William Byrnes

Development of lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset seizures

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) available in multiple formulations that was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures (POS) in adults. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing, and reduction in long‐term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide has a well‐characterized and favorable pharmacokinetic profile, including a fast absorption rate, minimal or no interaction with cytochrome P‐450 izoenzymes, and a low potential for drug–drug interactions. Lacosamide clinical development included three placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized trials conducted in more than 1300 patients, each demonstrating safety and efficacy of lacosamide compared to placebo as adjunctive therapy for adults with POS. The clinical use of lacosamide may broaden, pending results of trials evaluating its use as monotherapy for POS in adults, as treatment for epilepsy in pediatric subjects, and as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures in those with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Randomized double-blind comparison of cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine.

Differential effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is more commonly determined by tolerability than efficacy. Cognitive effects of AEDs can adversely affect tolerability and quality of life. This study evaluated cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide (LCM) compared with carbamazepine immediate-release (CBZ-IR). A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period crossover, fixed-dose study in healthy subjects compared neuropsychological and EEG effects of LCM (150mg, b.i.d.) and CBZ-IR (200mg, t.i.d.). Testing was conducted at screening, predrug baseline, the end of each treatment period (3-week titration; 3-week maintenance), and the end of each washout period (4weeks after treatment). A composite Z-score was derived for the primary outcome variable (computerized cognitive tests and traditional neuropsychological measures) and separately for the EEG measures. Other variables included individual computer, neuropsychological, and EEG scores and adverse events (AEs). Subjects included 60 healthy adults (57% female; mean age: 34.4years [SD: 10.5]); 44 completed both treatments; 41 were per protocol subjects. Carbamazepine immediate-release had worse scores compared with LCM for the primary composite neuropsychological outcome (mean difference=0.33 [SD: 1.36], p=0.011) and for the composite EEG score (mean difference=0.92 [SD: 1.77], p=0.003). Secondary analyses across the individual variables revealed that CBZ-IR was statistically worse than LCM on 36% (4/11) of the neuropsychological tests (computerized and noncomputerized) and 0% of the four EEG measures; none favored CBZ-IR. Drug-related AEs occurred more with CBZ-IR (49%) than LCM (22%). Lacosamide had fewer untoward neuropsychological and EEG effects and fewer AEs and AE-related discontinuations than CBZ-IR in healthy subjects. Lacosamide exhibits a favorable cognitive profile.

Assessment of the effects of lacosamide on sleep parameters in healthy subjects

PURPOSE Seizures and antiepileptic drugs (AED) may disrupt sleep patterns in patients with epilepsy, thus evaluation of lacosamide effects on objective and subjective sleep measures is warranted. METHODS A multicenter, interventional, open-label study (NCT01530386) was conducted in healthy subjects without confounding effects of concomitant AED use, co-morbidities, or disease state to determine whether lacosamide impacts sleep parameters after 22 days of lacosamide exposure. After overnight polysomnography (PSG) to assess baseline parameters, lacosamide was initiated at 100mg/day (50mg twice daily) and increased by 100mg/day weekly to 300 mg/day (the mid-range maintenance dose for adjunctive therapy). The primary variable was change from baseline to post-treatment in wake after sleep onset (WASO). Secondary variables included additional objective sleep measures, subject-reported measures of sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, and tolerability. Change from baseline in WASO was analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS A total of 27 subjects received ≥1 dose of lacosamide and 25 subjects completed the study. For WASO, median change from baseline was a 6-min reduction (95% confidence interval: -38, 77.5; p=0.1074) after lacosamide treatment; this was considered not clinically relevant. No clinically relevant changes were observed in any secondary variables. Thirteen subjects (48%) reported a treatment-emergent adverse event, none of which was severe or led to study discontinuation. CONCLUSION Lacosamide 300 mg/day had no effect on objective or subjective sleep parameters in healthy subjects and was generally well tolerated.

Long-term exposure and safety of lacosamide monotherapy for the treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures: Results from a multicenter, open-label trial.

To assess long‐term use and safety of lacosamide (LCM) ≤800 mg/day monotherapy in patients with partial‐onset seizures (POS) enrolled previously in a historical‐controlled, conversion‐to‐monotherapy study (SP902; NCT00520741).

Lacosamide and sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drug cross-titration against levetiracetam background therapy.

To assess prospectively the effectiveness of lacosamide (LCM) added to levetiracetam (LEV) after down‐titration of a concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB) among patients with focal epilepsy not adequately controlled on LEV and SCB.