Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where W. J. S. Aston is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by W. J. S. Aston.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2010

Femoral diaphyseal endoprosthetic reconstruction after segmental resection of primary bone tumours

S. A. Hanna; M. D. Sewell; W. J. S. Aston; Robin Pollock; John A. Skinner; S. R. Cannon; Timothy W. R. Briggs

Segmental resection of malignant bone disease in the femoral diaphysis with subsequent limb reconstruction is a major undertaking. This is a retrospective review of 23 patients who had undergone limb salvage by endoprosthetic replacement of the femoral diaphysis for a primary bone tumour between 1989 and 2005. There were 16 males and seven females, with a mean age of 41.3 years (10 to 68). The mean overall follow-up was for 97 months (3 to 240), and 120 months (42 to 240) for the living patients. The cumulative patient survival was 77% (95% confidence interval 63% to 95%) at ten years. Survival of the implant, with failure of the endoprosthesis as an endpoint, was 85% at five years and 68% (95% confidence interval 42% to 92%) at ten years. The revision rate was 22% and the overall rate of re-operation was 26%. Complications included deep infection (4%), breakage of the prosthesis (8%), periprosthetic fracture (4%), aseptic loosening (4%), local recurrence (4%) and metastases (17%). The 16 patients who retained their diaphyseal endoprosthesis had a mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score of 87% (67% to 93%). They were all able to comfortably perform most activities of daily living. Femoral diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement is a viable option for reconstruction following segmental resection of malignant bone disease. It allows immediate weight-bearing, is associated with a good long-term functional outcome, has an acceptable complication and revision rate and, most importantly, does not appear to compromise patient survival.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2011

Intercalary diaphyseal endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant tibial bone tumours

M. D. Sewell; S. A. Hanna; McGrath A; W. J. S. Aston; Gordon W. Blunn; Robin Pollock; John A. Skinner; S. R. Cannon; T. W. R. Briggs

The best method of reconstruction after resection of malignant tumours of the tibial diaphysis is unknown. In the absence of any long-term studies analysing the results of intercalary endoprosthetic replacement, we present a retrospective review of 18 patients who underwent limb salvage using a tibial diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement following excision of a malignant bone tumour. There were ten men and eight women with a mean age of 42.5 years (16 to 76). Mean follow-up was 58.5 months (20 to 141) for all patients and 69.3 months (20 to 141) for the 12 patients still alive. Cumulative patient survival was 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32 to 84) at five years. Implant survival was 63% (95% CI 35 to 90) at ten years. Four patients required revision to a proximal tibial replacement at a mean follow-up of 29 months (10 to 54). Complications included metastases in five patients, aseptic loosening in four, peri-prosthetic fracture in two, infection in one and local recurrence in one. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and the mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were 23 (17 to 28) and 74% (53 to 91), respectively. Although rates of complication and revision were high, custom-made tibial diaphyseal replacement following resection of malignant bone tumours enables early return to function and provides an attractive alternative to other surgical options, without apparent compromise of patient survival.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2009

Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal tibia and ankle joint after resection of primary bone tumours

A. S. Shekkeris; S. A. Hanna; M. D. Sewell; B. G. I. Spiegelberg; W. J. S. Aston; Gordon W. Blunn; S. R. Cannon; T. W. R. Briggs

Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint for a primary bone tumour is a rarely attempted and technically challenging procedure. We report the outcome of six patients treated between 1981 and 2007. There were four males and two females, with a mean age of 43.5 years (15 to 75), and a mean follow-up of 9.6 years (1 to 27). No patient developed a local recurrence or metastasis. Two of the six went on to have a below-knee amputation for persistent infection after a mean 16 months (1 to 31). The four patients who retained their endoprosthesis had a mean musculoskeletal tumour society score of 70% and a mean Toronto extremity salvage score of 71%. All were pain free and able to perform most activities of daily living in comfort. A custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal tibia and ankle joint is a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with a primary bone tumour. Patients should, however, be informed of the risk of infection and the potential need for amputation if this cannot be controlled.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2007

Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus following resection of bone tumours

S. A. Hanna; L. A. David; W. J. S. Aston; P. D. Gikas; Gordon W. Blunn; S. R. Cannon; T. W. R. Briggs

Between 1988 and 2006, 18 patients had a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus for bone tumours at our institution. There were 11 primary malignant neoplasms, six secondary deposits, and one benign aggressive tumour. The mean follow-up was for 4.4 years (1 to 18.2). Complications occurred in nine patients and included aseptic loosening in three (16.6%), local recurrence in two (11%), infection in two (11%), neuropraxia of the radial nerve in one (5.5%) and a peri-prosthetic fracture in one (5.5%). Excision was inadequate in four patients (22%), all of which developed local recurrence and/or metastases. There were seven deaths from the primary disease after a mean of 2.3 years (1 to 5), one of whom had an above-elbow amputation for local recurrence seven months before death. The remaining six had satisfactory elbow function at their last follow-up. The 11 living patients were evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society and Toronto Extremity Salvage scoring systems. The mean scores achieved were 76% (67% to 87%) and 73% (59% to 79%), respectively. Overall, 17 of 18 patients had significant improvement in the degree of their pain following operation. Custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction of the elbow for bone tumours is a viable treatment in carefully selected patients. It maintains satisfactory function and provides good pain relief.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2011

Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone: CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF A SERIES OF 22 CASES

O. Berber; Sebastian Dawson-Bowling; Azal Jalgaonkar; Jonathan Miles; Robin Pollock; John A. Skinner; W. J. S. Aston; T. W. R. Briggs

We describe 22 cases of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation, or Noras lesion. These are surface-based osteocartilaginous lesions typically affecting the hands and feet. All patients were identified from the records of a regional bone tumour unit and were treated between 1985 and 2009. Nine lesions involved the metacarpals, seven the metatarsals, one originated from a sesamoid bone of the foot and five from long bones (radius, ulna, tibia, and femur in two). The mean age of the patients was 31.8 years (6 to 66), with 14 men and eight women. Diagnosis was based on the radiological and histological features. The initial surgical treatment was excision in 21 cases and amputation of a toe in one. The mean follow-up was for 32 months (12 to 162). Recurrence occurred in six patients (27.3%), with a mean time to recurrence of 49 months (10 to 120). Two of the eight patients with complete resection margins developed a recurrence (25.0%), compared with four of 14 with a marginal or incomplete resection (28.6%). Given the potential surgical morbidity inherent in resection, our data suggest that there may be a role for a relatively tissue-conserving approach to the excision of these lesions.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2009

Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement following excision of bone tumours

M. D. Sewell; B. G. I. Spiegelberg; S. A. Hanna; W. J. S. Aston; W. Bartlett; Gordon W. Blunn; L. A. David; S. R. Cannon; T. W. R. Briggs

We undertook a retrospective review of 33 patients who underwent total femoral endoprosthetic replacement as limb salvage following excision of a malignant bone tumour. In 22 patients this was performed as a primary procedure following total femoral resection for malignant disease. Revision to a total femoral replacement was required in 11 patients following failed segmental endoprosthetic or allograft reconstruction. There were 33 patients with primary malignant tumours, and three had metastatic lesions. The mean age of the patients was 31 years (5 to 68). The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (9 months to 16.4 years). At five years the survival of the implants was 100%, with removal as the endpoint and 56% where the endpoint was another surgical intervention. At five years the patient survival was 32%. Complications included dislocation of the hip in six patients (18%), local recurrence in three (9%), peri-prosthetic fracture in two and infection in one. One patient subsequently developed pulmonary metastases. There were no cases of aseptic loosening or amputation. Four patients required a change of bushings. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional outcome score was 67%, the mean Harris Hip Score was 70, and the mean Oxford Knee Score was 34. Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement can provide good functional outcome without compromising patient survival, and in selected cases provides an effective alternative to amputation.


Journal of Orthopaedic Science | 2008

Autologous chondrocyte implantation: where do we stand now?

P. D. Gikas; W. J. S. Aston; T. W. R. Briggs

Chondral damage to the young knee is common. In symptomatic patients current surgical treatment has focused on filling the defect with fibrocartilage; however, this tissue has poor resistance to shear forces, leading to failure and the onset of degenerative osteoarthritis.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2014

Uncemented, custom-made, hydroxyapatite-coated collared distal femoral endoprostheses: Up to 18 years’ follow-up

V. Batta; Melanie J. Coathup; M. T. R. Parratt; Robin Pollock; W. J. S. Aston; S. R. Cannon; John A. Skinner; T. W. R. Briggs; Gordon W. Blunn

We reviewed the outcome of 69 uncemented, custom-made, distal femoral endoprosthetic replacements performed in 69 patients between 1994 and 2006. There were 31 women and 38 men with a mean age at implantation of 16.5 years (5 to 37). All procedures were performed for primary malignant bone tumours of the distal femur. At a mean follow-up of 124.2 months (4 to 212), 53 patients were alive, with one patient lost to follow-up. All nine implants (13.0%) were revised due to aseptic loosening at a mean of 52 months (8 to 91); three implants (4.3%) were revised due to fracture of the shaft of the prosthesis and three patients (4.3%) had a peri-prosthetic fracture. Bone remodelling associated with periosteal cortical thinning adjacent to the uncemented intramedullary stem was seen in 24 patients but this did not predispose to failure. All aseptically loose implants in this series were diagnosed to be loose within the first five years. The results from this study suggest that custom-made uncemented distal femur replacements have a higher rate of aseptic loosening compared to published results for this design when used with cemented fixation. Loosening of uncemented replacements occurs early indicating that initial fixation of the implant is crucial.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2011

Proximal humeral replacement using a fixed-fulcrum endoprosthesis

D. Griffiths; P. D. Gikas; C. Jowett; L. Bayliss; W. J. S. Aston; John A. Skinner; S. R. Cannon; Gordon W. Blunn; Timothy W. R. Briggs; Robin Pollock

Between 1997 and 2007, 68 consecutive patients underwent replacement of the proximal humerus for tumour using a fixed-fulcrum massive endoprosthesis. Their mean age was 46 years (7 to 87). Ten patients were lost to follow-up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at a mean follow-up of five years and 11 months (one year to ten years and nine months). The mean MSTS score was 72.3% (53.3% to 100%) and the mean TESS was 77.2% (58.6% to 100%). Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This subgroup had a mean MSTS score of 77.7% and a mean TESS of 80.0%. The dislocation rate for the original prosthesis was 25.9; none of the patients with the new liner had a dislocation at a mean of 14.5 months (12 to 18). Endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with a new constrained humeral liner, which reduces the risk of dislocation.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2009

The early results of joint-sparing proximal tibial replacement for primary bone tumours, using extracortical plate fixation

B. G. I. Spiegelberg; M. D. Sewell; W. J. S. Aston; Gordon W. Blunn; Robin Pollock; S. R. Cannon; T. W. R. Briggs

This paper describes the preliminary results of a proximal tibial endoprosthesis which spares the knee joint and enables retention of the natural articulation by replacing part of the tibial metaphysis and diaphysis. In eight patients who had a primary malignant bone tumour of the proximal tibia, the distal stem, which had a hydroxyapatite-coated collar to improve fixation, was cemented into the medullary canal. The proximal end had hydroxyapatite-coated extracortical plates which were secured to the remaining proximal tibial metaphysis using cortical screws. The mean age of the patients at operation was 28.9 years (8 to 43) and the mean follow-up was for 35 months (4 to 48). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 79% (57% to 90%), the mean Oxford Knee score was 40 points of 48 (36 to 46) and the mean knee flexion was 112 degrees (100 degrees to 120 degrees). In one patient, revision to a below-knee amputation through the prosthesis was required because of recurrence of the tumour. Another patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture which healed with a painful malunion. This was revised to a further endoprosthesis which replaced the knee. In the remaining six patients the prosthesis allowed preservation of the knee joint with good function and no early evidence of loosening. Further follow-up is required to assess the longevity of these prostheses.

Collaboration


Dive into the W. J. S. Aston's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. W. R. Briggs

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Skinner

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robin Pollock

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. R. Cannon

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gordon W. Blunn

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. D. Gikas

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. A. Hanna

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. D. Sewell

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. G. I. Spiegelberg

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge