Wallace P. Adams
Food and Drug Administration
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Wallace P. Adams.
Aaps Journal | 2009
Sau Lawrence Lee; Wallace P. Adams; Bing V. Li; Dale P. Conner; Badrul A. Chowdhury; Lawrence X. Yu
Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are used to deliver locally acting drugs (e.g., bronchodilators and corticosteroids) for treatment of lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) for DPI products is challenging, primarily due to an incomplete understanding of the relevance of drug concentrations in blood or plasma to equivalence in drug delivery to the local site(s) of action. Thus, BE of these drug/device combination products is established based on an aggregate weight of evidence, which utilizes in vitro studies to demonstrate equivalence of in vitro performance, pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies to demonstrate equivalence of systemic exposure, and pharmacodynamic and clinical endpoint studies to demonstrate equivalence in local action. This review discusses key aspects of in vitro studies in supporting the establishment of BE for generic locally acting DPI products. These aspects include comparability in device resistance and equivalence in in vitro testing for single inhalation (actuation) content and aerodynamic particle size distribution.
Aaps Journal | 2012
Wallace P. Adams; Sau L. Lee; Robert Plourde; Robert Lionberger; Craig M. Bertha; William H. Doub; Jean-Marc Bovet; Anthony J. Hickey
The study examined the sensitivity of DPI in vitro performance to formulation and device changes. Rotahaler/Rotacaps was selected as the reference DPI drug product, and Aerolizer was selected as the test device. Since the test device was recognized to have much greater efficiency of dispersion, simple modifications to both formulation and device were made in an effort to provide a closer match to the in vitro performance of the reference product. The modifications included varying the drug and lactose particle sizes and/or lactose fine particle content in the test formulations, as well as lowering the specific resistance of the test device. These modifications were intended to address variables important for drug product performance for a defined experimental design and were not intended to mimic the extensive formulation and device design strategies that are employed in an industrial setting. Formulation and device modifications resulted in a modified test product that approached the reference product in the in vitro performance.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis | 2010
Raghu Samy; Patrick J. Faustino; Wallace P. Adams; Lawrence X. Yu; Mansoor A. Khan; Yongsheng Yang
Lanthanum carbonate is indicated to reduce serum phosphate in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). When given orally, lanthanum carbonate dissociates in the acid environment of the upper gastrointestinal tract to release lanthanum ions. The free lanthanum ions bind with dietary phosphate released from food during digestion to form highly insoluble lanthanum-phosphate complexes which prevent the absorption of phosphate, consequently reduce the serum phosphate. In order to evaluate the in vitro binding capacity of lanthanum carbonate, a simple and efficient ion chromatography (IC) method was developed and validated for determination of phosphate across the pH range encountered in the gastrointestinal tract. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Dionex ICS-2000 IC system using a Dionex AS16, IonPac (4mmx250mm) analytical column and Dionex AG16, IonPac (4mmx50mm) guard column. Column temperature was maintained at 30 degrees C. Injection volume was 10microL. The compounds were eluted isocratically at a flow rate of 1mL/min and detected by suppressed conductivity. The analytical method was validated according to USP Category I requirements. The validation characteristics included accuracy, precision, quantification limit, linearity, and stability. The intra-day accuracy ranged from 89% to 103% for the solutions of pH 1.2-6.8. The intra-day precision (RSD) ranged from 0.6% to 3.7% for the solutions of pH 1.2-6.8. The analytical range was linear from 2 to 200ppm (mg/L). The R(2) ranged from 0.9998 to 1.0. This method was found to be simple, robust, sensitive, specific, and accurate. It has been successfully applied for determination of phosphate binding to lanthanum carbonate over the human gastrointestinal pH range at different time-points (from 0.5 to 24h).
Aaps Journal | 2015
Dongmei Lu; Sau L. Lee; Robert Lionberger; Stephanie Choi; Wallace P. Adams; Hoainhon N. Caramenico; Badrul A. Chowdhury; Dale P. Conner; Rohit Katial; Susan Limb; John R. Peters; Lawrence X. Yu; Sally Seymour; Bing V. Li
International regulatory agencies have developed recommendations and guidances for bioequivalence approaches of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) for local action. The objective of this article is to discuss the similarities and differences among these approaches used by international regulatory authorities when applications of generic and/or subsequent entry locally acting OIDPs are evaluated. We focused on four jurisdictions that currently have published related guidances for generic and/or subsequent entry OIDPs. They are Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia, Health Canada (HC) in Canada, European Medicines Association (EMA) of European Union (EU), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States of America (USA). The comparisons of these bioequivalence (BE) recommendations are based on selection of reference products, formulation and inhaler device comparisons, and in vitro tests and in vivo studies, including pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical studies. For the in vivo studies, the study design, choices of dose, subject inclusion/ exclusion criteria, study period, study endpoint, and equivalence criteria are elaborated in details. The bioequivalence on multiple-strength products and waiver options are also discussed.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery | 2010
Wallace P. Adams; Richard C. Ahrens; Mei-Ling Chen; David Christopher; Badrul A. Chowdhury; Dale P. Conner; Richard N. Dalby; Kevin Fitzgerald; Leslie Hendeles; Anthony J. Hickey; Günther Hochhaus; Beth L. Laube; Paul Lucas; Sau L. Lee; Svetlana Lyapustina; Bing Li; Dennis O'Connor; Neil Parikh; David A. Parkins; Prasad Peri; Gary R. Pitcairn; Michael Riebe; Partha Roy; Tushar Shah; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Sandra Suarez Sharp; Julie D. Suman; Marjolein Weda; Janet Woodcock; Lawrence X. Yu
Pharmaceutical Research | 2007
William H. Doub; Wallace P. Adams; John A. Spencer; Lucinda F. Buhse; Matthew P. Nelson; Patrick J. Treado
Aaps Journal | 2012
Jagdeep Shur; Sau Lee; Wallace P. Adams; Robert Lionberger; James Tibbatts; Robert Price
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery | 2011
Dennis O'Connor; Wallace P. Adams; Mei-Ling Chen; Peter T. Daley-Yates; John D. Davis; Hartmut Derendorf; Murray P. Ducharme; Anders Fuglsang; Myra Herrle; Günther Hochhaus; Susan Holmes; Sau L. Lee; Bing V. Li; Svetlana Lyapustina; Stephen P. Newman; Martin Oliver; Beverley Patterson; Joanne Peart; Guirag Poochikian; Partha Roy; Tushar Shah; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Sandra Suarez Sharp
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2002
Peter S. Creticos; Wallace P. Adams; Brent G. Petty; Lionel D. Lewis; Gur Jai Pal Singh; Arouna P. Khattignavong; Justina A. Molzon; Marilyn N. Martinez; Paul S. Lietman; Roger L. Williams
Journal of Aerosol Medicine-deposition Clearance and Effects in The Lung | 1994
Wallace P. Adams; Guirag Poochikian; Alan S. Taylor; Rashmikant M. Patel; Gregory P. Burke; Roger L. Williams