William A. Wegener

Phase I/II Trial of Epratuzumab (Humanized Anti-CD22 Antibody) in Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

PURPOSE This single-center, dose-escalation study examines the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of epratuzumab (anti-CD22 humanized monoclonal antibody) in patients with recurrent indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had indolent NHL and recurrent disease after at least one chemotherapy regimen. Epratuzumab was administered intravenously at 120 to 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 to 60 minutes weekly for four treatments. RESULTS Fifty-five patients received epratuzumab and were assessable for safety; 51 patients were assessable for response. Patients were heavily pretreated (50% had at least four prior regimens) and 49% had bulky disease (> or = 5 cm). Epratuzumab was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicity. Circulating B cells transiently decreased without significant effects on T cells or immunoglobulin levels. More than 95% of infusions were completed in approximately 1 hour. Mean serum half-life was 23 days. Across all dose levels and histologies, nine patients (18%; 95% confidence interval, 8% to 31%) achieved objective response, including three complete responses (CRs). All responses were in patients with follicular NHL: 24% of these patients responded, including 43% in the 360 mg/m2 dose group and 27% in the 480 mg/m2 dose group. No responses were observed in other indolent histologies. Median duration of objective response was 79.3 weeks (range, 11.1 to 143.3 weeks), with median time to progression for responders of 86.6 weeks by Kaplan-Meier estimate. CONCLUSION Epratuzumab was well tolerated at up to 1,000 mg/m2/wk (for 4 weeks) and had clinical activity. One third of responding patients achieved CR. A 43% objective response rate in follicular NHL patients treated at 360 mg/m2/wk indicates that this dose should be explored in additional studies.

Epratuzumab, a Humanized Anti-CD22 Antibody, in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Phase I/II Clinical Trial Results

Purpose: We conducted a single-center, dose-escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of epratuzumab, an anti-CD22 humanized monoclonal antibody, in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Experimental Design: Epratuzumab was administered once weekly for 4 weeks at 120-1000-mg/m2 doses to 56 patients [most (n = 35) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]. Results: Patients were heavily pretreated (median, 4 prior therapies), 25% received prior high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant, and 84% had bulky disease (≥5 cm). Epratuzumab was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicity. Most (95%) infusions were completed within 1 h. The mean serum half-life was 23.9 days. Across all dose levels and histologies, objective responses (ORs) were observed in five patients (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3–21%), including three complete responses. In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 15% had ORs. Overall, 11 (20%) patients experienced some tumor mass reduction. Median duration of OR was 26.3 weeks, and median time to progression for responders was 35 weeks. Two responses are ongoing at ≥34 months, including one rituximab-refractory patient. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that epratuzumab has a good safety profile and exerts antitumor activity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma at doses of ≥240 mg/m2, thus warranting further evaluation in this clinical setting.

Epratuzumab (humanised anti-CD22 antibody) in primary Sjogren's syndrome: an open-label phase I/II study.

This open-label, phase I/II study investigated the safety and efficacy of epratuzumab, a humanised anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with active primary Sjögrens syndrome (pSS). Sixteen Caucasian patients (14 females/2 males, 33–72 years) were to receive 4 infusions of 360 mg/m2 epratuzumab once every 2 weeks, with 6 months of follow-up. A composite endpoint involving the Schirmer-I test, unstimulated whole salivary flow, fatigue, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) was devised to provide a clinically meaningful assessment of response, defined as a ≥20% improvement in at least two of the aforementioned parameters, with ≥20% reduction in ESR and/or IgG considered as a single combined criterion. Fourteen patients received all infusions without significant reactions, 1 patient received 3, and another was discontinued due to a mild acute reaction after receiving a partial infusion. Three patients showed moderately elevated levels of Human anti-human (epratuzumab) antibody not associated with clinical manifestations. B-cell levels had mean reductions of 54% and 39% at 6 and 18 weeks, respectively, but T-cell levels, immunoglobulins, and routine safety laboratory tests did not change significantly. Fifty-three percent achieved a clinical response (at ≥20% improvement level) at 6 weeks, with 53%, 47%, and 67% responding at 10, 18, and 32 weeks, respectively. Approximately 40%–50% responded at the ≥30% level, while 10%–45% responded at the ≥50% level for 10–32 weeks. Additionally, statistically significant improvements were observed in fatigue, and patient and physician global assessments. Further, we determined that pSS patients have a CD22 over-expression in their peripheral B cells, which was downregulated by epratuzumab for at least 12 weeks after the therapy. Thus, epratuzumab appears to be a promising therapy in active pSS, suggesting that further studies be conducted.

Chemoimmunotherapy Reinduction With Epratuzumab in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Marrow Relapse: A Children's Oncology Group Pilot Study

PURPOSE To determine the tolerability and serum concentration of epratuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD22, administered alone and in combination with reinduction chemotherapy in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and to preliminarily assess tumor targeting and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Therapy consisted of a single-agent phase (epratuzumab 360 mg/m(2)/dose intravenously twice weekly x four doses), followed by four weekly doses of epratuzumab in combination with standard reinduction chemotherapy. Morphologic and minimal residual disease (MRD) responses were determined at the end of this 6-week period. Serum concentrations of epratuzumab were determined before and 30 minutes after infusions, and CD22 targeting efficiency was determined by quantifying changes in CD22 expression after epratuzumab administration. RESULTS Fifteen patients (12 fully assessable for toxicity) with first or later CD22-positive ALL marrow relapse enrolled on the feasibility portion of this study from December 2005 to June 2006. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred: one grade 4 seizure of unclear etiology and one asymptomatic grade 3 ALT elevation. In all but one patient, surface CD22 was not detected by flow cytometry on peripheral blood leukemic blasts within 24 hours of drug administration, indicating effective targeting of leukemic cells by epratuzumab. Nine patients achieved a complete remission after chemoimmunotherapy, seven of whom were MRD negative. CONCLUSION Treatment with epratuzumab plus standard reinduction chemotherapy is feasible and acceptably tolerated in children with relapsed CD22-positive ALL. CD22 targeting was efficient, and the majority of patients achieved favorable early responses.

Combination antibody therapy with epratuzumab and rituximab in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE To explore the safety and therapeutic activity of combination anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody therapy in non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-three patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma received anti-CD22 epratuzumab 360 mg/m(2) and anti-CD20 rituximab 375 mg/m(2) monoclonal antibodies weekly for four doses each. Sixteen patients had indolent histologies (15 with follicular lymphoma) and seven had aggressive NHL (all diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]). Indolent patients had received a median of one (range, one to six) prior treatment, with 31% refractory to their last therapy and 81% with high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores. Patients with DLBCL had a median of three (range, one to eight) prior regimens (14% resistant to last treatment) and 71% had high intermediate-risk or high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. All patients were rituximab naïve. RESULTS Treatment was well tolerated, with toxicities principally infusion-related and predominantly grade 1 or 2. Ten (67%) patients with follicular NHL achieved an objective response (OR), including nine of 15 (60%) with complete responses (CRs and unconfirmed CRs). Four of six assessable patients (67%) with DLBCL achieved an OR, including three (50%) CRs. Median time to progression for all indolent NHL patients was 17.8 months. CONCLUSION The full-dose combination of epratuzumab with rituximab was well tolerated and had significant clinical activity in NHL, suggesting that this combination should be tested in comparison with single-agent treatment.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of Immunotherapy With the Humanized Anti-CD22 Antibody, Epratuzumab, in Combination With Rituximab, in Refractory or Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE A multicenter, single-arm study examining efficacy and toxicity of epratuzumab combined with rituximab was conducted in patients with recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkins lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-five patients were enrolled; 34 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), 15 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 16 patients with other lymphomas. The patients had received a median of two prior therapies (range, 1 to 4); 23% had received rituximab. Epratuzumab was given at 360 mg/m2 intravenously over 60 minutes followed by infusion of 375 mg/m2 rituximab, weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. RESULTS Combination therapy was well tolerated without greater toxicity than rituximab alone. The objective response (OR) rate was 47% (30 of 64) in assessable patients (46%; 30 of 65 in all patients), being highest in FL (64%; 21 of 33) and DLBCL (47%; seven of 15), and with 24% (eight of 33) and 33% (five of 15) achieving complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu) in these two groups, respectively. Two of six patients with marginal zone lymphoma responded to treatment (one CR). There was a trend for the response rates to be higher in patients with low prognostic index scores (statistically significant with respect to the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score in FL patients), with 12 FL patients and three DLBCL patients in groups 0 to 1 having OR (CR/CRu) rates of 83% (33%) and 100% (100%), respectively. The median duration of response was 16 months for FL, with five patients currently progression free for 18 months to 30 months, and 6 months for DLBCL, with two patients currently progression free for 12 months and 18 months. CONCLUSION Epratuzumab combined with rituximab was well tolerated, demonstrating promising antilymphoma activity that warrants additional study.

Phase II Trial of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy With 131I-Labetuzumab After Salvage Resection of Colorectal Metastases in the Liver: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Results

PURPOSE Although complete resection (R0) of liver metastases (LM) remains the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients amenable to curative therapy, only approximately one third survive for 5 years. The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) after salvage resection of LM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-three patients who underwent surgery for LM of CRC received a dose of 40 to 60 mCi/m2 of 131I-labetuzumab, which is a humanized monoclonal antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen. Safety (n = 23), disease-free survival (DFS; n = 19), and overall survival (OS; n = 19) were determined. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 64 months, the median OS time from the first liver resection for RAIT patients was 68.0 months (95% CI, 46.0 months to infinity), and the median DFS time was 18.0 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 31.0 months). The 5-year survival rate was 51.3%. RAIT benefited patients independently of bilobar involvement, size and number of LM, and resection margins. The major adverse effect was transient myelosuppression, resulting mostly in grade < or = 3 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION Because both the median OS and 5-year survival rates seem to be improved with adjuvant RAIT after complete LM resection in CRC, compared with historical and contemporaneous controls not receiving RAIT, these results justify further evaluation of this modality in a multicenter, randomized trial.

Durable complete responses from therapy with combined epratuzumab and rituximab: final results from an international multicenter, phase 2 study in recurrent, indolent, non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In this international, multicenter trial, the authors evaluated rituximab (anti‐CD20) plus epratuzumab (anti‐CD22) in patients with postchemotherapy relapsed/refractory, indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), including long‐term efficacy.

Dose-Fractionated Radioimmunotherapy in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using DOTA-Conjugated, 90Y-Radiolabeled, Humanized Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibody, Epratuzumab.

Purpose: Fractionated radioimmunotherapy may improve therapeutic outcome by decreasing heterogeneity of the dose delivered to the tumor and by decreasing hematologic toxicity, thereby allowing an increased amount of radionuclide to be administered. Because humanized anti-CD22 epratuzumab can be given repeatedly, a single-center study was conducted to establish the feasibility, safety, optimal dosing, and preliminary efficacy of weekly administrations of 90Y-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclodecane-N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid–conjugated epratuzumab. Experimental Design: Cohorts of three to six patients with B-cell lymphoma received 185 MBq/m2 [90Y]epratuzumab with unconjugated epratuzumab (total protein dose 1.5 mg/kg) once weekly for two to four infusions, with [111In]epratuzumab coadministered at first infusion for scintigraphic imaging and dosimetry. Results: Sixteen patients received treatment without significant infusional reactions. The overall objective response rate was 62% (95% confidence interval, 39-86%) in both indolent (75%) and aggressive disease (50%). Complete responses (CR/CRu) occurred in 25% of patients and were durable (event-free survival, 14-41 months). Two patients receiving four infusions had hematologic dose-limiting toxicity. Serum epratuzumab levels increased with each weekly dose. Of 13 patients with tumor cell CD22 expression determined by flow cytometry, seven of eight with strongly positive results had objective responses, versus one of five with negative or weakly positive results (P = 0.032). Conclusions: Radioimmunotherapy with weekly 185 MBq/m2 [90Y]epratuzumab achieved a high objective response rate (62%) across lymphoma subtypes, including durable CRs. The findings that three weekly infusions (555 MBq/m2, total dose) can be administered safely with only minor toxicity, that antibody levels increased during treatment weeks, and that therapeutic response predominantly occurs in patients with unequivocal CD22 tumor expression provide guidance for future studies.

Efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderate/severe flaring systemic lupus erythematosus: results from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies (ALLEVIATE) and follow-up

OBJECTIVE To evaluate epratuzumab treatment in patients with moderately-to-severely active SLE in two international, randomized, controlled trials (ALLEVIATE-1 and -2) and an open-label extension study (SL0006). METHODS Ninety ALLEVIATE patients (43% BILAG A, median BILAG score 12.0) received standard of care plus 10 total doses of placebo (n = 37) or 360 mg/m(2) (n = 42) or 720 mg/m(2) (n = 11) epratuzumab, administered across 12-week cycles for up to 48 weeks, with BILAG assessments every 4 weeks. Patients were followed for ≥ 6 months and their data combined for analysis. The primary endpoint was BILAG response at week 12 (all BILAG A scores reduced to B/C/D and B scores to C/D, no new A and <2 new B scores). Twenty-nine patients continued in SL0006, receiving 12-week cycles of 360 mg/m(2) epratuzumab; this interim analysis was performed at median 120 weeks (range 13-184) of exposure. RESULTS Both ALLEVIATE trials were discontinued prematurely because of interruption in drug supply. Exploratory pooled analyses found that responses at week 12 were 15/34 (44.1%) and 2/10 (20.0%) for epratuzumab 360 and 720 mg/m(2), respectively, vs 9/30 (30.0%) for placebo. Total BILAG scores were lower in both epratuzumab arms vs placebo at week 48 and at all but two time points. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. In SL0006, median total BILAG score was 8.0 (n = 29) at study entry and 7.0 (n = 19) at week 100, with no additional safety signals. CONCLUSION This initial efficacy and safety profile of epratuzumab supports its continued development for SLE treatment.