Wallis Marsh

Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of a large cohort of liver transplant recipients and to identify static and changing factors that influenced these outcomes over time. Summary Background DataLiver transplantation has been accepted as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease since 1983, with continual improvements in patient survival as a result of advances in immunosuppression and medical management, technical achievements, and improvements in procurement and preservation. Although many reports, including registry data, have delineated short-term factors that influence survival, few reports have examined factors that affect long-term survival after liver transplantation. MethodsFour thousand consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation between February 1981 and April 1998 were included in this analysis and were followed up to March 2000. The effect of donor and recipient age at the time of transplantation, recipient gender, diagnosis, and year of transplantation were compared. Rates of retransplantation, causes of retransplantation, and cause of death were also examined. ResultsThe overall patient survival for the entire cohort was 59%; the actuarial 18-year survival was 48%. Patient survival was significantly better in children, in female recipients, and in patients who received transplants after 1990. The rates of retransplantation for acute or chronic rejection were significantly lower with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The risk of graft failure and death was relatively stable after the first year, with recurrence of disease, malignancies, and age-related complications being the major factors for loss. ConclusionSignificantly improved patient and graft survival has been observed over time, and graft loss from acute or chronic rejection has emerged as a rarity. Age-related and disease-related causes of graft loss represent the greatest threat to long-term survival.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in liver transplantation: a 20-year experience.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and the risk factors and the impact of this complication on survival outcomes in a large cohort of liver transplant recipients at a single institution. Summary Background DataLiver transplantation has been accepted as a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease since 1983, in large part due to the availability and reliance on the use of nonspecifically directed immunosuppression. However, as predicted and subsequently verified in 1968, an increased incidence of certain de novo malignancies has been observed, particularly with regards to lymphoid neoplasms. While many reports have confirmed and clarified the nature of PTLD, the literature is fraught with conflicting experience and outcomes with PTLD. MethodsFour thousand consecutive patients who underwent liver transplants between February 1981 and April 1998 were included in this analysis and were followed to November 2001. The effect of recipient age at the time of transplant, recipient gender, diagnosis, baseline immunosuppression, grading of PTLD, and association with Epstein-Barr virus were compared. The causes of death were also examined. Treatment for PTLD varied over the 20-year period, but all included massive reduction or elimination of baseline immunosuppression. ResultsThe 1-year patient survival for liver transplant patients with PTLD was 85%, while the overall patient survival for the entire cohort was 53%. The actuarial 20-year survival was estimated at 45%. The overall median time to PTLD presentation was 10 months, and children had an incidence of PTLD that was threefold higher than adults. Patient survival was better in children, in patients transplanted in the era of tacrolimus immunosuppression, in patients with polymorphic PTLD, and in those with limited disease. Interestingly, neither the presence or absence of Epstein-Barr virus nor the timing of PTLD presentation appeared to influence overall patient survival. Patients transplanted for alcohol-related liver disease had a similar incidence of PTLD but had a higher risk of mortality. ConclusionsWhile PTLD continues to pose problems in patients receiving liver transplants, improvements in patient survival have been observed over time. While it is too early to assess the impact of new advances in prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment, such approaches are based on an increased knowledge of the pathophysiology of PTLD.

Use of Alemtuzumab and Tacrolimus Monotherapy for Cadaveric Liver Transplantation: With Particular Reference to Hepatitis C Virus

We have proposed that the mechanisms of alloengraftment and variable acquired tolerance can be facilitated by minimum posttransplant immunosuppression. It was further suggested that the efficacy of minimalistic treatment could be enhanced by preoperative recipient conditioning with an antilymphoid antibody preparation. A total of 76 adults (38 hepatitis C virus [HCV]−, 38 HCV+) were infused with 30 mg alemtuzumab before primary cadaveric liver transplantation and maintained afterward on daily monotherapy unless breakthrough rejection mandated additional agents. In stable patients, the intervals between tacrolimus doses were lengthened (“spaced weaning”) after approximately 4 months. Eighty-four contemporaneous nonlymphoid-depleted liver recipients (58 HCV−, 26 HCV+) were treated with conventional postoperative immunosuppression. The overall incidence of rejection was similar with the two strategies of immunosuppression. With follow-ups of 14 to 22 months, patient and primary graft survival in HCV− cases are 97% and 90%, respectively, with alemtuzumab depletion plus minimal immunosuppression versus 71% and 70%, respectively, under conventional immunosuppression. In HCV+ recipients, current patient and graft survival in the alemtuzumab-pretreated group are 71% and 70% versus 65% and 54%, respectively, under conventional treatment. With both strategies of immunosuppression, the adverse effect of preexisting HCV on survival parameters and graft function already was significant at the 1-year milestone, but its extent was not evident until the second year. With or without HCV, 62% of the 64 surviving lymphoid-depleted patients are on spaced immunosuppression, and four patients receive no immunosuppression. Lymphoid depletion with alemtuzumab and minimalistic maintenance immunosuppression is a practical strategy of liver transplantation in HCV− recipients but not HCV+ recipients.

Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.

Objective:To perform a matched comparison of surgical and postsurgical outcomes between our robotic and laparoscopic hepatic resection experience. Background:The application of robotic technology and technique to liver surgery has grown. Robotic methods may have the potential to overcome certain laparoscopic disadvantages, but few studies have drawn a matched comparison of outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic liver resections. Methods:Demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing robotic (n = 57) and laparoscopic (n = 114) hepatic resections between November 2007 and December 2011 were reviewed. A 1:2 matched analysis was performed by individually matching patients in the robotic cohort to patients in the laparoscopic cohort based on demographics, comorbidities, performance status, and extent of liver resection. Results:Matched patients undergoing robotic and laparoscopic liver resections displayed no significant differences in operative and postoperative outcomes as measured by blood loss, transfusion rate, R0 negative margin rate, postoperative peak bilirubin, postoperative intensive care unit admission rate, length of stay, and 90-day mortality. Patients undergoing robotic liver surgery had significantly longer operative times (median: 253 vs 199 minutes) and overall room times (median: 342 vs 262 minutes) compared with their laparoscopic counterparts. However, the robotic approach allowed for an increased percentage of major hepatectomies to be performed in a purely minimally invasive fashion (81% vs 7.1%, P < 0.05). Conclusions:This is the largest series comparing robotic to laparoscopic liver resections. Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection display similar safety and feasibility for hepatectomies. Although a greater proportion of robotic cases were completed in a totally minimally invasive manner, there were no significant benefits over laparoscopic techniques in operative outcomes.

Liver transplantation before 1 year of age

Since 1981, 20 infants younger than 1 year of age received 26 orthotopic liver transplants. Immunosuppression was with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Thirteen (65%) of the recipients were discharged from the hospital. To date, 12 (60%) of the 20 recipients are surviving, with follow-up of 1 to 56 months (average 14 months). The 5-year actuarial survival is 53.8%. The allograft liver function in the majority of surviving infants is excellent. The predominant causes of mortality were primary nonfunction of the allograft (three patients) and sepsis (three). Major morbidity was caused by hepatic artery thrombosis (five patients), gastrointestinal complications (six), biliary tract complications (five), and bacterial and viral infections (13). Six patients underwent retransplantation; three of these six survived. Results could be improved by prevention of hepatic artery thrombosis, by decreasing the incidence of sepsis, and by procurement of more and better suited pediatric donors.

Thrombotic and nonthrombotic hepatic artery complications in adults and children following primary liver transplantation with long-term follow-up in 1000 consecutive patients

Arterial complications have a major impact on survival after liver transplantation (LTx). The aim of this study was to examine arterial complications in adults and children after LTx. A total of 1000 consecutive primary LTx patients [mean age 40.5 years: 600 males, 400 females, 834 adults; 166 children (age <18 years)] were studied. Forty‐two patients (4.2%; 31 adults, 11 children) developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). Thrombosis in children occurred significantly early (mean 5.4 days) compared with adults (mean 418.7 days, P = 0.0001). Nonthrombotic complications occurred in 30 patients (29 adults, one child). Overall, 13‐year patient survival after HAT was 43.2% (72.7% children, 32.9% adults). For nonthrombotic complications, 54.3% of adults died and 69.4% grafts were lost. An overall incidence of 4.2% thrombotic and 3.2% nonthrombotic complications was observed. Rate of HAT was higher in children, but survival was better compared with adults.

Single-center experience with primary orthotopic liver transplantation with FK 506 immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE The efficacy for primary orthotopic liver transplantation of a new immunosuppressive agent, FK 506 (tacrolimus, Prograf, Fujisawa USA, Deerfield, IL), was determined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA After 3 years of preclinical research, a clinical trial of FK 506 for orthotopic liver transplantation was begun in February 1989, first as a rescue therapy for patients with intractable rejection with conventional immunosuppression, then as a primary drug. METHODS Between August 1989 and December 1993, 1391 recipients (1188 adult and 203 pediatric) of primary liver allografts were treated with FK 506 from the outset. Results from these patients were analyzed and compared with those of 1212 historical control patients (971 adult and 241 pediatric) given cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. RESULTS Actuarial survival at 4 years was 86.2% with FK 506 versus 65.5% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000) and 71.4% versus 65.5% in the adults (p < 0.0005). The need for retransplantation was reduced significantly for FK 506 patients. Four-year graft survival was 77.0% with FK 506 versus 48.4% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000), and 61.9% with FK 506 versus 51.4% with cyclosporine in the adult recipients (p < 0.0000). Regression analysis revealed that reduction in mortality or graft loss from uncontrollable rejection, sepsis, technical failure, and recurrent original liver disease were responsible for the improved results with FK 506 therapy. CONCLUSIONS FK 506 is a potent and superior immunosuppressive agent for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Causes of death after liver transplantation in 4000 consecutive patients: 2 to 19 year follow-up

One thousand six hundred thirty-three patients (40.8%) have died during the follow-up period. The causes of death at various time intervals from transplant are shown in Table 1. Infection has remained the most common cause of death at all time points, comprising 28.4% of the deaths. This was followed with recurrent or de novo cancers (11.6%), cardiovascular (8.3%), and respiratory (7.0%) causes. The rate of death is shown in the Fig 1. Nearly three fourths of these died within the first 3 months (20.4%). As expected, the highest mortality occurred in the first year after LTx. Mortality after 2 years is about 3 to 4% per year, often as a result of age-related complications. Overall survival has improved significantly over time.

Reasons for long-term use of steroid in primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus.

Background. Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent that provides higher freedom from acute and chronic rejection than cyclosporine after liver transplantation (LTx). Initially, a steroid-free state was observed in about 70% of patients at 1 year; this did not change over the next 5 years. The present study identifies the various reasons why the remaining 30% of adult patients still require steroids even after 5 years after successful LTx. Method. Eight hundred thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent LTx between August 1989 and December 1992 were included in this study. Four hundred ninety-nine patients were alive in January 1999 and were available for this study. The dose of steroid and the reason for steroid use were retrospectively determined from the clinical records. Results. Three hundred sixty-five patients (73.1%) were off steroid, whereas 134 patients (26.9%) were receiving prednisone (mean dose was 6.4±3.7 mg/day) at the time of the study. Four hundred and eight-four patients (97%) were off prednisone at some time after LTx; however, in 119 (23.8%) patients, steroids were reintroduced. Fifteen patients (3%) continued to receive prednisone; eight receive prednisone due to reluctance of the local physician to withdraw the medication; in five patients, the prednisone was not withdrawn because these patients were on cyclosporine; in the remaining two patients, repeated attempts to withdraw steroid resulted in a rise in liver function test. In the 49 (36.6%) of 119 patients in whom the steroid was reintroduced, it was restarted secondary to pathologically proven or clinically suspected rejection (group I). In five patients steroid was reintroduced for abnormal liver function after being off immunosuppression for treatment of a posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Six patients were noncompliant with their immunosuppressive medication, and the steroid was reintroduced to control rejection. Steroids were reintroduced in 30 patients (22.4%) for recurrence of original disease: primary biliary cirrhosis (n=19), sclerosing cholangitis (n=6), and autoimmune hepatitis (n=5) (group II). In 24 patients (20.2%), steroids were reintroduced to lower the dose of tacrolimus secondary to nephrotoxicity. Six of these patients received kidney transplantation (group III). In 16 patients (13.4%) the steroid was reintroduced for concomitant medical problems, consisting of ulcerative/Crohn’s colitis (n=6), adrenal insufficiency (n=5), hematological disorders (n=3), dermatitis (n=1), and rheumatoid arthritis (n=1) (group IV). Conclusion. Ninety-seven percent of patients under tacrolimus were weaned off steroid; however, 23.8% required steroid reintroduction for late rejection, recurrence of autoimmune process(es), renal impairment, or the concomitant presence of other medical conditions. Although the use of other immunosuppressive agents may reduce the rate of reintroduction of steroid, long-term sustained freedom from steroid may not be possible in all patients under tacrolimus secondary to these conditions.

Reasons why some children receiving tacrolimus therapy require steroids more than 5 years post liver transplantation

Abstract: Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent and has been used in liver transplantation (LTx) for nearly a decade. More than 70% of children can be maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy, without steroids, by the end of 1 yr post‐Tx. This freedom from steroids does not appear to change significantly in subsequent years. The use of steroids has obvious metabolic and cosmetic disadvantages, besides affecting linear growth in children. The present study identifies why some children still require steroid therapy after successful LTx. One hundred and sixty‐six consecutive pediatric patients who had undergone primary LTx between October 1989 and December 1992, were included in this study. Follow‐up ranged from 6 to 9 yr (mean 7.5 ± 0.8 yr). One hundred and forty‐one children were alive in November 1998 and these patients constituted the study group. Their current rate of prednisone use, reason for prednisone use, and prednisone dose were examined retrospectively. Of the 141 patients, 139 (98.5%) had stopped taking steroids at some time‐point after LTx. Thirteen patients (9%) were off immunosuppression altogether (group I), 97 were undergoing tacrolimus monotherapy (group II), and the remaining 31 were receiving therapy with steroids and tacrolimus (group III). The mean prednisone dose at the last follow‐up was 6.5 ± 4.9 mg/day (median 5.0 mg/day). In group III, two children were never weaned off steroids because of inadequate follow‐up (both lived outside the country), and the remaining 29 children completely stopped steroid therapy at some time‐point after LTx; however, prednisone was re‐introduced for clinically suspected or biopsy‐proven rejection in 24. Seven children in group III had completely stopped immunosuppressive therapy either as part of an immunosuppression reduction protocol (n = 3) or for suspected or proven post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (n = 4). In eleven of the 18 children in group III, requirement of steroid for rejection was thought to be related, in part, to non‐compliance. In three children in group III, steroids were re‐introduced for renal dysfunction, and two of these patients subsequently received a kidney Tx. In one child with cerebral ischemia, steroids were used to reduce brain edema, and another child had features of auto‐immune hepatitis. Hence, almost all children can be weaned off steroids when tacrolimus is used as primary immunosuppresson after primary LTx. However, ≈ 22% of children may need re‐institution of steroids because of late acute rejection or renal dysfunction. The concomitant use of other non‐steroidal immunosuppressive agents with tacrolimus may further reduce the dose and rate of steroid use.