Wedad Hanna

Emerging Technologies for Assessing HER2 Amplification

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)+ breast cancer are eligible for trastuzumab treatment; therefore, accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential. Until recently, only 2 methods were validated for determining the HER2 status of breast tumors in the routine diagnostic setting: immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Recently, bright-field in situ hybridization techniques such as chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH), which combine features of immunohistochemical analysis and FISH, have been introduced for the determination of HER2 status. These new techniques use a peroxidase enzyme-labeled probe with chromogenic detection, instead of a fluorescent-labeled probe, allowing results to be visualized by standard bright-field microscopy. Thus, the histologic features and HER2 status of a specimen can be evaluated in parallel. Moreover, signals do not decay over time. This review discusses recent publications regarding CISH and SISH testing, including results scoring and concordance between FISH and immunohistochemical analysis.

Chromogenic in-situ hybridization: a viable alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in the HER2 testing algorithm

Assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status is standard practice in women with breast cancer. Most laboratories use immunohistochemistry as a screening test, with equivocal results confirmed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH) is a relatively new method for detection of gene amplification using a peroxidase reaction, which can be viewed using a standard light microscope. This study was undertaken to validate CISH as a method for assessing human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 gene amplification. The gene amplification status of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 immunohistochemistry negative (0/1+, n=69; Group 1), immunohistochemistry positive (3+, n=50; Group 2) and equivocal tumor samples (2+, n=135; Group 3) was evaluated by FISH and CISH, and the concordance between FISH and CISH results calculated. In Group 1, 67/69 cases did not show amplification by CISH and 69/69 showed no amplification by FISH. Two cases were discordant; therefore, fluorescence/CISH concordance was 97%. In Group 2, 46/50 cases were amplified by FISH and 47/50 cases were amplified by CISH; three cases were not amplified by either method (immunohistochemistry false-positives). Only one case showed discordant FISH and CISH results, making the fluorescence/CISH concordance 98%. In Group 3, 89/135 cases were not amplified and 37/135 were amplified by both methods. Nine cases were discordant, giving a fluorescence/CISH concordance of 93%. The discordant cases were those with very low or borderline amplification with FISH. The high level of concordance between FISH and CISH seen in this study suggests that CISH may be a viable alternative to FISH for use in the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 testing algorithm.

Testing for HER2 status

Incorporation of a new biological marker such as HER2 into routine clinical practice requires proof that it provides reproducible information independent of, and better than, conventional pathologic criteria, and that it influences treatment decisions. In breast cancer, HER2 amplification/overexpression predicts for a poor clinical outcome and an enhanced survival benefit from the HER2-targeted therapy, Herceptin®, and may predict for resistance to some conventional therapies. Thus, HER2 is considered to be a clinically important molecule and testing for HER2 abnormalities is already part of routine patient assessment in many parts of the world. There is currently no gold standard for HER2 testing. The main challenge is to standardize and technically validate HER2 testing methodologies. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are the most common HER2 tests used, and show a high level of concordance. HER2 testing approaches based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are under extensive investigation and appear promising. A Canadian HER2 testing algorithm designed to increase the validity and reproducibility of HER2 testing has been compiled. HER2-positive cases are defined as those with >10% of tumor cells with moderate/strong, complete membrane staining in the invasive component, by IHC. Confirmatory HER2 testing using either FISH or quantitative PCR is recommended for indeterminate cases. Additional studies are required to calibrate HER2 testing results to clinical outcome.

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring study

IntroductionBefore any new methodology can be introduced into the routine diagnostic setting it must be technically validated against the established standards. To this end, a ring study involving five international pathology laboratories was initiated to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) against fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a test for assessing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer.MethodsEach laboratory performed CISH, FISH and IHC on its own samples. Unstained sections from each case were also sent to another participating laboratory for blinded retesting by CISH (outside CISH).ResultsA total of 211 invasive breast carcinoma cases were tested. In 76 cases with high amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio >4.0) by FISH, 73 cases (96%) scored positive (scores ≥ 6) by outside CISH. For FISH-negative cases (HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0), 94 of 100 cases (94%) had CISH scores indicating no amplification (score ≤ 5), and only three cases were positive by CISH; in the three remaining cases, no CISH result could be obtained. For cases with low-level amplification using FISH (HER2/CEP17 ratio 2.0–4.0), 20 of 35 had CISH scores indicating gene amplification. Inter-laboratory concordance was also very high: 95% for normal HER2 copy number (1–5 copies); and 92% for cases with HER2 copy numbers ≥ 6. CISH intra-laboratory concordance with IHC was 92% for IHC-negative cases (IHC 0/1+) and 91% for IHC 3+ cases. Among IHC 2+ cases, CISH was 100% concordant with samples showing high amplification by FISH, and 94% concordant with FISH-negative samples.ConclusionThese results show that CISH inter- and intra-laboratory concordance to FISH and IHC is very high, even in equivocal IHC 2+ cases. Therefore, we conclude that CISH is a methodology that is a viable alternative to FISH in the HER2 testing algorithm.

Comparison of Two Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for Detecting HER2/neu Amplification

Two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for HER2/neu gene quantification were evaluated for implementation into a clinical laboratory. Assays were developed using sequence-specific hybridization probes to detect a target (HER2/neu) and a reference gene (beta-globin) simultaneously. One method utilizes real-time quantification while the second uses internal competitors and melting curves to quantify the unknown sample. These two methods were evaluated using three cell lines and 97 breast tumor samples. Two hundred ninety-four samples were subsequently evaluated using the real-time quantification and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Real-time PCR gave HER2/neu gene doses of 10 for SKBR3 and 2 for T47D while the competitive PCR gave doses of 11 for SKBR3 and 2.2 for T47D. Both methods produced coefficients of variation (CV) of less than 3% for within-run and less than 6% for between-run analysis. Examination of 97 breast tumors found a correlation of r = 0.974 between the two methods. IHC and PCR results agreed for 234 of the subsequent 294 samples analyzed (79% concordance). A subset of ten discrepant samples was microdissected. After microdissection all ten were positive by PCR, thus resolving the discrepancy. Real-time quantification and microdissection is useful clinically for HER2/neu quantification. Its ease of use and broad dynamic range allows screening for amplification of HER2/neu.

RT-PCR amplification of CK19 mRNA in the blood of breast cancer patients: correlation with established prognostic parameters

We optimized the assay for detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA by the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in blood as an index of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer patients. The limit of detection of <1 MCF7 tumor cells per 106 peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) was achieved in mixing experiments. We did not detect CKl9 mRNA in control bloods (0/30) or in the blood of patients with benign breast disease (0/15). In blood samples from 109 patients with invasive breast cancer, CK19 mRNA was detected in 7/23 patients with node-negative disease, in 21/58 with node-positive disease, and in 20/28 with distant metastases. There was a significant association (P<0.01) of CK19 positivity with distant metastatic versus both node-negative and node-positive disease, but not with any other histopathological parameter examined. In a small number of patients with distant metastases, increased intensity of the CK19 RT-PCR signal was associated with a reduced survival.

The Role of HER‐2/neu Oncogene and Vimentin Filaments in the Production of the Paget's Phenotype

Abstract:u2003 The histogenesis as well as the biological and molecular differences in mammary Pagets disease (MPD) and extramammary Pagets disease (EPD) are not well understood. HER‐2/neu oncogene overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. It is also believed that the spread of Pagets cells through the epidermis is induced by a motility factor that acts via the HER‐2/neu receptor. However, previous studies on HER‐2/neu expression in MPD and EPD have given conflicting results. Recent studies have suggested that vimentin expression in breast cancer confers a more aggressive phenotype with a possible role in tumor invasion and metastasis. We examined 58 cases of MPD and EPD for HER‐2/neu overexpression and vimentin status to study the role of these markers in the production of the Pagets phenotype. Thirty‐five of the 38 cases (92.1%) of MPD were associated with an underlying carcinoma, while none of the cases of EPD were associated with an underlying malignancy. Thirty‐six of the 38 cases of MPD (94.7%) overexpressed the HER‐2/neu oncoprotein and 17 cases (44.7%) showed vimentin expression. In contrast, only 1 of the 20 cases of EPD (5%) showed positivity for HER‐2/neu oncoprotein and all were negative for vimentin. Our results indicate that the cell motility enhancing effect of HER‐2/neu oncoprotein and possibly vimentin plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of MPD which appears to be a pagetoid spread of an underlying ductal malignancy (secondary), while EPD is an in situ malignant transformation of a totipotential epidermal cell or glandular epithelium.u2002

Is expert breast pathology assessment necessary for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ

AbstractBackground.Current guidelines include a recommendation that a pathologist with expertise in breast disease review all ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) specimens due to the presence of significant variability in pathologic reporting of DCIS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of pathologic reporting of DCIS over the past decade and to determine the current impact of expert breast pathology assessment on the management of DCIS.nMethods.All patients with a diagnosis of DCIS referred to a single regional cancer centre between 1982 and 2000 have been reviewed. Inter-observer variability between initial and secondary reports has been evaluated using kappa statistics. For each case, the Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) using pathologic data obtained from the initial and reviewed pathology reports were compared. The impact of expert breast pathology on risk assessment and treatment was determined.nResults.481 individuals with DCIS were referred and pathology review was performed on 350 patients (73%). Inter-observer agreement was high for the main pathologic features of DCIS. From 1996 to 2000, secondary pathology assessments lead to a change in the assessment of local recurrence risk in 100 cases (29%) and contributed to a change in treatment recommendation in 93 (43%) cases.nConclusionExpert breast pathology assessments continue to be necessary in the management of DCIS

Aggressive Giant Fibroepithelial Lesion with Unusual Vascular Stroma—A Case Report

The stroma of fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor usually consists of fibroblastic proliferation. Rarely the stroma contains bundles of smooth muscle. Pseudoangiomatous hyperplasia of the mammary stroma has been described in fibroadenomas. However, true benign vascular stroma has not been reported. We report a case of a 34-year-old Chinese woman who presented with a large mass occupying the entire left breast. Left mastectomy was performed and showed a large, well-circumscribed, lobulated, rubbery-firm tumor measuring 13 × 10 × 6 cm. Microscopic examination revealed a fibroepithelial tumor formed by an organoid pattern of ductal structures with a very striking stromal appearance composed of extensive vascular proliferation and that demonstrated strong immunoreactivity for CD31, CD34, and Factor VIII. Ultrastructural examination revealed intercellular junctions, basal lamina, pinocytotic vesicles, and Weibel-Palade bodies in the cells lining the vascular spaces, confirming their endothelial nature. These findings rule out the diagnosis of pseudoangiomatous hyperplasia. The patient developed local recurrence a year later, and the resection showed malignant phyllodes tumor with ductal carcinoma in situ. The extensive vascular stroma noted in the primary tumor may have played a role in the malignant transformation of the epithelial and stromal components in this tumor.

Cutaneous malakoplakia masquerading as pyoderma gangrenosum.

Cutaneous malakoplakia is a rare infection‐related granulomatous disease frequently associated with immunocompromised states. Foamy macrophages containing basophilic granules, called the Michaelis–Gutman bodies, are pathognomonic. We report a case of cutaneous malakoplakia in a 77‐year‐old male with pyoderma gangrenosum and a 2‐year history of a non‐healing malleolar ulcer treated successfully with cotrimoxazole.