Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Weile Wang is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Weile Wang.


Journal of Climate | 2007

Climate Response to Rapid Urban Growth: Evidence of a Human-Induced Precipitation Deficit

Robert K. Kaufmann; Karen C. Seto; Annemarie Schneider; Zouting Liu; Liming Zhou; Weile Wang

Abstract The authors establish the effect of urbanization on precipitation in the Pearl River Delta of China with data from an annual land use map (1988–96) derived from Landsat images and monthly climate data from 16 local meteorological stations. A statistical analysis of the relationship between climate and urban land use in concentric buffers around the stations indicates that there is a causal relationship from temporal and spatial patterns of urbanization to temporal and spatial patterns of precipitation during the dry season. Results suggest an urban precipitation deficit in which urbanization reduces local precipitation. This reduction may be caused by changes in surface hydrology that extend beyond the urban heat island effect and energy-related aerosol emissions.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Variations in atmospheric CO2 growth rates coupled with tropical temperature

Weile Wang; Philippe Ciais; Ramakrishna R. Nemani; Josep G. Canadell; Shilong Piao; Stephen Sitch; Michael A. White; Hirofumi Hashimoto; Cristina Milesi; Ranga B. Myneni

Previous studies have highlighted the occurrence and intensity of El Niño–Southern Oscillation as important drivers of the interannual variability of the atmospheric CO2 growth rate, but the underlying biogeophysical mechanisms governing such connections remain unclear. Here we show a strong and persistent coupling (r2 ≈ 0.50) between interannual variations of the CO2 growth rate and tropical land–surface air temperature during 1959 to 2011, with a 1 °C tropical temperature anomaly leading to a 3.5 ± 0.6 Petagrams of carbon per year (PgC/y) CO2 growth-rate anomaly on average. Analysis of simulation results from Dynamic Global Vegetation Models suggests that this temperature–CO2 coupling is contributed mainly by the additive responses of heterotrophic respiration (Rh) and net primary production (NPP) to temperature variations in tropical ecosystems. However, we find a weaker and less consistent (r2 ≈ 0.25) interannual coupling between CO2 growth rate and tropical land precipitation than diagnosed from the Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, likely resulting from the subtractive responses of tropical Rh and NPP to precipitation anomalies that partly offset each other in the net ecosystem exchange (i.e., net ecosystem exchange ≈ Rh − NPP). Variations in other climate variables (e.g., large-scale cloudiness) and natural disturbances (e.g., volcanic eruptions) may induce transient reductions in the temperature–CO2 coupling, but the relationship is robust during the past 50 y and shows full recovery within a few years after any such major variability event. Therefore, it provides an important diagnostic tool for improved understanding of the contemporary and future global carbon cycle.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2015

Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions

Hanqin Tian; Chaoqun Lu; Jia Yang; Kamaljit Banger; Deborah N. Huntzinger; Christopher R. Schwalm; Anna M. Michalak; R. B. Cook; Philippe Ciais; Daniel J. Hayes; Maoyi Huang; Akihiko Ito; Atul K. Jain; Huimin Lei; Jiafu Mao; Shufen Pan; Wilfred M. Post; Shushi Peng; Benjamin Poulter; Wei Ren; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Kevin Schaefer; Xiaoying Shi; Bo Tao; Weile Wang; Yaxing Wei; Qichun Yang; Bowen Zhang; Ning Zeng

Abstract Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration and climate change. In the past decades, a wide variety of studies have been conducted to quantify global SOC stocks and soil C exchange with the atmosphere through site measurements, inventories, and empirical/process‐based modeling. However, these estimates are highly uncertain, and identifying major driving forces controlling soil C dynamics remains a key research challenge. This study has compiled century‐long (1901–2010) estimates of SOC storage and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 10 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) in the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project and two observation‐based data sets. The 10 TBM ensemble shows that global SOC estimate ranges from 425 to 2111 Pg C (1 Pg = 1015 g) with a median value of 1158 Pg C in 2010. The models estimate a broad range of Rh from 35 to 69 Pg C yr−1 with a median value of 51 Pg C yr−1 during 2001–2010. The largest uncertainty in SOC stocks exists in the 40–65°N latitude whereas the largest cross‐model divergence in Rh are in the tropics. The modeled SOC change during 1901–2010 ranges from −70 Pg C to 86 Pg C, but in some models the SOC change has a different sign from the change of total C stock, implying very different contribution of vegetation and soil pools in determining the terrestrial C budget among models. The model ensemble‐estimated mean residence time of SOC shows a reduction of 3.4 years over the past century, which accelerate C cycling through the land biosphere. All the models agreed that climate and land use changes decreased SOC stocks, while elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen deposition over intact ecosystems increased SOC stocks—even though the responses varied significantly among models. Model representations of temperature and moisture sensitivity, nutrient limitation, and land use partially explain the divergent estimates of global SOC stocks and soil C fluxes in this study. In addition, a major source of systematic error in model estimations relates to nonmodeled SOC storage in wetlands and peatlands, as well as to old C storage in deep soil layers.


Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union | 2013

Downscaled Climate Projections Suitable for Resource Management

Bridget Thrasher; Jun Xiong; Weile Wang; Forrest Melton; A. R. Michaelis; Ramakrishna R. Nemani

The general circulation model (GCM) experiments conducted under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) [Taylor et al., 2012], which is being conducted in preparation for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes Fifth Assessment Report, provide fundamental data sets for assessing the effects of global climate change. However, efforts to assess regional or local effects of the projected changes in climate are often impeded by the coarse spatial resolution of the GCM outputs, as well as potential local or regional biases in GCM outputs [Fowler et al., 2007].


Environmental Research Letters | 2015

Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends

Jiafu Mao; Wenting Fu; Xiaoying Shi; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Joshua B. Fisher; Robert E. Dickinson; Yaxing Wei; Willis Shem; Shilong Piao; Kaicun Wang; Christopher R. Schwalm; Hanqin Tian; Mingquan Mu; Altaf Arain; Philippe Ciais; R. B. Cook; Yongjiu Dai; Daniel J. Hayes; Forrest M. Hoffman; Maoyi Huang; Suo Huang; Deborah N. Huntzinger; Akihiko Ito; Atul K. Jain; Anthony W. King; Huimin Lei; Chaoqun Lu; Anna M. Michalak; N. C. Parazoo; Changhui Peng

We examined natural and anthropogenic controls on terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) changes from 1982 to 2010 using multiple estimates from remote sensing-based datasets and process-oriented land surface models. A significant increasing trend of ET in each hemisphere was consistently revealed by observationally-constrained data and multi-model ensembles that considered historic natural and anthropogenic drivers. The climate impacts were simulated to determine the spatiotemporal variations in ET. Globally, rising CO2 ranked second in these models after the predominant climatic influences, and yielded decreasing trends in canopy transpiration and ET, especially for tropical forests and high-latitude shrub land. Increasing nitrogen deposition slightly amplified global ET via enhanced plant growth. Land-use-induced ET responses, albeit with substantial uncertainties across the factorial analysis, were minor globally, but pronounced locally, particularly over regions with intensive land-cover changes. Our study highlights the importance of employing multi-stream ET and ET-component estimates to quantify the strengthening anthropogenic fingerprint in the global hydrologic cycle.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2014

Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data

Jakob Zscheischler; Anna M. Michalak; Christopher R. Schwalm; Miguel D. Mahecha; Deborah N. Huntzinger; Markus Reichstein; Gwenaëlle Berthier; Philippe Ciais; R. B. Cook; Bassil El-Masri; Maoyi Huang; Akihiko Ito; Atul K. Jain; Anthony W. King; Huimin Lei; Chaoqun Lu; Jiafu Mao; Shushi Peng; Benjamin Poulter; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Xiaoying Shi; Bo Tao; Hanqin Tian; Nicolas Viovy; Weile Wang; Yaxing Wei; Jia Yang; Ning Zeng

Understanding the role of climate extremes and their impact on the carbon (C) cycle is increasingly a focus of Earth system science. Climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves, or heavy precipitation events can cause substantial changes in terrestrial C fluxes. On the other hand, extreme changes in C fluxes are often, but not always, driven by extreme climate conditions. Here we present an analysis of how extremes in temperature and precipitation, and extreme changes in terrestrial C fluxes are related to each other in 10 state-of-the-art terrestrial carbon models, all driven by the same climate forcing. We use model outputs from the North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). A global-scale analysis shows that both droughts and heat waves translate into anomalous net releases of CO2 from the land surface via different mechanisms: Droughts largely decrease gross primary production (GPP) and to a lower extent total respiration (TR), while heat waves slightly decrease GPP but increase TR. Cold and wet periods have a smaller opposite effect. Analyzing extremes in C fluxes reveals that extreme changes in GPP and TR are often caused by strong shifts in water availability, but for extremes in TR shifts in temperature are also important. Extremes in net CO2 exchange are equally strongly driven by deviations in temperature and precipitation. Models mostly agree on the sign of the C flux response to climate extremes, but model spread is large. In tropical forests, C cycle extremes are driven by water availability, whereas in boreal forests temperature plays a more important role. Models are particularly uncertain about the C flux response to extreme heat in boreal forests.


Remote Sensing | 2012

Exploring Simple Algorithms for Estimating Gross Primary Production in Forested Areas from Satellite Data

Hirofumi Hashimoto; Weile Wang; Cristina Milesi; Michael A. White; Sangram Ganguly; Minoru Gamo; Ryuichi Hirata; Ranga B. Myneni; Ramakrishna R. Nemani

Algorithms that use remotely-sensed vegetation indices to estimate gross primary production (GPP), a key component of the global carbon cycle, have gained a lot of popularity in the past decade. Yet despite the amount of research on the topic, the most appropriate approach is still under debate. As an attempt to address this question, we compared the performance of different vegetation indices from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) in capturing the seasonal and the annual variability of GPP estimates from an optimal network of 21 FLUXNET forest towers sites. The tested indices include the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation absorbed by plant canopies (FPAR). Our results indicated that single vegetation indices captured 50–80% of the variability of tower-estimated GPP, but no one index performed universally well in all situations. In particular, EVI outperformed the other MODIS products in tracking seasonal variations in tower-estimated GPP, but annual mean MODIS LAI was the best estimator of the spatial distribution of annual flux-tower GPP (GPP = 615 × LAI − 376, where GPP is in g C/m2/year). This simple algorithm rehabilitated earlier approaches linking ground measurements of LAI to flux-tower estimates of GPP and produced annual GPP estimates comparable to the MODIS 17 GPP product. As such, remote sensing-based estimates of GPP continue to offer a useful alternative to estimates from biophysical models, and the choice of the most appropriate approach depends on whether the estimates are required at annual or sub-annual temporal resolution.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2015

Toward “optimal” integration of terrestrial biosphere models

Christopher R. Schwalm; Deborah N. Huntzinger; Joshua B. Fisher; Anna M. Michalak; Kevin W. Bowman; Philippe Ciais; R. B. Cook; Bassil El-Masri; Daniel J. Hayes; Maoyi Huang; Akihiko Ito; Atul K. Jain; Anthony W. King; Huimin Lei; Junjie Liu; Chaoqun Lu; Jiafu Mao; Shushi Peng; Benjamin Poulter; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Kevin Schaefer; Xiaoying Shi; Bo Tao; Hanqin Tian; Weile Wang; Yaxing Wei; Jia Yang; Ning Zeng

Multimodel ensembles (MME) are commonplace in Earth system modeling. Here we perform MME integration using a 10-member ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) from the Multiscale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP). We contrast optimal (skill based for present-day carbon cycling) versus naive (“one model-one vote”) integration. MsTMIP optimal and naive mean land sink strength estimates (−1.16 versus −1.15 Pg C per annum respectively) are statistically indistinguishable. This holds also for grid cell values and extends to gross uptake, biomass, and net ecosystem productivity. TBM skill is similarly indistinguishable. The added complexity of skill-based integration does not materially change MME values. This suggests that carbon metabolism has predictability limits and/or that all models and references are misspecified. Resolving this issue requires addressing specific uncertainty types (initial conditions, structure, and references) and a change in model development paradigms currently dominant in the TBM community.


Remote Sensing | 2013

Structural Uncertainty in Model-Simulated Trends of Global Gross Primary Production

Hirofumi Hashimoto; Weile Wang; Cristina Milesi; Jun Xiong; Sangram Ganguly; Zaichun Zhu; Ramakrishna R. Nemani

Projected changes in the frequency and severity of droughts as a result of increase in greenhouse gases have a significant impact on the role of vegetation in regulating the global carbon cycle. Drought effect on vegetation Gross Primary Production (GPP) is usually modeled as a function of Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD) and/or soil moisture. Climate projections suggest a strong likelihood of increasing trend in VPD, while regional changes in precipitation are less certain. This difference in projections between VPD and precipitation can cause considerable discrepancies in the predictions of vegetation behavior depending on how ecosystem models represent the drought effect. In this study, we scrutinized the model responses to drought using the 30-year record of Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) 3g Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) dataset. A diagnostic ecosystem model, Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System (TOPS), was used to estimate global GPP from 1982 to 2009 under nine different experimental simulations. The control run of global GPP increased until 2000, but stayed constant after 2000. Among the simulations with single climate constraint (temperature, VPD, rainfall and solar radiation), only the VPD-driven simulation showed a decrease in 2000s, while the other scenarios simulated an increase in GPP. The diverging responses in 2000s can be attributed to the difference in the representation of the impact of water stress on vegetation in models, i.e., using VPD and/or precipitation. Spatial map of trend in simulated GPP using GIMMS 3g data is consistent with the GPP driven by soil moisture than the GPP driven by VPD, confirming the need for a soil moisture constraint in modeling global GPP.


Scientific Reports | 2017

Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

Deborah N. Huntzinger; Anna M. Michalak; Christopher R. Schwalm; P. Ciais; Anthony W. King; Yuanyuan Fang; Kevin Schaefer; Yaxing Wei; R. B. Cook; Joshua B. Fisher; Daniel J. Hayes; Maoyi Huang; Akihiko Ito; Atul K. Jain; Huimin Lei; Chaoqun Lu; F. Maignan; Jiafu Mao; N. C. Parazoo; Shushi Peng; Benjamin Poulter; Daniel M. Ricciuto; Xiaoying Shi; Hanqin Tian; Weile Wang; Ning Zeng; Fang Zhao

Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

Collaboration


Dive into the Weile Wang's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna M. Michalak

Carnegie Institution for Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin Poulter

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge