Wendy Ansell

Stilboestrol plus adrenal suppression as salvage treatment for patients failing treatment with luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone analogues and orchidectomy

Objective To investigate the efficacy of low‐dose stilboestrol (SB) with hydrocortisone in patients with advanced prostate cancer refractory to androgen suppression.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer Managed with Intermittent Androgen Suppression

Objectives: To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with prostate cancer managed with intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) following their enrolment in an open, non-randomised feasibility study initiated 10 years ago. Patients and Methods: Patients with prostate cancer who developed marked side effects following androgen deprivation were considered for entry into the study. All patients were required to have been managed with androgen deprivation for a minimum of 9 months and to have achieved PSA remissions to levels <4 ng/ml or falls to greater than 90% of pre-treatment levels. Patients remained off treatment until PSA values rose to >20 ng/ml or individuals became symptomatic – at which stage a 9-month cycle of androgen suppression was repeated. Such on-off cycling continued until hormone-resistant disease developed and patients proceeded (off trial) to second-line therapies. Results: 75 patients were recruited to the study following an initial referral with treatment-related side effects specifically associated with androgen deprivation. 86% of these remain alive at a median of 134 months (11 years) since initial histological diagnosis. Survival times and times to hormone resistance (from first cycle hormone deprivation) have also been calculated. Overall there is a median survival time of 95 months (8 years) from initial (first-cycle) androgen deprivation in those presenting with localised or locally advanced disease and a median survival time of 87 months (7 years) for those presenting with metastatic disease. There exists a median of 83 months to hormone resistance in the localised and locally advanced group and a median of 50 months in those presenting with metastatic disease. We have calculated a 100% 5-year actuarial survival rate for those presenting with localised or locally advanced disease (from time of first cycle hormone ablation) and a 70% 5-year actuarial survival rate for those presenting with metastatic. Conclusions: Long-term outcome figures and actuarial survival rates presented here provide further support for a pulsed or intermittent approach to androgen ablation in patients with prostate cancer. In addition, they serve as valuable extended outcome data for patients managed in this way. Likewise, data presented here suggests that apparent survival advantages appear related, at least in part, to a delay in the onset of androgen resistance and that such a management approach is both safe and effective in those presenting with both metastatic disease as well as those with more localised pathology.

A phase II study investigating the re-induction of endocrine sensitivity following chemotherapy in androgen-independent prostate cancer

When chemotherapy is used in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC), androgen deprivation is continued despite its failure. In this study, we investigated whether it was possible to re-induce hormone sensitivity in previously castrate patients by stopping endocrine therapy during chemotherapy. A phase II prospective study investigated the effects of reintroduction of endocrine therapy after oral chemotherapy in 56 patients with AIPC, which was given without concurrent androgen deprivation. After chemotherapy, patients were given maximum androgen blockade until failure when treatment was switched to diethylstilbestrol and dexamethasone. Patients had already received these endocrine treatments in the same sequence before chemotherapy. All patients were castrate at the start of chemotherapy. Forty-three subsequently restarted endocrine therapy after the completion of chemotherapy. The median overall survival for these 43 patients from the time of restarting endocrine therapy was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7–10.9 months). Sixteen (37%) patients had a 50% PSA response to treatment, which was associated with improved overall survival (14.0 months vs 3.7 months P=0.003). Eight out of 12 patients who did not respond to diethylstilbestrol before chemotherapy did so post chemotherapy. Re-induction of hormone sensitivity can occur after chemotherapy in AIPC.

Chlorambucil and lomustine (CL56) in absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer: re-induction of endocrine sensitivity an unexpected finding

The management of androgen independent prostate cancer is increasingly disputed. Diethylstilbestrol and steroids have useful second-line activity in its management. The value of chemotherapy still remains contentious. This paper reports a phase 2 study of two orally active chemotherapy drugs in patients who are absolutely hormone refractory having failed primary androgen blockade and combined oestrogens and corticosteroids. In total, 37 patients who were biochemically castrate with absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer and performance status of 0–3 were enrolled. Therapy consisted of chlorambucil 1 mg kg−1 given as 6 mg a day until the total dose was reached and lomustine 2 mg kg−1 given every 56 days (CL56). During this time all hormone therapy was stopped. One patient normalised his PSA with a further two having a greater than 50% decline leading to an objective response rate of 10%. The median time to progression was 3.6 months with an overall survival of 7.1 months. The median survival of this group of patients from first becoming androgen independent was 23.5 months. Eight of 17 (47%) patients who were subsequently re-challenged with hormonal therapy following failure of chemotherapy had a further PSA reduction, three (17%) of which were >50%. The median progression-free interval for the eight patients was 4 months. In conclusion, CL56 has a low objective response rate in the management of absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer. Toxicity was mild. Re-induction of hormone sensitivity following failure of chemotherapy was an unexpected finding that requires further study.

GAMEC – a new intensive protocol for untreated poor prognosis and relapsed or refractory germ cell tumours

There is no consensus as to the management of untreated poor prognosis or relapsed/refractory germ cell tumours. We have studied an intensive cisplatin-based regimen that incorporates high-dose methotrexate (HD MTX) and actinomycin-D and etoposide every 14 days (GAMEC). Sixty-two patients were enrolled in a phase 2 study including 27 who were untreated (IGCCCG, poor prognosis) and 35 with progression despite conventional platinum based chemotherapy. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were correlated with standard outcome measures. Twenty of the untreated patients were progression free following GAMEC and appropriate surgery, as were 18 individuals in the pretreated group. None of the established prognostic factors for therapy for pretreated patients could identify a poor-prognosis group. Five out of nine late relapses to prior chemotherapy were progression free following GAMEC and appropriate surgery. All patients had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia and there were five (8%) treatment-related deaths. PK values were not predictive of efficacy or toxicity, although the dose intensity in the pretreated group of patients, especially of HD MTX, was significantly correlated with progression-free survival (PFS). GAMEC is a novel intensive regimen for this group of patients producing encouraging responses, although with significant toxicity. For those in whom it fails, further therapy is still possible with durable responses being seen.

IPM chemotherapy in cytokine refractory renal cell cancer.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is notoriously chemoresistant. Current management of metastatic disease usually includes immunological agents of which the most clearly evaluated is alpha interferon. Following the failure of such agents no clear second-line therapy exists. The use of a novel combination of cisplatin, irinotecan and mitomycin may offer some palliative benefit in this situation. Thirty-three patients with cytokine refractory RCC and documented progression and documented active progressive disease with performance status 0–3 were enrolled. Therapy consisted of cisplatin 40 mg m−2 on day 1 and day 15, irinotecan 100 mg m−2 on day 1 and day 15, and mitomycin 6 mg m−2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The results showed that one patient (3%) had a partial response, eight (24%) had minor responses and nine (27%) had stable disease, overall 61% had symptomatic responses. Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment did not change significantly during therapy. Seventy-one percent of those who had primary refractory disease to cytokine therapy subsequently responded to IPM. The median progression-free interval was 4.8 months in this cohort on chemotherapy, compared to 3.9 months with their previous cytokine treatment. In conclusion, IPM produced symptomatic relief for a majority of patients with cytokine refractory RCC without any deterioration in QOL. Disease stabilisation on radiological assessment and symptomatic improvement were associated with prolonged survival. A degree of non-crossresistance to cytokine therapy was seen. IPM may be considered in patients with renal cancer following failure of cytokines.

Bone metastases in germ cell tumours: lessons learnt from a large retrospective study.

To determine the characteristics of patients with germ cell cancer and bone metastases.

Carboplatin AUC 10 for IGCCCG good prognosis metastatic seminoma

Abstract Objective. Metastatic seminoma is a highly curable disease. Standard treatment comprises of combination chemotherapy. The short- and long-term toxicities of this treatment are increasingly recognised and the possibility of over treatment in such a curable disease should be considered. We have therefore assessed the use of single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 in patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma. Materials and methods. Patients with good prognosis metastatic seminoma treated with carboplatin (AUC 10) were identified at our institution and affiliated institutions. Treatment was three weekly for a total of three or four cycles. Outcome and toxicities were analysed. Results. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 61 patients in total were treated with carboplatin AUC 10, all good prognosis by the IGCCCG criteria. Forty-eight percent had stage IIA/IIB disease and 52% had greater than stage IIB disease. Thirty-one patients (51%) had a complete response following treatment. Three-year survival was 96.3% with a three-year progression free survival of 93.2%. The main treatment toxicity was haematological with 46% having grade 3, 24% having grade 4 neutropenia and 54% experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion. Single agent carboplatin at a dose of AUC 10 is an effective treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma. The outcome compares favourably to previously published outcomes of combination chemotherapy. Although haematological toxicity is a concern, single agent carboplatin treatment for good prognosis metastatic seminoma could be considered a treatment option and is associated with less toxicity than combination regimens currently used.

Single-agent carboplatin AUC10 for metastatic seminoma with IGCCCG good prognosis disease; a feasibility study of the Orchid Clinical Trials Group

Patients with metastatic seminoma exhibit excellent long-term cure rates [1], with the focus of recent investigations being the reduction of toxicity associated with standard cisplatinbased combination regimens. Carboplatin, a cisplatin analogue with improved toxicity profile, has been examined by a number of metastatic seminoma studies [2–7]. These have generally concluded that although progression-free survival is inferior to that seen with standard therapy, overall survival does not differ due to effective salvage treatment and toxicity is substantially reduced. The aim of this study was to assess higher doses of carboplatin monotherapy in order to improve efficacy while maintaining minimal toxicity.

The efficacy of tacrolimus and sirolimus in heavily pre-treated unresectable thymic malignancies.

BACKGROUND Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, although uncommon, constitute a significant proportion of anterior mediastinal tumours. Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for inoperable or recurrent disease, but immunosuppressive therapy may provide an alternative treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We present a series of 18 patients diagnosed with unresectable thymic tumours, of which eight received immunosuppressive therapy following relapse after chemotherapy. RESULTS Eight individuals were treated with primary immunotherapy after a median of 3.5 lines of chemotherapy (range 2-6 lines), of which 3 had confirmed myasthenia gravis (MG). After 3 months, 2 patients achieved a radiological partial response and 4 had stable disease. The median time to progression measured 6.8 months (CI 1.4-19.3 months). Two of the 4 patients who progressed on tacrolimus and prednisolone received sirolimus. One of these patients has stable disease (SD) at 21 months, and the other has SD at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS Although previous case reports have related tacrolimus therapy with tumour shrinkage in patients with MG-associated invasive thymomas, these data are the first to demonstrate the efficacy of such immunosuppressive agents in a larger cohort of heavily pre-treated patients with thymic tumours. Our experience adds to the limited anecdotal evidence in the literature, and suggests that immunosuppressive agents represent a valuable additional treatment for thymic tumours.