Warren Walsh

Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: A clinical and echocardiographic analysis

The clinical and echocardiographic variables related to left atrial spontaneous echo contrast were prospectively evaluated in a consecutive series of 400 patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography with a 5-MHz single plane transducer. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was found in 75 patients (19%) and was significantly associated with atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis, absence of mitral regurgitation, increased left atrial dimension and a history of suspected embolism. Seventy-one (95%) of the patients with spontaneous echo contrast had atrial fibrillation or mitral stenosis. Anticoagulant therapy had no significant association with spontaneous echo contrast. Multivariate analysis in 89 patients with mitral stenosis or mitral valve replacement showed that spontaneous echo contrast was the only independent predictor (p = 0.03) of left atrial thrombus or suspected embolism, or both. In 60 patients with atrial fibrillation of nonvalvular origin, spontaneous echo contrast (p = 0.01) and age (p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of left atrial thrombus or suspected embolism, or both. It is concluded that left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is 1) a common finding in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, 2) associated with conditions favoring stasis of left atrial blood, and 3) a marker of previous thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and those with mitral stenosis or mitral valve replacement.

Prognostic implications of left artial spontaneous echo contrast in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES This study examined the influence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast on the subsequent stroke or embolic event rate and on survival in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is associated with atrial fibrillation and a history of previous stroke or other embolic events. However, the prognostic implications of spontaneous contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are unknown. METHOD The study group comprised 272 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline, and patients were prospectively followed up, and all strokes, other embolic events and deaths were documented. The relation between spontaneous contrast at baseline and subsequent stroke, other embolic events and survival was analyzed. RESULTS Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was detected at baseline in 161 patients (59%). The mean follow-up was 17.5 months. The stroke or other embolic event rate was 12%/year (15 strokes, 3 transient ischemic attacks, 2 peripheral embolisms) in patients with, compared with 3%/year (5 strokes) in patients without, baseline spontaneous contrast (p = 0.002). In 149 patients without previous thromboembolism, the event rate was 9.5%/year in patients with and 2.2%/year in patients without spontaneous contrast (p = 0.003). There were 25 deaths in patients with and 11 deaths in patients without spontaneous contrast. Patients with spontaneous contrast had significantly reduced survival (p = 0.025). On multivariate analysis, spontaneous contrast was the only positive predictor (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.03) and warfarin therapy on follow-up the only negative predictor (odds ratio 0.23, p = 0.02) of subsequent stroke or other embolic events. CONCLUSIONS Transesophageal echocardiography can risk stratify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by identifying left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. These patients have both a significantly higher risk of developing stroke or other embolic events and a reduced survival, and they may represent a subgroup in whom the risk/benefit ratio of anticoagulation may be most favorable.

Hematologic correlates of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast and thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES This study examined the relation between left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, hematologic variables and thrombo-embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is associated with left atrial stasis and thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, its hematologic determinants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are unknown. METHODS Clinical, hematologic and echocardiographic variables were prospectively measured in 135 consecutive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS Patients with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (n = 74, 55%) had an increased fibrinogen concentration (p = 0.029), platelet count (p = 0.045), hematocrit (p = NS) and left atrial dimension (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was independently related to hematocrit (odds ratio = 2.24, p = 0.002), fibrinogen concentration (odds ratio = 2.08, p = 0.008) and left atrial dimension (odds ratio = 1.90, p = 0.004) but not platelet count. It was also associated with left atrial thrombus (n = 15, p = 0.001) and with recent embolism (n = 40, p < 0.001). In 40 clinically stable outpatients without previous embolism, left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was significantly related to hematocrit (p = 0.005), fibrinogen concentration (p = 0.035) and left atrial dimension (p = 0.029) but not to coagulation factor VII, D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet count, plasma beta-thromboglobulin, plasma glycocalicin or glycocalicin index. CONCLUSIONS Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is independently related to hematocrit, fibrinogen concentration and left atrial dimension, indicating a relatively hypercoagulable state in addition to stasis. These findings support the hypothesis that left atrial spontaneous echo contrast is due to erythrocyte aggregation. Hematologic factors may contribute to its association with thromboembolism.

Selection of Patients for Transesophageal Echocardiography After Stroke and Systemic Embolic Events: Role of Transthoracic Echocardiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study examined whether patients suffering from stroke and other systemic embolic events may be selected for transesophageal echocardiography on the basis of clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic findings. METHODS We performed transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography on 824 patients after stroke and other suspected embolic events. Patients were classified into group A if they were in sinus rhythm and had a normal transthoracic echocardiogram. Group B consisted of all other patients. Transesophageal echocardiographic findings of left atrial spontaneous contrast, left atrial thrombus, complex aortic atheroma, and interatrial septal anomalies were correlated with clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic results. RESULTS Transesophageal echocardiography detected at least one potential source of embolism in 399 patients (49%): spontaneous contrast in 214 patients (26%), left atrial thrombus in 54 (7%), complex atheroma in 111 (13%), and interatrial septal anomalies in 126 (15%). In group A (n = 236), only 3 (1%) had spontaneous contrast, 11 (4.6%) had complex atheroma, and none had left atrial thrombus. In group B (n = 588), 211 patients (36%, P < .001) had spontaneous contrast, 54 (9.2%, P < .001) had atrial thrombus, and 100 (17%, P < .001) had complex atheroma. Interatrial septal anomalies were detected in similar proportions of patients (18% in group A versus 14% in group B). Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, thrombus, and complex atheroma were significantly more prevalent in older patients, but interatrial septal anomalies were more prevalent in younger patients irrespective of transthoracic echocardiographic findings. Multivariate analysis identified both an abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram and patient age to be independent predictors of transesophageal echocardiographic findings of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial thrombus, or complex atheroma. CONCLUSIONS Transesophageal echocardiography has a low yield for left atrial spontaneous contrast, left atrial thrombus, or complex aortic atheroma in patients with normal transthoracic echocardiogram and sinus rhythm and in younger patients. Interatrial septal anomalies are more prevalent in younger patients. Transthoracic echocardiogram should be performed in patients after stroke or systemic embolic events as a noninvasive screening tool. We recommend transesophageal echocardiogram for patients with abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram and in younger patients when the finding of a patent foramen ovale may contribute to patient management.

Thromboembolic risks of left atrial thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiogram.

Patients with left atrial thrombus are considered at high risk for thromboembolic events. The actual prognosis of these patients and the features most predictive of future events are unclear. We performed transesophageal echocardiograms in 2,894 patients over a 6 1/2-year period; 94 (age 69 +/- 11 years, 59 men, 83 in atrial fibrillation) were found to have left atrial thrombus. The thrombi were considered mobile in 45 patients and 33 patients had thrombus with a maximum dimension > or = 1.5 cm. Seven of the 94 patients with prosthetic valves were excluded from follow-up analysis. Over a follow-up period of 25.3 +/- 19.2 months, 17 patients had suffered a stroke or embolic event (event rate 10.4% per year) and 27 had died (mortality 15.8% per year). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified a maximum thrombus dimension > or = 1.5 cm (RR 19, p = 0.002), history of thromboembolism (RR 4.2, p = 0.038), and mobile thrombus (RR 5.3, p = 0.02) as predictors of subsequent thromboembolism. Moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction was the only significant predictor of death (RR 2.9, p = 0.04). Gender, age, warfarin therapy at follow-up, atrial fibrillation, location (cavity vs appendage) of thrombus, and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast were not significant. Aggressive antithrombotic therapy may be indicated in these high-risk patients.

Evaluation of transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter in nonanticoagulated patients

This study prospectively evaluated the role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in screening for atrial thrombi before electrical cardioversion in 40 nonanticoagulated patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n = 33) or atrial flutter (n = 7). Transthoracic echocardiography did not detect atrial thrombus in any patient. TEE detected left atrial appendage thrombi in five patients (12%, p = 0.03), significantly associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p = 0.02) and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (p = 0.04). Cardioversion was cancelled in the five patients with thrombi and in two patients with spontaneous reversion before planned cardioversion. Cardioversion was successful in 25 (76%) of the 33 remaining patients. Cerebral embolism occurred 24 hours after successful cardioversion in one patient with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction, who had left atrial spontaneous echo contrast, but no thrombus was detected by TEE before cardioversion. Repeat TEE after embolism showed a fresh left atrial appendage thrombus and increased left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. These results indicate that TEE improves the detection of left atrial appendage thrombi in candidates for cardioversion, in whom the procedure may be deferred. However, the exclusion by TEE of preexisting atrial thrombi before cardioversion does not eliminate the risk of embolism after cardioversion because of persistent atrial stasis and de novo thrombosis.

Regional left ventricular wall motion assessment: comparison of two-dimensional echocardiography and radionuclide angiography with contrast angiography in healed myocardial infarction.

The diagnostic ability of radionuclide angiography (RNA) and 2-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) to assess regional left ventricular (LV) wall motion was compared with contrast angiography in 52 patients with healed myocardial infarction. After 5 patients were excluded for inadequate 2-D echocardiographic studies, the LV images of 47 patients obtained by all 3 techniques were divided into 7 segments for analysis. Both 2-D echo and RNA showed close agreement with contrast angiography in assessing normal vs abnormal wall motion in the anterobasal (91%, 91%), anterolateral (87%, 79%) and posterolateral segments (77%, 79%). The sensitivity in detecting wall motion abnormalities was highest for 2-D echo and RNA in the anterolateral (83%, 77%) and apical (95%, 84%) segments and lowest for the inferior segment (48%, 48%). Specificity of 2-D echo and RNA was high, ranging from 94% in the anterolateral segment to 71% in the septal segment for 2-D echo, and from 91% in the inferior segment to 81% in the posterobasal and septal segments for RNA. Major discrepancies with contrast angiography occurred more often in the posterobasal, posterolateral, inferior and septal LV segments. Thus, in comparison with contrast angiography, 2-D echo and RNA are reliable for detecting anterior and apical wall motion abnormalities, but relatively less sensitive for detecting wall motion abnormalities involving the inferior, posterobasal and posterolateral LV segments.

Accuracy of biplane transesophageal echocardiography in detecting left atrial thrombus

Abstract In summary, biplane TEE had a high sensitivity and specificity, but a low positive predictive accuracy, for detecting left atrial thrombus in 60 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. The high falsepositive rate observed in this study appears to reflect the difficulty in differentiating severe spontaneous echo contrast from thrombus on TEE.

Role of transoesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of aortic root abscess.

OBJECTIVE--To assess and compare the roles of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of an aortic root abscess. DESIGN--To select patients with echocardiographic diagnosis of aortic valve endocarditis with and without an aortic root abscess and correlate this with a retrospective review of surgical and necropsy data. SETTING--Tertiary referral centre at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS--34 patients with confirmed aortic valve endocarditis were treated over a four and a half year period. All patients underwent both transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography with 17 patients having biplane or multiplane imaging. RESULT--11 patients (32%) had an aortic root abscess. Transthoracic echocardiography identified four cases of aortic root abscess whereas transoesophageal echocardiography correctly detected all 11 cases and also detected complications including mitral aortic intervalvar fibrosa fistula in two patients and right atrial involvement in another two patients. Only biplane imaging was able to show an anterior aortic root abscess in one patient and the circumferential involvement of the aortic annulus in another two patients. All patients with an aortic root abscess were treated surgically after transoesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis. After operation, prosthetic aortic regurgitation was present in seven patients and a repeat operation was performed in three patients. Only transoesophageal echocardiography detected a postoperative aorto-right atrial fistula in two patients and recurrence of the root abscess in another. There were five deaths in hospital (45%). CONCLUSIONS--Compared with transthoracic echocardiography, transoesophageal echocardiography was more sensitive and more specific for the early diagnosis of aortic root abscess and its complications and facilitated both the preoperative and postoperative management of these patients. Biplane and multiplane imaging provide additional diagnostic information. All patients with suspected aortic valve endocarditis should have an early transoesophageal echocardiographic study.

Role of transoesophageal echocardiography in evaluation of cardiogenic embolism.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the value of transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it. DESIGN--Prospective comparison of the results of transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed with a 5 MHz single plane phased array transducer. SETTING--University teaching hospital. PATIENTS--100 patients referred for transoesophageal echocardiography after a cerebral ischaemic event or peripheral arterial embolism (n = 63), before percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve (n = 23), or before electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (n = 14). RESULTS--Transthoracic echocardiography showed potential sources of embolism in four patients including left ventricular thrombus in two patients (with one false positive), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 1), and patent foramen ovale (n = 1). Transoesophageal echocardiography showed 59 potential embolic sources in 45 patients including left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (n = 33), left atrial appendage thrombus (n = 13), left ventricular thrombus (n = 5), patent foramen ovale (n = 3), left ventricular spontaneous echo contrast (n = 2), mitral valve prosthesis thrombus (n = 1), mitral valve prolapse (n = 1), and pronounced aortic atheroma (n = 1). Transoesophagal echocardiography showed potential embolic sources in 36/53 (68%) patients with atrial fibrillation compared with 9/47 (19%) patients in sinus rhythm. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve was performed without embolic complications in 18 patients without left atrial thrombi and in three patients with small fixed thrombi in the left atrial appendage. It was cancelled in two patients with large thrombi in the left atrial appendage. Cardioversion was performed without embolic complications in 14 patients without left atrial thrombi. CONCLUSIONS--Transoesophageal echocardiography detects potential sources of embolism better than transthoracic echocardiography in selected patients at risk of cardiogenic embolism or after it.