Wen Ching Lo

Role of Intravenous Omeprazole in Patients with High-Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding After Successful Endoscopic Epinephrine Injection: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

BACKGROUND:Epinephrine injection is the most common endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Controversy exists concerning the optimal dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after successful endoscopic therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal dose of PPI after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.METHODS:A total of 200 peptic ulcer patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels (NBVV) who had obtained initial hemostasis with endoscopic injection of epinephrine were randomized to receive omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h, omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 12 h or cimetidine (CIM) 400 mg infusion every 12 h. Outcomes were checked at 14 days after enrollment.RESULTS:Rebleeding episodes were fewer in the group with omeprazole 40 mg infusion every 6 h (6/67, 9%) as compared with that of the CIM infusion group (22/67, 32.8%, p < 0.01). The volume of blood transfusion was less in the group with omeprazole 40 mg every 6 h than in those groups with omepraole 40 mg infusion every 12 h (P = 0.001) and CIM 400 mg infusion every 12 h (p < 0.001). The hospital stay, number of patients requiring urgent operation, and death rate were not statistically different among the three groups.CONCLUSION:A combination of endoscopic epinephrine injection and a large dose of omeprazole infusion is superior to combined endoscopic epinephrine injection with CIM infusion for preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcers with active bleeding or NBVV.

Endoscopic hemoclip versus triclip placement in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND:Hemoclip placement is an effective endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Triclip is a novel clipping device with three prongs over the distal end. So far, there is no clinical study concerning the hemostatic effect of triclip placement.AIM:To determine the hemostatic effect of the triclip as compared with that of the hemoclip.METHODS:A total of 100 peptic ulcer patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels received endoscopic therapy with either hemoclip (N = 50) or triclip placement (N = 50). After obtaining initial hemostasis, they received omeprazole 40 mg intravenous infusion every 12 h for 3 days. The main outcome assessment was hemostatic rate and rebleeding rate at 14 days.RESULTS:Initial hemostasis was obtained in 47 patients (94%) of the hemoclip group and in 38 patients (76%) of the triclip group (P = 0.011). Rebleeding episodes, volume of blood transfusion, the hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent operation, and mortality were not statistically different between the two groups.CONCLUSION:Hemoclip is superior to triclip in obtaining primary hemostasis in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. In bleeders located over difficult-to-approach sites, hemoclip is more ideal than triclip.

Predictive factors for rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after multipolar electrocoagulation: a retrospective analysis.

The role of endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding is well-documented. Nevertheless, rebleeding occurs in 10% to 30% of patients, and such patients are at high risk for death without early retreatment or definitive surgery. The aim of our study was to predict which patients would rebleed within 1 month after successful multipolar electrocoagulation of 100 patients with active peptic ulcer bleeding (spurting, oozing, or nonbleeding visible vessel). We had achieved initial hemostasis in 97 patients and carried out univariate and multivariate analyses to predict which patients would rebleed. Rebleeding occurred within 1 month in 17 (17.5%) patients. we correlated 20 clinical and endoscopic factors with rebleeding episodes. With univariate analysis, blood transfusion of 500 ml or more at entry (p < 0.0001) and use of cimetidine (p = 0.01) were statistically significant for rebleeding. With multivariate analysis, use of omeprazole was an independent factor for preventing rebleeding (odds ratio, 7.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.642-35.929). We suggest that omeprazole may help to prevent rebleeding in patients who have had hemostasis with multipolar electrocoagulation.

Gastric secretion in Chinese patients with cirrhosis

The role of gastric secretion has been controversial in patients with cirrhosis. Except for studies of gastric secretion in cirrhotic patients who underwent a shunt operation, there is no report correlating gastric secretion with portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. In this study, we evaluated gastric secretion in cirrhotic patients and correlated it with hemodynamic parameters. Within 12 months, 20 normal volunteers and 16 cirrhotic patients were enrolled. Gastric secretion was assessed in all patients, but portal pressure hemodynamic studies were performed only in cirrhotic patients. We found that the median basal acid output, maximal acid output, and basal pepsin output in the controls (1.41 mmol/h, 9.2 mmol/h, and 0.02 mg/h, respectively) and in the cirrhotic patients (0.6 mmol/h, 7.84 mmol/h, and 1.5 mg/h, respectively) were not statistically different. However, maximal pepsin output was lower in the cirrhotic patients (1.5 mg/h) than in the normal subjects (5.14 mg/h) (p < 0.05). Gastric secretion correlated poorly with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and the presence of congestive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients. The severity of congestive gastropathy correlated poorly with HVPG. Helicobacter pylori has difficulty replicating in the stomach when HVPG is > 14 mm Hg. We conclude that patients with cirrhosis have a lower maximal pepsin output than that of the healthy subjects. Gastric secretion correlates poorly with HVPG and the presence of congestive gastropathy in patients with cirrhosis.