W. Salem
University of Southern California
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by W. Salem.
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2015
J. Letourneau; J.L. Chan; W. Salem; S.-W. Chan; Meera Shah; E. Ebbel; Charles E. McCulloch; Lee-may Chen; Marcelle I. Cedars; M.P. Rosen
Little is known about fertility outcomes after fertility sparing surgery (FSS) for localized ovarian cancers.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2015
J.L. Chan; J. Letourneau; W. Salem; Aylin Pelin Cil; S.-W. Chan; Lee-may Chen; M.P. Rosen
OBJECTIVE To determine if sexual satisfaction and sexual quality of life (QOL) are different in survivors of localized cervical and ovarian cancers who undergo fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) as compared with standard surgery. METHODS 470 survivors of localized cervical and ovarian cancers diagnosed between the ages of 18-40 were recruited from the California Cancer Registry to complete a cross-sectional survey. Validated questionnaires were used to assess sexual satisfaction and sexual QOL. RESULTS 228 women with localized cervical cancer and 125 with localized ovarian cancer completed the survey. In the cervical cancer group, 92 underwent FSS. Compared with the 84 women who did not undergo FSS (had a hysterectomy, but retained at least one ovary), there was no significant difference in sexual satisfaction or sexual QOL mean scores in women who maintained their uterus (cold-knife cone or trachelectomy), after controlling for age and menopausal status. 82 women with ovarian cancer underwent FSS. Compared with the 39 women that had a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, we found no significant differences in sexual satisfaction or sexual QOL in women who maintained at least one ovary (USO or cystectomy), after controlling for age and menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS While FSS may allow for post-treatment fertility, it may not confer a significant benefit with regard to sexual satisfaction or sexual QOL. Thus, the decision to perform FSS should not be dictated based on preservation of sexual functioning.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 2018
Jacqueline R. Ho; Nabil Arrach; Katherine Rhodes-Long; W. Salem; Lynda K. McGinnis; K. Chung; K. Bendikson; Richard J. Paulson; Ali Ahmady
PurposePreimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and assessment of mitochondrial content (MC) are current methods for selection of the best embryos for transfer. Studies suggest that time-lapse morphokinetics (TLM) may also be helpful for selecting embryos more likely to implant. In our study, we sought to examine the relationship between TLM parameters and MC to determine if they could be used adjunctively in embryo selection. We also examined the relationship between MC with ploidy and blastulation.MethodsCryopreserved human embryos at the zygote stage were thawed and cultured in a time-lapse system. Blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies were performed on days 3 and 6. Biopsied cells and all whole embryos from day 6 were analyzed for MC (ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA) and ploidy using next-generation sequencing.ResultsIn embryos, MC per cell declined between day 3 and day 6. While early cleavage parameters did not predict MC, embryos with longer blastulation timing had higher MC on day 6. Day 6 MC was lower in euploid vs. aneuploid embryos and lower in blastocysts vs. arrested embryos.ConclusionsA lower MC at the blastocyst stage was associated with euploid status and blastocyst formation, indicating better embryo quality compared to those with a higher MC. Higher MC in aneuploid and arrested embryos may be explained by slower cell division or degradation of genomic DNA over time. Blastulation timing may be helpful for selection of higher quality embryos. Combining blastulation timing and MC along with morphologic grading and euploid status may offer a new direction in embryo selection.
Journal of Cancer Survivorship | 2017
J.L. Chan; J. Letourneau; W. Salem; Aylin Pelin Cil; S.-W. Chan; Lee-may Chen; M.P. Rosen
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 2017
Jacqueline R. Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; W. Salem; S. Jabara; K. Bendikson; Richard J. Paulson; K. Chung
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 2017
W. Salem; A. Abdullah; Omar Abuzeid; K. Bendikson; F. I. Sharara; Mostafa Abuzeid
Fertility and Sterility | 2013
W. Salem; J. Letourneau; John K. Chan; S.-W. Chan; Marcelle I. Cedars; M.P. Rosen
Fertility and Sterility | 2018
Jacqueline R. Ho; W. Salem; Nabil Arrach; K. Chung; Richard J. Paulson; Ali Ahmady; Lynda K. McGinnis
Fertility and Sterility | 2018
W. Salem; Jacqueline R. Ho; Lynda K. McGinnis; K. Chung; K. Bendikson; Richard J. Paulson
Fertility and Sterility | 2017
Jacqueline R. Ho; W. Salem; Nabil Arrach; K. Bendikson; K. Chung; Richard J. Paulson; Ali Ahmady