Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where W. Dean Hively is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by W. Dean Hively.


Applied and Environmental Soil Science | 2011

Use of Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery to Map Soil Properties in Tilled Agricultural Fields

W. Dean Hively; Gregory W. McCarty; James B. Reeves; Megan W. Lang; Robert A. Oesterling; Stephen R. Delwiche

Soil hyperspectral reflectance imagery was obtained for six tilled (soil) agricultural fields using an airborne imaging spectrometer (400–2450 nm, 10 nm resolution, 2.5 m spatial resolution). Surface soil samples () were analyzed for carbon content, particle size distribution, and 15 agronomically important elements (Mehlich-III extraction). When partial least squares (PLS) regression of imagery-derived reflectance spectra was used to predict analyte concentrations, 13 of the 19 analytes were predicted with , including carbon (0.65), aluminum (0.76), iron (0.75), and silt content (0.79). Comparison of 15 spectral math preprocessing treatments showed that a simple first derivative worked well for nearly all analytes. The resulting PLS factors were exported as a vector of coefficients and used to calculate predicted maps of soil properties for each field. Image smoothing with a low-pass filter prior to spectral data extraction improved prediction accuracy. The resulting raster maps showed variation associated with topographic factors, indicating the effect of soil redistribution and moisture regime on in-field spatial variability. High-resolution maps of soil analyte concentrations can be used to improve precision environmental management of farmlands.


IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing | 2014

Remote Sensing With Simulated Unmanned Aircraft Imagery for Precision Agriculture Applications

E. Raymond Hunt; Craig S. T. Daughtry; Steven B. Mirsky; W. Dean Hively

An important application of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) may be remote-sensing for precision agriculture, because of its ability to acquire images with very small pixel sizes from low altitude flights. The objective of this study was to compare information obtained from two different pixel sizes, one about a meter (the size of a small vegetation plot) and one about a millimeter. Cereal rye (Secale cereale) was planted at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center for a winter cover crop with fall and spring fertilizer applications, which produced differences in biomass and leaf chlorophyll content. UAS imagery was simulated by placing a Fuji IS-Pro UVIR digital camera at 3-m height looking nadir. An external UV-IR cut filter was used to acquire true-color images; an external red cut filter was used to obtain color-infrared-like images with bands at near-infrared, green, and blue wavelengths. Plot-scale Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index was correlated with dry aboveground biomass (r = 0.58), whereas the Triangular Greenness Index (TGI) was not correlated with chlorophyll content. We used the SamplePoint program to select 100 pixels systematically; we visually identified the cover type and acquired the digital numbers. The number of rye pixels in each image was better correlated with biomass (r = 0.73), and the average TGI from only leaf pixels was negatively correlated with chlorophyll content (r = -0.72). Thus, better information for crop requirements may be obtained using very small pixel sizes, but new algorithms based on computer vision are needed for analysis. It may not be necessary to geospatially register large numbers of photographs with very small pixel sizes. Instead, images could be analyzed as single plots along field transects.


Science of The Total Environment | 2010

Pollutant fate and spatio-temporal variability in the choptank river estuary: Factors influencing water quality

David R. Whitall; W. Dean Hively; Andrew K. Leight; Cathleen J. Hapeman; Laura L. McConnell; Thomas R. Fisher; Clifford P. Rice; Eton E. Codling; Gregory W. McCarty; Ali M. Sadeghi; Anne B. Gustafson; Krystyna Bialek

Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the United States, is a national priority. Documentation of progress of this restoration effort is needed. A study was conducted to examine water quality in the Choptank River estuary, a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay that since 1998 has been classified as impaired waters under the Federal Clean Water Act. Multiple water quality parameters (salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a) and analyte concentrations (nutrients, herbicide and herbicide degradation products, arsenic, and copper) were measured at seven sampling stations in the Choptank River estuary. Samples were collected under base flow conditions in the basin on thirteen dates between March 2005 and April 2008. As commonly observed, results indicate that agriculture is a primary source of nitrate in the estuary and that both agriculture and wastewater treatment plants are important sources of phosphorus. Concentrations of copper in the lower estuary consistently exceeded both chronic and acute water quality criteria, possibly due to use of copper in antifouling boat paint. Concentrations of copper in the upstream watersheds were low, indicating that agriculture is not a significant source of copper loading to the estuary. Concentrations of herbicides (atrazine, simazine, and metolachlor) peaked during early-summer, indicating a rapid surface-transport delivery pathway from agricultural areas, while their degradation products (CIAT, CEAT, MESA, and MOA) appeared to be delivered via groundwater transport. Some in-river processing of CEAT occurred, whereas MESA was conservative. Observed concentrations of herbicide residues did not approach established levels of concern for aquatic organisms. Results of this study highlight the importance of continued implementation of best management practices to improve water quality in the estuary. This work provides a baseline against which to compare future changes in water quality and may be used to design future monitoring programs needed to assess restoration strategy efficacy.


Science of The Total Environment | 2011

Relating nutrient and herbicide fate with landscape features and characteristics of 15 subwatersheds in the Choptank River watershed

W. Dean Hively; Cathleen J. Hapeman; Laura L. McConnell; Thomas R. Fisher; Clifford P. Rice; Gregory W. McCarty; Ali M. Sadeghi; David R. Whitall; Peter M. Downey; Gabriela T. Niño de Guzmán; Krystyna Bialek-Kalinski; Megan W. Lang; Anne B. Gustafson; Adrienne J. Sutton; Kerry A. Sefton; Jennifer A. Harman Fetcho

Excess nutrients and agrochemicals from non-point sources contribute to water quality impairment in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and their loading rates are related to land use, agricultural practices, hydrology, and pollutant fate and transport processes. In this study, monthly baseflow stream samples from 15 agricultural subwatersheds of the Choptank River in Maryland USA (2005 to 2007) were characterized for nutrients, herbicides, and herbicide transformation products. High-resolution digital maps of land use and forested wetlands were derived from remote sensing imagery. Examination of landscape metrics and water quality data, partitioned according to hydrogeomorphic class, provided insight into the fate, delivery, and transport mechanisms associated with agricultural pollutants. Mean Nitrate-N concentrations (4.9 mg/L) were correlated positively with percent agriculture (R(2)=0.56) and negatively with percent forest (R(2)=0.60). Concentrations were greater (p=0.0001) in the well-drained upland (WDU) hydrogeomorphic region than in poorly drained upland (PDU), reflecting increased denitrification and reduced agricultural land use intensity in the PDU landscape due to the prevalence of hydric soils. Atrazine and metolachlor concentrations (mean 0.29 μg/L and 0.19 μg/L) were also greater (p=0.0001) in WDU subwatersheds than in PDU subwatersheds. Springtime herbicide concentrations exhibited a strong, positive correlation (R(2)=0.90) with percent forest in the WDU subwatersheds but not in the PDU subwatersheds. In addition, forested riparian stream buffers in the WDU were more prevalent than in the PDU where forested patches are typically not located near streams, suggesting an alternative delivery mechanism whereby volatilized herbicides are captured by the riparian forest canopy and subsequently washed off during rainfall. Orthophosphate, CIAT (6-chloro-N-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine), CEAT (6-chloro-N-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine), and MESA (2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) (2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)amino]-2-oxoethanesulfonic acid) were also analyzed. These findings will assist efforts in targeting implementation of conservation practices to the most environmentally-critical areas within watersheds to achieve water quality improvements in a cost-effective manner.


Science of The Total Environment | 2014

Metolachlor metabolite (MESA) reveals agricultural nitrate-N fate and transport in Choptank River watershed.

Gregory W. McCarty; Cathleen J. Hapeman; Clifford P. Rice; W. Dean Hively; Laura L. McConnell; Ali M. Sadeghi; Megan W. Lang; David R. Whitall; Krystyna Bialek; Peter M. Downey

Over 50% of streams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been rated as poor or very poor based on the index of biological integrity. The Choptank River estuary, a Bay tributary on the eastern shore, is one such waterway, where corn and soybean production in upland areas of the watershed contribute significant loads of nutrients and sediment to streams. We adopted a novel approach utilizing the relationship between the concentration of nitrate-N and the stable, water-soluble herbicide degradation product MESA {2-[2-ethyl-N-(1-methoxypropan-2-yl)-6-methylanilino]-2-oxoethanesulfonic acid} to distinguish between dilution and denitrification effects on the stream concentration of nitrate-N in agricultural subwatersheds. The ratio of mean nitrate-N concentration/(mean MESA concentration * 1000) for 15 subwatersheds was examined as a function of percent cropland on hydric soil. This inverse relationship (R(2)=0.65, p<0.001) takes into consideration not only dilution and denitrification of nitrate-N, but also the stream sampling bias of the croplands caused by extensive drainage ditch networks. MESA was also used to track nitrate-N concentrations within the estuary of the Choptank River. The relationship between nitrate-N and MESA concentrations in samples collected over three years was linear (0.95 ≤ R(2) ≤ 0.99) for all eight sampling dates except one where R(2)=0.90. This very strong correlation indicates that nitrate-N was conserved in much of the Choptank River estuary, that dilution alone is responsible for the changes in nitrate-N and MESA concentrations, and more importantly nitrate-N loads are not reduced in the estuary prior to entering the Chesapeake Bay. Thus, a critical need exists to minimize nutrient export from agricultural production fields and to identify specific conservation practices to address the hydrologic conditions within each subwatershed. In well drained areas, removal of residual N within the cropland is most critical, and practices such as cover crops which sequester the residual N should be strongly encouraged. In poorly drained areas where denitrification can occur, wetland restoration and controlled drained structures that minimize ditch flow should be used to maximize denitrification.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Impacts of Watershed Characteristics and Crop Rotations on Winter Cover Crop Nitrate-Nitrogen Uptake Capacity within Agricultural Watersheds in the Chesapeake Bay Region

Sangchul Lee; In-Young Yeo; Ali Sadeghi; Gregory W. McCarty; W. Dean Hively; Megan W. Lang

The adoption rate of winter cover crops (WCCs) as an effective conservation management practice to help reduce agricultural nutrient loads in the Chesapeake Bay (CB) is increasing. However, the WCC potential for water quality improvement has not been fully realized at the watershed scale. This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term impact of WCCs on hydrology and NO3-N loads in two adjacent watersheds and to identify key management factors that affect the effectiveness of WCCs using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and statistical methods. Simulation results indicated that WCCs are effective for reducing NO3-N loads and their performance varied based on planting date, species, soil characteristics, and crop rotations. Early-planted WCCs outperformed late-planted WCCs on the reduction of NO3-N loads and early-planted rye (RE) reduced NO3-N loads by ~49.3% compared to the baseline (no WCC). The WCCs were more effective in a watershed dominated by well-drained soils with increased reductions in NO3-N fluxes of ~2.5 kg N·ha-1 delivered to streams and ~10.1 kg N·ha-1 leached into groundwater compared to poorly-drained soils. Well-drained agricultural lands had higher transport of NO3-N in the soil profile and groundwater due to increased N leaching. Poorly-drained agricultural lands had lower NO3-N due to extensive drainage ditches and anaerobic soil conditions promoting denitrification. The performance of WCCs varied by crop rotations (i.e., continuous corn and corn-soybean), with increased N uptake following soybean crops due to the increased soil mineral N availability by mineralization of soybean residue compared to corn residue. The WCCs can reduce N leaching where baseline NO3-N loads are high in well-drained soils and/or when residual and mineralized N availability is high due to the cropping practices. The findings suggested that WCC implementation plans should be established in watersheds according to local edaphic and agronomic characteristics for reducing N leaching.


Science of The Total Environment | 2012

Potential pollutant sources in a Choptank River (USA) subwatershed and the influence of land use and watershed characteristics

Gabriela T. Niño de Guzmán; Cathleen J. Hapeman; Kusuma Prabhakara; Eton E. Codling; Daniel R. Shelton; Clifford P. Rice; W. Dean Hively; Gregory W. McCarty; Megan W. Lang; Alba Torrents

Row-crop and poultry production have been implicated as sources of water pollution along the Choptank River, an estuary and tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. This study examined the effects of land use, subwatershed characteristics, and climatic conditions on the water quality parameters of a subwatershed in the Choptank River watershed. The catchments within the subwatershed were defined using advanced remotely-sensed data and current geographic information system processing techniques. Water and sediment samples were collected in May-October 2009 and April-June 2010 under mostly baseflow conditions and analyzed for select bacteria, nitrate-N, ammonium-N, total arsenic, total phosphorus (TP), orthophosphate (ortho-P), and particle-phase phosphorus (PP); n=96 for all analytes except for arsenic, n=136, and for bacteria, n=89 (aqueous) and 62 (sediment). Detections of Enterococci and Escherichia coli concentrations were ubiquitous in this subwatershed and showed no correlation to location or land use, however larger bacterial counts were observed shortly after precipitation. Nitrate-N concentrations were not correlated with agricultural lands, which may reflect the small change in percent agriculture and/or the similarity of agronomic practices and crops produced between catchments. Concentration data suggested that ammonia emission and possible deposition to surface waters occurred and that these processes may be influenced by local agronomic practices and climatic conditions. The negative correlation of PP and arsenic concentrations with percent forest was explained by the stronger signal of the head waters and overland flow of particulate phase analytes versus dissolved phase inputs from groundwater. Service roadways at some poultry production facilities were found to redirect runoff from the facilities to neighboring catchment areas, which affected water quality parameters. Results suggest that in this subwatershed, catchments with poultry production facilities are possible sources for arsenic and PP as compared to catchment areas where these facilities were not present.


Managing Agricultural Greenhouse Gases | 2012

Advances in spectroscopic methods for quantifying soil carbon

James B. Reeves; Gregory W. McCarty; Francisco J. Calderón; W. Dean Hively

The current gold standard for soil carbon (C) determination is elemental C analysis using dry combustion. However, this method requires expensive consumables, is limited by the number of samples that can be processed (~100/d), and is restricted to the determination of total carbon. With increased interest in soil C sequestration, faster methods of analysis are needed, and there is growing interest in methods based on diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the visible, near-infrared or mid-infrared spectral ranges. These spectral methods can decrease analytical requirements and speed sample processing, be applied to large landscape areas using remote sensing imagery, and be used to predict multiple analytes simultaneously. However, the methods require localized calibrations to establish the relationship between spectral data and reference analytical data, and also have additional, specific problems. For example, remote sensing is capable of scanning entire watersheds for soil carbon content but is limited to the surface layer of tilled soils and may require difficult and extensive field sampling to obtain proper localized calibration reference values. The objective of this chapter is to discuss the present state of spectroscopic methods for determination of soil carbon.


21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment Conference Proceedings, 21-24 February 2010, Universidad EARTH, Costa Rica | 2010

Modeling Cover Crop Effectiveness on Maryland’s Eastern Shore

Aisha M Sexton; Ali Sadeghi; Adel Shirmohammadi; Greg McCarty; W. Dean Hively

Cover cropping has become a widely used conservation practice on Maryland’s Eastern shore. It is one of the main practices funded by the Maryland Department of Agriculture’s (MDA) Maryland Agricultural Water Quality Cost Share (MACS) program. The major benefits of this practice include reduction of nutrient runoff and leaching to surface and ground waters, and control of soil erosion. Although cover crops are increasingly being implemented, the long term effectiveness of this practice is not well known, especially on a watershed-scale basis. Since many watershed/water quality models are designed to measure long-term, large-scale effects of management practices, the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was employed to evaluate the environmental impact of cover crop implementations. This project is part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) program which was established to specifically quantify the environmental benefits from conservation practices. The study is being carried out on the Choptank, one of the nine major Maryland river basins within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Several tributaries in the Choptank river basin have been identified as “impaired waters” under Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act due to high levels of nutrients and sediments. SWAT was first utilized to build a model for the German Branch (GB) subbasin (~50 km2), a non-tidal tributary basin of the larger Choptank River watershed. The study period was 18 years (1990-2007). The streamflow component of SWAT was calibrated on a daily basis using years 2005 and 2006 with one year of spin-up (2004). Validation was conducted using the 1/1/07-4/15/07 time period. Cover cropping was first implemented in the GB watershed in 2002. Changes in nitrate loading were examined to measure improvements in the reduction of nitrate loads by increasing cover crop implementation. Model simulations were run to estimate nitrate loads for two scenarios: (1) no cover crop implementation during the entire study period, and (2) increasing cover crop implementation starting from 2002 through 2007.


Soil Science Society of America Journal | 2012

Strategies for Soil Quality Assessment Using Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy in a Western Kenya Chronosequence

Rintaro Kinoshita; Bianca N. Moebius-Clune; Harold M. van Es; W. Dean Hively; A. Volkan Bilgilis

Collaboration


Dive into the W. Dean Hively's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory W. McCarty

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura L. McConnell

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cathleen J. Hapeman

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clifford P. Rice

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greg McCarty

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Sadeghi

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali M. Sadeghi

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Sadeghi

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne B. Gustafson

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Craig S. T. Daughtry

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge