tibial translation significantly more than the transtibial reconstruction with anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift examinations of knee stability (P ≤ .05). Anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction restored the Lachman and anterior drawer examinations to those of the intact condition and constrained translation with the manual and instrumented pivot-shift examinations more than the native ACL (P ≤ .05). Despite optimal guidewire positioning, the transtibial technique resulted in a mean position 1.94 mm anterior and 3.26 mm superior to the center of the femoral footprint. The guidewire was positioned at the center of the femoral footprint through the anteromedial portal in all cases. The tibial tunnel intra-articular aperture was 38% larger in the anteroposterior dimension with the transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique (mean, 14.9 mm v 10.8 mm; P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS The anteromedial portal drilling technique allows for accurate positioning of the femoral socket in the center of the native footprint, resulting in secondary improvement in time-zero control of tibial translation with Lachman and pivot-shift testing compared with conventional transtibial ACL reconstruction. This technique respects the native ACL anatomy but cannot restore it with a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Eccentric, posterolateral positioning of the guidewire in the tibial tunnel with the transtibial technique results in iatrogenic re-reaming of the tibial tunnel and significant intra-articular aperture expansion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral socket may allow for improved restoration of anatomy and stability with ACL reconstruction compared with conventional transtibial drilling techniques.

A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL

Transtibial single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the gold standard for several years. This technique often fails to restore native ACL femoral origin and tibial insertion anatomy of the ACL. Recently, there is a strong trend towards a more anatomical approach in single and double bundle ACL reconstruction. Using the anatomic double bundle structure of the ACL as a principle, the entirety of both tibial insertion and femoral origin of both bundles, the posterolateral and anteromedial, may be restored. Reflected by recent publications over the past two years, there is an increasing interest in the anatomy of the ACL. In the current study, a PubMed literature search was performed looking for measurements of the ACL femoral origin and tibial insertion. These studies show a large variability in the size and the anatomy of the femoral origin and tibial ACL insertion using different methods and specimens. The diversity of reported measurements makes clinical application of these data difficult at best. Thus, it is of paramount importance to understand the individual variations in size and shape of the ACL femoral origin and tibial ACL insertion. This study is a systematic review of the morphology of the ACL femoral origin and tibial insertion as reported in the literature.

The Effect of Medial Versus Lateral Meniscectomy on the Stability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee

Background: The pivot shift is a dynamic test of knee stability that involves a pathologic, multiplanar motion path elicited by a combination of axial load and valgus force during a knee flexion from an extended position. Purpose: To assess the stabilizing effect of the medial and lateral meniscus on anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACL-D) knees during the pivot shift examination. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A Lachman and a mechanized pivot shift test were performed on 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric hip-to-toe lower extremity specimens. The knee was tested intact, ACL-D, and after sectioning the medial meniscus (ACL/MM-D; n = 8), lateral meniscus (ACL/LM-D; n = 8), and both (ACL/LM/MM-D; n = 16). A navigation system recorded the resultant anterior tibial translations (ATTs). For statistical analysis an analysis of variance was used; significance was set at P < .05. Results: The ATT significantly increased in the ACL-D knee after lateral meniscectomy (ACL/LM-D; P < .05) during the pivot shift maneuver. In the lateral compartment of the knee, ATT in the ACL-D knee increased by 6 mm after lateral meniscectomy during the pivot shift (16.6 ± 6.0 vs 10.5 ± 3.5 mm, P < .01 for ACL/LM out vs ACL out). Medial meniscectomy, conversely, had no significant effect on ATT in the ACL-D knee during pivot shift examination (P > .05). With standardized Lachman examination, however, ATT significantly increased after medial but not lateral meniscectomy compared with the ACL-D knee (P < .001). Conclusion: Although the medial meniscus functions as a critical secondary stabilizer to anteriorly directed forces on the tibia during a Lachman examination, the lateral meniscus appears to be a more important restraint to anterior tibial translation during combined valgus and rotatory loads applied during a pivoting maneuver. Clinical Relevance: This model may have implications in the evaluation of surgical reconstruction procedures in complex knee injuries.

The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa to enhance the healing of the medial collateral ligament—a functional tissue engineering study in rabbits

Introduction: Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) from porcine has been successfully used as a collagen scaffold for the repair of various tissues, including those of the human vascular, urogenital, and musculoskeletal systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether SIS can be used to enhance the healing process of a medial collateral ligament (MCL) with a gap injury in a rabbit model.

A three-dimensional finite element model of the human anterior cruciate ligament: a computational analysis with experimental validation

In this study, the force and stress distribution within the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in response to an anterior tibial load with the knee at full extension was calculated using a validated three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) of a human ACL. The interaction between the AM and PL bundles, as well as the contact and friction caused by the ACL wrapping around the bone during knee motion, were included in the model. The AM and PL bundles of the ACL were simulated as incompressible homogeneous and isotropic hyperelastic materials. The multiple-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) knee kinematics of a cadaveric knee were first obtained using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. These data were used as the boundary conditions for the FEM of the ACL to calculate the forces in the ACL. The calculated forces were compared to the in situ force in the ACL, determined experimentally, to validate the model. The validated FEM was then used to calculate the force and stress distribution within the ACL under an anterior tibial load at full extension. The AM and PL bundles shared the force, and the stress distribution was non-uniform within both bundles with the highest stress localized near the femoral insertion site. The contact and friction caused by the ACL wrapping around the bone during knee motion played the role of transferring the force from the ACL to the bone, and had a direct effect on the force and stress distribution of the ACL. This validated model will enable the analysis of force and stress distribution in the ACL in response to more complex loading conditions and has the potential to help design improved surgical procedures following ACL injuries.

Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important?

Background: Minimal attention has been directed toward tibial tunnel position and the native tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of tibial tunnel position on restoration of knee kinematics and stability after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten paired cadaveric knees were subjected to biomechanical testing (standardized Lachman and mechanized pivot-shift examination). With each maneuver, a computer-assisted navigation system recorded the 3-dimensional motion path of a tracked point at the center of the tibia, medial tibial plateau, and lateral tibial plateau. The testing protocol consisted of evaluation in the intact state and after complete ACL transection, after ACL transection with bilateral meniscectomy, and after ACL reconstruction using 3 tibial tunnel positions—over the top (OTT), anterior footprint (AT), and posterior footprint (PT)—with a standard femoral socket placed in the center of the femoral footprint. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with a post hoc Tukey test compared measured translations with each condition. Results: A significant difference in anterior translation was seen with Lachman examination between the ACL-deficient condition and both the OTT and AT reconstructions, but no significant difference was observed between the ACL-deficient and PT reconstruction. The OTT and AT constructs were significantly better in limiting anterior translation of the lateral compartment compared with the PT ACL reconstruction during a pivot-shift maneuver in the ACL- and meniscal-deficient knee. However, anteriorizing the tibial position was accompanied by a correspondingly greater risk and magnitude of graft impingement in extension. Clinical Relevance: The OTT and anterior tibial tunnel positions better control the Lachman and the pivot shift compared with an ACL graft placed in the posterior aspect of the tibial footprint. However, an anterior tibial tunnel position must be balanced against an increased risk and magnitude of graft impingement in extension.

What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift?

AbstractThe pivot shift is the most specific clinical test to assess pathological knee joint rotatory laxity following ACL injury. This article attempts to describe the anatomic structures responsible for creating a high-grade pivot shift and their potential role in customizing ACL reconstruction. A review of the literature demonstrates that disruption of the secondary stabilizers of anterior translation of the lateral compartment including the lateral meniscus, anterolateral capsule, and IT band contributes to a high-grade pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. The morphology of the lateral tibial plateau, including increased posteroinferior tibial slope and small size, can also contribute to high-grade pivot shift. Factors that may decrease the grade of the pivot shift include medial compartment injury, MCL injury, patient guarding, and osteoarthritis. In conclusion, a high-grade pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee is often associated with incompetence of the lateral soft tissue envelope. Rotatory laxity as assessed by the pivot shift may also be falsely underestimated by concomitant injuries. Level of evidence IV.

Development of a simple device for measurement of rotational knee laxity

The goal of this study was to develop a new device for the measurement of rotational knee laxity and to measure intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in a cadaveric study. An array of established tools was utilized to design the device with a basis that consists of an Aircast Foam Walker™ boot. A load cell was attached to the boot with a handle bar for application of moments about the knee. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to record the motion of the tibia with respect to the femur. The total arc of motion ranged from 23° at full extension to 46° at 90° of knee flexion. The intra-tester ICCs ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. The ICC for inter-tester reliability ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. In summary, the new device for measurement of rotational knee laxity is simple, reliable, and can be used in a non-invasive fashion in the office or surgical suite document clinical outcome in terms of rotational knee laxity.

A Prospective Study of Kitesurfing Injuries

Background To date, the pattern and rate of kitesurfing injuries are largely unclear. Hypothesis The pattern and rate of kitesurfing injuries are comparable to that of contact sports such as football and soccer. Study Design Prospective study. Methods The study was conducted over a 6-month period of 1 season and included 235 kitesurfers. Results The number of self-reported injuries was 124, for an overall self-reported injury rate of 7 per 1000 hours of practice. One fatal accident (polytrauma) and 11 severe injuries occurred during the study period (2 knee ligament injuries and 9 fractures at various sites). The most commonly injured sites were the foot and ankle (28%), skull (14%), chest (13%), and knee (13%). Fifty-six percent of the injuries were attributed to the inability to detach the kite from the harness in a situation involving loss of control over the kite. There was a tendency for athletes using a quick-release system to sustain fewer injuries than athletes without such a release system. Conclusion Kitesurfing can be considered a high-risk sport. Clinical Relevance The use of a quick-release system that enables the surfers to detach the kite in case of an accident might aid in the prevention of injuries.