Vysakh Mohan
Indian Veterinary Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vysakh Mohan.
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents | 2016
Manesh Kumar; Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; Jess Vergis; Vysakh Mohan; Ashok Kumar; Nitin V. Kurkure; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; S.V.S. Malik; Deepak B. Rawool
The in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus were evaluated individually and synergistically against multidrug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (MDR-EAEC). In vitro evaluation of each probiotic strain when co-cultured with MDR-EAEC isolates revealed a reduction in MDR-EAEC counts (eosin-methylene blue agar) in a dose- and time-dependent manner: probiotics at a dose rate of 10(10) CFU inhibited MDR-EAEC isolates at 72 h post-inoculation (PI), whereas at lower concentrations (10(8) and 10(9) CFU) MDR-EAEC isolates were inhibited at 96 h PI. The synergistic antimicrobial effect of both probiotic strains (each at 10(10) CFU) was highly significant (P < 0.01) and inhibited the growth of MDR-EAEC isolates at 24 h PI. For in vivo evaluation, weaned mice were fed orally with 10(7) CFU of MDR-EAEC. At Day 3 post-infection, treated mice were fed orally with the probiotic strains (each at 10(10) CFU). Compared with the control, post-treatment a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in MDR-EAEC counts was observed in faeces by Day 2 and in intestinal tissues of treated mice by Days 3 and 4 as evidenced by plate count (mean 2.71 log and 2.27 log, respectively) and real-time PCR (mean 1.62 log and 1.57 log, respectively) methods. Histopathologically, comparatively mild changes were observed in the ileum and colon from Days 3 to 5 post-treatment with probiotics; however, from Day 6 the changes were regenerative or normal. These observations suggest that these probiotic strains can serve as alternative therapeutics against MDR-EAEC-associated infections in humans and animals.
Infection ecology & epidemiology | 2016
Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; Jess Vergis; Mamta Negi; Manesh Kumar; Vysakh Mohan; Swapnil Doijad; Krupali V. Poharkar; S.V.S. Malik; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Deepak B. Rawool
Introduction Infectious diarrhoea particularly due to pathogenic bacteria is a major health problem in developing countries, including India. Despite significant reports of diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) pathotypes around the globe, studies which address genetic relatedness, antibiogram profile and their correlation with respect to their isolation from different sources are sparse. The present study determines isolation and identification of DEC pathotypes from different sources, their genetic characterisation, antibiogram profile and their correlation if any. Materials and methods A total of 336 samples comprising diarrhoeic stool samples from infants (n=103), young animal (n=106), foods (n=68) and associated environmental sources (n=59) were collected from Bareilly region of India. All the samples were screened by using standard microbiological methods for the detection of E. coli. The identified E. coli were then confirmed as DEC pathotypes using polymerase chain reaction–based assays. Those DEC pathotypes identified as Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) were further confirmed using HEp-2 adherence assay. All the isolated DEC pathotypes were studied for their genetic diversity using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by using disc diffusion method as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Results and discussion Of the four DEC pathotypes investigated, EAEC was found to be the predominant pathogen with an isolation rate of 16.5% from infants, 17.9% from young animals, 16.2% from foods and 3.4% from the associated environmental sources. These EAEC isolates, on further characterisation, revealed predominance of ‘atypical’ EAEC, with an isolation rate of 10.7% from infants, 15.1% from young animals, 16.2% from foods, and 3.4% from the associated environmental sources. On PFGE analysis, discrimination was evident within DEC pathotypes as 52 unique pulsotypes were observed for 59 recovered DEC pathotypes. However, a few EAEC isolates were found to be clonal (clusters A, B, C, D, F, G, and H) irrespective of their source of isolation, suggests sharing and/or circulation among different sources. Further, a high antibiotic resistance pattern was observed among isolated DEC pathotypes as almost 86.4% of isolates were found to be resistant against ≥3 tested drugs.
Veterinary World | 2015
Amruta Nair; T. Balasaravanan; S. V. S. Malik; Vysakh Mohan; Manesh Kumar; Jess Vergis; Deepak B. Rawool
Aim: This study was carried out to determine the prevalence, distribution, and identification of Salmonella serotypes in diarrheagenic infants and young animals, including sewage waste and fresh vegetables. Materials and Methods: A total of 550 samples were processed for the isolation of Salmonella spp., using standard microbiological and biochemical tests. Further polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of Salmonella genus was carried out using self-designed primers targeting invA gene and thereafter identification of important serotypes namely Salmonella Enterica serovar Typhimurium, Salmonella Enterica serovar Enteritidis, Salmonella Enterica serovar Typhi was performed using published standardized multiplex PCR. Results: An overall low prevalence of 2.5% (14/550) was observed. The observed prevalence of Salmonella spp. in diarrheagenic infants was 1.2% (05/400), diarrheagenic young animals 4% (02/50), sewage waste 10% (05/50), and fresh vegetables 4% (02/50), respectively. In diarrheagenic infants, of the five Salmonella isolates identified, two were Salmonella Typhimurium, two Salmonella Enteritidis, and one was unidentified and hence designated as other Salmonella serovar. All the Salmonella isolates identified from diarrheagenic young animals and sewage waste belonged to other Salmonella serovar, whereas, of the two isolates recovered from fresh vegetables, one was identified as other Salmonella serovar, and one as Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively. Conclusion: Isolation of Salmonella spp. especially from sewage waste and fresh vegetable is a matter of great concern from public health point of view because these sources can accidentally serve as a potential vehicle for transmission of Salmonella spp. to animals and human beings.
Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases | 2015
Deepthi Vijay; Pankaj Dhaka; Jess Vergis; Mamta Negi; Vysakh Mohan; Manesh Kumar; Swapnil Doijad; Krupali V. Poharkar; Ashok Kumar; S.V.S. Malik; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Deepak B. Rawool
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences | 2014
Mamta Negi; Deepak B. Rawool; Jess Vergis; Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; Vysakh Mohan; Rahul Suryavanshi; S. V. S. Malik; Ashok Kumar; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Pramod W. Ramteke
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences | 2014
Jess Vergis; D. P. Das; R. D. Suryawanshi; Mamta Negi; Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; Vysakh Mohan; Amruta Nair; S. V. S. Malik; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Deepak B. Rawool; R. Pratap; P. K. Panwar; Y. S. Malik; Kuldeep Dhama
Veterinary World | 2014
Vysakh Mohan; Shriya Rawat; K. M. Lokesh; Hosakote Venkatappa Mohan; D. Avinash Reddy; Ashok Kumar; K. N. Bhilegaonkar
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences | 2014
R. D. Suryawanshi; Bhushan Jayarao; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Sandeep P. Chaudhari; Deepak B. Rawool; Vysakh Mohan; Jess Vergis; Mamta Negi; S.V.S. Malik
International Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2016
Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; J. Vergis; Vysakh Mohan; Manesh Kumar; Ashok Kumar; S.V.S. Malik; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Deepak B. Rawool
F1000Research | 2016
Pankaj Dhaka; Deepthi Vijay; Jess Vergis; Vysakh Mohan; Manesh Kumar; Ashok Kumar; S. V. S. Malik; Sukhadeo B. Barbuddhe; Deepak B. Rawool