W.R.M. Aengevaeren

LDL-apheresis atherosclerosis regression study (LAARS). Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering treatment on coronary atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND Intensive lipid lowering may retard the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. LDL-apheresis has the potential to decrease LDL cholesterol to very low levels. To assess the effect of more aggressive lipid lowering with LDL-apheresis, we set up a randomized study in men with hypercholesterolemia and severe coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS For 2 years, 42 men were treated with either biweekly LDL-apheresis plus medication or medication alone. In both groups a dose of simvistatin of 40 mg per day was administered. Baseline (mean+/-SD) LDL cholesterol was 7.8+/-1.9 mmol x L(-1) and 7.9+/-2.3 mmol x L(-1) in the apheresis and medication groups, respectively. The mean reduction in LDL cholesterol was 63% (to 3.0 mmol x L(-1)) and 47% (to 4.1 mmol x L(-1)), respectively. Primary quantitative coronary angiographic end points were changes in average mean segment diameter and minimal obstruction diameter. No differences between the apheresis and medication groups were found in mean segment diameter (-0.01+/-0.16 mm versus 0.03+/-0.16 mm, respectively) or in minimal obstruction diameter (0.01+/-0.13 mm versus 0.01+/-0.11 mm, respectively), expressed as means per patient. On the basis of coronary segment, mean percent stenosis of all lesions showed a tendency to decrease; only in the apheresis group more minor lesions disappeared in comparison to the medication group. On bicycle exercise tests, the time to 0.1 mV ST-segment depression increased significantly by 39% and the maximum level of ST depression decreased significantly by 0.07 mV in the apheresis group versus no changes in the medication group. CONCLUSIONS Two years of lipid lowering both with medication alone or LDL-apheresis with medication showed angiographic arrest of the progression of coronary artery disease. However, more aggressive treatment induced functional improvement, which may precede anatomic changes.

Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear cells from bone marrow or peripheral blood compared with standard therapy in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the randomized controlled HEBE trial

AIMS Previous trials that investigated cell therapy as an adjunctive therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have shown conflicting results. We designed a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of intracoronary infusion of mononuclear cells from bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood in patients with AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS In a multicentre trial, 200 patients with large first AMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to either intracoronary infusion of mononuclear BM cells (n = 69), mononuclear peripheral blood cells (n = 66), or standard therapy (without placebo infusion) (n = 65). Mononuclear cells were delivered intracoronary between 3 and 8 days after AMI. Regional and global left ventricular myocardial function and volumes were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging before randomization and at 4 months, and clinical events were reported. The primary endpoint of the percentage of dysfunctional left ventricular segments that improved during follow-up did not differ significantly between either of the treatment groups and control: 38.6 ± 24.7% in the BM group, 36.8 ± 20.9% in the peripheral blood group, and 42.4 ± 18.7% in the control group (P = 0.33 and P = 0.14). Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction was 3.8 ± 7.4% in the BM group, 4.2 ± 6.2% in the peripheral blood group when compared with 4.0 ± 5.8% in the control group (P = 0.94 and P = 0.90). Furthermore, the three groups did not differ significantly in changes in left ventricular volumes, mass, and infarct size and had similar rates of clinical events. CONCLUSION Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear cells from BM or peripheral blood following AMI does not improve regional or global systolic myocardial function in the HEBE trial. REGISTRATION The Netherlands Trial Register #NTR166 (www.trialregister.nl) and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, #ISRCTN95796863 (http://isrctn.org).

Aspirin Plus Coumarin Versus Aspirin Alone in the Prevention of Reocclusion After Fibrinolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction Results of the Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In Coronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT)-2 Trial

Background—Despite the use of aspirin, reocclusion of the infarct-related artery occurs in ≈30% of patients within the first year after successful fibrinolysis, with impaired clinical outcome. This study sought to assess the impact of a prolonged anticoagulation regimen as adjunctive to aspirin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemic events after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results—At coronary angiography <48 hours after fibrinolytic therapy, 308 patients receiving aspirin and intravenous heparin had a patent infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow). They were randomly assigned to standard heparinization and continuation of aspirin alone or to a 3-month combination of aspirin with moderate-intensity coumarin, including continued heparinization until a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were assessed at 3 months. Median INR was 2.6 (25 to 75th percentiles 2.1 to 3.1). Reocclusion (≤TIMI grade 2 flow) was observed in 15% of patients receiving aspirin and coumarin compared with 28% in those receiving aspirin alone (relative risk [RR], 0.55; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90;P <0.02). TIMI grade 0 to 1 flow rates were 9% and 20%, respectively (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.89;P <0.02). Survival rates free from reinfarction and revascularization were 86% and 66%, respectively (P <0.01). Bleeding (TIMI major and minor) was infrequent: 5% versus 3% (P =NS). Conclusions—As adjunctive to aspirin, a 3-month-regimen of moderate-intensity coumarin, including heparinization until the target INR is reached, markedly reduces reocclusion and recurrent events after successful fibrinolysis. This conceptual study provides a mechanistic rationale to further investigate the role of prolonged anticoagulation after fibrinolytic therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Restenosis After Coronary Stent Placement

Background—In-stent restenosis is notoriously difficult to treat by repeat catheter intervention because of its propensity for aggressive recurrent neointimal formation. This study sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Methods and Results—The study was designed as a prospective multicenter registry. We included 162 patients with in-stent restenosis of a native coronary artery who had a clinical indication for repeat intervention. Patients were scheduled for follow-up angiography at 6 months. The primary end point was in-lesion late loss. Follow-up angiography was performed in 155 patients. We obtained an in-lesion late loss of 0.08±0.49 mm and a binary restenosis rate of 9.7% (15/155), which prompted reintervention in 7.4% (12/162) at 9 months. The 9-month rate of death was 1.2% (2/162) and that of nonfatal myocardial infarction was 1.2% (2/162). Conclusions—Sirolimus-eluting stents were highly efficacious and safe in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Our study provides rationale for the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry.

The intrinsic limitations of coronary arteriography to predict the physiological effects of coronary obstructions are well known. Therefore, more direct assessments of the functional significance of coronary stenoses are becoming increasingly important. Study of contrast passage by electrocardiogram-triggered digital radiography has been proposed as a way of assessing changes in myocardial perfusion. The main problems in this approach are the limited time for motionless image acquisition, the potential alteration of vascular volume between different states, and the changing flow pattern induced by contrast agents. This has led to empiric substitution of mean transit time (Tmn) by other time parameters and to representation of vascular volume by maximal contrast intensity (Dmax). To avoid these problems, intact dogs were studied during almost motionless image acquisition of 20-25 consecutive paced heart beats obtained with synchronous radiographic pulses. In this way, unequivocal and reproducible determination of Tmn was possible. Constant and maximal vascular volume was created by continuous infusion of dipyridamole, and it was proved that coronary flow in this model was not influenced by contrast injections. Flow in the circumflex artery was measured by a ring mounted and calibrated Doppler probe. In each dog, flow in the circumflex artery was varied by a balloon occluder in 12 small steps (range, 0-174 +/- 42 ml/min). Inverse appearance time (1/Tapp), Dmax, Dmax/Tapp, inverse time of maximal intensity (1/Tmax), and 1/Tmn were calculated and the relations of these parameters to measured flow were investigated. Tmn proved to be the most reliable parameter for this purpose (r = 0.97 +/- 0.02; mean +/- SD), followed by Tmax (r = 0.93 +/- 0.04). Dmax failed to represent vascular volume but, in fact, showed a moderate correlation with flow (r = 0.78 +/- 0.22), as did Tapp (r = 0.64 +/- 0.18, 0.75 +/- 0.27, and 0.59 +/- 0.26 for the three definitions of Tapp used in this study). Dmax/Tapp correlated better with flow than either component separately. Our results indicate that the mean transit time calculated by videodensitometry can be used to accurately assess changes in myocardial perfusion strictly according to the original principles of indicator dilution theory.

Low Density Lipoprotein Apheresis Improves Regional Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia and Extensive Coronary Artery Disease : The LDL-Apheresis Atherosclerosis Regression Study (LAARS)

OBJECTIVES In a randomized study we evaluated the effect of biweekly low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis plus simvastatin versus medication alone on regional myocardial perfusion. BACKGROUND In patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, diet and lipid-lowering drugs are often insufficient to achieve optimal LDL cholesterol values. Low density lipoprotein apheresis is a very effective lipid-lowering therapy. Assessment of regional myocardial perfusion enables evaluation of the functional state of the coronary circulation. METHODS We studied 42 patients with severe hypercholesterolemia and extensive coronary artery disease who were randomized to diet and simvastatin with or without biweekly LDL apheresis. Regional myocardial perfusion was assessed by digital subtraction angiography with videodensitometric calculation of hyperemic mean transit time (HMTT) of contrast medium at baseline and after 2 years of therapy. RESULTS Low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased by 63% (to 3.0 mmol/liter) in the LDL apheresis group and by 47% (to 4.1 mmol/liter) in the medication group. Paired HMTT measurements were assessed in 43 regions in the LDL apheresis group and 35 regions in the medication group. In the LDL apheresis group, regional HMTT decreased over 2 years from 3.35 +/- 1.18 (mean +/- SD) to 2.87 +/- 0.82 s (-14%, p = 0.001), whereas no change in the medication group was observed: 2.95 +/- 1.06 to 2.96 +/- 0.90 s (p = NS). In the patient-based comparison, the mean change in HMTT was -0.45 s (-14%, p = 0.01) in the LDL apheresis group and -0.05 s (-2%, p = NS) in the medication group, respectively. Only exercise-induced ischemia improved in the LDL apheresis group. CONCLUSIONS Biweekly LDL apheresis plus simvastatin decreased time-averaged LDL cholesterol levels by an additional 31% (1.1 mmol/liter) compared with medication alone. After 2 years of therapy, regional myocardial perfusion improved in the LDL apheresis group and remained unchanged in the medication group. Thus, aggressive reduction of LDL cholesterol has a favorable effect on regional myocardial perfusion and alleviates ischemia.

Successful out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what is the optimal in-hospital treatment strategy?

UNLABELLED The aim of the study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients after successful out-of-hospital resuscitation (sOHR) within 30 min after admission. A prognostic scoring scale in patients surviving OHR was analysed. We also studied the effect of these predictive factors and the in-hospital treatment (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) vs. thrombolysis) on mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of the emergency medical system forms and medical files of 72 consecutive patients aged > or =18 years with sOHR. Of these 72 patients 37 (51%) met the electrocardiographic and enzymatic criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Ten of the 37 AMI patients (27%) underwent acute PTCA as primary treatment and seven patients (19%) received thrombolytic therapy for AMI despite prolonged (mean 24+/-13 min) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The remaining 20 patients had no specific infarct treatment. Despite successful PTCA, in eight out of ten patients, their mortality in hospital was 60% (6/10). Mortality in the thrombolysis group was 57% (4/7). For the remaining 20 MI-patients the mortality was 65% (13/20). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to design a weighted prognostic scoring system. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was the strongest independent predictor (r=0.76, P< or =0.001) for in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS in-hospital mortality after successful OHR seems to largely depend on neurological status at admission and much less on the specific treatment of myocardial infarction. The prognostic scoring system accurately predicted the in-hospital mortality and can be used for early treatment stratification; however, it should be proven in a prospective study.

Coronary Endothelial Function in Hyperhomocysteinemia: Improvement After Treatment With Folic Acid and Cobalamin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the effect of therapy with folic acid and cobalamin on coronary endothelial function, expressed as a change in volumetric coronary blood flow (CBF), in hyperhomocysteinemic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor for CAD. The mechanism responsible for this increased risk is unclear, but it is generally assumed that hyperhomocysteinemia causes endothelial dysfunction. It is unknown whether lowering plasma homocysteine levels with folic acid and cobalamin improves coronary endothelial function in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia and symptomatic CAD. METHODS Fifteen patients scheduled for elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with plasma homocysteine levels of >or=16 micromol/l were randomized for six months of treatment with folic acid 5 mg and cobalamin 400 microg daily or placebo. Coronary endothelial function was evaluated in a non-PTCA vessel using acetylcholine infusion in dosages of 10(-8) M, 10(-7) M, and 10(-6) M. Endothelium- dependent CBF is determined using intracoronary Doppler velocity and quantitative coronary angiography at baseline and after six months. RESULTS In the folic acid/cobalamin treated group, CBF increased after acetylcholine infusion with 96% (standard deviation 54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44% to 154%) compared with a decrease of 16% (standard deviation 35; 95% CI: -20% to +30%) of the CBF in the placebo-treated group (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS This is the first prospective randomized placebo-controlled intervention study evaluating coronary endothelial function in hyperhomocysteinemic patients with CAD. Our results suggest that coronary endothelial function improves after treatment with folic acid and cobalamin.

Pre-hospital triage for primary angioplasty: direct referral to the intervention center versus interhospital transport.

OBJECTIVES We sought to study the impact of direct referral to an intervention center after pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on treatment intervals and outcome. BACKGROUND Primary angioplasty has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in STEMI. Ambulance diagnosis and direct referral to an intervention center is an attractive treatment option that has not been studied extensively. METHODS Consecutive pre-hospital patients with STEMI, who were referred to our intervention center for primary angioplasty between 2005 and 2007, were studied. After pre-hospital diagnosis, patients were either directly transported to our center or referred through a nonintervention center. The catheterization laboratory was activated before transport to the intervention center. RESULTS Of the 581 patients referred, 454 (78%) came with direct transport and 127 (22%) through a nonintervention center. Direct transport was associated with a higher proportion of patients treated within the 90-min time window of the STEMI guidelines: 82% versus 23% (p < 0.01). Patients directly transported had a significantly shorter median symptom-to-balloon time of 149 min (Interquartile range: 118 to 197 min) versus 219 min (interquartile range: 178 to 315 min), p < 0.01, a higher post-procedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 rate (92% vs. 84%; p = 0.03), and a lower 1-year mortality rate (7% vs. 13%; p = 0.03). Direct transport to the intervention center was independently associated with the symptom-to-balloon time, which in turn was an independent predictor of post-procedural TIMI flow grade 3, a strong prognosticator of outcome. CONCLUSIONS After ambulance-based diagnosis of STEMI, direct transport to an intervention center with pre-hospital notification of the catheterization laboratory more than triples the proportion of patients treated within the time window of the guidelines. Time to balloon was an independent predictor of post-procedural TIMI flow grade 3, which underscores the need to reduce treatment delays.

Bone marrow cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction: the HEBE trial in perspective, first results.

AbstractDuring the last decennium, the role of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) has been underscored in the healing process after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although these cells improve left ventricular recovery after AMI in experimental studies, results from large-scale randomised trials investigating BMMC therapy in patients with AMI have shown contradictory results. To address this issue the HEBE study was designed, a multicentre, randomised trial, evaluating the effects of intracoronary infusion of BMMCs and the effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint of the HEBE trial is the change in regional myocardial function in dysfunctional segments at four months relative to baseline, based on segmental analysis as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. The results from the HEBE trial will provide detailed information about the effects of intracoronary BMMC therapy on post-infarct left ventricular recovery. In addition, further analysis of the data and material obtained may provide important mechanistic insights into the contribution of BMMCs to natural recovery from AMI as well as the response to cell therapy. This may significantly contribute to the development of improved cell-based therapies, aiming at optimising post-infarct recovery and preventing heart failure. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:436-9.)