Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Wendy Onstenk is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Wendy Onstenk.


Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2015

Improved Circulating Tumor Cell Detection by a Combined EpCAM and MCAM CellSearch Enrichment Approach in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Wendy Onstenk; Jaco Kraan; Bianca Mostert; Mieke M. Timmermans; Ayoub Charehbili; Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit; Judith R. Kroep; Johan W.R. Nortier; Saskia van de Ven; Joan B. Heijns; Lw Kessels; Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven; Monique M.E.M. Bos; Cornelis J. H. van de Velde; Jan W. Gratama; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; John W. M. Martens; John A. Foekens; Stefan Sleijfer

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are detected by the CellSearch System in 20% to 25% of patients with primary breast cancer (pBC). To improve CTC detection, we investigated melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) as enrichment marker next to epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and tested the clinical relevance of MCAM-positive CTCs in patients with HER2-negative stage II/III pBC starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the NEOZOTAC trial. Using the CellSearch System, EpCAM-positive and MCAM-positive CTCs were separately enriched from 7.5 mL blood, at baseline and after the first NAC cycle. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) were measured using flow cytometry. Primary objective was to improve the CTC detection rate to ≥40% combining EpCAM/MCAM. Correlations of CTC and CEC counts and pathologic complete response (pCR) were also explored. At baseline, we detected EpCAM-positive and MCAM-positive CTCs in 12 of 68 (18%) and 8 of 68 (12%) patients, respectively. After one cycle, this was 7 of 44 (16%) and 7 of 44 (16%) patients, respectively. The detection rate improved from 18% at baseline and 16% after one cycle with EpCAM to 25% (P = 0.08) and 30% (P = 0.02), respectively, with EpCAM/MCAM. No patients with MCAM-positive CTCs versus 23% of patients without MCAM-positive CTCs at baseline achieved pCR (P = 0.13). EpCAM-positive CTCs and CEC counts were not correlated to pCR. Combined EpCAM/MCAM CellSearch enrichment thus increased the CTC detection rate in stage II/III pBC. We found no associations of CTC and CEC counts with pCR to NAC. The clinical relevance of MCAM-positive CTCs deserves further study. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(3); 821–7. ©2014 AACR.


Cancer Letters | 2015

Circulating tumour cells and lung microvascular tumour cell retention in patients with metastatic breast and cervical cancer

Dieter Peeters; Anja Brouwer; Gert G. Van den Eynden; Annemie Rutten; Wendy Onstenk; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Steven Van Laere; P. Huget; Patrick Pauwels; Marc Peeters; Peter B. Vermeulen; Luc Dirix

We have shown that in up to half of the patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), higher numbers of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are present in the central venous blood (CVB) compared to the peripheral venous blood (PVB), suggesting that the lungs might retain a substantial number of CTCs. Here we report the presence of tumour cell emboli (TCE) in the microvasculature of the lungs in three out of eight patients with MBC and one patient with metastatic cervical carcinoma who had markedly elevated numbers of CTCs in the blood. All these patients suffered from symptomatic dyspnoea not easily attributable to other causes. No TCE were observed in five patients with MBC and elevated CTC counts and three patients with MBC who had low CTC counts (<5/7.5 ml). To investigate whether CTCs derived from CVB or PVB exhibit different transcriptional characteristics that might explain selective CTC retention, paired CTC samples from CVB and PVB of 12 patients with advanced breast cancer were subjected to gene expression analysis of 105 genes. No significant differences in CTC gene expression were observed. Together, these data suggest that potentially clinically relevant CTC retention in the microvasculature of the lung can occur in a subset of patients with advanced metastatic breast and cervical cancer, which seems to be transcriptionally non-selectively.


Cancer Treatment Reviews | 2016

The use of circulating tumor cells in guiding treatment decisions for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Wendy Onstenk; Willemijn de Klaver; Ronald de Wit; Martijn P. Lolkema; John A. Foekens; Stefan Sleijfer

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has drastically changed over the past decade with the advent of several new anti-tumor agents. Oncologists increasingly face dilemmas concerning the best treatment sequence for individual patients since most of the novel compounds have been investigated and subsequently positioned either pre- or post-docetaxel. A currently unmet need exists for biomarkers able to guide treatment decisions and to capture treatment resistance at an early stage thereby allowing for an early change to an alternative strategy. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have in this context intensively been investigated over the last years. The CTC count, as determined by the CellSearch System (Janssen Diagnostics LLC, Raritan, NJ), is a strong, independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with mCRPC at various time points during treatment and, as an early response marker, outperforms traditional response evaluations using serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, scintigraphy as well as radiography. The focus of research is now shifting toward the predictive value of CTCs and the use of the characterization of CTCs to guide the selection of treatments with the highest chance of success for individual patients. Recently, the presence of the androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) has been shown to be a promising predictive factor. In this review, we have explored the clinical value of the enumeration and characterization of CTCs for the treatment of mCRPC and have put the results obtained from recent studies investigating the prognostic and predictive value of CTCs into clinical perspective.


Neoplasia | 2016

Prognostic Impact of HER2 and ER Status of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with a HER2-Negative Primary Tumor

Nick Beije; Wendy Onstenk; Jaco Kraan; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Paul Hamberg; Luc Dirix; Anja Brouwer; Felix E. de Jongh; Agnes Jager; Caroline M. Seynaeve; Ngoc M. Van; John A. Foekens; John W. M. Martens; Stefan Sleijfer

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical studies have reported that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression yields resistance to endocrine therapies. Here the prevalence and prognostic impact of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were investigated retrospectively in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with a HER2-negative primary tumor receiving endocrine therapy. Additionally, the prevalence and prognostic significance of HER2-positive CTCs were explored in a chemotherapy cohort, as well as the prognostic impact of the estrogen receptor (ER) CTC status in both cohorts. METHODS: Included were MBC patients with a HER2-negative primary tumor, with ≥1 detectable CTC, starting a new line of treatment. CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch system, characterized for HER2 with the CellSearch anti-HER2 phenotyping reagent, and characterized for ER mRNA expression. Primary end point was progression-free rate after 6 months (PFR6months) of endocrine treatment in HER2-positive versus HER2-negative CTC patients. RESULTS: HER2-positive CTCs were present in 29% of all patients. In the endocrine cohort (n = 72), the PFR6months was 53% for HER2-positive versus 68% for HER2-negative CTC patients (P = .23). In the chemotherapy cohort (n = 82), no prognostic value of HER2-positive CTCs on PFR6months was observed either. Discordances in ER status between the primary tumor and CTCs occurred in 25% of all patients but had no prognostic value in exploratory survival analyses. CONCLUSION: Discordances regarding HER2 status and ER status between CTCs and the primary tumor occurred frequently but had no prognostic impact in our MBC patient cohorts.


Oncotarget | 2018

Circulating tumor cells, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles and plasma cytokeratins in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

Afroditi Nanou; F.A.W. Coumans; Guus van Dalum; Leonie L. Zeune; David Dolling; Wendy Onstenk; Mateus Crespo; Mariane Sousa Fontes; Pasquale Rescigno; Gemma Fowler; Penny Flohr; Christoph Brune; Stefan Sleijfer; Johann S. de Bono; Leon W.M.M. Terstappen

Purpose The presence of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients is associated with poor prognosis. In this study, we evaluated the association of clinical outcome in 129 CRPC patients with CTCs, tumor-derived Extracellular Vesicles (tdEVs) and plasma levels of total (CK18) and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 (ccCK18). Experimental Design CTCs and tdEVs were isolated with the CellSearch system and automatically enumerated. Cut-off values dichotomizing patients into favorable and unfavorable groups of overall survival were set on a retrospective data set of 84 patients and validated on a prospective data set of 45 patients. Plasma levels of CK18 and ccCK18 were assessed by ELISAs. Results CTCs, tdEVs and both cytokeratin plasma levels were significantly increased in CRPC patients compared to healthy donors (HDs). All biomarkers except for ccCK18 were prognostic showing a decreased median overall survival for the unfavorable groups of 9.2 vs 21.1, 8.1 vs 23.0 and 10.0 vs 21.5 months respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, tdEVs remained significant. Conclusions Automated CTC and tdEV enumeration allows fast and reliable scoring eliminating inter- and intra- operator variability. tdEVs provide similar prognostic information to CTC counts.


Molecular Oncology | 2018

Estrogen receptor mutations and splice variants determined in liquid biopsies from metastatic breast cancer patients

Nick Beije; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Jaco Kraan; Ngoc M. Van; Wendy Onstenk; Silvia Rita Vitale; Michelle van der Vlugt‐Daane; Luc Dirix; Anja Brouwer; Paul Hamberg; Felix E. de Jongh; Agnes Jager; Caroline M. Seynaeve; Maurice P.H.M. Jansen; John A. Foekens; John W. M. Martens; Stefan Sleijfer

Mutations and splice variants in the estrogen receptor (ER) gene, ESR1, may yield endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. These putative endocrine resistance markers are likely to emerge during treatment, and therefore, its detection in liquid biopsies, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell‐free DNA (cfDNA), is of great interest. This research aimed to determine whether ESR1 mutations and splice variants occur more frequently in CTCs of MBC patients progressing on endocrine treatment. In addition, the presence of ESR1 mutations was evaluated in matched cfDNA and compared to CTCs. CellSearch‐enriched CTC fractions (≥5/7.5 mL) of two MBC cohorts were evaluated, namely (a) patients starting first‐line endocrine therapy (n = 43, baseline cohort) and (b) patients progressing on any line of endocrine therapy (n = 40, progressing cohort). ESR1 hotspot mutations (D538G and Y537S/N/C) were evaluated in CTC‐enriched DNA using digital PCR and compared with matched cfDNA (n = 18 baseline cohort; n = 26 progressing cohort). Expression of ESR1 full‐length and 4 of its splice variants (∆5, ∆7, 36 kDa, and 46 kDa) was evaluated in CTC‐enriched mRNA. It was observed that in the CTCs, the ESR1 mutations were not enriched in the progressing cohort (8%), when compared with the baseline cohort (5%) (P = 0.66). In the cfDNA, however, ESR1 mutations were more prevalent in the progressing cohort (42%) than in the baseline cohort (11%) (P = 0.04). Three of the same mutations were observed in both CTCs and cfDNA, 1 mutation in CTCs only, and 11 in cfDNA only. Only the ∆5 ESR1 splice variant was CTC‐specific expressed, but was not enriched in the progressing cohort. In conclusion, sensitivity for detecting ESR1 mutations in CTC‐enriched fractions was lower than for cfDNA. ESR1 mutations detected in cfDNA, rarely present at the start of first‐line endocrine therapy, were enriched at progression, strongly suggesting a role in conferring endocrine resistance in MBC.


bioRxiv | 2018

Pan-cancer whole genome analyses of metastatic solid tumors

Peter Priestley; Jonathan Baber; Martijn P. Lolkema; Neeltje Steeghs; Ewart de Bruijn; Korneel Duyvesteyn; Susan Haidari; Arne van Hoeck; Wendy Onstenk; Paul Roepman; Charles Shale; Mircea Voda; Haiko J. Bloemendal; Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen; Carla M.L. van Herpen; Mariette Labots; Petronella O. Witteveen; Egbert F. Smit; Stefan Sleijfer; Emile E. Voest; Edwin Cuppen

Metastatic cancer is one of the major causes of death and is associated with poor treatment efficiency. A better understanding of the characteristics of late stage cancer is required to help tailor personalised treatment, reduce overtreatment and improve outcomes. Here we describe the largest pan-cancer study of metastatic solid tumor genomes, including 2,520 whole genome-sequenced tumor-normal pairs, analyzed at a median depth of 106x and 38x respectively, and surveying over 70 million somatic variants. Metastatic lesions were found to be very diverse, with mutation characteristics reflecting those of the primary tumor types, although with high rates of whole genome duplication events (56%). Metastatic lesions are relatively homogeneous with the vast majority (96%) of driver mutations being clonal and up to 80% of tumor suppressor genes bi-allelically inactivated through different mutational mechanisms. For 62% of all patients, genetic variants that may be associated with outcome of approved or experimental therapies were detected. These actionable events were distributed across various mutation types underlining the importance of comprehensive genomic tumor profiling for cancer precision medicine.


BMC Cancer | 2016

An 8-gene mRNA expression profile in circulating tumor cells predicts response to aromatase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Esther A. Reijm; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Marcel Smid; Joan Bolt-de Vries; Bianca Mostert; Wendy Onstenk; Dieter Peeters; Luc Dirix; Caroline M. Seynaeve; Agnes Jager; Felix E. de Jongh; Paul Hamberg; Anne van Galen; Jaco Kraan; Maurice P.H.M. Jansen; Jan W. Gratama; John A. Foekens; John W. M. Martens; Els M. J. J. Berns; Stefan Sleijfer


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018

Androgen receptor expression in circulating tumor cells of metastatic breast cancer patients.

Ingeborg de Kruijff; Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Wendy Onstenk; Agnes Jager; Paul Hamberg; Felix E. de Jongh; Marcel Smid; Mieke Timmermans; John W. M. Martens; Stefan Sleijfer


Cancer Research | 2018

Abstract 2617: A multicenter project to test the validity and logistics surrounding the testing ofAR-V7mRNA expression in circulating tumor cells

Anieta M. Sieuwerts; Bianca Mostert; Michelle van der Vlugt-Daane; Jaco Kraan; Corine M. Beaufort; Mai Van; Wendy J.C. Prager; Bram De Laere; Nick Beije; Paul Hamberg; Hans M. Westgeest; Metin Tascilar; Luc Dirix; Wendy Onstenk; Ronald de Wit; Martijn P. Lolkema; Ron H.J. Mathijssen; John W.M. Martens; Stefan Sleijfer

Collaboration


Dive into the Wendy Onstenk's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Sleijfer

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anieta M. Sieuwerts

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaco Kraan

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Foekens

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Hamberg

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Agnes Jager

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bianca Mostert

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Felix E. de Jongh

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. M. Martens

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luc Dirix

University of Antwerp

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge