Wendy M. Kersemaekers

Male Hormonal Contraception: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND This study was performed to assess spermatogenesis suppression and safety of a new combination of an etonogestrel (ENG) implant combined with testosterone undecanoate (TU) injections for male contraception. This is the first large placebo-controlled study for male hormonal contraception. DESIGN AND STUDY SUBJECTS In this double-blind, multicenter study, we randomly assigned 354 healthy men to receive either a low- or high-release ENG implant sc combined with im TU injections (750 mg every 10 or 12 wk or 1000 mg every 12 wk) or placebo implant and injections. Treatment duration was 42 or 44 wk and posttreatment follow-up at least 24 wk. RESULTS Overall, spermatogenesis was suppressed to 1 million/ml or less at wk 16 in 89% of men, with approximately 94% in two high-release ENG groups. Suppression was maintained up to the end of the treatment period in 91% of men. For all men who completed the treatment period, 3% never achieved 1 million/ml or less. Median recovery time to a sperm concentration above 20 million/ml was 15 wk (mean 17 wk, 95% confidence interval 16-18 wk). Treatment was well tolerated. As compared with the placebo group, more men in the active treatment groups reported adverse events such as weight gain, mood changes, acne, sweating, or libido change. For both spermatogenesis suppression and safety, differences were small between the active treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS The combination of an ENG implant with TU injections is a well-tolerated male hormonal method, providing effective and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis. Although the results are good, there is still room for improvement, possibly by adjusting the dose regimen or changing the mode of application.

A comparative study of breast cell proliferation during hormone replacement therapy : effects of tibolon and continuous combined estrogen-progestogen treatment

Objective To use the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy technique to compare the effects of tibolone, conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and placebo on breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women. Methods A total of 91 women were randomized to receive either estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA), tibolone 2.5 mg or placebo for 6 months in a prospective double-blind trial. Breast cell proliferation was assessed using the Ki-67/MIB-1 monoclonal antibody. Results From the 83 women who completed the study, a total of 166 FNA biopsies were obtained, and 118 of these aspirates (71%) were evaluable for MIB-1 content. Women with assessable biopsies were younger, had a lower body mass index, and had higher levels of sex hormone binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor-I than women in whom the cell yield was insufficient. During treatment with E2/NETA, there was an increase in proliferation (percentage of MIB-1) from a mean value of 2.2 to 6.4% after 6 months (p < 0.01). No significant changes were recorded during treatment with tibolone or placebo. There was a negative association between proliferation and serum levels of total (rs = −0.29, p < 0.05) and free (rs = −0.31, p < 0.03) testosterone. Conclusions Tibolone seems to have little influence on breast cell proliferation.