W. Virgil Brown

National Lipid Association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: Part 1 - executive summary *

Various organizations and agencies have issued recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia. Although many commonalities exist among them, material differences are present as well. The leadership of the National Lipid Association (NLA) convened an Expert Panel to develop a consensus set of recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia in clinical medicine. The current Executive Summary highlights the major conclusions in Part 1 of the recommendations report of the NLA Expert Panel and includes: (1) background and conceptual framework for formulation of the NLA Expert Panel recommendations; (2) screening and classification of lipoprotein lipid levels in adults; (3) targets for intervention in dyslipidemia management; (4) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment and treatment goals based on risk category; (5) atherogenic cholesterol-non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-as the primary targets of therapy; and (6) lifestyle and drug therapies intended to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with dyslipidemia.

National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2

An Expert Panel convened by the National Lipid Association previously developed a consensus set of recommendations for the patient-centered management of dyslipidemia in clinical medicine (part 1). These were guided by the principle that reducing elevated levels of atherogenic cholesterol (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) reduces the risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This document represents a continuation of the National Lipid Association recommendations developed by a diverse panel of experts who examined the evidence base and provided recommendations regarding the following topics: (1) lifestyle therapies; (2) groups with special considerations, including children and adolescents, women, older patients, certain ethnic and racial groups, patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and patients with residual risk despite statin and lifestyle therapies; and (3) strategies to improve patient outcomes by increasing adherence and using team-based collaborative care.

National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 1—Full Report

The leadership of the National Lipid Association convened an Expert Panel to develop a consensus set of recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia in clinical medicine. An Executive Summary of those recommendations was previously published. This document provides support for the recommendations outlined in the Executive Summary. The major conclusions include (1) an elevated level of cholesterol carried by circulating apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins (non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], termed atherogenic cholesterol) is a root cause of atherosclerosis, the key underlying process contributing to most clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events; (2) reducing elevated levels of atherogenic cholesterol will lower ASCVD risk in proportion to the extent that atherogenic cholesterol is reduced. This benefit is presumed to result from atherogenic cholesterol lowering through multiple modalities, including lifestyle and drug therapies; (3) the intensity of risk-reduction therapy should generally be adjusted to the patients absolute risk for an ASCVD event; (4) atherosclerosis is a process that often begins early in life and progresses for decades before resulting a clinical ASCVD event. Therefore, both intermediate-term and long-term or lifetime risk should be considered when assessing the potential benefits and hazards of risk-reduction therapies; (5) for patients in whom lipid-lowering drug therapy is indicated, statin treatment is the primary modality for reducing ASCVD risk; (6) nonlipid ASCVD risk factors should also be managed appropriately, particularly high blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus; and (7) the measurement and monitoring of atherogenic cholesterol levels remain an important part of a comprehensive ASCVD prevention strategy.

Clinical utility of inflammatory markers and advanced lipoprotein testing: Advice from an expert panel of lipid specialists

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines have established low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals, and secondary non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C treatment goals for persons with hypertriglyceridemia. The use of lipid-lowering therapies, particularly statins, to achieve these goals has reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; however, significant residual risk for events remains. This, combined with the rising prevalence of obesity, which has shifted the risk profile of the population toward patients in whom LDL-C is less predictive of CVD events (metabolic syndrome, low HDL-C, elevated triglycerides), has increased interest in the clinical use of inflammatory and lipid biomarker assessments. Furthermore, the cost effectiveness of pharmacological intervention for both the initiation of therapy and the intensification of therapy has been enhanced by the availability of a variety of generic statins. This report describes the consensus view of an expert panel convened by the National Lipid Association to evaluate the use of selected biomarkers [C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), apolipoprotein B, LDL particle concentration, lipoprotein(a), and LDL and HDL subfractions] to improve risk assessment, or to adjust therapy. These panel recommendations are intended to provide practical advice to clinicians who wrestle with the challenges of identifying the patients who are most likely to benefit from therapy, or intensification of therapy, to provide the optimum protection from CV risk.

Integrated guidance on the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the International FH Foundation

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a dominantly inherited disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and causes premature coronary heart disease. There are at least 20 million people with FH worldwide, but the majority remain undetected and current treatment is often suboptimal. To address this major gap in coronary prevention we present, from an international perspective, consensus-based guidance on the care of FH. The guidance was generated from seminars and workshops held at an international symposium. The recommendations focus on the detection, diagnosis, assessment and management of FH in adults and children, and set guidelines for clinical purposes. They also refer to best practice for cascade screening and risk notifying and testing families for FH, including use of genetic testing. Guidance on treatment is based on risk stratification, management of non-cholesterol risk factors, and safe and effective use of LDL lowering therapies. Recommendations are given on lipoprotein apheresis. The use of emerging therapies for FH is also foreshadowed. This international guidance acknowledges evidence gaps, but aims to make the best use of contemporary practice and technology to achieve the best outcomes for the care of FH. It should accordingly be employed to inform clinical judgement and be adjusted for country-specific and local health care needs and resources.

The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative: a call to action to reduce residual vascular risk in dyslipidaemic patients

Despite current standards of care aimed at achieving targets for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, blood pressure and glycaemia, dyslipidaemic patients remain at high residual risk of vascular events. Atherogenic dyslipidaemia, specifically elevated triglycerides and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, often with elevated apolipoprotein B and non-HDL cholesterol, is common in patients with established cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity or metabolic syndrome and is associated with macrovascular and microvascular residual risk. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R3I) was established to address this important issue. This position paper aims to highlight evidence that atherogenic dyslipidaemia contributes to residual macrovascular risk and microvascular complications despite current standards of care for dyslipidaemia and diabetes, and to recommend therapeutic intervention for reducing this, supported by evidence and expert consensus. Lifestyle modification is an important first step. Additionally, pharmacotherapy is often required. Adding niacin, a fibrate or omega-3 fatty acids to statin therapy improves achievement of all lipid risk factors. Outcomes studies are evaluating whether these strategies translate to greater clinical benefit than statin therapy alone. In conclusion, the R3i highlights the need to address with lifestyle and/or pharmacotherapy the high level of residual vascular risk among dyslipidaemic patients who are treated in accordance with current standards of care.

Efficacy of rosuvastatin compared with other statins at selected starting doses in hypercholesterolemic patients and in special population groups.

A total of 5 randomized, double-blind trials in patients with hypercholesterolemia were prospectively designed to allow pooling of plasma lipid data after 12 weeks of treatment. The purpose was (1) to compare rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg with atorvastatin 10 mg (data from 3 of the 5 trials); (2) to compare rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg with simvastatin 20 mg and pravastatin 20 mg (data from 2 of the 5 trials); and (3) to summarize overall efficacy and subset analyses of rosuvastatin data from all 5 trials. Rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 390) and 10 mg (n = 389) reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol significantly more than did atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 393) (41.9% and 46.7% vs 36.4%, both p <0.001). Treatment with rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 240) and 10 mg (n = 226) also resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL cholesterol compared with both simvastatin 20 mg (n = 249) and pravastatin 20 mg (n = 252) (40.6% and 48.1% vs 27.1% and 35.7%, all p <0.001). Significant differences favoring rosuvastatin 10 mg were also observed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) B, and apo A-I versus atorvastatin 10 mg, and for total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, and apo B versus simvastatin 20 mg and pravastatin 20 mg. Analyses of all the rosuvastatin 10 mg data (n = 615) from the 5 trials in subgroups defined by age > or =65 years, female sex, postmenopausal status, hypertension, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity showed that rosuvastatin had consistent efficacy across patient subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: I. A dose-response study

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study was conducted in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia to examine the effects of pravastatin, a selective inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. A total of 306 patients on cholesterol-lowering diets received twice daily doses of 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg pravastatin, or placebo for 12 weeks. Marked reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol were observed after 1 week of treatment; maximum lipid-lowering effects occurred at 4 weeks and were sustained for the duration of the trial. At week 12, pravastatin treatment resulted in dose-dependent mean reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol of 17.5%, 22.9%, and 30.8% for the 3 doses tested (P less than or equal to 0001 compared with baseline and placebo). The reduction in LDL cholesterol was log-linear with respect to dose; each doubling of dose reduced LDL cholesterol an additional 6.5%. Dose-dependent reductions in total cholesterol from 12.9% to 23.3% also occurred (P less than or equal to 0.001). Triglycerides decreased by as 15.4% (P less than or equal to 0.001) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased approximately 7% (P less than or equal to 0.01), but these effects were not dose-dependent. No patient receiving pravastatin was discontinued during the 12-week trial. Transient episodes of rash and headache occurred. Slight increases in mean serum levels of ASAT and ALAT occurred, and 2% of both placebo- and pravastatin-treated patients reported myalgia although there was no clinically significant elevation of creatine kinase. These data indicate that pravastatin favorably affects all lipid parameters and is well tolerated.

Lipid and apolipoprotein levels and distribution in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: effect of triglyceride reductions with atorvastatin.

Atorvastatin is a new hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that has been demonstrated to be efficacious in reducing both triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (CHOL) levels in humans. Twenty-seven (N = 27) patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 350 mg/dL) were studied before and after 4 weeks on atorvastatin treatment at a dosage of either 20 (n = 16) or 80 (n = 11) mg/d. The present report examines changes in the plasma levels of several apolipoproteins, including apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II), apoC-III, and apoE, after atorvastatin. Dose-dependent reductions in both CHOL (20.3% v 43.1%) and TG (26.5% v 45.8%) for the low and high dose, respectively, have been reported in these individuals. In addition to the reductions in apoB commonly associated with the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, significant reductions in apoE (37% and 49%), apoC-II (28% and 42%), and apoC-III (18% and 30%) were observed with this agent at the 20- and 80-mg/d dosage, respectively. Using fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) to fractionate whole plasma according to particle size, the effect of atorvastatin on lipid and apolipoprotein distribution in 20 lipoprotein fractions was also determined. Our results indicate that after 4 weeks on atorvastatin, (1) there was a 2-fold increase in the CHOL content as assessed by the CHOL/apoB ratio for 13 subfractions from very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) to small low-density lipoprotein (LDL); (2) there was a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of plasma apoB associated with VLDL-sized particles (30.5% v 26.8%); (3) there was a preferential reduction in plasma apoE from non-apoB-containing lipoproteins with treatment; (4) the losses of apoC-II and apoC-III, on the other hand, were comparable for all lipoprotein fractions; and (5) the fraction of plasma TG associated with HDL was increased after treatment. These changes in lipids and apolipoproteins did not depend on the dose of atorvastatin. There was, on the other hand, a dose-dependent reduction in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, defined as the percentage of 3H-cholesteryl oleate transferred from high-density lipoprotein (HDL) to LDL. CETP activity was reduced by 10.3% and 26.4% with the low and high dose of atorvastatin. Together, these composition data would be consistent with a net reduction in the number of TG-rich lipoproteins that may be explained by (1) a reduction in VLDL synthesis, (2) a preferential removal of VLDL without conversion to LDL, and (3) a preferential accelerated removal of a subpopulation of LDL.

An assessment by the Statin Diabetes Safety Task Force: 2014 update

Statin therapy reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death by 25% to 30% in primary as well as secondary prevention patients. Thus, statins are the pharmacologic therapy of choice for the management of high blood cholesterol levels. Prompted by examination of clinical trial data suggesting a modest, but statistically significant, increase in the incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus with statin use, the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012 added a statement to the labels of statin medications indicating that increases in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and fasting glucose levels have been reported with statin use. This labeling change has raised questions among clinicians regarding the relative benefits and risks of statin use, both among patients with diabetes mellitus and among those with diabetes risk factors. This 2014 report from the Diabetes Subpanel of the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Statin Safety reviews the published evidence relating statin use to the hazard for diabetes mellitus or worsening glycemia, examines potential mechanisms that may mediate the relationship between statin use and diabetes mellitus risk, and suggests future research efforts. Given the well-established benefits of statin therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events among those with indications for treatment, no changes to clinical practice are recommended other than the measurement of HbA1C or fasting glucose in those deemed to also be at elevated diabetes risk after initiating statin therapy, and potentially before initiation in selected patients considered to be at elevated risk of developing diabetes. The panel advocates following recommendations from the American Diabetes Association, or other relevant guidelines if outside the United States, for screening and diagnosis as well as lifestyle modification for prevention or delay of diabetes mellitus in those with prediabetes or other risk factors.