Walter Haas
University of Bonn
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Walter Haas.
Naturwissenschaften | 1966
Walter Haas; Walter Kausch
Wie ktirzlich be r i eh te t [1 a] spiegel t s ich die x e r o m o r p h e S t ruk f u r der Sonnenb l~ t f e r ~1 b] der ] 3 h t b u c h e (Fagus sylvatica L. cv. Atropunicea) chemi sch in ei l iem h o h e n Q u o t i e n t e n Rohl ign in /Holocel lu lose (QR= 1,46). ]3ei dell Schat tenbl /~ t te rn h ingegen s ind die Gewich t san te i l e der be iden Subs ta l i zen alisgeg l ichen ( QR = 1,0t). X e r o m o r p h e S t r u k t u r e n k 6 n n e n n a c h ~Llteren Arbe i t en [2~5] d u r c h e inen h o h e n Calciumgehalf i im ]31att, m e s o m o r p h e dagegen du rch e inen h o h e n t~a l iumgeha l t induz ie r t werden . Zus a m m e n h ~ n g e zwischen C a l c i u m a n g e b o t n n d L ign i f i z i e rung s ind b i she r IIur in nega t i ve r R i c h t u n g b e k a n n t , insofe rn nXmlich, als eine s t a rke Ca lc iumgabe im N X h r m e d i u m y o n Gewebek u l t u r e n die L i g n i n b i l d u n g verh i l ider t ~6]. C a l c i u m m a n g e l sell dagegen die L ign i f iz ie rung f6rdern [7]. Auf dieser Grund l age ve rg l i chen wir die Calc iumu n d K a l i m n g e h a l t e u n s e r e r Sonilenu n d Schat tenbl /~ t ter m i t ihreI1 Rohligninlu n d Holocel luloseartteilen. A i i a l y s e n m e t h o d e fiir Ca lc ium u n d K a l i u m : Grav ime t r i s che B e s t i m m u n g des Ca lc iums als CaCaO~ 9 H~O u n d des K a l i u m s als T e t r a p h e n y l o b o r a t [8]. B e s t i m m u n g der Holocel lulosen n d L ign inwer t e s iehe [la~ b], Die Tabel le e n t h ~ l t die Mi t te lwer te a u s je 4 Einzelanla lysen m i t ih ren m i t t l e r e n Fehlern . Die U n t e r sch iede zwischen Sonnena n d Schat tenbl /~ t te rn s ind m i t p ~ = 0,00t seh r s ign i f ikan t (t-Test).
Planta | 1969
Walter Haas
SummaryThe amino acid contents of sun and shade leaves of the copper beech are significantly different. On the basis of dry matter, the concentration of the majority of amino acids is higher in shade leaves. Only the concentrations of proline, valine, histidine and arginine are about 30% lower compared with those of the other amino acids. Calculated on the basis of crude protein, the concentrations of lysine, histidine, arginine, valine, isoleucine and proline are considerably lower in shade leaves than in sun leaves. On the other hand, shade leaves contain more tyrosine, phenylalanine, and methionine.A hypothesis interpreting the different morphogenesis of sun and shade leaves in connection with the high proline content of sun leaves is discussed.The amino acid contents of sun and shade leaves of the copper beech are significantly different. On the basis of dry matter, the concentration of the majority of amino acids is higher in shade leaves. Only the concentrations of proline, valine, histidine and arginine are about 30% lower compared with those of the other amino acids. Calculated on the basis of crude protein, the concentrations of lysine, histidine, arginine, valine, isoleucine and proline are considerably lower in shade leaves than in sun leaves. On the other hand, shade leaves contain more tyrosine, phenylalanine, and methionine.A hypothesis interpreting the different morphogenesis of sun and shade leaves in connection with the high proline content of sun leaves is discussed.
Planta | 1969
Walter Haas
SummaryThe amino acid contents of sun and shade leaves of the copper beech are significantly different. On the basis of dry matter, the concentration of the majority of amino acids is higher in shade leaves. Only the concentrations of proline, valine, histidine and arginine are about 30% lower compared with those of the other amino acids. Calculated on the basis of crude protein, the concentrations of lysine, histidine, arginine, valine, isoleucine and proline are considerably lower in shade leaves than in sun leaves. On the other hand, shade leaves contain more tyrosine, phenylalanine, and methionine.A hypothesis interpreting the different morphogenesis of sun and shade leaves in connection with the high proline content of sun leaves is discussed.The amino acid contents of sun and shade leaves of the copper beech are significantly different. On the basis of dry matter, the concentration of the majority of amino acids is higher in shade leaves. Only the concentrations of proline, valine, histidine and arginine are about 30% lower compared with those of the other amino acids. Calculated on the basis of crude protein, the concentrations of lysine, histidine, arginine, valine, isoleucine and proline are considerably lower in shade leaves than in sun leaves. On the other hand, shade leaves contain more tyrosine, phenylalanine, and methionine.A hypothesis interpreting the different morphogenesis of sun and shade leaves in connection with the high proline content of sun leaves is discussed.
Naturwissenschaften | 1965
Walter Kausch; Walter Haas
Naturwissenschaften | 1969
G. Krampitz; S. Baars; Walter Haas; M. Kempfle
Naturwissenschaften | 1966
Walter Kausch; Walter Haas
Naturwissenschaften | 1969
G. Krampitz; S. Baars; Walter Haas; M. Kempfle
Naturwissenschaften | 1969
Walter Haas; Heinrich G. Hardebeck
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition | 2009
G. Krampitz; Walter Haas; H. Hardebeck
Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B | 1971
Heinrich G. Hardebeck; Walter Haas