W. van 't Hof

VIP21/caveolin, glycosphingolipid clusters and the sorting of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in epithelial cells.

We studied the role of the association between glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)‐anchored proteins and glycosphingolipid (GSL) clusters in apical targeting using gD1‐DAF, a GPI‐anchored protein that is differentially sorted by three epithelial cell lines. Differently from MDCK cells, where both gD1‐DAF and glucosylceramide (GlcCer) are sorted to the apical membrane, in MDCK Concanavalin A‐resistant cells (MDCK‐ConAr) gD1‐DAF was mis‐sorted to both surfaces, but GlcCer was still targeted to the apical surface. In both MDCK and MDCK‐ConAr cells, gD1‐DAF became associated with TX‐100‐insoluble GSL clusters during transport to the cell surface. In dramatic contrast with MDCK cells, the Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cell line targeted both gD1‐DAF and GlcCer basolaterally. The targeting differences for GSLs in FRT and MDCK cells cannot be accounted for by a differential ability to form clusters because, in spite of major differences in the GSL composition, both cell lines assembled GSLs into TX‐100‐insoluble complexes with identical isopycnic densities. Surprisingly, in FRT cells, gD1‐DAF did not form clusters with GSLs and, therefore, remained completely soluble. This clustering defect in FRT cells correlated with the lack of expression of VIP21/caveolin, a protein localized to both the plasma membrane caveolae and the trans Golgi network. This suggests that VIP21/caveolin may have an important role in recruiting GPI‐anchored proteins into GSL complexes necessary for their apical sorting. However, since MDCK‐ConAr cells expressed caveolin and clustered GPI‐anchored proteins normally, yet mis‐sorted them, our results also indicate that clustering and caveolin are not sufficient for apical targeting, and that additional factors are required for the accurate apical sorting of GPI‐anchored proteins.

Bactericidal activity of LFchimera is stronger and less sensitive to ionic strength than its constituent lactoferricin and lactoferrampin peptides

The innate immunity factor lactoferrin harbours two antimicrobial moieties, lactoferricin and lactoferrampin, situated in close proximity in the N1 domain of the molecule. Most likely they cooperate in many of the beneficial activities of lactoferrin. To investigate whether chimerization of both peptides forms a functional unit we designed a chimerical structure containing lactoferricin amino acids 17-30 and lactoferrampin amino acids 265-284. The bactericidal activity of this LFchimera was found to be drastically stronger than that of the constituent peptides, as was demonstrated by the need for lower dose, shorter incubation time and less ionic strength dependency. Likewise, strongly enhanced interaction with negatively charged model membranes was found for the LFchimera relative to the constituent peptides. Thus, chimerization of the two antimicrobial peptides resembling their structural orientation in the native molecule strikingly improves their biological activity.

Histatin 5 and derivatives: Their localization and effects on the ultra-structural level

Histatins, a family of cationic peptides present in saliva, are active against the opportunistic yeast Candida albicans. The mechanism of action is still unclear. Histatin 5 and more potent synthetic variants, dhvar4 and dhvar5, were used to study localization and effects on morphology on the ultra-structural level. Although all peptides induced leakage, no association with the plasma membrane, indicative for permanent pores, was observed with immuno-gold-labeling. Freeze-fracturing showed severe changes of the plasma membrane. Together with, for the dhvars, the loss of intracellular integrity, this suggests that leakage may be a secondary effect rather than an effect of formation of permanent pores.

Antimicrobial defense systems in saliva

The oral cavity is one of the most heavily colonized parts of our body. The warm, nutrient-rich and moist environment promotes the growth of a diverse microflora. One of the factors responsible for the ecological equilibrium in the mouth is saliva, which in several ways affects the colonization and growth of bacteria. In this paper, we discuss the various mechanisms by which the composition of the oral microflora is modulated by saliva. Saliva covers the oral hard and soft tissues with a conditioning film which governs the initial attachment of microorganisms, a crucial step in the setup of the oral microflora. It furthermore contains proteins which in the soluble phase bind to bacteria, blocking their adherence to surfaces. When the supply of nutrients is diminished, bacteria use salivary glycoproteins, especially high-molecular-weight mucins, as a source of complex carbohydrates, requiring a consortium of microorganisms for breakdown. In this way saliva promotes the complexity of the oral microflora, which in itself protects against overgrowth by few pathogenic species. Finally, saliva harbors a large panel of antimicrobial proteins which directly and indirectly inhibit uncontrolled outgrowth of bacteria. These include lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, lysozyme and antimicrobial peptides. Under pathological conditions serum leakage occurs, and saliva mobilizes the humoral and cellular defense mechanisms in the blood. In sum, saliva favors the establishment of a highly diverse microflora, rather than a semisterile environment.

Chimerization of lactoferricin and lactoferrampin peptides strongly potentiates the killing activity against Candida albicans.

Bovine lactoferrin harbors 2 antimicrobial sequences (LFcin and LFampin), situated in close proximity in the N1-domain. To mimic their semi parallel configuration we have synthesized a chimeric peptide (LFchimera) in which these sequences are linked in a head-to-head fashion to the α- and ε-amino group, respectively, of a single lysine. In line with previously described bactericidal effects, this peptide was also a stronger candidacidal agent than the antimicrobial peptides LFcin17-30 and LFampin265-284, or a combination of these 2. Conditions that strongly reduced the candidacidal activities of LFcin17-30 and LFampin265-284, such as high ionic strength and energy depletion, had little influence on the activity of LFchimera. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy showed that LFchimera severely affected the membrane morphology, resulting in disintegration of the membrane bilayer and in an efflux of small and high molecular weight molecules such as ATP and proteins. The differential effects displayed by the chimeric peptide and a mixture of its constituent peptides clearly demonstrate the synergistic effect of linking these peptides in a fashion that allows a similar spatial arrangement as in the parent protein, suggesting that in bovine lactoferrrin the corresponding fragments act in concert in its candidacidal activity.

Internalisation and degradation of histatin 5 by Candida albicans

Abstract Histatins, salivary antimicrobial peptides, are susceptible to proteolytic degradation, often ascribed to host proteinases. In this study, we addressed the question whether proteolytic activity from microbial sources can contribute to this degradation. Candida albicans, an opportunistic yeast that is susceptible to the histatins, was used as target organism. The most potent histatin (histatin 5: sequence: DSHAKRHHGYKRKFHEKHHSHRGY), two histatin 5 fragments (dh-5: sequence: KRKFHEKHHSHRGY; P-113: sequence: AKRHHGYKRKFH) and an all-D isomer of the latter (P-113D) were used as model peptides. All L peptides were susceptible to degradation by C. albicans. Cleavage was established at Lys5 and His19 of histatin 5, Lys11, Arg12, Phe14, Glu16, Lys17, His18 and Ser20 of dh-5 and Ala4 and Lys11 of P-113. In addition, it was found that secreted C. albicans enzymes are not involved in the degradation process and that blocking cell entry of the peptides greatly impedes degradation. Moreover, P-113D, which is biologically as active as P-113, was hardly susceptible to proteolysis. These data imply that proteolysis occurs mainly intracellularly and is not used as a protective mechanism against histatin activity. Together, our results suggest that, besides host proteinases, microbial enzymes play an important role in histatin degradation.

Sortase-mediated backbone cyclization of proteins and peptides

Abstract Backbone cyclization has a profound impact on the biological activity and thermal and proteolytic stability of proteins and peptides. Chemical methods for cyclization are not always feasible, especially for large peptides or proteins. Recombinant Staphylococcus aureus sortase A shows potential as a new tool for the cyclization of both proteins and peptides. In this review, the scope and background of the sortase-mediated cyclization are discussed. High efficiency, versatility, and easy access make sortase A a promising cyclization tool, both for recombinant and chemo-enzymatic production methods.

Degradation of Antimicrobial Histatin-variant Peptides in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans

Histidine-free variants of salivary histatin 5 have a broad antimicrobial activity against various bacteria. In relation to a possible therapeutic application, we were interested in the susceptibility of these small peptides (14 amino acids long) to microbial proteinases and whether this affects their antimicrobial activity. Analyses by SDS-PAGE of supernatants of peptide-bacteria incubation showed a reduction in protein bands within 15 minutes’ incubation, as a result of cellular internalization. Degradation products of dhvar1 and dhvar2 appeared within one hour in the supernatants of Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus. In contrast, the variants dhvar3 and dhvar4 were more resistant to degradation under the same conditions. MALDI-TOF analyses identified cleavage of dhvar1 and dhvar2 at Glu6. The N-terminal peptide part (1–6) of dhvar1 and 2 showed no bactericidal activity, while peptide fragment (7–14) showed a highly reduced bactericidal activity.