William B. Applegate

Instruments for the Functional Assessment of Older Patients

Structured assessment instruments are particularly useful in screening for problems that often go undetected in older patients. In addition, such instruments can provide information about conditions and abilities or limitations that are not regularly assessed in standard clinical practice. Often, their administration is delegated to other health professionals, but these tools still provide useful information to the physician. Clinicians should view assessment instruments as they would any other clinical test. They should be familiar with the strengths, weaknesses, and precision of any test used and understand how best to use the test as an adjunct to clinical practice. In addition, clinicians must learn to focus on functional status, in terms of both assessment and outcome, in their care of older patients.

A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital

We conducted a randomized trial in a community rehabilitation hospital to determine the effect of treatment in a geriatric assessment unit on the physical function, institutionalization rate, and mortality of elderly patients. Functionally impaired elderly patients (mean age, 78.8 years) who were recovering from acute medical or surgical illnesses and were considered at risk for nursing home placement were randomly assigned either to the geriatric assessment unit (n = 78) or to a control group that received usual care (n = 77). The two groups were similar at entry and were stratified according to the perceived risk of an immediate nursing home placement. After six months, the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit had significantly more functional improvement in three of eight basic self-care activities (P less than 0.05). Those in the lower-risk stratum had significantly more improvement in seven of eight self-care activities. Both six weeks and six months after randomization, significantly more patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit than controls (79 vs. 61 percent after six months) were residing in the community. During the year of follow-up, the control patients had more nursing home stays of six months or longer (10 vs. 3; P less than 0.05). However, there was no difference between the groups in the mean number of days spent in health care facilities (acute care hospital, nursing home, or rehabilitation hospital). Survival analysis showed a trend toward fewer deaths among the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit, and mortality was significantly reduced in the patients considered to be at lower risk of immediate nursing home placement (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the treatment of selected elderly patients in a specialized geriatric rehabilitation unit improves function, decreases the risk of nursing home placement, and may reduce mortality. The beneficial effects on mortality and function appear greatest for patients at a moderate rather than high risk of nursing home placement.

Prevention of heart failure by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

CONTEXT Heart failure is often preceded by isolated systolic hypertension, but the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment in preventing heart failure is not known. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive stepped-care treatment on the occurrence of heart failure in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. DESIGN Analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS A total of 4736 persons aged 60 years and older with systolic blood pressure between 160 and 219 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg who participated in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). INTERVENTION Stepped-care antihypertensive drug therapy, in which the step 1 drug is chlorthalidone (12.5-25 mg) or matching placebo, and the step 2 drug is atenolol (25-50 mg) or matching placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Fatal and nonfatal heart failure. RESULTS During an average of 4.5 years of follow-up, fatal or nonfatal heart failure occurred in 55 of 2365 patients randomized to active therapy and 105 of the 2371 patients randomized to placebo (relative risk [RR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.71; P<.001; number needed to treat to prevent 1 event [NNT], 48). Among patients with a history of or electrocardiographic evidence of prior myocardial infarction (MI), the RR was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.06-0.53; P=.002; NNT, 15). Older patients, men, and those with higher systolic blood pressure or a history of or electrocardiographic evidence of MI at baseline had higher risk of developing heart failure. CONCLUSION In older persons with isolated systolic hypertension, stepped-care treatment based on low-dose chlorthalidone exerted a strong protective effect in preventing heart failure. Among patients with prior MI, an 80% risk reduction was observed.

Heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study (HERS): Design, methods, and baseline characteristics

The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to test the efficacy and safety of estrogen plus progestin therapy for prevention of recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in women. The participants are postmenopausal women with a uterus and with CHD as evidenced by prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or other mechanical revascularization or at least 50% occlusion of a major coronary artery. Between February 1993 and September 1994, 20 HERS centers recruited and randomized 2763 women. Participants ranged in age from 44 to 79 years, with a mean age of 66.7 (SD 6.7) years. Most participants were white (89%), married (57%), and had completed high school or some college (80%). As expected, the prevalence of coronary risk factors was high: 62% were past or current smokers, 59% had hypertension, 90% had serum LDL-cholesterol of 100 mg/dL or higher, and 23% had diabetes. Each woman was randomly assigned to receive one tablet containing 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate daily or an identical placebo. Participants will be evaluated every 4 months for an average of 4.2 years for the occurrence of CHD events (CHD death and nonfatal myocardial infarction). We will also assess other major CHD endpoints, including revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina. The primary analysis will compare the rate of CHD events in women assigned to active treatment with the rate in those assigned to placebo. The trial was designed to have power greater than 90% to detect a 35% reduction in the incidence of CHD events, assuming a 50% lag in effect for 2 years and a 5% annual event rate in the placebo group. The design, analysis, and conduct of the study are controlled by the Steering Committee of Principal Investigators and coordinated at the University of California, San Francisco. HERS is the largest trial of any intervention to reduce the risk of recurrent CHD events in women with heart disease and is the first controlled trial to seek evidence of the efficacy and safety of postmenopausal hormone therapy to prevent recurrent CHD events.

Prevalence of postural hypotension at baseline in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program (SHEP) cohort

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence and correlates of postural hypotension (defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure of ≥20 mm Hg) in a cohort of elderly persons with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).

Effect of pharmacologic lipid lowering on health-related quality of life in older persons: results from the Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program (CRISP) Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of lovastatin therapy on health‐related quality of life in older persons.

Cholesterol lowering in the elderly. Results of the Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program (CRISP) pilot study.

BACKGROUND Total and lipoprotein cholesterol levels continue to be predictors of coronary heart disease risk in men and women over 65 years old. Cholesterol-lowering trials, however, while sometimes including such subjects, have not concentrated on this age group. The Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program was a five-center pilot study to assess feasibility of recruitment and efficacy of cholesterol lowering in this age group. METHODS The study was a randomized, double-masked clinical trial with placebo, 20-mg lovastatin, and 40-mg lovastatin arms. Major efforts were made to recruit women and minorities. Participants were followed up for 1 year on a cholesterol-lowering diet plus placebo or study drug. End points were changes in blood lipid levels. Data on other blood chemistry values, as well as quality-of-life measures and coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality, were also collected. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-one subjects with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 4.1 and less than 5.7 mmol/L (159 and 221 mg/dL) were randomized, of whom 71% were women and 21% were African Americans; the mean age was 71 years. In the 20- and 40-mg lovastatin groups, total cholesterol levels fell 17% and 20%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels fell 24% and 28%; triglyceride levels fell 4.4% and 9.9%, respectively. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels rose 7.0% and 9.0%, respectively. No changes were observed in the placebo group. Gender, race, and age did not significantly affect responses. Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality data were collected but not analyzed for this study. CONCLUSION Older subjects of both genders and a variety of racial and ethnic groups can be successfully recruited into a cholesterol-lowering trial. Lovastatin has effects similar to those reported in younger subjects in previous controlled trials. There is little advantage to the higher lovastatin daily dose. Side effects were remarkably low in all groups.

Trial of Nonpharmacologic Intervention in the Elderly (TONE): Design and rationale of a blood pressure control trial☆

National and international policy-making organizations advocate nonpharmacologic therapies to reduce blood pressure (BP). However, data to support such recommendations in older persons are virtually nonexistent. The Trials of Nonpharmacologic Intervention in the Elderly (TONE) is a randomized, controlled trial that will test whether weight loss or a reduced sodium (Na) intake or both can maintain satisfactory BP control, without unacceptable side effects, after withdrawal of antihypertensive drug therapy. Medication-treated hypertensives (aged 60 to 80 years) with a systolic BP less than 145 mm Hg and a diastolic BP less than 85 mm Hg who are taking one antihypertensive medication are randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) weight loss alone, (2) reduced Na intake alone, (3) combined weight loss and reduced Na intake, or (4) usual life-style (control group). Overweight participants are randomized to one of these four groups, while nonoverweight individuals are assigned to either the reduced Na intake or the usual life-style group. The interventions, tailored to the needs of older persons, use behavioral approaches to accomplish intervention-specific goals (weight loss > or = 10 lb, daily Na intake < or = 80 mEqa). Three months after the start of intervention, antihypertensive drug therapy is withdrawn. The primary trial end point is a BP of 150/90 mm Hg or higher, resumption of antihypertensive drug therapy, or the occurrence of a BP-related clinical complication during 2 to 3 years of follow-up. It is anticipated that TONE findings may identify an effective and acceptable nonpharmacologic approach to control hypertension in the increasingly large number of older persons treated with antihypertensive drug therapy.

Lack of blood pressure effect with calcium and magnesium supplementation in adults with high-normal blood pressure: Results from phase I of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP)

Phase I of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) was a randomized, multicenter investigation that included double-blind, placebo-controlled testing of calcium and magnesium supplementation among 698 healthy adults (10.5% blacks and 31% women) aged 30 to 54 years with high-normal diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (80 to 89 mm Hg). Very high compliance (94 to 96% by pill counts) with daily doses of 1 g of calcium (carbonate), 360 mg of magnesium (diglycine), or placebos was corroborated for the active supplements by significant net increases in all urine and serum compliance measures in white men and for urine compliance measures in white women. Overall, neither calcium nor magnesium produced significant changes in blood pressure at 3 and 6 months. Analyses stratified by baseline intakes of calcium, magnesium, sodium, or initial blood pressures also showed no effect of supplementation. These analyses suggested that calcium supplementation may have resulted in a DBP decrease in white women and that response modifiers in this subgroup might have included lower initial urinary calcium levels, urinary sodium levels, or lower body mass index. However, overall analyses indicated that calcium and magnesium supplements are unlikely to lower blood pressure in adults with high-normal DBP. The subgroup analyses, useful to formulate hypotheses, raise the possibility of a benefit to white women, which requires testing in future trials.

Career development in academic medicine

Clinical academic medicine desperately needs the continued infusion of talented young academicians, but many young faculty are not pursuing strategies that optimize their chances for academic survival. Many junior faculty are overburdened with clinical demands and do not have a well-focused research agenda. Such situations will hinder the full development of many talented young persons. In order to optimize chances for success, young faculty should clearly define their goals, carefully negotiate the terms of their employment, practice sound principles of time management, identify a mentor, and develop a focused research agenda.