W.Y. Cheung

Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of early tongue carcinoma

There are controversies on the benefits of elective neck dissection (END) for oral tongue carcinoma.

Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma—clinical features and outcome

AIM Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (DSPC) is rare and occurs in young patients. This is a single institute retrospective analysis to report the clinical features and outcome of DSPC. METHOD DSPC constituted 8 (0.74%) of 1086 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) referred to the department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong from 1960 to 2000. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 8 years (range: 1.4 to 15.2 years). Six were females and two were males, with age ranging from 11 to 48 years. All were ethnic Chinese. Compared with the whole cohort of PTC followed in the same period, these patients showed younger age at presentation (mean 27.4 vs 45.3 years), larger tumor size (mean 6.9 cm vs 2.4 cm), higher incidence of lymph node metastasis (100% vs 32.4%), and more frequent presence of serum anti-thyroglobulin autoantibody (75% vs 11.3%). The patients were managed as for differentiated thyroid carcinoma according to the institutes protocol, including total thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine (RAI) treatment. External radiotherapy was given to two patients as primary treatment and one patient after regional relapse. One patient had distant metastases at presentation and she was successfully treated by surgery followed by RAI, remaining in complete remission at 12.1 years. One patient had lymph node recurrence after primary total thyroidectomy and RAI treatment and was successfully salvaged by surgery and external radiotherapy. At last follow-up, all eight patients were alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS Although DSPC is associated with some unfavourable features at presentation (such as large tumor size, extensive lymph node metastasis), the prognosis appears to be as good as classical PTC. After aggressive treatment by radical surgery, RAI ablation and/or external radiotherapy, the outcome and survival was excellent.

Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy.

Background:There is concern about the oncological safety of preserving most of the breast skin in skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Most supportive evidence for SSM evaluates the local recurrence rate on clinical follow-up. Methods:The skin and 10 mm of the subcutaneous tissue of 30 total mastectomy specimens were studied with a step-serial sectioning technique. The incidence and mode of involvement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue were recorded in detail. This was correlated with other clinical and pathologic parameters. Results:The incidence of skin involvement outside the nipple-areola complex was 20% (6 of 30). This was significantly related to the clinical T stage, site of the tumor, skin tethering, pathologic tumor size, and perineural infiltration. When the effects of both skin and subcutaneous tissue involvement were considered, the incidence of skin-flap involvement outside the nipple-areola complex was 23% (7 of 30). The significant parameters related to skin-flap involvement were skin tethering (75% vs. 15%; P < .05), pathologic tumor size (P < .03), and perineural infiltration (63% vs. 9%; P < .01). Conclusions:It would be oncologically safe to perform SSM in T1 and T2 tumors, because the chance of skin involvement is small. It is safe to preserve the skin overlying the tumor if there is no skin tethering.Background:There is concern about the oncological safety of preserving most of the breast skin in skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Most supportive evidence for SSM evaluates the local recurrence rate on clinical follow-up.Methods:The skin and 10 mm of the subcutaneous tissue of 30 total mastectomy specimens were studied with a step-serial sectioning technique. The incidence and mode of involvement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue were recorded in detail. This was correlated with other clinical and pathologic parameters.Results:The incidence of skin involvement outside the nipple-areola complex was 20% (6 of 30). This was significantly related to the clinical T stage, site of the tumor, skin tethering, pathologic tumor size, and perineural infiltration. When the effects of both skin and subcutaneous tissue involvement were considered, the incidence of skin-flap involvement outside the nipple-areola complex was 23% (7 of 30). The significant parameters related to skin-flap involvement were skin tethering (75% vs. 15%; P < .05), pathologic tumor size (P < .03), and perineural infiltration (63% vs. 9%; P < .01).Conclusions:It would be oncologically safe to perform SSM in T1 and T2 tumors, because the chance of skin involvement is small. It is safe to preserve the skin overlying the tumor if there is no skin tethering.

Surgical treatment of recalcitrant radiation-induced gastric erosions

Uncontrolled bleeding as a result of radiation gastritis in patients who have pharyngo‐laryngo‐esophagectomy and gastric pull‐up is seldom reported. Surgical resection in the management of this condition has rarely been described.