Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where William A. Lakel is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by William A. Lakel.


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2012

Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont

B.C. Sawyers; M.C. Bolding; W.M. Aust; William A. Lakel

Soil erosion is influenced by factors such as soil properties, slope, ground cover, climatic conditions, and forest management activities, including skid trails. Skid trails typically represent 2% to 10% of a timber harvests area; therefore, the potential to negatively affect site productivity and water quality as a result of harvesting is of concern. Soil erosion can reduce site nutrient reserves and increase sedimentation of nearby streams. Forestry best management practices (BMPs) are designed to provide effective techniques for maintaining environmental stability. Although BMPs are widely implemented, few data exist regarding the efficacy and costs of different BMP options for skid trail closure. The study objectives were to evaluate erosion control effectiveness and implementation costs of five overland skid trail closure techniques. The closure techniques were (1) waterbar only (Control), (2) waterbar plus seed (Seed), (3) waterbar plus seed and mulch (Mulch), (4) waterbar plus hardwood slash (Hardwood), and (5) waterbar plus pine slash (Pine). Each treatment was installed following harvesting and replicated on four trails to provide twenty experimental erosion plots. Geotextile sediment traps (Dirtbags) were used to filter skid trail sediment. Accumulated sediments were weighed monthly for one year, and erosion rates were determined for each treatment. Two commonly used erosion models, Universal Soil Loss Equation as modified for forests (USLE-Forest) and Water Erosion Prediction Project for Forest Roads (WEPP-Roads), were also applied to each treatment. Sediment collected from traps indicated that the Mulch treatment was the most effective for reducing erosion (3.29 Mg ha−1 y−1 [1.47 tn ac−1 yr−1]), followed by Hardwood (5.08 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.27 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Pine (5.40 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.41 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Seed (13.57 Mg ha−1 y−1 [6.06 tn ac−1 yr−1]), and Control (24.24 Mg ha−1 y−1 [10.82 tn ac−1 yr−1]). Overall, WEPP-Roads estimates were more similar to measured erosion than USLE-Forest estimates, but both models generally agreed with actual erosion trends. The Seed treatment was the least expensive beyond waterbars alone, but it was only moderately effective at limiting erosion. Incorporating slash dispersal and compaction onto overland skid trails during harvesting activities may be the best option for reducing BMP costs and long term soil stability on disturbed soils associated with log skidding.


Forest Science | 2010

Sediment trapping by streamside management zones of various widths after forest harvest and site preparation

William A. Lakel; W.M. Aust; M. Aust; Chad Bolding; C. Dolloff; Patrick D. Keyser; Robert Feldt


Southern Journal of Applied Forestry | 2012

Comparison of Five Erosion Control Techniques for Bladed Skid Trails in Virginia

Charlie R. Wade; M. Chad Bolding; W.M. Aust; William A. Lakel


Southern Journal of Applied Forestry | 2013

Streamside Management Zones Affect Movement of Silvicultural Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers to Piedmont Streams

Joseph M. Secoges; W.M. Aust; John R. Seiler; C. Andrew Dolloff; William A. Lakel


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2006

Seeing the trees along the streamside

William A. Lakel; W. Michael Aust; C. Andrew Dolloff


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2006

Seeing the trees along the streamside Forested streamside management zones are one of the more commonly recommended forestry best management practices for the protection of water quality

William A. Lakel; W. Michael Aust; C. Andrew Dolloff


Journal of Forestry | 2016

Estimated Erosion, Ground Cover, and Best Management Practices Audit Details for Postharvest Evaluations of Biomass and Conventional Clearcut Harvests

Scott M. Barrett; W. Michael Aust; M. Chad Bolding; William A. Lakel; John F. Munsell


Water | 2016

Implementation of Forestry Best Management Practices on Biomass and Conventional Harvesting Operations in Virginia

Scott M. Barrett; W.M. Aust; M.C. Bolding; William A. Lakel; John F. Munsell


Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 400-401 | 2006

Soil erosion from harvested sites versus streamside management zone sediment deposition in the Piedmont of Virginia

William A. Lakel; W. Michael Aust; C. Andrew Dolloff; Amy W. Easterbrook


Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Shreveport, LA. February 16-18, 1999. | 1999

Slash Incorporation for Amelioration of Site, Soil and Hydrologic Properties on Pocosins and Wet Flats in North Carolina

William A. Lakel; W. Michael Aust; Emily A. Carter; Bryce J. Stokes; Felipe G. Sanchez

Collaboration


Dive into the William A. Lakel's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Andrew Dolloff

United States Forest Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge