W O'Connell

The phase image: its relationship to patterns of contraction and conduction.

To determine the relationship of phase changes and abnormalities of ventricular contraction and conduction, we performed phase image analysis of blood pool scintigrams in 29 patients. Eleven patients had no evidence of blood pool contraction or ECG conduction abnormalities, four had contraction abnormalities, seven had abnormal conduction and seven had abnormalities of both variables. The phase delay generally related to the degree of contraction abnormality. The mean phase delay in hypokinetic segments differed from that in normokinetic segments in the same patient (p < 0.025), the phase delay of akinetic and dyskinetic segments differed from that in normokinetic segments (p < 0.001) and the phase delay in dyskinetic segments differed from that in akinetic segments (p < 0.005), but there was a significant overlap in the phase delay in normal and hypokinetic segments. Also, in patients with conduction abnormalities, the minimal associated regional phase delay presented a phase dispersion and a pattern of contraction consistent with the pattern of conduction and different from normal. A single study performed both at rest and with stress demonstrated the effect of heart rate on phase assessment and confirmed the independent effects of contraction and conduction on phase delay. Acquisition and analytic methods should add significantly to the resolution of the phase method.

Phase Image Characterization of Ventricular Contraction in Left and Right Bundle Branch Block

The phase image is a computer-derived functional image, based on the analysis of the time versus radioactivity curve in each pixel location of the multiple gated blood pool scintigram. Within the ventricular regions of interest, the phase angle is roughly equivalent to the time of onset of counts reduction or to the time of onset of ventricular contraction and is expressed in degrees from 0 to 360 degrees. A gray scale-coded image of such a regional phase angle, the phase image, can be looked on as a map of sequential contraction. This method was applied in 33 patients without severe contraction abnormality including 16 patients with normal conduction, 9 with right bundle branch block and 8 with left bundle branch block. In patients with normal conduction the pattern of phase angle distribution, representing the pattern of ventricular contraction, was homogeneous and symmetric in both the left and right ventricles. Analysis in this normal group indicated a slight but significant difference between the mean (+/- standard deviation) phase angle of the left ventricle (8.5 +/- 11.8 degrees) and that of the right ventricle (13.6 +/0 12.9 degrees, p = 0.01). There was a slight, but nonsignificant difference between mean intrapatient left and right ventricular phase angle onset (1.9 +/- 6.5 degrees). The mean phase angle of the right ventricle in patients with right bundle branch block (27.6 +/- 14.2 degrees) and of the left ventricle in those with left bundle branch block (21.9 +/- 14.0 degrees) was delayed compared with that in patients with normal conduction (p less than 0.05 for both). The mean intrapatient difference between left and right ventricular mean phase angles in patients with normal conduction (-5.2 +/- 6.8 degrees) was significantly different from that in patients with right (-21.8 +/- 10.3 degrees, p less than 0.001) or left (21.8 +/- 6.8 degrees, p less than 0.001) bundle branch block. The mean intrapatient difference between onset of left and right ventricular phase angles was also significantly different from normal in patients with right (-10.6 +/- 7.5 degrees, p less than 0.005) or left (18.7 +/- 8.3 degrees, p = 0.01) bundle branch block. Although phase imaging is not without artifactual error, this study demonstrates that the phase image can characterize familiar conduction abnormalities. It presents the potential for application as a general noninvasive tool in the investigation of the timing and sequence of ventricular contraction in patients with normal or abnormal ventricular activation.

Are regions of ischaemia detected on stress perfusion scintigraphy predictive of sites of subsequent myocardial infarction

To determine the relation between scintigraphic regions of stress-induced ischaemia and subsequent myocardial infarction, a select group of 21 patients was investigated. Each patient had undergone stress perfusion scintigraphy before myocardial infarction was recorded. After acute infarction, thallium-201 perfusion scintigraphy was performed in 16 patients (76%) and 99mTc (stannous) pyrophosphate in 14 patients (67%). All patients had at least one post-myocardial infarction scintigram and nine (42%) had both perfusion scintigraphy and infarct imaging. Nineteen patients (90%) had scintigraphic evidence of stress-induced ischaemia pre-infarction. Scintigraphic regions of infarction were compared with regions of previously demonstrated stress-induced ischaemia. In 11 patients (53%) the myocardial infarction was more extensive; in one of these patients, reimaged one week before myocardial infarction, and in four others (19%) there were matching defects; in three patients (14%) the infarction was less extensive, and in two patients (9%) the infarction was less extensive but also involved regions not previously shown to develop ischaemia. In the final patient (5%) there was no match. Stress perfusion scintigraphy was generally abnormal before acute infarction in this group of patients. Acute infarction frequently involved regions previously shown to develop stress-induced ischaemia, though these often underestimated the extent of myocardium at risk.

Basal interventricular septal thallium-201 defects : real or artifact ?

Misinterpretation of reversible defects at the base of the interventricular septum is perhaps among the greatest single causes of false positive TI-201 myocardial perfusion images. This is a report of a patient with angiographically documented ischemia at the base of the septum and corresponding reversible defects as seen using TI-201 imaging. Illustrated are two different forms of malalignment artifact that duplicate this patients findings in a patient with normal perfusion.