Walter M. High

The neurobehavioural rating scale: assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician.

To investigate the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale at various stages of recovery after hospitalisation for closed head injury, we studied 101 head trauma patients who had no antecedent neuropsychiatric disorder. The results demonstrated satisfactory inter-rater reliability and showed that the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale reflects both the severity and chronicity of closed head injury. A principal components analysis revealed four factors which were differentially related to severity of head injury and the presence of a frontal lobe mass lesion. Although our findings provide support for utilising clinical ratings of behaviour to investigate sequelae of head injury, extension of this technique to other settings is necessary to evaluate the distinctiveness of the neurobehavioural profile of closed head injury as compared with other aetiologies of brain damage.

Long-term Neuropsychological Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective:To describe neuropsychological outcome 5 years after injury in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received inpatient medical rehabilitation. To determine the magnitude and pattern neuropsychological recovery from 1 year to 5 years after injury. Design:Longitudinal cohort study with inclusion based on the availability of neuropsychological data at 1 year and 5 years after injury. Setting:National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care. Participants:One hundred eighty-two persons with complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury. Primary Outcome Measures:Digits Forward and Backward, Logical Memory I and II, Token Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Visual Form Discrimination, Block Design, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Grooved Pegboard. Results:Significant variability in outcome was found 5 years after TBI, ranging from no measurable impairment to severe impairment on neuropsychological tests. Improvement from 1 year after injury to 5 years was also variable. Using the Reliable Change Index, 22.2% improved, 15.2% declined, and 62.6% were unchanged on test measures. Conclusions:Neuropsychological recovery after TBI is not uniform across individuals and neuropsychological domains. For a subset of persons with moderate to severe TBI, neuropsychological recovery may continue several years after injury with substantial recovery. For other persons, measurable impairment remains 5 years after injury. Improvement was most apparent on measures of cognitive speed, visuoconstruction, and verbal memory.

Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis

OBJECTIVE To investigate incidence and etiology of rehospitalizations at 1, 2, and 3 years after traumatic brain injury. DESIGN Descriptive statistics were computed in a prospective study of etiology and incidence of rehospitalization at years 1, 2, and 3 postinjury. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi2 were used to identify factors relating to rehospitalization; factors included length of stay, admission and discharge functional status, payer source, medical complications, injury severity, and demographics. SETTING Four medical centers in the federally sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. In each setting, the continuum of care includes emergency medical services, intensive and acute medical care, inpatient rehabilitation, and a spectrum of community rehabilitation services. PARTICIPANTS Six hundred sixty-five rehabilitation patients admitted to acute care within 24 hours of traumatic brain injury between 1989 and 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Annual incidence and etiology of rehospitalization. RESULTS The annual incidence of rehospitalization ranged from 20% to 22.5%. Approximately half the rehospitalizations were for elective reasons. The most common reason for rehospitalization was for orthopedic or reconstructive surgery, followed by infectious disorders and general health maintenance. After the first year, the incidence of readmissions for seizures and psychiatric difficulties increased substantially. ANOVA and chi2 analyses were performed on data from the first year postinjury. No statistically significant associations were noted between incidence and etiology of rehospitalization and: demographics; injury severity; payer source for rehabilitation; concurrent injuries; acute care and rehabilitation length of stays; discharge Functional Assessment Measure; and discharge residence (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS There is a relatively stable but high rate of rehospitalization for at least 3 years after injury. The costs of rehospitalization should be considered when evaluating the long-term consequences of injury.

Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of acute injury characteristics on subsequent return to work in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. DESIGN Descriptive statistics were performed in a comparative study of 49 TBI patients who were competitively employed at 1-year follow-up and 83 unemployed patients. Independent t tests were then performed to examine the differences between the two groups on specific measures including the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Assessment Measure (FIM), Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS), and neuropsychological test results. SETTING Four medical centers in the federally sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Project that provide emergency medical services, intensive and acute medical care, inpatient rehabilitation, and a spectrum of community rehabilitation services. PARTICIPANTS Patients were selected from a national database of 245 rehabilitation inpatients admitted to acute care within 8 hours of TBI and seen at 1-year follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Return to work at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS Persons employed at 1-year follow-up obtained significantly better scores on specific acute measures of physical functioning (Admission FIM, Admission DRS, Discharge DRS), cognitive functioning (Logical Memory Delay), behavioral functioning (Admission RLAS, Discharge RLAS, NRS Excitement factor), and injury severity (Admission GCS, Highest GCS, Length of Coma, Length of PTA) than their unemployed counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Persons obtaining better scores on certain acute measures (e.g., Admission GCS) are more likely to return to the workforce. Future research should focus on developing a standardized tool to assess a patients ability to return to work, as well as an operational definition for successful employment.

Serial MRI and neurobehavioural findings after mild to moderate closed head injury.

Fifty patients who sustained mild to moderate closed head injury (CHI) underwent a CT scan, MRI, and neurobehavioural testing. At baseline 40 patients had intracranial hyperintensities detected by MRI which predominated in the frontal and temporal regions, whereas 10 patients had lesions detected by CT. Neurobehavioural data obtained during the first admission to hospital disclosed no distinctive pattern in subgroups of patients characterised by lesions confined to the frontal, temporal, or frontotemporal regions, whereas all three groups exhibited pervasive deficits in relation to normal control subjects. The size of extraparenchymal lesion was significantly related to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, whereas this relation was not present in parenchymal lesions. One and three month follow up MRI findings showed substantial resolution of lesion while neuropsychological data reflected impressive recovery. The follow up data disclosed a trend from pervasive deficits to more specific impairments which were inconsistently related to the site of brain lesion. These results corroborate and extend previous findings, indicating that intracranial lesions detected by MRI are present in most patients hospitalised after mild to moderate CHI. Individual differences in the relation between site of lesion and the pattern of neuropsychological findings, which persist over one to three months after mild to moderate CHI, remain unexplained.

Functional measures after traumatic brain injury : ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ.

Objective:The characteristics of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM), and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) are examined, especially in regard to a “celling effect” after rehabilitation discharge (ie, how well each of the instruments detects meaningful change in level of function). Design:Data were collected prospectively at admission and discharge from acute inpatient rehabilitation and at years 1 and 2 after injury (the CIQ was collected only at years 1 and 2). Analyses are reported on a subsamplc of cases with listwise deletion, although the analyses were also done using all data available, and results compared to ensure stability of findings between samples. Setting:National database of the four Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Model Systems in San Jose, Calif; Detroit, Mich; Richmond, Va; and Houston, Tex. Patients:All consenting patients with TBI age 16 and older admitted to a Model System within 24 hours of Injury and receiving inpatient rehabilitation within the Model System qualified for the study. Data on 612 individuals were collected, with a minimum of 80 cases having complete data over time. Main Outcome Measures:The DRS, FIM, FIM+FAM, and CIQ. Results:There is a substantial ceiling effect of the FIM, even by inpatient rehabilitation discharge (ie, one half of the cases have an average score of 6 to 7 [“independent or modified independence—no helper] across the 18 FIM Items). The FIM+FAM shows a ceiling effect In one third of the cases. The DRS shows less ceiling effect at discharge, 1 year, and 2 years than the FIM or the FIM+FAM. CIQ scores have a ceiling effect on home and social integration subscales when compared with scores from a sample of individuals without disabilities. The productivity subscale remains well below the norm. Conclusions:Celling effects for the FIM, FIM+FAM, and two of the three CIQ subscales indicate that these measures are not as sensitive to changes, especially in the community, as may be needed to assess progress in areas most commonly causing dysfunction for the TBI population. More emphasis must be placed on improved measurement of relevant goals in the postacute and home settings with brief and precise scales

The community integration questionnaire revisited: An assessment of factor structure and validity

OBJECTIVE To investigate the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ), using a large sample of persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN Principal components analysis with varimax rotation was performed on CIQ items completed through interview with patients at 1 year after injury. Correlational analyses compared CIQ scores to scores on other widely used outcome measures. SETTING Outpatient clinics affiliated with four TBI Model System rehabilitation centers funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred twelve patients with medically documented TBI who were enrolled in the TBI Model Systems Project. The majority of patients were Caucasian males with severe TBI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES CIQ; Functional Independence Measure (FIM); Functional Assessment Measure (FAM); Disability Rating Scale (DRS). RESULTS Three factors emerged: Home Competency, Social Integration, and Productive Activity. The financial management item was moved from Social Integration to Home Competency, and the travel item was moved from Productive Activity to Social Integration. Each CIQ scale score showed significant correlations in the expected direction with the FIM+FAM and DRS items. CONCLUSIONS The results provide further evidence for the validity of the CIQ and improve the scoring system. The factor structure is clinically and theoretically meaningful. The subscale and total scores show significant relationships with other widely used measures of outcome. Future research should focus on increasing the range of questions, accounting for changes from preinjury functioning, and obtaining normative data on the new factors.

The Awareness Questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency

Patients with traumatic brain injuries often show impaired awareness of their impairments. This impaired awareness can decrease motivation for treatment and limit eventual functional outcome. The importance of this phenomenon has led to the development of multiple techniques and scales for measuring impaired awareness. The present paper briefly reviews the various methods of operationalizing impaired awareness and describes a new scale (the Awareness Questionnaire) designed to incorporate all these methods. Findings of previous studies supporting the validity of the Awareness Questionnaire are presented. The present investigation examined the factor structure and internal consistency of the Awareness Questionnaire with samples of 126 traumatic brain injury survivors and 75 family members/significant others. Principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation indicated three factors: cognitive, behavioural/affective, and motor/sensory. Investigation of internal consistency (Cronbach Coefficient Alpha) in both the patient and family sample yielded satisfactory results. These findings are supportive of continued use and investigation of the Awareness Questionnaire.

Functional outcomes of older adults with traumatic brain injury: A prospective, multicenter analysis☆

OBJECTIVE To investigate improvement rates and medical services costs in older brain injured adults relative to younger patients. DESIGN Descriptive statistics were computed in a prospective comparative study of 50 patients 55 years and older and 50 patients 18 to 54 years old matched for gender and injury severity (number of days in coma, admission Glasgow Coma Score, intracranial pressure). Independent t tests were performed to examine differences between the two samples on specific variables. SETTING Five medical centers in the federally sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Project that provide emergency medical services, intensive and acute medical care, inpatient rehabilitation, and a spectrum of community rehabilitation services. PARTICIPANTS Patients were selected from a national database of 531 rehabilitation inpatients admitted to acute care within 8 hours of traumatic brain injury between 1989 and 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale, length of stay, acute care and rehabilitation charges, and discharge disposition. RESULTS Older persons averaged a significantly longer rehabilitation length of stay, higher total rehabilitation charges, and a lower rate of change on functional measures. No significant differences between groups were found for acute care length of stay, daily rehabilitation charges, acute care charges (daily or total), or discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS Although older persons demonstrated functional changes, the cost of change was substantially higher than for younger patients, coincident with longer lengths of stay. These higher overall charges and slower rates of change may effect changes in referral and management patterns.

Assessment of cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral disturbances in patients with dementia: the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale.

To assess the validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS) in patients with Alzheimers disease (AD) or multi‐infarct dementia (MID) and to characterize the cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral disturbances that occur in these patients.