W. Zhong

Supraclavicular lymph node incisional biopsies have no influence on the prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study

BackgroundSupraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) biopsies play an important role in diagnosing and staging lung cancer. However, not all patients with SCLN metastasis can have a complete resection. It is still unknown whether SCLN incisional biopsies affect the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsPatients who were histologically confirmed to have NSCLC with SCLN metastasis were enrolled in the study from January 2007 to December 2012 at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute. The primary endpoint was OS, and the secondary endpoints were complications and local recurrence/progression.ResultsTwo hundred two consecutive patients who had histologically confirmed NSCLC with SCLN metastasis were identified, 163 with excisional and 39 with incisional biopsies. The median OS was not significantly different between the excisional (10.9xa0months, 95% CI 8.7–13.2) and incisional biopsy groups (10.1xa0months, 95% CI 6.3–13.9), Pu2009=u20090.569. Multivariable analysis showed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2 (HRu2009=u20092.75, 95% CI 1.71–4.38, Pu2009<u20090.001) indicated a worse prognosis. Having an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (HRu2009=u20090.58, 95% CI 0.40–0.84, Pu2009=u20090.004) and receiving systemic treatment (HRu2009=u20090.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.53, Pu2009<u20090.001) were associated with a favorable OS. Neither the number (multiple vs. single) nor site (bilateral vs. unilateral) of SCLNs was associated with an unfavorable OS, and SCLN size or fixed SCLNs did not affect OS.ConclusionsSCLN incisional biopsies did not negatively influence the prognosis of NSCLC patients. It was safe and feasible to partly remove a metastatic SCLN as a last resort in advanced NSCLC.