Walter H.J. Ward
AstraZeneca
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Walter H.J. Ward.
Biochemical Pharmacology | 1994
Walter H.J. Ward; Peter N. Cook; Anthony M. Slater; D.Huw Davies; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Leslie R'. Green
Inhibition of tyrosine kinases is a possible approach for the treatment of cancer. We have investigated the catalytic mechanism of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGF-RTK) in order to obtain information for use in structure-based searching for inhibitors. Initial rate studies imply that EGF-RTK forms a ternary complex together with ATP and peptide substrate. Investigation of pH and temperature dependence suggests that the kinase reaction requires the ionised form of a carboxylate (pK = 6.3) and the protonated form of another group (pK = 9.1). These characteristics are consistent with a mechanism where the carboxylate of Asp813(pK = 6.3) facilitates deprotonation of the tyrosyl hydroxyl of the peptide substrate, activating it as a nucleophile to attack the gamma-phosphorus of ATP which interacts with a protonated enzyme side-chain (pK = 9.1), possibly the guanidinium group of Arg817. This proposed catalytic mechanism was used to define a query when searching for inhibitors in a database of predicted three-dimensional structures. The procedure involved searching for compounds that mimic the ATP gamma-phosphate, tyrosyl hydroxyl and the tyrosyl aromatic ring, all of which seem to interact strongly with the enzyme during catalysis. This search allowed identification of inhibitors of EGF-RTK which were used to define queries for two-dimensional searching of a larger database, leading to the discovery of 4-(3-chloroanilino)quinazoline (CAQ) which is a potent inhibitor (Ki = 16 nM) of the enzyme. The compound is believed to be the first representative from a new structural class of anilinoquinazoline tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It follows competitive kinetics with respect to ATP and noncompetitive kinetics when the peptide is varied, implying that it functions as an analogue of ATP. CAQ is a novel and potent lead in the search for tyrosine kinase inhibitors as potential agents for the treatment of cancer.
Biochemistry | 1997
Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Alan Tunnicliffe; Walter H.J. Ward; Simon A. Weston; Gina Rosenbrock; Peter T. Barth; Ian W. F. Taylor; Richard A. Pauptit; David Timms
Novobiocin is an antibiotic which binds to a 24 kDa fragment from the B subunit of DNA gyrase. Naturally occurring resistance arises from mutation of Arg-136 which hydrogen bonds to the coumarin ring of novobiocin. We have applied calorimetry to characterize the binding of novobiocin to wild-type and R136H mutant 24 kDa fragments. Upon mutation, the Kd increases from 32 to 1200 nM at 300 K. The enthalpy of binding is more favorable for the mutant (DeltaH degrees shifts from -12.1 to -17.5 kcal/mol), and the entropy of binding is much less favorable (TDeltaS degrees changes from -1.8 to -9.4 kcal/mol). Both of these changes are in the direction opposite to that expected if the loss of the Arg residue reduces hydrogen bonding. The change in heat capacity at constant pressure upon binding (DeltaCp) shifts from -295 to -454 cal mol-1 K-1. We also report the crystal structure, at 2.3 A resolution, of a complex between the R136H 24 kDa fragment and novobiocin. Although the change in DeltaCp often would be interpreted as reflecting increased burial of hydrophobic surface on binding, this structure reveals a small decrease. Furthermore, an ordered water molecule is sequestered into the volume vacated by removal of the guanidinium group. There are large discrepancies when the measured thermodynamic parameters are compared to those estimated from the structural data using empirical relationships. These differences seem to arise from the effects of sequestering ordered water molecules upon complexation. The water-mediated hydrogen bonds linking novobiocin to the mutant protein make a favorable enthalpic contribution, whereas the immobilization of the water leads to an entropic cost and a reduction in the heat capacity of the system. Such a negative contribution to DeltaCp, DeltaH degrees , and TDeltaS degrees appears to be a general property of water molecules that are sequestered when ligands bind to proteins.
Drug Discovery Today | 2005
Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Walter H.J. Ward
Thermodynamics governs the process of biomolecular recognition. The steps of characterizing, understanding and exploiting binding thermodynamics have the potential to contribute to an improved rational drug design process that is more robust and reliable. It is only relatively recently that instrumentation capable of direct and full thermodynamic characterization has been improved, giving impetus to the application of thermodynamic measurements in drug discovery. This review highlights current instruments and methods that can be employed to measure binding thermodynamics and their use in studies of biomolecular recognition and drug discovery.
Molecular Oncology | 2009
Tim P. Green; Mike Fennell; Robin D. Whittaker; Jon Owen Curwen; Vivien Jacobs; Jack Allen; Armelle Logie; Judith Hargreaves; D. Mark Hickinson; Robert W. Wilkinson; Paul Elvin; Brigitte Boyer; Neil Oliver Carragher; Patrick Ple; Alun Bermingham; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Walter H.J. Ward; Laurent Francois Andre Hennequin; Barry R. Davies; Gerard Costello
AZD0530, an orally available Src inhibitor, demonstrated potent antimigratory and anti‐invasive effects in vitro, and inhibited metastasis in a murine model of bladder cancer. Antiproliferative activity of AZD0530 in vitro varied between cell lines (IC50 0.2 –>10μM). AZD0530 inhibited tumor growth in 4/10 xenograft models tested and dynamically inhibited in vivo phosphorylation of Src substrates paxillin and FAK in both growth‐inhibition‐resistant and ‐sensitive xenografts. The activity of AZD0530 in NBT‐II bladder cancer cells in vitro was consistent with inhibition of cell migration and stabilization of cell–cell adhesion. These data suggest a dominant anti‐invasive pharmacology for AZD0530 that may limit tumor progression in a range of cancers. AZD0530 is currently in Phase II clinical trials.
Progress in Medicinal Chemistry | 2001
Walter H.J. Ward; Geoffrey A. Holdgate
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) follows the heat change when a test compound binds to a target protein. It allows precise measurement of affinity. The method is direct, making interpretation facile, because there is no requirement for competing molecules. Titration in the presence of other ligands rapidly provides information on the mechanism of action of the test compound, identifying the intermolecular complexes that are relevant for structure-based design. Calorimetry allows measurement of stoichiometry and so evaluation of the proportion of the sample that is functional. ITC can characterize protein fragments and catalytically inactive mutant enzymes. It is the only technique which directly measures the enthalpy of binding (delta H degree). Interpretation of delta H degree and its temperature dependence (delta Cp) is usually qualitative, not quantitative. This is because of complicated contributions from linked equilibria and a single change in structure giving modification of several physicochemical properties. Measured delta H degree values allow characterization of proton movement linked to the association of protein and ligand, giving information on the ionization of groups involved in binding. Biochemical systems characteristically exhibit enthalpy-entropy compensation where increased bonding is offset by an entropic penalty, reducing the magnitude of change in affinity. This also causes a lack of correlation between the free energy of binding (delta G degree) and delta H degree. When characterizing structure-activity relationships (SAR), most groups involved in binding can be detected as contributing to delta H degree, but not to affinity. Large enthalpy changes may reflect a modified binding mode, or protein conformation changes. Thus, delta H degree values may highlight a potential discontinuity in SAR, so that experimental structural data are likely to be particularly valuable in molecular design.
Biochemistry | 2008
Wendy S. VanScyoc; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Jane E. Sullivan; Walter H.J. Ward
Inhibition of the protein kinase, MEK1, is a potential approach for the treatment of cancer. Inhibitors may act by prevention of activation (PoA), which involves interfering with phosphorylation of nonactivated MEK1 by the upstream kinase, B-RAF. Modulation also may occur by inhibition of catalysis (IoC) during phosphorylation of the downstream substrate, ERK2, by activated MEK1. Here, five MEK inhibitors are characterized in terms of binding affinity, PoA, and IoC. The compounds are a butadiene (U-0126), an N-alkoxy amide (CI-1040), two CI-1040 analogues (an anthranilic acid and an N-alkyl amide), and a cyanoquinoline. Some compounds give different mechanisms of inhibition (ATP-competitive, noncompetitive, or uncompetitive) in PoA compared to IoC or show a change in potency between the assays. The inhibitors also exhibit different shifts in potency when either PoA or IoC is compared with binding to nonactivated MEK. The inhibitor potency ranking, therefore, is dependent upon the assay format. When the ATP concentration equals K m, IoC IC 50 increases in the order CI-1040 approximately cyanoquinoline < anthranilic acid approximately U-0126 < alkyl amide. Conversely, the K d from nonactivated MEK1 for four of the compounds varies between more than 6-fold lower and over 18-fold higher than this IC 50, with U-0126 having the lowest K d and CI-1040 having the highest. In PoA when the ATP concentration equals K m, U-0126 has the lowest IC 50, becoming more potent than CI-1040, the cyanoquinoline, and the anthranilic acid. These observations have implications for understanding structure-activity relationships of MEK inhibitors and illustrate how assays can be designed to favor different compounds.
Biochemistry | 1999
Walter H.J. Ward; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Siân Rowsell; Estelle G. McLean; Richard A. Pauptit; Edward Clayton; Wright W. Nichols; Jeremy G. Colls; Claire A. Minshull; David Jude; Anil Mistry; David Timms; Roger Camble; Neil J. Hales; Carolyn J. Britton; Ian W. F. Taylor
Biochemistry | 2005
Jane E. Sullivan; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Douglas Campbell; David Timms; Stefan Gerhardt; Jason Breed; Alexander L. Breeze; Alun Bermingham; Richard A. Pauptit; Richard A. Norman; Kevin J. Embrey; Jon Read; Wendy S. VanScyoc; Walter H.J. Ward
Biochemical Society Transactions | 2008
Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Walter H.J. Ward; Fergus McTaggart
Biochemical Pharmacology | 1996
Fergus McTaggart; George Robert Brown; Robert G. Davidson; Susan Freeman; Geoffrey A. Holdgate; Keith Blakeney Mallion; Donald J. Mirrlees; Graham J. Smith; Walter H.J. Ward