William A. Gray

Percutaneous Mitral Repair With the MitraClip System : Safety and Midterm Durability in the Initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) Cohort

OBJECTIVES We undertook a prospective multicenter single-arm study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the MitraClip system (Evalve Inc., Menlo Park, California). BACKGROUND Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation (MR) has been performed by the use of a surgically created double orifice. Percutaneous repair based on this surgical approach has been developed by use of the Evalve MitraClip device to secure the mitral leaflets. METHODS Patients with 3 to 4+ MR were selected in accordance with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for intervention and a core echocardiographic laboratory. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were treated. Ten (9%) had a major adverse event, including 1 nonprocedural death. Freedom from clip embolization was 100%. Partial clip detachment occurred in 10 (9%) patients. Overall, 79 of 107 (74%) patients achieved acute procedural success, and 51 (64%) were discharged with MR of < or =1+. Thirty-two patients (30%) had mitral valve surgery during the 3.2 years after clip procedures. When repair was planned, 84% (21 of 25) were successful. Thus, surgical options were preserved. A total of 50 of 76 (66%) successfully treated patients were free from death, mitral valve surgery, or MR >2+ at 12 months (primary efficacy end point). Kaplan-Meier freedom from death was 95.9%, 94.0%, and 90.1%, and Kaplan-Meier freedom from surgery was 88.5%, 83.2%, and 76.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The 23 patients with functional MR had similar acute results and durability. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous repair with the MitraClip system can be accomplished with low rates of morbidity and mortality and with acute MR reduction to < 2+ in the majority of patients, and with sustained freedom from death, surgery, or recurrent MR in a substantial proportion (EVEREST I; NCT00209339. EVEREST II; NCT00209274).

The CAPTURE registry: Results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting

Background: Pivotal study data examining carotid stenting with embolic protection as a less invasive alternative to endarterectomy for high surgical risk patients have been acquired under controlled conditions with highly selected physicians and hospitals. This report examines outcomes of carotid stenting post‐approval after diffusion of this technology to a broader cross‐section of physicians and hospitals. Methods: The Carotid Acculink/Accunet Post‐Approval Trial to Uncover Unanticipated or Rare Events (CAPTURE) is a prospective, multi‐center registry to assess two important aspects of the post‐IDE experience: the safety of carotid stenting by physicians with varying levels of experience as a measure of the adequacy of physician training, and the identification of rare/unexpected device‐related complications. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days post‐procedure. Results: 3,500 patients were enrolled by 353 physicians at 144 sites. The 30‐day primary endpoint event rate was 6.3% (95% CI: 5.5–7.1%) and did not differ among the three operator experience levels (5.3%, 6.0%, and 7.4%; P = 0.31) from most to least experienced, respectively. There were no differences in outcomes among physician specialties when adjusted for case mix. There were no unanticipated device related adverse events. Conclusions: The results of the CAPTURE study compare favorably to those achieved in the predicate pivotal investigations, and suggest that the post‐approval transfer of this new therapy to the community practice setting via carotid stent training programs is effective in preparing physicians with varying experience levels and specialty training backgrounds.

The CAPTURE registry: Predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting

The use of carotid artery stenting with embolic protection has been practiced for over a decade in the United States, and increasingly so since carotid stenting received FDA approval in 2004. While there have been attempts at establishing predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting, they have generally been limited to single center experiences and/or multicenter retrospective surveys. This report examines predictors of outcomes in carotid stenting in the earliest and largest prospective multicenter neurologist‐adjudicated experience in the United States post device approval.

Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation: 5-Year Results of EVEREST II.

BACKGROUND In EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study), treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) with a novel percutaneous device showed superior safety compared with surgery, but less effective reduction in MR at 1 year. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the final 5-year clinical outcomes and durability of percutaneous mitral valve (MV) repair with the MitraClip device compared with conventional MV surgery. METHODS Patients with grade 3+ or 4+ MR were randomly assigned to percutaneous repair with the device or conventional MV surgery in a 2:1 ratio (178:80). Patients prospectively consented to 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS At 5 years, the rate of the composite endpoint of freedom from death, surgery, or 3+ or 4+ MR in the as-treated population was 44.2% versus 64.3% in the percutaneous repair and surgical groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The difference was driven by increased rates of 3+ to 4+ MR (12.3% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.02) and surgery (27.9% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.003) with percutaneous repair. After percutaneous repair, 78% of surgeries occurred within the first 6 months. Beyond 6 months, rates of surgery and moderate-to-severe MR were comparable between groups. Five-year mortality rates were 20.8% and 26.8% (p = 0.4) for percutaneous repair and surgery, respectively. In multivariable analysis, treatment strategy was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with percutaneous repair more commonly required surgery for residual MR during the first year after treatment, but between 1- and 5-year follow-up, comparably low rates of surgery for MV dysfunction with either percutaneous or surgical therapy endorse the durability of MR reduction with both repair techniques. (EVEREST II Pivotal Study High Risk Registry; NCT00209274).

Improved Functional Status and Quality of Life in Prohibitive Surgical Risk Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND Surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) remains the gold standard for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). However, the results with transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) in prohibitive-risk DMR patients have not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe DMR at prohibitive surgical risk undergoing TMVR. METHODS A prohibitive-risk DMR cohort was identified by a multidisciplinary heart team that retrospectively evaluated high-risk DMR patients enrolled in the EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study) II studies. RESULTS A total of 141 high-risk DMR patients were consecutively enrolled; 127 of these patients were retrospectively identified as meeting the definition of prohibitive risk and had 1-year follow-up (median: 1.47 years) available. Patients were elderly (mean age: 82.4 years), severely symptomatic (87% New York Heart Association class III/IV), and at prohibitive surgical risk (STS score: 13.2 ± 7.3%). TMVR (MitraClip) was successfully performed in 95.3%; hospital stay was 2.9 ± 3.1 days. Major adverse events at 30 days included death in 6.3%, myocardial infarction in 0.8%, and stroke in 2.4%. Through 1 year, there were a total of 30 deaths (23.6%), with no survival difference between patients discharged with MR ≤1+ or MR 2+. At 1 year, the majority of surviving patients (82.9%) remained MR ≤2+ at 1 year, and 86.9% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased (from 125.1 ± 40.1 ml to 108.5 ± 37.9 ml; p < 0.0001 [n = 69 survivors with paired data]). SF-36 quality-of-life scores improved and hospitalizations for heart failure were reduced in patients whose MR was reduced. CONCLUSIONS TMVR in prohibitive surgical risk patients is associated with safety and good clinical outcomes, including decreases in rehospitalization, functional improvements, and favorable ventricular remodeling, at 1 year. (Real World Expanded Multi-center Study of the MitraClip System [REALISM]; NCT01931956).

Fibromuscular Dysplasia: State of the Science and Critical Unanswered Questions A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is nonatherosclerotic, noninflammatory vascular disease that may result in arterial stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm, or dissection.1–3 The cause of FMD and its prevalence in the general population are not known.4 FMD has been reported in virtually every arterial bed but most commonly affects the renal and extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries (in ≈65% of cases).5 The clinical manifestations of FMD are determined primarily by the vessels that are involved. When the renal artery is involved, the most frequent finding is hypertension, whereas carotid or vertebral artery FMD may lead to dizziness, pulsatile tinnitus, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or stroke. There is an average delay from the time of the first symptom or sign to diagnosis of FMD of 4 to 9 years.5,6 This is likely because of a multitude of factors: the perception that this is a rare disease and thus FMD is not considered in the differential diagnosis, the reality that FMD is poorly understood by many healthcare providers, and the fact that many of the signs and symptoms of FMD are nonspecific, thus leading the clinician down the wrong diagnostic pathway. A delay in diagnosis can lead to impaired quality of life and poor outcomes such as poorly controlled hypertension and its sequelae, TIA, stroke, dissection, or aneurysm rupture. It should also be noted that FMD may be discovered incidentally while imaging is performed for other reasons or when a bruit is heard in the neck or abdomen in an asymptomatic patient without the classic risk factors for atherosclerosis. The first description of FMD is attributed to Leadbetter and Burkland7 in a 5½-year-old boy with severe hypertension and a renal artery partially occluded by an intra-arterial mass of smooth muscle. He underwent a unilateral nephrectomy of an …

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: Credentialing of Interventionalists and Final Results of Lead-in Phase

The success of carotid artery stenting in preventing stroke requires a low risk of periprocedural stroke and death. A comprehensive training and credentialing process was prerequisite to the randomized Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) to assemble a competent team of interventionalists with low periprocedural event rates. Interventionalists submitted cases to a multidisciplinary Interventional Management Committee. This committee evaluated 427 applicants. Of these, 238 (56%) were selected to participate in the training program and the lead-in phase, 73 (17%) who had clinical registry experience and satisfactory results with the devices used in CREST were exempt from training and were approved for the randomized phase, and 116 (27%) did not qualify for training. At 30 days in the lead-in study, stroke, myocardial infarction, or death occurred in 6.1% of symptomatic subjects and 4.8% of asymptomatic subjects. Stroke or death occurred in 5.8% of symptomatic subjects and 3.8% of asymptomatic subjects. Outcomes were better for younger subjects and varied by operator training. Based on experience, training, and lead-in results, the Interventional Management Committee selected 224 interventionalists to participate in the randomized phase of CREST. We believe that the credentialing and training of interventionalists participating in CREST have been the most rigorous reported to date for any randomized trial evaluating endovascular treatments. The study identified competent operators, which ensured that the randomized trial results fairly contrasted outcomes between endarterectomy and stenting.

Drug-Coated Balloons for the Prevention of Vascular Restenosis

From early in the history of percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, restenosis has been one of the most important clinical and biological measures of success, and a great deal of effort has been put into understanding the mechanisms responsible.1,2 Restenosis is the result of the interaction of a variety of mechanical and biological processes that begin immediately after balloon injury, including early vessel recoil,3,4 negative vascular remodeling,5 and excessive neointimal proliferation.5–7 The most important limitations of balloon angioplasty, abrupt vessel closure resulting from elastic recoil and occlusive plaque dissection, were effectively solved by the introduction of balloon-expandable stents.8 However, in-stent restenosis (ISR), the result of the initial injury and the vascular response to the implanted metallic prosthesis leading to excessive neointimal proliferation, remained as the most important cause of failure of these devices.9,10 Drug-eluting stents (DES) effectively reduced ISR by addressing the biological mechanisms of neointimal proliferation and have become the mainstay of the interventional treatment of coronary atherosclerotic disease.11 However, the demonstrated efficacy of DES is balanced by the small but unpredictable risk of very late stent thrombosis thought to be due to delayed vascular healing resulting from either the initial antiproliferative effect (and associated late acquired incomplete stent apposition) or a hypersensitivity reaction to the drug, polymer coating, or their combination.12,13 Moreover, beyond the coronary vasculature, there has been a paucity of effective therapies to manage restenosis after intervention. In recent years, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a therapeutic alternative in the interventional field.14 With this technology, short-term transfer of antiproliferative drugs to the arterial wall is achieved without the requirement of an implanted drug delivery system, thus potentially reducing the untoward effects associated with polymer-based stent technologies. In small clinical randomized trials, paclitaxel-coated balloons have been shown to be …

Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study.

Purpose: To present the results of a multicenter registry established to collect data on carotid stent procedures in patients with restenosis following carotid endarterectomy. Methods: The procedural details, outcomes, and late follow-up results were collected from 14 centers in the United States. Thirty-day and late stroke and death rates were analyzed. Results: Three hundred and thirty-eight patients (201 men; 71 ± 8 years) underwent carotid stenting in 358 arteries. The average duration from carotid endarterectomy was 5.5 ± 7.3 years. Sixty-one percent of the patients were asymptomatic. The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 3.7%. The minor stroke rate was 1.7% (6/358), and the major nonfatal stroke rate was 0.8% (3/358). The fatal stroke rate was 0.3% (1/358), and the nonstroke-related death rate was 0.9% (3/338). There was 1 (0.3%) fatal and 1 (0.3%) nonfatal stroke during the follow-up period. The overall 3-year rate of freedom from all fatal and nonfatal strokes was 96% ± 1% (±SE). Conclusions: Carotid artery stenting can be performed in patients with restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with 30-day complication rates comparable to those of most published studies on repeat carotid endarterectomy. Results of late follow-up suggest that this technique is durable and efficacious.

Power M‐Mode Transcranial Doppler for Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale and Assessing Transcatheter Closure

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) can benefit from a less invasive diagnostic method than transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Thirty-three gate power m-mode transcranial Doppler (pmTCD) was evaluated for its accuracy in diagnosis of PFO and utility in evaluating residual intracardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) following transcatheter closure. METHODS The sensitivity of pmTCD and single-gate TCD (sgTCD) to detect contrast bubble emboli through RLS was compared during transcatheter PFO closure. During 100 preclosure diagnostic evaluations and in 81 postclosure assessments, embolic tracks on pmTCD were counted following intravenous contrast injections and were graded using a 6-level logarithmic scale. The accuracy of TEE and pmTCD was separately compared to PFO anatomical findings during transcatheter closures. RESULTS There were significantly more microemboli detectable on pmTCD (322 +/- 166; 95% confidence interval [CI], 388-257) than on sgTCD (186 +/- 109; 95% CI, 229-143; P < .001). McNemar change tests suggest that the diagnostic capabilities of pmTCD and TEE for detecting PFO are comparable and correspond to the anatomical findings determined during cardiac catheterization (P = .69 and .45, respectively). During 6-month postclosure evaluation (mean = 185 days), 66% of the patients demonstrated successful closure without significant RLS (ie, grades 0, I, or II), and 34% were found to have incomplete closure with significant RLS (ie, grades III, IV, or V). CONCLUSIONS pmTCD provides greater sensitivity to contrast bubble emboli than does sgTCD. Among candidates for transcatheter closure, pmTCD provides an improved noninvasive method for diagnosing PFO and evaluating transcatheter closure.