W. Debernardi-Venon

Prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients treated with lamivudine and passive immunoprophylaxis

BACKGROUND/AIMS Treatment with hepatitis B virus immune globulins (HBIG) or lamivudine has reduced the rate of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation to approximately 50%. METHODS To further decrease hepatitis B recurrence, 33 hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhotic patients were treated with lamivudine before liver transplantation and with lamivudine together with low-dose HBIG (46 500 IU the first month followed by 5,000 lU/monthly) after surgery. RESULTS While on lamivudine, serum HBV DNA level decreased significantly in all patients and in 11 (33%) the Child-Pugh score improved. Twenty-six patients were transplanted. Among the 25 who survived for longer than 12 months, only one (4%) experienced a hepatitis B recurrence over an average follow-up of 31 months, a rate significantly lower (P = 0.0002) than the 50% recurrence rate among a historical control group of 12 patients. However, low-level HBV replication was detected sporadically throughout the follow-up in 64% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Over the medium-term, combined prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG significantly decreases the risk of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. Though low-level HBV infection recurred in two thirds of patients, the pathogenic expression of HBV was prevented.

Viral load at the time of liver transplantation and risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation is significantly reduced by prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulins (HBIG) or antiviral drugs in nonreplicating patients and by the combination of both drugs in replicating patients. However, the load of HBV DNA, which defines replicating status in patients undergoing liver transplantation, remains unclear. This study analyzes the correlation between the viral load, tested with a single amplified assay, at the time of liver transplantation, and the risk of hepatitis B recurrence in 177 HBV carriers who underwent transplantation in a single center from 1990 to 2002. Overall, HBV relapsed after surgery in 15 patients (8.5%) with a 5‐ and 8‐year actuarial rate of recurrence of 8% and 21%, respectively. After liver transplantation hepatitis B recurred in 9% of 98 selected subjects treated only with immune globulins and in 8% of 79 viremic patients who received immune globulins and lamivudine (P = NS). A linear correlation was observed between recurrence and viral load at the time of surgery. In transplant patients with HBV DNA higher than 100,000 copies/mL, 200–99,999 copies/mL, and DNA undetectable by amplified assay, hepatitis B recurred in 50%, 7.5%, and 0% of patients, respectively. Overall, a viral load higher than 100,000 copies/mL at the time of liver transplantation was significantly associated with hepatitis B recurrence (P = .0003). In conclusion, spontaneous or antiviral‐induced HBV DNA viral load at the time of surgery classifies the risk of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation and indicates the best prophylaxis strategy. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:402–409.)

EFFICACY OF IRBESARTAN, A RECEPTOR SELECTIVE ANTAGONIST OF ANGIOTENSIN II, IN REDUCING PORTAL HYPERTENSION

The use of angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. Our aims were to assess the effect of Irbesartan on portal pressure and to evaluate its safety in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Twenty-five cirrhotic patients were treated in a pilot study with Irbesartan 300 mg orally once daily for 60 days. Hemodynamic evaluations and biochemical tests were performed before therapy and after two months of treatment. Three patients (12%) discontinued treatment for symptomatic arterial hypotension (mean arterial pressure −26.% ± 3.1 versus basal). In the 18 responders, the hepatic venous pressure gradient diminished by a mean of 18.1% ± 10.5 from baseline (p = 0.02); the gradient decreased by 20% or more in only 5 patients (23%). The mean arterial pressure decreased significantly during therapy (92 ± 7 vs 109 ± 25 mm Hg, P < 0.001). In conclusions, Irbesartan induced a marginal reduction in portal pressure and its safety was limited by the pronounced effects on arterial pressure.

Adrenaline plus cyanoacrylate injection for treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers after failure of conventional endoscopic haemostasis

BACKGROUND Endoscopic therapy is a safe and effective method for treating non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However failure of therapy, in terms of continuing bleeding or rebleeding, is seen in up to 20%. Cyanoacrylate is a tissue glue used for variceal bleeding that has occasionally been reported as an alternative haemostatic technique in non-variceal haemorrhage. AIM To retrospectively describe personal experience using cyanoacrylate injection in the management of bleeding ulcers after failure of first-line endoscopic modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1995 and March 1998, 18 [12 M/6 F, mean age 68.1 years) out of 176 patients, referred to our Unit for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, were treated with intralesional injection of adrenaline plus undiluted cyanoacrylate. Persistent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis or early rebleeding were the indications for cyanoacrylate treatment. RESULTS Definitive haemostasis was achieved in 17 out of 18 patients treated with cyanoacrylate. One patient needed surgery. No early or late rebleeding occurred during the follow-up. No complications or instrument lesions related to cyanoacrylate were recorded. CONCLUSIONS In our retrospective series, cyanoacrylate plus adrenaline injection was found to be a potentially safe and effective alternative to endoscopic haemostasis when conventional treatment modalities fail in controlling bleeding from gastroduodenal ulcers.

Midodrine in the prevention of hepatorenal syndrome type 2 recurrence: A case–control study

BACKGROUND Hepatorenal syndrome is a severe complication of cirrhosis. Treatment with terlipressin has currently the best efficacy pedigree, inducing hepatorenal syndrome reversal in a high proportion of patients. However, hepatorenal syndrome recurrence after terlipressin withdrawal is very common, especially in type 2 hepatorenal syndrome. Midodrine, an oral adrenergic vasoconstrictor, has been suggested to be an effective therapy in hepatorenal syndrome. AIMS To analyse the impact of treatment with midodrine after hepatorenal syndrome type 2 reversal induced by terlipressin on the prevention of hepatorenal syndrome recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS A case-control design was used. The outcome of 10 patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 2 treated successfully with terlipressin and then with midodrine (7.5-12.5mg/tid) was compared with that of an historical control group of hepatorenal syndrome type 2 patients responders to treatment with terlipressin. Patients and controls were matched by age, plasma renin activity (PRA) levels and severity of renal and liver failure. RESULTS Cases and controls were similar with respect to pre-treatment with terlipressin. The hepatorenal syndrome recurrence probability was the same in the two groups (cases and control: 9/10, 90%, p=ns). No significant differences were found between cases and controls with respect to serum creatinine (1.9+/-0.1mg/dl vs. 2+/-0.2mg/dl), blood creatinine clearance (28+/-5ml/min vs. 24+/-5ml/min), urinary sodium excretion (12+/-6mequiv./d vs. 19+/-4mequiv./d) and PRA levels (17+/-3ng/ml/h) vs. 20+/-3ng/ml/h) after terlipressin withdrawal (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS These results show that in patients responders to terlipressin hepatorenal syndrome recurrence is not different between patients treated with midodrine and subjects who did not receive vasoconstrictor treatment after terlipressin withdrawal. These data suggest that midodrine is not effective in preventing hepatorenal syndrome type 2 recurrence.

Efficacy of lamivudine re-treatment in a patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation and HBV-DNA breakthrough during the first treatment

BACKGROUND Transplantation for terminal hepatitis B virus (HBV) disease is aggravated by a high rate of reinfection and disease recurrence. Lamivudine, a new nucleoside analog, is a potent inhibitor of HBV synthesis, but its use may lead to the emergence of HBV-DNA polymerase mutants resistant to the drug. METHODS AND RESULTS We describe the case of a patient who developed an HBV recurrence after liver transplantation and was treated with lamivudine. An HBV-DNA breakthrough occurred 7 months after the start of therapy, and the drug was stopped after 9 months. The molecular state of HBV-DNA was analyzed, and a mutation in the YMDD (tyrosine, methionine, aspartate, aspartate) locus of HBV-DNA polymerase was identified. Nine months after the suspension of lamivudine the patient experienced a new hepatic attack accompanied by high HBV-DNA levels. Lamivudine was given again. Serum HBV-DNA levels normalized after 45 days of re-treatment, but lamivudine-resistant mutants were again the prevalent viral population after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS The case described suggests that retherapy with lamivudine after a first emergence of YMDD mutants is temporarily effective in recontrolling HBV synthesis but ultimately induces the accelerated reemergence of a prevalently mutant population of HBV. This emphasizes the need for combined antiviral therapy.

Extrahepatic aneurysm of the portal venous system and portal hypertension

Portal venous aneurysm (PVA) is a rare condition characterized by dilatation of the portal venous system. PVA manifestation of symptoms is varied and depends on the aneurysm size, location and related-complications, such as thrombosis. While the majority of reported cases of PVA are attributed to portal hypertension, very little is known about the conditions pathophysiology and clinical management remains a challenge. Here, we describe a 67-year-old woman who presented with complaint of dyspepsia and without a significant medical history, for whom PVA was incidentally diagnosed. The initial upper abdominal ultrasound revealed marked dilatation of the main portal vein, and subsequent contrast-enhanced computed tomography with angiography revealed a large aneurysm arising from the extrahepatic troncus portion of the portal vein, as well as gastroesophageal varices. A conservative approach using beta-blocker therapy was chosen. The patient was followed-up for 60 mo, during which time the asymptomatic status was unaltered and the PVA remained stable.