W.Marchien van Baal

Long-term effects of combined hormone replacement therapy on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE To study the effects of combined hormone replacement therapy on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING Academic hospital. PATIENT(S) Healthy postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. INTERVENTION(S) For the first 12 months, the hormone replacement therapy group (n = 14) received oral E2, 1 mg daily, sequentially combined with 5 or 10 mg of dydrogesterone. Thereafter, they received oral E2, 2 mg daily, sequentially combined with 10 mg of dydrogesterone. The control group (n = 13) received no treatment. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, and 15 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Parameters of endothelial function and inflammatory activity. RESULT(S) During 12 months of follow-up, we observed decreases of 15% in plasma levels of endothelin-l, of 21% in soluble thrombomodulin, of 14% in von Willebrand factor, and of 12% in clottable fibrinogen in the hormone replacement therapy group compared with the control group. There was a 5% decrease in soluble E-selectin tevels. All significant changes were observed by 3 months and sustained after 15 months. Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilatation and C-reactive protein levels did not change significantly. CONCLUSION(S) Long-term combined hormone replacement therapy with E2 and dydrogesterone in healthy women was associated with sustained improvement in some aspects of endothelial function and in clottable fibrinogen levels.

Hormone replacement therapy and plasma homocysteine levels

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of 4 and 12 weeks of combined estradiol-progestogen replacement with unopposed estradiol therapy on fasting plasma total homocysteine concentrations in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS In this prospective, 12-week study in healthy postmenopausal women, we randomly assigned 59 women to sequentially combined daily 2 mg estradiol (E2) plus either trimegestone 0.5 mg daily or dydrogesterone 10 mg daily (n = 28), or to unopposed daily 2 mg estradiol (n = 16), or to placebo (n = 15). RESULTS Fasting plasma total homocysteine concentrations decreased by 9.4% in the combined estradiol-progestogen group and by 5.1% in the estradiol-only group, and they increased by 2.4% in the placebo group (analysis of covariance: combined hormone replacement therapy compared with placebo (P = .02); combined therapy compared with estradiol (P = .23); and estradiol compared with placebo (P = .26). Reductions were detectable after 4 weeks of combined estradiol-progestogen treatment. The data suggest an additional progestogen-related reduction in homocysteine levels of 0.7 micromol/L and 0.4 micromol/L after 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. Women with a baseline homocysteine concentration in the highest quartile had significantly greater reductions in homocysteine compared with women with an initial homocysteine value in the lowest quartile. CONCLUSION Fasting total homocysteine concentrations were significantly reduced by combined estradiol-progestogen replacement. Women with high homocysteine levels at baseline benefit the most. The progestogens used in this study did not have an unfavorable effect on homocysteine metabolism.

Ambulatory--not office--blood pressures decline during hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal women.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT, estrogen plus progestagen) in postmenopausal women has beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. However, effects on blood pressure, determined with office measurements, remain controversial. We studied the effects of HRT in 29 healthy normotensive postmenopausal women (mean age 52.3 [3.8] years, median duration of amenorrhea 34.5 months), using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Women were randomized to two groups: an HRT group (N = 14), treated with 1 mg 17beta-estradiol once daily and 5 or 10 mg dydrogesterone once daily during the third and fourth week of every 4 weeks; and a control group (C-group, N = 15), which did not receive therapy. Blood pressures did not differ between the groups at baseline (HRT group 117.1 (9.2)/74.4 (6.6) mm Hg, C-group 113.8 (11.2)/71.3 (7.4) mm Hg). During the follow-up period, changes from baseline of office blood pressures did not differ significantly between the groups. However, changes (95% CI) of mean 24-h blood pressures differed significantly between the two groups after 1 year of follow-up: a decrease of blood pressures was observed in the HRT group (delta systolic/delta diastolic = -5.54 [-8.86 to -2.21]/-4.23 [-6.66 to -1.80] mm Hg), whereas an increase was found in the C-group (+3.33 [-0.69 to +7.35]/+1.67 [-1.75 to +5.09] mm Hg; P [HRT v control group] = .001/.005). We conclude that HRT may have blood pressure lowering properties in healthy, normotensive postmenopausal women.

A 2-year, randomized, comparative, placebo-controlled study on the effects of raloxifene on lipoprotein(a) and homocysteine

OBJECTIVES Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and homocysteine (Hcy) are independent cardiovascular risk factors, which have been shown to be lowered by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). In this 2-year study, the long-term effects of raloxifene (Rlx) in two doses, on Lp(a) and Hcy, were studied and compared with the effects of continuously combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT). METHODS In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-year study, 95 healthy, non-hysterectomized, early postmenopausal women, received daily either oral Rlx 60 mg (N=24) or 150 mg (N=23), ccHRT (conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg; N=24) or placebo (N=24). Fasting serum Lp(a) and plasma Hcy concentrations were measured at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS The mean individual changes compared to baseline after 24 months were for Lp(a): Rlx 60: - 5%, Rlx 150: -7%, ccHRT: -34%, placebo: +1% and for Hcy: Rlx 60: -3%, Rlx 150: -4%, ccHRT: -4%, placebo: +6%. ANCOVA was significant for Lp(a) under ccHRT versus placebo (P=0.001) and for Lp(a) under ccHRT versus each of the two Rlx groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Long-term treatment with Rlx was not as effective as ccHRT in lowering Lp(a). Although not significant and without an obvious dose-related response, the Hcy values showed the same trend for each treatment arm, which is in line with data reported earlier.

The mechanisms of thrombotic risk induced by hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES To review the available information on the action of hormones on the mechanisms involved in thrombotic risk. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Thrombosis plays a crucial role in the genesis and progression of both coronary heart disease (CHD) and venous thromboembolic disease (VTED), the two main forms of cardiovascular disease. Two main determinants of the thromboembolic phenotype, hypercoagulable state and altered endothelium, accumulate much of the work performed on the influence of hormones on thrombosis. Information has accumulated mainly for oestrogens, but increasing evidences support a role for progestogens. The sensitivity of each of the three components of the hemostatic balance, the coagulation cascade, the anticoagulant system and fibrinolysis, to oestrogens has been widely examined in the literature. Functional tests suggest that HRT is accompanied by a procoagulant state. Much of the work has concentrated on changes induced on reputable indicators of risk for either CHD or VTED. Distinct indicators of increased coagulability, such as resistance to activated C protein, antithrombin or tissue factor pathway inhibitor have been selected for VTED, whereas factor VII, fibrinogen, and defective fibrinolysis, for CHD. Different states of genetic susceptibility have been involved in both forms of the disease. The status of health of endothelium, defines another scenario for attention in CHD. A long-term anti-atherogenic action of oestrogens, which may be associated with short-term risk in cases of atherosclerosis-induced endothelial dysfunction, may most adequately explain much of the clinical observation. In both CHD and VTED, the procoagulant changes initiate soon after HRT administration.

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with specific risk factors for coronary artery disease

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women is associated with a reduction in the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) of about 50%. Women with an elevated risk for CAD appear to benefit most by HRT. The HRT-associated cardiovascular protection may be related to favourable changes in several important cardiovascular risk estimators, such as circulating blood concentrations of cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and homocysteine. This paper reviews the literature presently available on the effects of HRT on cholesterol, Lp(a) and homocysteine concentrations, and special attention will be given to the effects on their elevated concentrations. The effect of HRT in women with hypertension is reviewed as well. From this overview it can be concluded that risk factors such as cholesterol, Lp(a), and homocysteine can be favourably modulated by HRT, and especially, that the strongest reductions can be achieved in those women with the highest concentrations. Although clinical trials still need to demonstrate the impact of lowering concentrations of Lp(a) and homocysteine, HRT appears to be a promising risk reduction strategy in this respect.

Sequentially combined hormone replacement therapy reduces impedance to flow within the uterine and central retinal arteries in healthy postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of combined hormone replacement therapy on the impedances of the uterine, central retinal, and ophthalmic arteries in healthy postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN In a prospective controlled study we randomly assigned 30 healthy postmenopausal women (mean age, 52 +/- 3 years) to 2 groups. Women in the hormone replacement therapy group (n = 15) received 1 mg micronized 17beta-estradiol daily sequentially combined with 5 or 10 mg dydrogesterone for 14 days of each 28-day cycle during 12 months and 2 mg 17beta-estradiol combined with 10 mg dydrogesterone thereafter for a period of 3 months. The control group (n = 15) received no treatment. Color Doppler ultrasonography was used to measure the impedance to flow (pulsatility index) within the uterine, central retinal, and ophthalmic arteries in the 17beta-estradiol phase at baseline and after 3, 12, and 15 months. RESULTS With respect to values in the control group, 12 months of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a significantly lower (by 39%) mean pulsatility index of the uterine artery (decrease from baseline of 25% in hormone replacement therapy group and increase of 14% in control group) and a significantly lower (by 29%) mean pulsatility index of the central retinal artery (decrease of 9% in hormone replacement therapy group and increase of 20% in control group). After 3 months this effect was already evident. During hormone replacement therapy the reductions in mean pulsatility index values of the uterine and central retinal arteries with respect to baseline were larger (both P =.002) in the women with high pretreatment pulsatility index values than in those with low pretreatment values. The baseline pulsatility index of the uterine artery correlated positively with age and with duration of amenorrhea (r = 0.42, P =. 01; r = 0.48, P =.008; respectively). CONCLUSION These results suggest that 12 months of sequentially combined hormone replacement therapy with a low dose of estradiol (1 mg) lowers arterial impedance in specific vascular territories. These data may help in understanding the effects of hormone replacement therapy on the cerebral circulation.

Methylation profiles of endometrioid and serous endometrial cancers

Promoter methylation is a gene- and cancer type-specific epigenetic event that plays an important role in tumour development. As endometrioid (endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, EEC) and serous endometrial cancers (uterine papillary serous carcinoma, UPSC) exhibit different clinical, histological and molecular genetic characteristics, we hypothesized that these differences may be reflected in epigenetic phenomena as well. Identification of a panel of methylation biomarkers could be helpful in a correct histological classification of these two subtypes, which solely on the basis of morphology is not always easy. Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification was used to assess the extent of promoter methylation of different tumour suppressor genes in EEC and UPSC. Methylation results were correlated with histology and survival. The median cumulative methylation index of all genes was significantly higher in EEC (124) than in UPSC (93) (P<0.001). Promoter methylation of CDH13 and MLH1 was more frequently present in EEC, while CDKN2B and TP73 were more frequently methylated in UPSC. Almost 90% of EEC and 70% of UPSC could be predicted by CDH13 and TP73. In EEC, methylation of MLH1 was associated with a shorter disease-free survival (DFS; P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS; P=0.005). In a multivariate model, MLH1 methylation emerged as an additional prognostic factor to stage for DFS (P=0.002). In conclusion, promoter methylation is more common in EEC than UPSC. A panel of methylation biomarkers could be useful to distinguish between the two histological subtypes of endometrial cancer. Furthermore, methylation of MLH1 may have prognostic value in EEC.